The moment you realise
What realizes moment(um)?
being replaced
If being replaced implies being responding to place, then what place/plateia/plat - "to spread; sprout" does one respond to?
own land
Can one own natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) while being processed within it?
a) Why can a lie be faster than truth?
b) What drives artifice?
c) Can one take away reality, while being (life) within way (inception towards death) of reality?
d) If the google/goggle is over ones eyes; then all search results are on top.
natural conclusion
Nature reveals by setting apart...those within suggest conclusion to tempt together.
For example...suggested liberalism tempts one to seek to be liber/free, while ignoring that perceivable nature already set one free...otherwise one couldn't use ones free will of choice to consent to a suggestion, which in return binds one to another.
distort reality
Reality implies linear direction (all perceivable through each ones perception)...ones consent to a suggestion implies ones ignorance of perception, hence twisting/distorting ones view.
Furthermore...ones consent (agree or disagree) to any suggestion establishes a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) aka circular reasoning in ignorance of linear direction.
Fiction (reason) distorts reality (implication)...if consented to.
Target told to stop calling the police over crimes
- Target: "They are shooting at me"
- Police: "Bro..."
- Fiat (antisemitism)
- Derivative (persecution)
- Interest (blame)
Ones consent to suggested fiat permits another to charge one with interest, while drawing derivatives from ones self imposed burden.
escalation ladder
Few are given the high ground by many lowering themselves when consenting to suggestions by few. Trying to climb towards those who hand-down, while lowering self...doesn't raise one.
In other words...a slave doesn't become master by kissing up to a master. It's a master who suggests slaves to master each other by kissing up, while kicking down.
they couldn't have their own discernment
a) They/their (plural) contradicts ones (singular) self discernment.
b) Separation (Latin discernere) implies within motion, hence during change...which cannot be owned/possessed/held onto by one being (life) moved (inception towards death).
empty vessel
a) There's no lack (empty) within whole (all perceivable) for each partial (ones perception)...unless one chooses to ignore all (perceivable) for one another (suggested).
b) For a vessel (life) within sea (inception towards death) to be able to float it has to be buoyant... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Buoyant
c) Ones mind/memory becomes an empty vessel for the suggested information by others IF one ignores perceivable inspiration (sound) moving through by consenting to hold onto suggested information (words).
downloading propaganda
Aka downloading (consent) propaganda (suggested information) into an empty (ignorant) vessel (mind).
use their own minds to see
Seeing implies ones sight within all...focusing on something owned/held onto mentally tempts one to ignore that.
- Agent (motion) - Matrix (momentum) - Smiths (matter)
There can be only one action/agent enacting upon each ones reaction. The matrix/mother/momentum implies the spectrum within action; setting apart reactions. To react implies by ones free will of choice; hence being a smith aka a skilled worker.
Bonus: A mason of free will utilizes black-smiths aka worker skilled in artifice (black) who tempt others to ignore natural (white).
people who believe...
...are giving consent to others shaping what they're believing.
handshake
Ones hand implies want to hold onto and need to let go of...others utilize a handshake to agitate a contract, hence tempting one to consent to holding into possession what another one suggested.
Notice the picture used to advertise a handshake... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handshake aka black and white aka bringing darkness and light together.
Notice the second picture...Nixon shaking hand with Paul VI aka nixon/nexing/nectere - "to bind" + six/sex/seco - "to divide".
Notice further down...tennis players (life) shaking hands over the white line (inception towards death), hence crossing the stream.
oral tradition...not only writing
Both of which are suggested by another, hence tempting one to ignore "so long as you truly do know God". Knowledge implies perception, not suggestion.
for saying contrarian things
SAY; verb from PIE root sekw - "to follow". Consenting to a suggested saying implies ones consent to follow another, which in return contradicts perceivable.
If one follows perceivable thirst or hunger, then one contradicts being alive, which requires resistance. Notice furthermore that nature doesn't say anything to make one hungry or thirsty, yet it deafens ones senses the longer one ignores to resist.
to simply be different vulgar renditions of the one true religion
Does the one true religion require followers? If so, then why can followers choose to follow vulgar renditions? What empowers choice...following or resisting to follow?
representative of God himself
Doesn't each one re-present aka respond to what is presented by God? How are those within nature not representatives of nature?
Where does this middle-man concept originate from? Why are many voting for representatives among few?
you will feel the love of God wash all over you
Washing (inception towards death) all over you (life)...Love? Hate? A conflict of reason (love vs hate) or simply an implication (if/then)?
what separates the (one perfect) religion of God
a) Religion (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" contradicts separation. Letting go of religion allows one to discern self as partial one (Christ) within whole oneness (God)...without binding self to another.
b) Perfect; noun (Latin perficio) - "to carry to the end" implies motion moving (inception towards death) matter (life).
open to all
What if it's the opposite? All open to each one within?
God’s eyes
If God implies one (singular); then why count eyes (plural)? Where's the plural in the ALL seeing EYE?
samarkand
Samar/shamar - "to keep, watch, preserve" + Kand/kent - "city/center"....center (life) within circumference (inception towards death) cannot be kept...it's about adaptation; not preservation.
- Courtesan Procuress: "Are you gentleman satisfied with our service?"
- Intoxicated Patron: "SA MAR KAND!"
They ramble...
RAM'BLE, verb - "to rove; to wander from place to place, without any determinate object in view"
they fire the next best crazy thing at you
Aka suggesting an object (next best crazy thing) for view (at you).
An eGYPTian aka gypsy aka nomad aka vagabond aka small rootless international clique aka globalist aka jew...can only wander among subjects if goyim fix their minds on objects aka idolatry.
House GOP Leaders
If field nigger are followers and house nigger leaders, then what about the master owning house; field and niggers?
Breaking NEWS
What breaks N(orth) E(ast) W(est) S(outh) apart from one another?
SAY from PIE root sekw - "to follow". Nature generates (inception towards death) resistance (life)...following implies the temptation to ignore resisting. That's why nature (perceivable sound) doesn't say (suggested words) anything.
Sleight of hand: Sound of Silence... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
for any concept to exist, the opposite must also exist
a) CON (together; with) CAPERE (to take)...how could one take if all is together?
b) What if all sets apart so that each one within can take from one another?
c) What if taking (want) puts one into opposition with another one holding onto (not want), while ignoring all given (need)?
We connect
a) How did the connection between one and we came to be? How could a singular being (one) be plural (we)?
b) Connect aka CON (together; with) NECTERE (to bind)...what binds ones free will of choice together with another?
Who suggests RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...many to few or few to many?
GOD...universe of duality
UNI (one) of DUAL (two)... "You shall have no other gods before me."...duality contradicts monotheism.
if you are anything other
Being implies ONE among other...it implies ignorance of ONEself to view self as part of other.
a jewish utopia feeding on...Goyim
a) If feeding is an utopia/ideal/imagination, then what generates hunger?
b) Why are there always more goyim than jew...more students than teachers; more followers than leaders; more poor than rich; more slaves than masters; more prey than predators; more many than few?
Does nature generate more than each ONE?
feudalism
FEU'DAL, adjective - "embracing tenures by services" + TEN'URE, noun (Latin teneo) - "to hold".
Feudalism implies suggestion (service) by few tempting consent (embracing) by many, and each one of many utilizes free will of choice to hold onto the suggested -ism.
genderfluid
Generation (motion) implies fluid (momentum) for regenerating solid (matter)...form (life) can be tricked to ignore flow (inception towards death) by holding onto other form, hence ignoring to regenerate itself.
The entire thing is fully normalized manufactured consent
a) Normal (want) implies versus abnormal (not want)...a conflict of reason shaped by ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring perceivable need.
b) What's the opposite of normal/standard? Alternative aka ones adaptation to all perceivable, which one ignores when holding onto a suggested standard.
c) Nature doesn't manufacture consent...it forces adaptation by setting apart manual (life) within auto (inception towards death).
Homo-shlomo (homogeneity of peace/piece) offers the service of manufactured consent by tempting gentiles to willingly give manual consent to the suggested service...for a reasonable price.
a) Notice FOLLOW... next to the one weirdo, which implies how many others responding to presented?
b) Influence implies being within fluid, and form (life) put into fluid (inception towards death) gains momentum...
c) People implies an accumulation of person (per sonos; by sound)...sound moves; so anything within its momentum can be accumulated.
All Votes Go To The jews
Besides chosen ones, there's only ones choice...which one ignores when voting.
free...on thin ice
Free (choice) implies within dominance (balance)...the foundation of natural law isn't gonna break under one; one is the break (temporary growing partial) within foundation (ongoing loss of whole).
Slipping on ice implies imbalance, hence ones choice ignoring balance.
a) Change implies origin; hope implies those within change mentally affixing an outcome.
b) Being (life) within change (inception towards death) implies transformation...ignoring this implies "translation". Form needs to react to changing origin; ignoring this for affixed outcome implies a late reaction.
c) Suggested information (words) implies a translation of perceivable inspiration (sound)....words subtitle sound; while dubbing those within.
- Terror/terreo - "to frighten"
- Patriot/patria/pater - "one's native country; father"
Few suggest terror-ism and patriot-ism for analysis and synthesis among many. That's how alchemy works.
Level Earth is a great rhetoric...going against it implies taking the side of imbalance. When speaking about water seeking level on earth; ask...how does earth seek level in space?
a) Argue implies ones charge against another, hence tempting 1 and 1 together into 2...this is called reasoning.
b) Again (a second time)...if inception towards death implies ones first time, then what's the second?
a) Collaborate aka working (labor) together (co)
b) ARBEIT MACHT FREI (work sets free).
c) Being free will of choice implies being center of EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power", hence work (energy) setting one free (choice).
"The force will be with you, always"
enlightenment
Memory (ment) can only exist within (en) light...spectrum.
false religion
Religion/religio - "to bind anew" implies ones choice to bind self to a suggested side like true or false.
all sects of one religion
Religion implies one binding self to another one, hence one + one = two (dualism). Binding self to another willingly implies sect/sekw - "to follow".
creed
That implies ones consent/belief/faith/creed/credit given to the suggested -ism of another. Sect (to follow) comes after creed (to consent).
humanism means that man can make his own
-ism implies as suggested by one human to another human. The one consenting makes himself subordinate to the one suggesting, who in return gained permission to remake one by shaping the meaning of the suggested -ism.
Human aka hue (color) of man implies spectrum (momentum) within light (motion) for rays (matter) within...each separated from one another internally. The contract between suggestion (humanism) and consent (humanist) contradicts internal separation with external division.
a) If all is one; then any division made within implies two...one against another one.
b) One (perception) cannot divide oneness (perceivable) without suggesting DUAL-ism to another...it's ones consent to that which establishes a conflict of reason (one vs one) aka a division into two.
c) DIVIDE, verb - "to part or separate an entire thing; to part a thing into two or more pieces"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Divide
d) Numerical aka NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit", hence Latin unus - "one".
A jew (chosen one) suggests gentiles to count other ones, while ignoring oneself, which establishes conflicts of reason aka division into two.
e) The trick...suggesting division (one vs one aka two) to distract from perceivable separation (oneness into ones aka whole into partials).
Example: Take an apple as one. The first division establishes two parts of one apple. That's a suggested division tempting one to ignore perceivable separation aka seed within kernel; within flesh; within skin; within soil of all...each one part within whole oneness.
Separation offers partials the opportunity to discern self within whole...division tempts partials to fight each other, while ignoring whole.
f) All implies one in energy (internal/inherent power)...TWO energy cannot exist.
to defeat a diaspora all different ones need to come together
DIA (two) SPORA (to scatter; disperse)...gentiles are the dia aka the accumulated collective, which permits each chosen one to scatter and disperse among them.
It's a jew who suggests gentiles to come together aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka multiculturalism; mongrelization; miscegenation; melting pot; mass migration aka united states; united nations; european union, united kingdom; soviet union aka university; uniformity; unisex; unicode; unicef; universal pictures; universal serial bus (USB); universal studios; universal basic income aka equality through diversity and so on.
Nature sets apart aka from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perception)...few within suggest many to come together as to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
Apartheid within wholeness implies the status quo of being.
DIVISIVE, hence truth vs lie.