Mein Kampf Excerpt
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
a) Base solution (inception towards death) issues ingredients (life)
b) Persistence aka PER (by forwards motion) SISTERE (come to stand, cause to stand still)...what if motion cannot stand still, since it inherent nature implies MOTION?
Even (balance) generates odds (choice)...odds ignoring even "makes it worse".
a) All perceivable WAS before one within can suggest one another what it IS.
b) Being one within all implies nation aka NATIVE within ACTION. What is native within action? Each ones reaction.
c) If ones FREE will of choice chooses to Ignore perception for suggestion, then that implies religion/religio - "to bind anew".
d) Ethnic/ethnos - "nation; people" aka singular native within plural collective.
a) What does singular (one) among plural (we) see from ones surrounding?
b) Notice that moving around while looking/locking onto something implies circling a center...that's the opposite of being center (ones perception) within circumference (all perceivable).
Aka ein st ein aka ONE SAINT ONE.
a) Same solution (inception towards death) generates different problems (life) through internal transmutation.
b) Suggesting creationism (out of nothing) distracts from everything perceivable if consented to.
c) CON (together; with) SCIOUS/SCIRE/SCIO (to know) tempts one to ignore that knowledge implies all perceivable set apart into each ones perception.
One doesn't have a con-sciousness...one is being conned by another ones suggestion to ignore perception (knowledge; scio).
a) What if getting many on a quest (question) to seek answers from others is how a jew tempt gentiles with suggested progressivism to seek desired outcomes?
b) What if each person (singular) among people (plural) already got all sound, hence being per sonos (by sound)? What if trying to get from one another tempts one to ignore self discernment?