by DrLeaks
1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remote-controlled electric butt plug. You have your methods, I have mine. __ Dr. Jill

by DrLeaks
1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

We apologize and are recalling all Astrophysics Enthusiast degrees distributed on the back of breakfast cereal boxes. __ Harvard University

by DrLeaks
2
2EyesOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Astrophysics "enthusiast".

Guess that makes me a pornstar. ___ Harry Palmer, President, Armchair Actors Guild

5
2EyesOpen 5 points ago +5 / -0

There's no such thing as an Artic or Arctic circle, because there are no circles, only straight lines that bend. kek Just trying to help the 'Slide'.

Why would there be tropical zones.....warm belt at the equator ....on a flat earth?

There wouldn't be. A flat surface would equally spread the heat.

2
2EyesOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Numbers and their association with letters through interconnected principles.

How a 'thing' is 'shaped' into form(s).

Knowledge is power. To attempt to use it for selfish gain divides the warlock from the wizard, the angel from the daemon, the devil from the christ.

Would you feign to gno without being tempted to misuse? Who is able to reach this high place?

"....but to those who would ask of the 'perfect', he took aside and gave the secret teaching."

Here perfect means unblemished truth. It isn't for everyone.

https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf

Be as wise as the serpent, but blameless as a dove.

If knowledge is power and of God, then use it as your shield, don't hand it over to your enemy to misuse and abuse those who are ignorant of it.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know a fake expert who can beat up your fake experts.

You really need to raise the bar on your slide, Clyde.

Your puppeteers have mistrained you as a joke and you're the punchline here.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are Satanists. Both Satanists and non Satan-worshippers believe in 'him'.

There are Luciferians.

What's the difference, since the name implies one.

Research

Two are taken upon a high place. (gnosis)

One sees the source (the 'father')

The other one is Luciferian and rules by it.

Satanists and their counterparts are considered foolish minions.

by DrLeaks
1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

We also advised him to trade silicon valley for New York, invest in Trump for 2024, and buy up all Bitcoin and trash the receipts. ____ Whitehat Advisors Inc.

by DrLeaks
2
2EyesOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

The very first 'story' to read as a 1st grader had a little girl pretending to be a bunny, while her parents found a clever way to get her out of her fantasy...by feeding her rabbit food.

This shows that the educators knew about a child's fantasy world, and that it needed to be reality checked.

Today, they'd be arrested, and 'Bunny' would go on to become a comic-con incel SJW living on the street.

Or governor of California.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why does water run south?

I'm trying to help train in how to mistrain and figure you can help.

If I fake a fake faker, am I fake faker fag? Would that be doing it right or wrong?

What do I say when asked what my IQ is in a number between 1 and 1......on a flat scale.

If I can get you to agree on this thing here, can I rape your mind in a reach-around over there, while you're distracted?

Do I have the technique right?

Do I have to be careful while rofl that i don't go off the edge?

Is Orange Man Bad gone yet? Then glow on, soldier.

by DrLeaks
1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's a goldang liar......cause I was There........I mean....wait... George H.W. Sherf

Ask him who suddenly changed the parade route and how would Oswald have known they were going to do that in order to bring him to the target area?

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

All this represents misuse of implication (if/then) after consenting to suggested nihilism (not), hence putting self into a conflict of reason...

Thank you for finally coming full circle to MY point about what you do.

Every statement can be seen as conflict or as confluence.

Choices

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

The numbers and letters are not 'equal to' the whole. They are minus one. The One who can re-member them. Remembering the source makes them return to 'wholesomeness'.

Until then, they divide by choosing one side of the definition.

DE-fining the spirit AS word will be shown to have mistakes inherent in language itself. As you know, better than you would admit.

2
2EyesOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

It appears that the exodus from Babylon spilled into Canaan and from there, diverged. So yes, that fits the narrative as well. Also showing the Babylonian theology to be an early 'original' belief. This included sacrifice at the Gala. See 'orgy with golden calf when Moses comes down from the mountain' for details.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's the general test of a prophecy? It happened.

I don't think this prophecy word is as you would have it.

People who 'preach' instead of teach never seem to climb high enough on the cliff before turning around and pretending to be the example. It shows in their attempts to send everyone to their misconceived Hell rather that come to an understanding.

Your destroyer God needs to get a room with Kali......but you wouldn't understand what that mean because of your shallow roots in historic world scripture.

If the Roman Jesus returns to destroy in his name, he's playing the role of Kali the destroyer and his role as Christ of the living is negated. Blame Flavian theology twistings.

It allows lesser men to pretend to teach the learned with false platitudes. The gnostics warned the literalist Romans against politicizing religion by creating an anthropromorphic substitute to rule the world by forcing them into a 'universal' aka 'Catholic' dogma about the new man-god. A book had to be backwritten to confirm. Enter the Flavians, exit the true meaning of chrism and the christ.

You've made your choice. The end won't be for everyone.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Are you open to perceivable ONE (1) underneath suggested TWO (2)?"

You mean after parsing all those words of mine you didn't understand that was exactly my point and you unravel the one by going for the 'two' sides of every definition?

And that's why i say you're always half right. And won't downdoot the hair-splitting.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

And then there's the Peter Pan Principle with yet again another island full of boys and pirate trafficker who 'hooks' them. ___ Wendy

4
2EyesOpen 4 points ago +4 / -0

That argument can be made about all bank loans and stock offerings as well.

401ks and social security funds got locked into private corporations funding while everyone slept in the 90s. What does 'private corporation' mean in this context?

A Gordian knot to unravel. But how to remove the snake from the victim's neck without killing the victim? (private savings, investments, aka the real economy) And then get back to production of things?

Is it possible? Are there alternatives?

The snake has a name. The dread 'F' word both 'sides' toss around but refuse to accept as fact is the mode of operation.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›