Agenda 2030, multiple PSYOPs incoming: Energy Lockdowns, Famine & Meningitis Plandemic outbreaks
(fileditchfiles.me)
NWO
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Stickied for more visibility, thanks for putting this together.
(Killer jams too)
Get the fuck out of here impostor. This isn't your forum. Resign your moderation.
Some tranny kike shows up and thinks they run the place.
How exactly did you become moderator again? Was there a vote? Who granted you the status and by what protest was the action made?
I never gave you authority to moderate this forum. You cannot circumvent my approval.
Why can't we be frens?
What notes do you have for moderation?
It's the jews
Any attempts to silence this fact, to censor it, to punish people for saying it, to retaliate against those who state the truth about it shall be considered foreign jewish subversion by jews or their worshiping shabbos goy zionist cuck boys and their criminal cohorts. However, alternative theories are welcomed. Persuasive arguments to claim it is not the jews are allowed to be presented as rebuttal.
No censorship of naughty words. All words are just words. If a word evokes an emotional response out of you, that's your fault, not mine. NIGGER!!!! KIKE!!!! see? They are just words. White Nationalists get called mean words too. You trying to censor people for naughty words means you are gay or else a feminist trying to dominate male spaces, where you don't belong. We don't care about your conditioned visceral emotional trained propagandist responses to naughty words.
apparently they miss you in GAW, go back there.
Hey Vlad, sorry to keep asking, but did we establish that the vast majority of Jewish children were guilty of some crimes in your opinion? Either yes, we should name the crimes, or no, we should modify the oversimplified statement "it's the Jews". And what was it called before Judah was born in 1793 BC? I say it's the satanists.
Words that attack persons without evidence of crimes would break Rule 1.
This is an interesting question. I would ask, are the children of Palestinians guilty of some crimes in the eyes of (Jews)? Yes. Emphatically yes. The answer is yes - their crime is not being born Jewish and being born to the "subservient race" made to serve the Jew.
That is why Palestinian children are murdered, starved and burned with cigarettes.
Thanks for asking, I saw your asking this in c/Christianity first and replied there.
The last sentence is attacking the person, not the argument and this needs to be edited for your comment to be approved.
Argument:
u/SwampRangers
Here we go. White people caring more about White children than your cursed anti-Christ greedy lying rat faced jew children is a crime and gets censored.
Perfect example how you ruined this forum. Right here.
So you're using the alleged standards of Jews who judge their behavior and adopting it as your own standard to judge your own behavior? No, I'm asking you to judge your behavior by stating a crime. You obviously don't believe it's right for them to judge children, so why do you? This has nothing to do with remigration proposals or Anne Frank laws, I want to know why you believe "it's the Jews" includes your criminalizing millions of children. So that I can agree or disagree with your reasoning.
The crime is you hijack the moderation of every subforum and then misuse the power to censor, delete posts, censor fake naughty words, and basically run the place like a communist jew feminist subversive kikel drawer
you forming a fake quorum of 4.5 sock puppets is a gay and fraudulent attempt to ruin this subforum. Shame on the admins who were gullible to fall for your tactics.
To your argument, it's funny to see you adopt the same mindset you are accusing 'all Jews' of having against you. Evil encourages more evil, stop letting them sink you down..
What's that?
If I utilize the same procedures and methods of a jew, then suddenly i have done something wrong? LOL what kind of jewish hypocrisy is this?
3 simple rules Vlad,
Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.
Rule 3: No subversion.
The community discussed, voted that some new mod was needed, and mentioned about 7 different names. After review, admin told u/Thisisnotanexit that they were likely to appoint her (as someone who's been on Conspiracies about 2 years longer than you) and she announced this. After 2 more months in which no serious objection or contestation arose from the community, she was appointed.
Individuals are free to object or seek community action, but so far none has been coordinated.
What was the number of those in approval and what is their recorded forum names? Who is "admin" ?
By your own admission, this planted spy has been sitting dormant many years and then magically gets assigned power. typical jew spy behavior.
Voters were listed at https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARK0RBc7L/community-question-your-response/c/4eXueGRlA3U
Admin are the known admin accounts (C, Perun, Doggos), TINAE didn't say who represented them.
As a fellow Christian, please take my public accountability to Scott Lively and my elders and SwampRangers.com, and TINAE's public accountability as my sister as stated at c/Christianity for the past 5+ years, as sufficient testimony. I respect your right not to take our testimony, but it's appropriate for sovereigns to negotiate rather than to act unilaterally, especially when admins and mods have authority stemming from platform ownership.
LOL so only 4.5 votes allowed you to hijack this forum?
What if i accumulate more than your 4.5 votes in favor of removing this new moderator from power? Then does the same procedural process work for me?
It was up to admin last time and it'll be up to admin anytime it's challenged.
The community had a chance to argue in favor of having no active mods. It still hasn't put forward a case that there is a consensus for that.
Good. Then we will utilize the same scammy procedure and choose a new moderator and make a call to action to remove this tranny. Then you can prove that "it's different this time" and why the procedures have to change now and prove, via your blatant hypocrisy, that you are jew or at least jew in nature.
With a meager 5 upvotes your fraudulent authority will be upended. Your 4.5 approvals are probably just all your own sock puppet accounts.
What a deceptive list of votes, where were they compiled? I distinctly remember myself and many others aside from your 1 listed being against the need for moderation: https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARK9l6ukF/x/c/4eXuKkvGsCZ
Do you have notes on moderation?
Well, your link sure doesn't show a consensus of any kind. It shows haggling about rules, which is now mostly stabilized.
The link I gave you is the compilation. You can click the links to view all comments to see the individual votes.
The fact that a community exists with rules is a default consensus by its founding members that carries over to members who joined later such that overturning those rules requires a large, clear, new discussion.
I encourage anyone interested to do as I have, post a binary (yes-no) question for discussion and analyze the votes. There was one question proposed about alternate moderation and, it not being binary, my recollection is that every contributor had a different idea from every other.
Hello u/Thisisnotanexit, in this title that OP says
BUT having read all 30 comments, WHERE is the discussion on it?
Agenda 2030 will be consisted of civil war, World War 3, and global labor camps.
The pandemics will not be meningitis but leprosy, typhoid and malaria.
The famine will be caused by people being locked up in "section 8 housing in the middle of pristine wilderness" -- literal concentration camps on a global scale.
Depopulate the planet is one of stated Agenda 2030 goal.
BLACK PILLS! GET YOUR BLACK PILLS HERE!!