3
EUssr 3 points ago +3 / -0

"muh we need workers"

Gay bullshit argument. Handrubbing faggots import hordes of incompetent parasitic leeches that strain the real estate market. It becomes impossible for natives to buy a house, feed their family, have kids. And the solution? Dialing the problem up to 11?

3
EUssr 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Progressive conservative" lmfao what a faggot

by DrLeaks
1
EUssr 1 point ago +1 / -0

The comments backfired and now the video has been taken private.

by DrLeaks
1
EUssr 1 point ago +1 / -0

God explicitly forbids intermarriage between Ish and Adamites, so a Christian marrying an Esau-Edom Canaanite (Ish) is explicitly guilty of the same that got Edomites/Canaanites cursed in the first place. He is not Christian, no matter what he calls himself.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can add it to any "wet" dish in amounts that keep the flavor where you like it. Works with a lot of sauces, stews, soups, etc. Can also add to doughs but need to be a little bit careful since it can change the way it bakes if you add too much.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

My point is that the ones who support the standard narratives are the ones who are more likely be evil.

The ones that don't tend to be discredited and lose funding. With very few exceptions. In mathematics there is no narrative to push for example, so as long as you shut your mouth you get to keep doing your research.

That said, the number of real scientists left in academia is orders of magnitude lower than the number of career academics larping as scientists. And even the scientists fall for the traps of the quasi-religious cult that is academia. I ended up losing a bunch of "friends" over the clot shots, including Cambridge PhDs in Mathematics or PhDs in Physics from other global elite universities. And since we had the same training I know for fact that they subconsciously must know that they're wrong, because the data and papers regarding that shitshow are far below the level of what any of us are used to.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or are you smarter than the professors at Harvard and Stanford who want to examine the UFO issue?

Probably. I didn't sell my soul to the devil.

0
EUssr 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not making claims for one side or the other, but implying that Harvard is in any way credible is not a mistake that should happen around these corners.

by DrLeaks
1
EUssr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Edomite-Bolshevik shilling intensifies

by pkvi
2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. Every knee will bow, and the fiat scam will find its end with Esau-Edom.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looks like a fake poll that's supposed to look like a reasonable distribution that they can then shift over the years to eventually legitimize overt mind control.

by pkvi
3
EUssr 3 points ago +3 / -0

fuckability

Married? No? Don't do it.

Pleasant side effects include a stable marriage, good kids, and a better society.

4
EUssr 4 points ago +4 / -0

Note the satanic cross on their fingernails.

3
EUssr 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who knows. Not the first time they played multiple sides. Satan the deceiver.

But regardless of who created Communism, it's a demented ideology that should never be taken seriously.

by Oaty
2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they want everyone vaccinated, why would they publish damning data?

Israel has all-time high infections and deaths post-inoculation.

I'd wager that the overlords consider anyone and everyone beneath them as cattle. Even their co-conspirers.

by Oaty
5
EUssr 5 points ago +5 / -0

heart damage

It's obviously a cover up for vAcCiNe deaths.

Blame it all on Covid:

See!!! OMGG!!! IT'S SO DEADLY! GET THE SHOT!

3
EUssr 3 points ago +3 / -0

Marx is related to the Rothschilds.

They created communism for a reason. And no, there's nothing positive about it.

by pkvi
2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was some talk about oxidized vs unoxidized blood, as well as blood from different parts of the body.

1
EUssr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sugar/carb industry deluding the public into believing sugar good, fat bad is a start.

Replacing sugar with FDA approved and cancer causing aspartame is a decent follow up.

Unorthodox, but not entirely out of place.

1
EUssr 1 point ago +1 / -0

November 6th... duh.

1
EUssr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Were that the case they would not be censoring treatments with well established safety profiles in favor of shoving an experimental vaccine with highly questionable at best data.

tl;dr No. They are power and money hungry corrupt shit bags at best.

by pkvi
2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

So would they stand to gain from increased Ivermectin sales? Or is there any reason to care about their motives when they're actively pushing back against censorship?

Not everyone who has capital or manages influential firms is a crook, not saying that they aren't but I see nothing substantial that indicates so. Even if they were to make bank on Ivermectin.

The questions of interest here are: Does Ivermectin work? Are they pushing back against censorship and corruption?

If the answer is yes, then who gives a shit if they make money in the process.

1
EUssr 1 point ago +1 / -0

They should be very careful if they think they can get a religious exemption for murder.

view more: Next ›