Suggests that enlightenment is controlled and manipulated by those within.
a) Enlightenment aka mind (ment) within (en) light...that's perceivable.
b) Light directs rays apart from one another...suggested control aka rolled (roll) together (con) tempts one to ignore that.
c) Light moves...suggested manipulate aka man (hand) pele (to fill) tempts one to manually fill, while ignoring the auto-matic foundation of light.
Implies that agreeing to mainstream beliefs means submitting to control by others.
Agreeing or disagreeing + believing or disbelieving + submitting or denying implies ones consent to the suggestion of another.
Perceivable cannot be agreed or disagreed with, nor believed or disbelieved in; nor submitted or denied without ignoring that it moves through one...no matter how one (life) reacts to all (inception towards death).
Ignorance implies the path of least resistance aka the temptation for form (matter) within flow (motion) to go with the flow instead of resisting. Others exploit this by suggesting one to follow along (progressivism) the "main stream" .
Indicates an internal manipulation of enlightenment, casting doubt on true knowledge.
a) Being implies internal ray within external light. Manipulation thereof implies internal (perception) holding onto (suggested) while ignoring external (perceivable) moving through.
b) Ignoring perceivable for suggested establishes a conflict of reason (true vs false)...which light doesn't generate; but which can be shaped within shadows.
Within these conflicts of reason; both sides are suggesting enlightenment to each other in exchange for consent given aka for ignorance of perceivable, while consenting to hold onto suggested aka by permitting another to cast and shape shadows within ones mind/memory.
To focus on suggested information implies putting a blinder on ones sight within perceivable inspiration.
Suggested information implies casting of spell-craft; while ones consent to another one implies dual-ism aka doubt aka permitting another one to overshadow ones sight within light.
In other words...constancy (inception towards death) generates fluctuation (life) by separation/differentiation into units (Latin unitas; unus; one). Tempting units together (1+1=2) reshapes fluctuation into constancy aka equalization of differences...it's very beneficial for different few to equalize many.
a) All is light; ones within cast shadows. Light can only infiltrate (fill in) shaped shadows.
b) Ones consent to suggested THE-ism implies ones submission to another, hence permitting another to "overshadow" one.
THE implies the shadow cast upon those IL (within) LUMEN (light)...
a) Enlightenment aka mind (ment) within (en) light...that's perceivable.
b) Light directs rays apart from one another...suggested control aka rolled (roll) together (con) tempts one to ignore that.
c) Light moves...suggested manipulate aka man (hand) pele (to fill) tempts one to manually fill, while ignoring the auto-matic foundation of light.
Agreeing or disagreeing + believing or disbelieving + submitting or denying implies ones consent to the suggestion of another.
Perceivable cannot be agreed or disagreed with, nor believed or disbelieved in; nor submitted or denied without ignoring that it moves through one...no matter how one (life) reacts to all (inception towards death).
Ignorance implies the path of least resistance aka the temptation for form (matter) within flow (motion) to go with the flow instead of resisting. Others exploit this by suggesting one to follow along (progressivism) the "main stream" .
a) Being implies internal ray within external light. Manipulation thereof implies internal (perception) holding onto (suggested) while ignoring external (perceivable) moving through.
b) Ignoring perceivable for suggested establishes a conflict of reason (true vs false)...which light doesn't generate; but which can be shaped within shadows.
Within these conflicts of reason; both sides are suggesting enlightenment to each other in exchange for consent given aka for ignorance of perceivable, while consenting to hold onto suggested aka by permitting another to cast and shape shadows within ones mind/memory.
To focus on suggested information implies putting a blinder on ones sight within perceivable inspiration.
Doubt/dubious/duo/dwo - "two"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/doubt#etymonline_v_13974
Suggested information implies casting of spell-craft; while ones consent to another one implies dual-ism aka doubt aka permitting another one to overshadow ones sight within light.
In other words...constancy (inception towards death) generates fluctuation (life) by separation/differentiation into units (Latin unitas; unus; one). Tempting units together (1+1=2) reshapes fluctuation into constancy aka equalization of differences...it's very beneficial for different few to equalize many.