God's Spirit breathed life into me
Aka God's (motion) Spirit (momentum) breathed life (matter) into me.
I live because He died
Not "died"...living (matter) within process (momentum) of dying (motion).
God cannot die. For each living Christ within...God implies dying. For each temporary matter; all ongoing motion implies extinction.
Only within extinction (inception towards death) can there be origination (life) aka only within loss can there be growth aka only within action can there be reactions aka only within order can there be chaos etc.
resurrected into new life
a) Suggested "new" tempts one to ignore perceivable "now".
b) For matter..."now" implies the perceivable momentum of ongoing motion, within which temporary matter continuously comes into (inception) and gets moved out of (death) being (life).
c) Resurrect aka re (response to) surgere (to rise) implies ones free will of choice as risen (life) during fall (inception towards death).
The trick underneath the "Resurrection of Christ" is to make it about another instead of each one coming into being by unction/anointing/messiah/mashah.
The Christ had to be nailed to the cross to distract from being (life) moved aCROSS (inception towards death). Coming into being implies the act of christening.
He takes me with Him.
He gives (inception) being within (life) while taking (death)...
a) Corruptible mortal (life) with-IN IN-corruptible IM-mortality (inception towards death).
b) Why does that which is set free (life) needs to cover itself from that which sets free (inception towards death)?
Why the clothes when one comes in naked and goes out naked?
Death, where is your victory?
The ongoing process of dying isn't on a conquest towards victory; it generates each life as a temporal hero's journey of valor.
VAL'OR, noun (Latin valor; valeo, to be strong, to be worth) - "strength of mind in regard to danger; that quality which enables a man to encounter danger with firmness"...seeking victory tempts one to spend valor.
Death, where is your sting?"
Life, does it sting if you ignore breathing; drinking and eating? Ignorance makes one stingy...
nowhere near an election
Elect implies being choice within balance; select implies choosing to ignore perceivable balance for suggested choices, which then imbalances self.
What could be nearer than ones choice and what could be farther than all to choose from?
they
a) Can you explain plural of energy? If THE energy, then what is THEY energy?
b) Plural/pluralis/pluris/plus - "more". How could there be more than ALL for each singular one within?
Could it be that one can be tempted to ignore all (perceivable) for more (suggested)?
-ist (scientist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (scientism). Those who suggest -isms gain remote control over those who consent to be -ists.
Few suggest; many consent to follow suggested...that implies remote aka response to (re) distant in place (mote). Perceivable inspiration moves through ones perception, while suggested information has to be taken remotely from the distance of another.
I don't think the church or Holy Spirit leave
a) Holy/whole for each partial within spirit/spiro - "to breathe".
b) Church/circe/kirika/keue - "to swell" aka swelling (inception) and waning (death) of each anointed one coming into life within.
c) Ones leave (life) of absence (inception towards death), while being carried into presence.
d) Choosing to take possession of oneself as "I" contradicts holy spirit, and doing nothing (don't) contradicts church...only within everything can each thing swell, and only while letting go can potential increase.
Jesus comes back
a) Christ (to anoint) implies each off-spring coming "back" from origin into being...Jesus (to save) tempts one to ignore that being (life) within origin (inception towards death) cannot be saved...only sustained temporarily before going "back" to origin.
In short...Jesus (to hold onto) contradicts Christ (to give away).
b) Save/salvus/sol - "whole"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/save#etymonline_v_22794
Opposite of save implies harm, hence coming to be within (life) harms way (inception towards death).
Still God
a) All moves; each one within is being (life) moved (inception towards death)
b) God/ghut/gheu - "to invoke" aka in (within) vox (voice)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/god#etymonline_v_9016 + https://www.etymonline.com/word/invoke#etymonline_v_12201
Edit: Notice god/gheu (phonetic goy)...
Only within all moving sound can each one invoke voice aka utter speech. Doing so to suggest anything to one another (invocare; to call upon) implies spell-craft.
is good
a) All perceivable WAS before one within can suggest what IS to another.
b) Suggesting IS implies a conflict of reason against ISN'T, which each addition to what it is then perpetuates into for example good vs bad.
vote for the next kabbalistic
Kabbalah/cabbala/qibbel - "to receive; admit; accept"...voting implies consenting to the suggested authority of another, hence accepting; admitting and receiving from a chosen one.
moral consensus" that the entire world has ever known
a) Knowledge implies perceivable...ones consent to suggested moralism establishes a conflict of reason (right vs wrong), which distracts one from perceivable knowledge.
b) World/vault implies a differentiation of outside (entire) and inside (partials).
the framework to create
a) Few suggest creationism to build a frame out of mass consensus.
b) FRAME, verb - "to unite several parts into an entire thing". In reality...entire (all perceivable) generates partials (each ones perception).
Few utilize suggestion to frame many together as to confine their minds (confinement) by entering and taming their minds (entertainment) as to control their minds (government).
already in place
All (perceivable) readies each ones (perception) place.
Sleight of hand: Ready (motion) Steady (momentum) Go (matter).
pep talk
PEP; noun "vigor, energy"...perceivable sound charges; while suggested words tempt an exchange. Exchanging tempts one to ignore recharging.
Talking neutralizes energetic charges.
convince someone confused
CONvince and CONfused implies "together"...someONE implies "apart" from one another.
the division trick
Few suggest unity as meaning "together", which divides consenting many against one other within conflicts of reason about the suggested.
Somewhere along the line
A portion (life) can only exist at center of line (inception towards death)...few suggest "some" to sum up many portions aka collectivism.
Manipulation of center within line implies for example midian line (geography) or maiden lane (banking) or memory loss (psychology) etc.
will be enough to motivate
Motivation (motion) implies foundation of being (matter)...will/want tempts one to ignore that. Few suggest "enough" (Heb. to rest; that which satisfies desire) to distract many from being (life) moved (inception towards death).
broken and not worth saving
What if moving value (inception towards death) breaking down (life) cannot be saved...only sustained temporarily?
messiah
Aka mashiah/mashah - "to anoint"...each off-spring coming into being through mother/matrix/materia/mater/matter implies an anointed one being christened.
sabotage
Aka employee (perception) sabotaging (suggested) work (perceivable). Consenting to suggested sabotage implies taking a rest aka a sabbath/shabath, which makes one a shabbos goy to another.
your religion
Latin religio - "to bind anew" implies being in bondage to another, hence it ain't yours.
Suggests that enlightenment is controlled and manipulated by those within.
a) Enlightenment aka mind (ment) within (en) light...that's perceivable.
b) Light directs rays apart from one another...suggested control aka rolled (roll) together (con) tempts one to ignore that.
c) Light moves...suggested manipulate aka man (hand) pele (to fill) tempts one to manually fill, while ignoring the auto-matic foundation of light.
Implies that agreeing to mainstream beliefs means submitting to control by others.
Agreeing or disagreeing + believing or disbelieving + submitting or denying implies ones consent to the suggestion of another.
Perceivable cannot be agreed or disagreed with, nor believed or disbelieved in; nor submitted or denied without ignoring that it moves through one...no matter how one (life) reacts to all (inception towards death).
Ignorance implies the path of least resistance aka the temptation for form (matter) within flow (motion) to go with the flow instead of resisting. Others exploit this by suggesting one to follow along (progressivism) the "main stream" .
Indicates an internal manipulation of enlightenment, casting doubt on true knowledge.
a) Being implies internal ray within external light. Manipulation thereof implies internal (perception) holding onto (suggested) while ignoring external (perceivable) moving through.
b) Ignoring perceivable for suggested establishes a conflict of reason (true vs false)...which light doesn't generate; but which can be shaped within shadows.
Within these conflicts of reason; both sides are suggesting enlightenment to each other in exchange for consent given aka for ignorance of perceivable, while consenting to hold onto suggested aka by permitting another to cast and shape shadows within ones mind/memory.
To focus on suggested information implies putting a blinder on ones sight within perceivable inspiration.
casting doubt
Doubt/dubious/duo/dwo - "two"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/doubt#etymonline_v_13974
Suggested information implies casting of spell-craft; while ones consent to another one implies dual-ism aka doubt aka permitting another one to overshadow ones sight within light.
In other words...constancy (inception towards death) generates fluctuation (life) by separation/differentiation into units (Latin unitas; unus; one). Tempting units together (1+1=2) reshapes fluctuation into constancy aka equalization of differences...it's very beneficial for different few to equalize many.
misinterpreted
a) Does origin (perceivable) need to be interpreted (suggested)?
b) What if interpret implies INTER (internal; within) PER (forwards) aka being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within origin? Could one miss that?
I provided context
a) All (perceivable) was provided before one (perception) can contextualize (suggested) towards others under the pretext of "providing".
b) Context aka CON (together; with) TEKS (to weave)...why would one, while being apart from one another, weave things together?
c) How does energy weave together particles? Why is it called PART-icle?
wrong
Can nature be wrong? Can all be wrong? Can energy be wrong? What if wrong implies being ignoring right/reg - "to move in a straight line"? ... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right#etymonline_v_15068
infiltrated by the illuminati
a) All is light; ones within cast shadows. Light can only infiltrate (fill in) shaped shadows.
b) Ones consent to suggested THE-ism implies ones submission to another, hence permitting another to "overshadow" one.
THE implies the shadow cast upon those IL (within) LUMEN (light)...
ALL...any addition contradicts that.
The suggested rhetoric "above all" is based on GESTALT; noun - "quality of perceiving a complex organization of things or events as an organized whole and also as more than the sum of the parts"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Gestalt#etymonline_v_6048
reductionist
-ist (reductionist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (reductionism)...a bringing together. Reduction; while bringing together implies friction.
above all
"You shall have no other gods before me"
find one
Oneness (whole) implies foundation for each one (partials) within. Looking to find suggested tempts one to ignore that all perceivable was always there.
value is assessed
What if value cannot be assessed/affixed? What if value (perceivable) moves evaluation (perception)?
a) A sleight of hand...master (mister) being (be) astute (ast) aka growth of self discernment.
b) Weird/wyrd/wert/wer - "to turn"...balance directs choice; choosing to turn imbalances choice.
How to cause
By suggesting effect (perception) to ignore cause (perceivable).
How to cause a war
By suggesting sides to tempt choice off-center.
How to cause a civil war
By tempting private (ones perception within all perceivable) to consent to civil (suggested by another).
AI losing
Who's affected by artificial loss? If gentiles are $35 trillion in debt, then does a jew experience artificial loss?
AI imploding
Can artificial implode without ignoring that natural implodes (Inception towards death) explosions (life)?
Open AI
If artificial implies ignorance of natural and intelligence implies standing under (understanding) another, then how could ignorance and submission be viewed as open? Open to deception?
won’t have to vote anymore
To vote/vow implies a preference of choice aka a wanted desire in opposition to needed response-ability. Choice needs to adapt to balance, no matter which other choices it prefers.
if he wins...
...then he was selected a chosen one by each ones choice avowing.
is...real
Any suggested answer ones quest waits for implies fiction. Reality implies the perceivable origin one ignores when waiting for suggested outcomes.
leaked footage
a) Leak implies letting water in or out...being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) aka as partial inside hole/whole. Few suggest leaks to tempt many to stuff holes.
b) Footage implies a measured length (foot of age)...being implies a temporal rise (life) during ongoing loss (inception towards death). Few suggest many to measure others instead of discerning ONE-self.
patterns that aren't really there
PAT'TERN, noun - "an original (perceivable reality) or model (suggested fiction) proposed for imitation (perception)"
If all is one in energy; then flow (inception towards death) implies origin generating formed (life) patterns.
The trick is pattern-recognition aka re (response to) cogni (perceivable)...not consenting to suggested.
a) https://img.gvid.tv/i/3mj3kdCS.png
b) July Deals aka dealing with jew lies.
Patch Notes:
- Pharmaceutical food additives
- Pesticides
- Straighten the bend
Single; tho...one cannot pass over from one state into another without being set apart from one another. Hence pass/pete - "to spread"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/pass#etymonline_v_7277
We/vedu/ve - "we two"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/we#etymonline_v_4866 That implies suggested dualism tempting each consenting singular to ignore oneself for another.