The idea of a God often doesn't add up when we look at the universe. Stars, with their endless energy, power life across countless planets. This abundance suggests that life could thrive without the need for violence or killing.
If a benevolent and omnipotent God created everything, it would make sense for such a deity to design a world where all life could coexist peacefully, drawing from the boundless energy of the stars. However, the reality on Earth is quite different. We see a world driven by competition, predation, and survival of the fittest. Animals kill for food, and humans have a long history of violence and conflict.
This inherent need for destruction contradicts the idea of a benevolent creator who would provide for all living beings without suffering. The existence of endless energy sources like the sun suggests that life could be sustained harmoniously.
Therefore, the harsh realities we witness challenge the concept of a man-made God intended to explain and justify the world. It implies that our understanding of divinity might be flawed or that the true nature of the universe is more complex and less centered around human beliefs.
Aka para/per (forwards) and dox/dek (to take). Few suggest doxology (taking speech) to tempt many to consent to progressivism, hence taking that which moves forwards (inception towards death), while ignoring to resist (life).
Dox contradicts para...matter cannot hold onto motion without destroying itself.
Suggested idealism tempts one to hold onto, while ignoring that addition (inception) and subtraction (death) of being (life) cannot be held onto.
a) To look at implies to lock onto aka to focus on...while ignoring that ones sight (perception) implies within the movement of all perceivable.
b) Universe implies turning (vertere) one (unus). Few suggest universe to turn many from perceivable origin towards suggested outcomes.
Creation implies out of nothing. Everything implies each thing (partials) within everything (whole) aka transmutation within everything.
Suggested creationism tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation of motion through momentum (inception towards death) into matter (life).
Here's a test...create anything suggestible without using everything perceivable to "create".
One cannot perceive creation, because all perceivable existed before ones perception came to be.
a) Living implies one (partial); dying implies all (whole)...only within loss (inception towards death) can there be growth (life).
b) -ist (coexist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (co-existentialism) aka ones submission of self into bondage to another aka religion (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
c) CO (together; with) contradicts EX (expression) because expressions put together repress each other.
Sleight of hand: "Express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry...it's human nature"
d) Peace/piece implies being apart from one another as partials within whole. Few trick many to ignore that by tempting them into a perpetual conflict of reason (peace vs war), while ignoring that reason is the foundation for all conflicts and wanting to come together in "peace" contradicts nature differentiating pieces by setting each one apart from one another.
Competition implies ones consent to take a suggested side within a conflict of reason against another...which tempts one to ignore being (life) driven (inception towards death) apart from one another.
a) How could it be ours if we "stand under" others?
Are many students stand under few teachers? What about many followers standing under few leaders or many slaves standing under few masters?
b) What if suggested pluralism (our, we) tempts singular (one) to ignore self discernment?
Being implies center (perception) of circumference (perceivable)...believing implies ones consent to the suggestion of another.
To believe tempts "being to leave" ones position at center, while inclining outwards. How does one belief? By free will of choice. What does choice imply? Center of balance. What does choice at center of balance choosing to incline outwards towards "chosen ones" suggestions imply? Imbalance!