7 The problem with conspiracy theorizing is that we often want linear plots -- but TPTB have a rolodex of if-else responses to arrive at a destination through numerous scenarios. We can presume they want to promote civil war for xyz but they ably accommodate both war and no-war to enslave peasants. (media.scored.co) posted 105 days ago by pkvi_apostate 105 days ago by pkvi_apostate +14 / -7 7 comments share 7 comments share save hide report block hide replies
a) What if chosen ONEs suggest many things to establish a conflict of reason (over vs under) among others?
b) Does "over vs under" contradict "as above so below"? How is a fish in conflict with water?
Control implies "rolled together"...few suggest pluralism (they) to roll the consent of many together within circular logic aka conflicts of reason.
PARTials (life) within a LINE (inception towards death) need to resist the wanted temptation to follow...
Ones consent to suggested pluralism (we) binds singular, hence preventing ones ability to bend (flexibility) as ray within light.
Participate in any group and try to be more flexible to experience mass resistance.
Being implies in-between (life) arrival (inception) and departure (death) as an arriving partial.
How does one unplug from "we"? How did one (singular) plug into we (plural)?
Inception toward impalement of kikes