1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the famous photo

FAME; noun (Latin fama) - "to speak" + PHOTO; noun - "light"...light doesn't speak, speech distorts light. Holding onto speech within light generates shadows.

Johnathan Willis

JO (lord) NATHAN (has given) WILLIS (will; want; desire)...one needs to resist wanted desires.

4
free-will-of-choice 4 points ago +4 / -0

The marketing shitheads at Prodentim made sure nothing bad about their product is available online.

https://img.gvid.tv/i/3MXtycMS.png

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

enoch...inside you

Enoch/enokh/hanokh - "dedicated; set apart" aka one (partial) inside all (whole).

enoch banned from the bible

Because bible binds together, hence religion (Latin religio, to bind anew).

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

I understand, we live in a world where we are mired down by crafted suggestions.

Understanding/standing under implies such a crafted suggestion tempting ones consent to mire under another, hence student under teacher or follower under leader or slave under master.

Being implies rise (life) during fall (inception towards death)...understanding tempts one to ignore that, hence being tempted to stand in the shadow of another.

lucky too know

Luck aka chance (effect of an unknown cause) tempts one to ignore choice (effect within known cause). All suggested gaming/gambling tempts ones choice to ignore self discernment by putting choice on the stake of chance.

In other words...choice implies within origin of balance; chance implies towards outcome, while within conflict (win vs lose) aka imbalance.

Sleight of hand: Les jeux sont faits, rien ne va plus (the game's up, nothing goes anymore).

thank God for putting this path before me

a) The suggested rhetoric "before me" tempts one to ignore being forwarded.

b) If God implies origin, then origin pushes one towards outcome, which one needs to resist to sustain self.

Sleight of hand: When push (inception towards death) comes to shove (life). That's also what yisra-el (resist all) implies.

If it all was just my free will of choice

All implies just (balance); each one within implies odd (choice).

The odds of being one...

See. If one discerns self as odd, then all implies that which just-is (justice), hence natural law.

Guardian Angel

Ones "line" of sight can be tricked by the suggestion of another to fix upon a "point" of view, which permits others to utilize triangulation and angles/angels to tempt one to guard (keep watch) aka focusing onto suggested, while narrowing sight within perceivable.

the truth

Truth (wanting suggested) and Lie (not wanting suggested) tempt one to ignore change (perceivable need).

Applying change to truth shapes it into a lie and vice versa. Whatever suggestion one chooses to hold onto becomes ones truth, and whatever contradicts ones held on truth becomes a lie.

like many

Few suggest each different one to consent alike, which in return establishes a many aka a collective/community/society.

Notice that the posters here are each struggling with being different from the many, hence seeing something which most ignore.

free of brainwashing

Nature washes through ones brain...one needs to utilize this to "launder" input...both perceivable inspiration moving through and suggested information held onto. It's ones free will of choice that needs to adapt to former, while resisting the temptation to hold onto latter.

Memory is like a lint filter...one can use it to store (suggested information), but what happens to the laundry (perceivable inspiration) if one doesn't clean out that memory? It's getting harder (ignorance) to clean (discernment).

Also...don't mix white and black when washing.

freemasons always kill their opposition, those who oppose or betray or reveal secrets.

a) Mostly within institutionalized freemasonry aka to those breaking a contract, hence the 33 ranks to grow ones spine as to be upright and not leaning towards or against others.

b) Nature reveals all (perceivable) to each one (perception)...anyone can choose to draw from revelation aka perceivable inspiration. Ignoring this for suggested information is how others utilize ones consent to shape secrets to be unveiled to initiates.

c) Free (choice) implies within separation (balance), not within opposition (imbalance)...yet one can only discern this for oneself.

I know the story

Nature (perceivable knowledge) doesn't store...those within shape stories (suggested information) to tempt one to store within mind/memory by consenting to hold onto.

This held on information then becomes a burden ones stands under (understand). What does a teacher do when a student wants to understand? He suggests more information to burden the student with.

Knowledge aka perceivable inspiration; when drawn from, relieves burden. It's like...whenever one draws from inspiration it clicks and one goes "ahhhhh". That's relief aka mind blowing.

jews always being spys and subverters

a) Suggested information is the spy device one willingly positions within ones mind/memory, while permitting remote control to another. Gentiles are telegraphing their movement by consenting alike to a suggesting jew, hence behaving like order follower.

Take Amazon and Pornhub as parts of five eyes Intelligence alliance for example...they don't have to spy on all the willingly given user data.

This in return makes those who don't follow orders stick out from the many like a nail for hammering down. All unification efforts aim to reduce spying necessity.

b) Sub (under) vert (turn)...gentiles are submitting themself by consenting to jewish suggestions, which in return turns them against one another within conflicts of reason.

Nature directs growth...turning from direction and under another implies ones free will of choice. A jew comprehends what sub-verto implies, while tempting ignorant gentiles to subvert themselves willingly. The resulting blame for subversion is then utilized to protect a jew from persecution by gentiles.

synagogues are always oddly designed

a) Synagouge/synagein - "to bring together" aka to synchronize. That's for gentiles.

b) Odd (choice) implies within even (balance)...that's for a chosen one aka ones choice.

c) Design/sign - "signifying mark of identification". That's idolatry for gentiles to distract from identical (inception towards death) differentiation (life).

Marking (sign) self divides (de) one against one another.

Notice the narrative of "intelligent design" aka INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design

even in the shape of a triangle

a) Using odds (choice) to hold angles together implies uneven (imbalance).

b) SHAPE, verb - "to form; to mold; to cast; to regulate; to adjust; to adapt to a purpose"...flow (inception towards death) shapes form (life).

Triangulation tempts ones line of sight to affix a point of view within a moving system.

always well hidden

All way reveals each one within. Once one spots what others are hiding, all the distractions build around the hidden imply concealment aka ones concealing mind, when ignoring what was always there.

Utilize movement aka a moving mind to discern between solid and fluid aka temporal and ongoing....which of the buildings are designed temporal, and which are designed with the ongoing in mind? Once one sees the latter, one can think away the former and thereby navigate in-between all the distractions.

exclusive communities

a) Clusive/cludo - "to confine within"...being implies ex (reaction) set free with-in (action). A jew tempts gentiles to ignore this, which then permits a jew to exclude gentiles.

b) A jew suggest communism (community) to tempt consenting gentiles together, hence collectivizing them, which in return permits each jew to remain apart from one another and a partial within whole.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Being implies FREE within MA of SONIC aka choice within matter of sound.

b) Consenting by free will of choice to a suggestion; permits another to shape matter within sound...that's magic aka mag-son-ic.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/*mag-

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

They can't see the devil even when he's everywhere in plain sight.

a) Devil is in the detail/detaillier - "cut into pieces"

b) Sight implies within whole (perceivable)...what other partials are showing (suggested) tempts one to ignore whole.

c) Plain (inception towards death) sight (life)...what others are suggesting towards ones sight tempts one to hold onto it (information) while ignoring that ones perception within all perceivable moves (inspiration) and therefore cannot be held onto.

mental gymnastics, newspeak in their heads

Aka suggested information upheld willingly within ones mind/memory.

Nature doesn't speak...it moves sound. Those within shape spoken words to distract from moving sound.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Archaeologists uncover

a) Archaeo/archon (to begin) + logi/logic (reason)...reasoning about suggested contradicts perceivable beginning.

b) -ist (logist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (logism)

c) Nature reveals all (perceivable) to each one (perception)...reasoning (logic) about suggested beginning (archaeo) tempts one to ignore that.

d) Beginning (inception) and end (death) implies same flow for each different form (life) coming to be within.

e) Moses (law giver) implies motion giving L(and) A(ir) W(ater) for matter to balance within. Those within given law cannot give only resist (need) the temptation (want) of taking, hence wielding free will of choice during dominance of balance, while being (life) moved (inception towards death).

f) PROMISE; noun - "a solemn pledge; a vow; a declaration in reference to the future made by one person to another"...that implies ones free will of choice consenting to suggested progressivism by another, which establishes the suggested as a promissory note within the consenting ones mind/memory.

Holding onto a promised land tempts one to ignore natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) aka land to balance on; air to breathe and water to be solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

incurring heavy losses

INCUR; verb - "to bring an undesirable consequence upon oneself"...does heavy (life) loss (inception towards death) imply an undesirable consequence for oneself or an opportunity to be oneself?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

an excuse to attack

Excuse/excausa aka out of cause, which implies effect (perception) out of cause (perceivable)...not an attack.

A jew tempts gentiles into conflicts of reason (attack vs defend) to seek excuses from outcomes, instead of origin. Hence: "You will be sorry once I'm done with you".

In other words...gentiles excuse and seek excuses from others, while ignoring to be EX within CUSE/CAUSE.

israel created

YISRA (to resist) EL (all) implies being one (perception) within all (perceivable)...not created out of nothing.

A jew suggests creationism to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore resisting.

jews are running from Israel

a) Each jew (singular) implies israel (one resisting all)...suggested pluralism (jews) tempts consenting gentiles (already collectivized) to ignore that.

b) Only nature runs/rei - "to flow"...gentiles ignore ones sight within nature for what a jew shows, which permits a jew to "run the show" for gentiles...and since nature flows..."the show must go on".

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

both white and negro

Nature sets white (pure light) and black (absence of light) apart from one another, which establishes spectrum of visible light aka color.

Few suggest identiarianism (identical; same) to mix colors together, which when consented to by many, will be ripped apart by nature. Many willingly ignore natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested), which permits few to craft artifice, while utilizing natural order against many holding onto artifice.

As for South Africa... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry_in_South_Africa + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Droit_Humain

"Le Droit Humain is a global Masonic Order, membership of which is available to men and women on equal terms, regardless of nationality, religion or ethnicity."

Always artificially equalizing differences, while distracting from nature equally (inception towards death) differentiating (life).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The lord giveth, the lord taketh away

a) Giveth (inception) and taketh (death) within (life) a way (inception towards death).

b) To lord implies to dominate (balance) freely (choice) aka towards (motion) dominating (momentum) freely (matter).

be content

CON (together, with) contradicts being apart from one another.

equality is a blasphemous

a) Equality (inception towards death) generates diversity (life)...few suggest diversity to establish equality as the inversion to equalize differences among consenting many.

b) BLAS (to speak) PHEME (utter/outer)...hence putting perceivable sound into suggestible words aka spell-craft.

Sound cannot be uttered by anyone within without ignoring that sound sets apart, while anything uttered implies putting together.

Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics

  • People talking without speaking
  • People hearing without listening
  • People writing songs that voices never shared
  • And no one dared disturb the sound of silence

c) https://www.etymonline.com/word/Hottentot#etymonline_v_14499 aka stammer/stummer - "being mute".

Also...HOT (heat) TOT (death)...only during process of dying can life heat up. Motion implies cold; matter resisting motion implies friction aka heat generation within cold velocity. Cold implies lack (loss) of resistance (growth).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

As long as they are around....apartheid...as it should be

To be implies apartheid (ones perception) within wholeness (all perceivable), hence apart from one another. As long as one (singular) chooses to view another as they (plural), so long does one ignore apartheid within wholeness for togetherness within conflict among partials.

What we need

Need (motion) separates want (matter)...one needs to resist wanted temptation. Choosing want over need implies matter holding onto each other, while ignoring that motion (inception towards death) sets matter (life) apart from one another.

Few suggest pluralism (we) to singular (one) to ignore self for others. Nature doesn't generate WE...it designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one). Generation implies external velocity (inception towards death) generating internal resistance (life) aka action generating reactions aka motion generating matter aka whole generating partials etc.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

box

Ones sight within left/right + up/down + front/back implies being within a box...few draw a ring (circular reasoning) around the box (sight) to tempt many to fight each other.

your psyche has been captured

Psyche (animating power) cannot be captured while being (life) animated (inception towards death)...others suggest "your" to tempt ones consent to hold onto the suggested, while ignoring the animating power.

Try to fit everyone in

Being one implies set free from one another within all, hence separated...not fit together.

playing the people against each other

Playing implies ones consent; game implies suggestions by another. To play implies ones plight (solemn oath) to another by taking part in a suggested game/gamble, which implies falling for temptation hence getting addicted/added to loss.

real problem

Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) aka problem (life) responding to solution (inception towards death)...few suggest many to solve problems, which implies dissolving self when consenting.

system they created

  • SYS/SYN implies together with
  • THEY implies suggested pluralism
  • CREATED implies suggested creationism

Using these words implies ones consent to be together with another, ones ignorance of being singular aka apart from one another, and ones ignorance of being trans-formed (life) within flow (inception towards death)...not created out of nothing.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Infrastructure aka infra/inferior (below) and structure/structura (fitting together)...the hidden hand underneath communication networks.

Look into...Ericsson - 'Helping to shape a world of communication' aka the Wallenberg family. Their motto... Esse, non Videri (not to be seen).

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

third eye

a) There can be only one eye/ouga - "to see"...one's sight.

b) Counting implies putting together, which implies focusing, hence narrowing ones sight.

a sort of cornerstone

a) CORNERSTONE; noun - "stone which lies at the corner of two walls and unites them"

b) Unity implies one...two contradicts that.

c) Choice isn't a cornerstone within balance (left/right), but an adaptive center within a moving circumference.

d) A cornerstone is utilized to affix a center, while sort/assort - "to line up" implies different center (life) within same line (inception towards death).

Pineal gland

Consider PENAL (punishment) GLANCE (snatch of sight)...does ones mind gets punished for snatching/taking into possession ones sight?

Could others exploit that punishment by tempting one to snatch (consent to suggested) ones sight (perception within perceivable)?

to see the full picture

a) If one could see full, there would be no possibility for improvement for ones sight. Only while being (life) diminished (inception towards death) can one grow.

b) A picture implies a captured moment...ones sight implies free within momentum.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

every other generation prolly tried to destroy evidence of the old one.

Does the "evidence" of spring need to be destroyed or does winter take care of it anyway? Does spring destroy the evidence of winter? Where's the evidence that spring and winter happen within the same motion?

A little bit of a stretch

Aka a little bit (life) of a stretch (inception towards death)...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

hands are a very unique aspect

A unique manual (Latin manus; hand) aspect within an auto-matic system. If hand is manual, then what is auto? Notice that a hand wanting to hold onto something needs to let go...where does the force of that need originate from?

sounds alot like the aether

a) SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken; whole" implies same. Only after sound breaks, can different parts within respond (resonance or dissonance) alike each other.

b) Aether aka aēr (lower air) + aithēr (upper air) implies a separation of; within and in response to sound.

Sound (motion) to aithēr (momentum) to aēr (matter)

c) LOT, noun - "that which, in human speech, is called chance" aka CHANCE, noun - "the effect of an unknown cause"

Few suggest "alot" to tempt many to consent to chance, while ignoring to be effect (choice) within known cause (balance). Consenting to suggested chance implies gambling for a stake while squandering self away.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Force surrounded...electric universe...carving

Why carve within a force that shapes? If the electrical patterns are inherent, then why utilize magnetic effort to carve them into other shapes?

there may be a deeper operation of the Universe facilitated by these connections

What happens if electricity connects? Do those within electricity need to avoid connection with electricity? To be within an electric universe implies being set apart from it and one another...

what I just described

Describing to others and carving within electricity...what's the difference? Could a description be inscribed into memory? How does electricity generate memory?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

it is necessary to build society where everything is measured in something completely different.

Society implies together; difference implies apart. A jew suggests society to collectivize gentiles together, which in return tempts each gentiles to ignore being a partial within whole nature. The collectivization of many implies the debt each one within is carrying along for a few.

Cash is not worth any efforts

"Is not" implies your effort to evaluate a suggested value by another. This evaluation implies your consent permitting those suggesting values to shape values for your to evaluate. You are being tricked to evaluate something reevaluated (suggested) from value (perceivable) by another.

All ones efforts are drained by another if one ignores value (perception) for resale value (suggestion).

CASH, verb - "to convert; turn; exchange", hence exchanging reality (perception) for fiction (suggestion) by turning away.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the % of people that believe in the holocaust is at an all time low. Yet they still "worship ZOG"?

The % according to whom? Did these people get their holocaust percentages from zionist occupied governments? Does consenting to suggested percentages imply ones belief in it?

check out this Gallop poll

a) POLL, verb - "to take the votes of". If one votes by free will of choice and a poll takes the free will of choice of voters, then...?

b) Could few utilize suggestion to SPUR consenting many into GALLOP aka into consenting to progressivism?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

When you can't trust....people will believe anything

Believing implies trusting...both imply ones consent to the suggestion of another, hence giving credibility and authority over self onto another.

collapse of credibility...more gullible

What if giving credit to others implies selling self out? What if giving credit implies being credulous/gull/gullible?

without trusted authorities, ppl just believe anything.

Does that which authorizes ones free will of choice require trust or does trusting another contradict ones FREE will of choice?

If choice can only exist within balance, then does choice need to believe in balance to make choices?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Before implies being (life) forwarded (inception towards death)...hence being within that which moves forwards. Tick tick tick...what could that imply?

b) The EX in exist implies expression (outwards) which implies from within, and the separation of outward inwards implies motion.

c) TIME, noun - "a particular portion or part of duration"...that implies a partial within whole, hence made durable within action (dur-ation).

d) Notice that "before" implies as opposed to after....a conflict...not within time, but within your thinking aka your reasoning.

What if all the above described can be distracted from by suggesting one to measure time aka to take a count (account) within duration? How could one count something that "existed before time itself"?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nature WAS separating from whole into partials before one within can choose to suggest what truth IS, which divides one against one another within a conflict of reason (truth vs lie).

Separation implies forwards; division implies against...hence a turning aka a tournament (turn of mind) into circular reasoning.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›