The suggested rhetoric "above all" is based on GESTALT; noun - "quality of perceiving a complex organization of things or events as an organized whole and also as more than the sum of the parts"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Gestalt#etymonline_v_6048
reductionist
-ist (reductionist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (reductionism)...a bringing together. Reduction; while bringing together implies friction.
a) Does origin (perceivable) need to be interpreted (suggested)?
b) What if interpret implies INTER (internal; within) PER (forwards) aka being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within origin? Could one miss that?
I provided context
a) All (perceivable) was provided before one (perception) can contextualize (suggested) towards others under the pretext of "providing".
b) Context aka CON (together; with) TEKS (to weave)...why would one, while being apart from one another, weave things together?
c) How does energy weave together particles? Why is it called PART-icle?
ALL...any addition contradicts that.
The suggested rhetoric "above all" is based on GESTALT; noun - "quality of perceiving a complex organization of things or events as an organized whole and also as more than the sum of the parts"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Gestalt#etymonline_v_6048
-ist (reductionist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (reductionism)...a bringing together. Reduction; while bringing together implies friction.
You misinterpreted the context I implied which I provided you with. That's ok, even you are wrong sometimes.
a) Does origin (perceivable) need to be interpreted (suggested)?
b) What if interpret implies INTER (internal; within) PER (forwards) aka being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within origin? Could one miss that?
a) All (perceivable) was provided before one (perception) can contextualize (suggested) towards others under the pretext of "providing".
b) Context aka CON (together; with) TEKS (to weave)...why would one, while being apart from one another, weave things together?
c) How does energy weave together particles? Why is it called PART-icle?
Can nature be wrong? Can all be wrong? Can energy be wrong? What if wrong implies being ignoring right/reg - "to move in a straight line"? ... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right#etymonline_v_15068