1
Filledwithfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know what the stink is about. I'm pretty positive the FotL clothing I folded in the 90s never had the cornucopia. It was always just a bunch of fruit.

1
Filledwithfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is why I think the Jesuits are the ones to point the finger at and not the Jews. Jews are too few. But Jesuits/Catholicism is a literal continuation of the Roman Empire. They are more in control than the jews

1
Filledwithfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is literally the final set scene from a James Bond movie

2
Filledwithfire 2 points ago +2 / -0

These are my thoughts exactly. People always hope for leaks, but in a compartmentalized world you won't get any. Leaks come from on high, or from people who want to leak. It IS possible to withhold vital information for long periods of time.

1
Filledwithfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fascinating.

I’ve been studying germ theory and terrain theory for four years, and this is the first time I’ve heard this.

Do you have some reading material on this topic?

3
Filledwithfire 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why do they have the most gross names?

7
Filledwithfire 7 points ago +7 / -0

God they have parasites everywhere. I was not aware they’d be so desperate to go thousands of miles just for fish

3
Filledwithfire 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bruh just click ‘no thanks’ or ‘continue reading’

Substack doesn’t force you to subscribe

2
Filledwithfire 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes that’s precisely what I was thinking of!

10
Filledwithfire 10 points ago +10 / -0

They admitted this in early 2020 and no one noticed. Of course it only comes out now after their schemes are well passed.

3
Filledwithfire 3 points ago +3 / -0

Another hit! Please don't stop writing songs

2
Filledwithfire 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hawaii Is one of the best places to build a shelter

-sea levels are not rising

-Kauai and Maui geologically very stable (occasional earthquakes are not an issue)

-fertile soil and unlimited fish.

The only issue I see with Hawaii is: it’s an island and the locals hate you. In a billionaire’s case, they’ve trapped themselves on an island with a target on their back

1
Filledwithfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m on lecture 19 of 34. Started his Total Onslaught series a few months ago.

He has mentioned Ellen G White once.

Take it with a grain of salt. He is an excellent scholar and should still be highly regarded.

1
Filledwithfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you watching Walter Veith’s presentations? Good stuff. Groundbreaking considering it was all in the early 00s

2
Filledwithfire 2 points ago +3 / -1

I just had an argument with a legitimate narrative-pushing retard. Account was only a week old so I knew it was most likely a troll.

FWoC to me is just an annoying text wall that I usually scroll past. There’s not much he writes worth engaging in, so I would just ignore him. Def not banworthy.

3
Filledwithfire 3 points ago +3 / -0

These dental studies over what foods we are designed to eat are all irrelevant:

Fruitheads say “our mouth shape and tooth shape dictate we only eat a pants”

Meatheads say “we have fire therefore meat can be softened and consumed without problem”

Very few people ever bring up “our mouths and teeth are designed perfectly for complex language”

No animal could achieve as much as we have simply because their communication is limited. We have the mouth that can create language, and therefore express deeper thought.

Food type is almost irrelevant (just avoid all processed oils, sugars, and carbs)

2
Filledwithfire 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fans just caught up in the fervor of the moment... and also being invited in by the DC police...

1
Filledwithfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ha.

Haha.

Rofl.

"Virus denier" is the same as "climate change denier:" a very clear-cut fallacy. You're acting like you own the place. You don't know who I am, and I don't know who you are, but I absolutely know when someone is lazy.

I have provided you with the essentials of this concept, but if you're too intellectually fragile to even dare read a simple paper, than just say so. In your responses, you have demonstrated six logical fallacies. You have proven that you don't have any authority over this issue so you saying things like "not worth my time" and how I've "got another thing coming" is more laughable than your already pathetic arguments. Now, your animal brain has truly lost it's reason and is now making empty threats.

Bless you, my child. Be at peace.

1
Filledwithfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are not listening. You posted a link of some site showing images of bacteria (which are very real) and viruses (which are very much not real), blind to the truth that viruses are nothing more than dead cell debris.

Then you asked for a "peer reviewed" paper, and then have since been doing nothing but attacking an author for trying to make a living outside of medicine, claiming that should disqualify him from any opinion ever, despite him having two decades in the field.

On top of that, your criteria for what a "peer" even is had not been defined. It is obvious you didn't read what I sent, because there are dozens of doctors who helped write this report, and hundreds more who have "reviewed" it. "Peer review" is simply receiving critique from others in your relevant field. So, this paper has been reviewed, critiqued, commented on, etc... by people from all sides of this aisle, and you can find those reviews if you just stop being stuck up the asshole of dogma for a brief moment.

All you have been doing is attacking this (retired) doctor while refusing to read a now well-reviewed paper (so of course you wouldn't see the critiques of it; isn't that the best part of peer review?).

No, you say that "if it does not end up in an "official" journal, then it is fake! Fake! My high-priest of SciEnCe says it's fake because Lancet or Cell did not publish it!."

Sweetie, your priests are lying to you. Their "peer reviewed" papers and experiments claiming viruses exist are: faulty, illogical, not repeatable, contain no control experiments, and violate their own rules of what constitutes virology. In other words, it is not science.

So you stating that there needs to be experiments proving that viruses do not exist is the most backwards logic imaginable. Viruses, have never even been proved! And you demand that somehow we disprove them? lol

Virology at it's core is created on a false notion that these tiny little mystery particles (which have never been isolated, or been shown to replicate, or been shown to cause the specific disease they took the original sample from), grown in poisoned culture with different DNAs from different species, make you sick. There are more logical reasons why someone would get sick than invisible make-believe little particles.

Did you know that you can "make" viruses using no original sample at all? Surely that is a paper you'd be interested in. There are examples of how different samples of the same control culture, with no foreign material having been introduced, under different conditions will "create" different "viruses."

At this point, I am only feeding a troll because you have refused to hear what I'm saying because you are so insecure you hide behind "muh peer reviewed only" guise to ward off anything that could potentially change your mind.

Virology, is just an extension of pharma. It's just good for business, but has no basis in truth.

1
Filledwithfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re so fixated on me giving you some reading material (which in itself was NOT the focal point of the argument) that you failed to realize why. I didn’t think you could prove yourself to be more blind, but, you did.

1
Filledwithfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your "scientific process" does not exist in virology!

They use circular logic and confirmation biases. It is not science. Read any virology paper and they are all littered with logical fallacies.

But, you won't. You have proven yourself blind and of ill thought. Congratulations.

view more: Next ›