a) AVERAGE - "equal share of loss (inception towards death) among different parties (life)... a jew suggests gentiles to equalize differences (equality through diversity) to establish an unequal share of loss among jew and gentiles.
b) To establish such unequal share; a jew suggests THE-ism to tempt consenting gentiles to authorize suggesting jew.
This establishes ones choice (many) under chosen one (few)...an uneven distribution of choice, ignoring that nature gives each one free will of choice.
c) A jew suggest pluralism (people) to tempt each singular (person) gentile to ignore self for others, and to ignore being BY (per) SOUND (sonos) and therefore WITHIN (in) SOUND (sanus).
Once again...suggested spell-craft "insane person" is utilized to tempt gentiles into reasoning against one another who is or isn't an insane person, which distracts both sides from drawing inspiration from perceivable implication (if/then) of being in sound (in sanus) and by sound (per sonos).
bunch of laws
Aka suggested pluralism (laws) distracting from perceivable singularity...L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...natural law sets each one apart from one another, and each one balances on land; breathes air and sustains self as solid (life) during fluid (inception towards death) of water.
Consenting to suggested bundles/bunches together aka binds free will of choice anew.
manipulating them into doing
a) Automatic (inception towards death) generates manual (life)...manipulation requires manual consent to manual suggestion, while ignoring perceivable automatic.
b) One cannot be manipulated by others...one wields the free will of choice to manually permit others to manipulate (to manage by mental influence aka government) ones consent with suggested information; which one willingly holds onto; follows along and submits self to.
c) DO (inception towards death) generates RE-DO (life), hence reacting partials being enabled to react to enacting whole.
a) AVERAGE - "equal share of loss (inception towards death) among different parties (life)... a jew suggests gentiles to equalize differences (equality through diversity) to establish an unequal share of loss among jew and gentiles.
b) To establish such unequal share; a jew suggests THE-ism to tempt consenting gentiles to authorize suggesting jew.
This establishes ones choice (many) under chosen one (few)...an uneven distribution of choice, ignoring that nature gives each one free will of choice.
c) A jew suggest pluralism (people) to tempt each singular (person) gentile to ignore self for others, and to ignore being BY (per) SOUND (sonos) and therefore WITHIN (in) SOUND (sanus).
Once again...suggested spell-craft "insane person" is utilized to tempt gentiles into reasoning against one another who is or isn't an insane person, which distracts both sides from drawing inspiration from perceivable implication (if/then) of being in sound (in sanus) and by sound (per sonos).
Aka suggested pluralism (laws) distracting from perceivable singularity...L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...natural law sets each one apart from one another, and each one balances on land; breathes air and sustains self as solid (life) during fluid (inception towards death) of water.
Consenting to suggested bundles/bunches together aka binds free will of choice anew.
a) Automatic (inception towards death) generates manual (life)...manipulation requires manual consent to manual suggestion, while ignoring perceivable automatic.
b) One cannot be manipulated by others...one wields the free will of choice to manually permit others to manipulate (to manage by mental influence aka government) ones consent with suggested information; which one willingly holds onto; follows along and submits self to.
c) DO (inception towards death) generates RE-DO (life), hence reacting partials being enabled to react to enacting whole.