Agenda 2030, multiple PSYOPs incoming: Energy Lockdowns, Famine & Meningitis Plandemic outbreaks
(fileditchfiles.me)
NWO
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Get the fuck out of here impostor. This isn't your forum. Resign your moderation.
Some tranny kike shows up and thinks they run the place.
How exactly did you become moderator again? Was there a vote? Who granted you the status and by what protest was the action made?
I never gave you authority to moderate this forum. You cannot circumvent my approval.
Why can't we be frens?
What notes do you have for moderation?
It's the jews
Any attempts to silence this fact, to censor it, to punish people for saying it, to retaliate against those who state the truth about it shall be considered foreign jewish subversion by jews or their worshiping shabbos goy zionist cuck boys and their criminal cohorts. However, alternative theories are welcomed. Persuasive arguments to claim it is not the jews are allowed to be presented as rebuttal.
No censorship of naughty words. All words are just words. If a word evokes an emotional response out of you, that's your fault, not mine. NIGGER!!!! KIKE!!!! see? They are just words. White Nationalists get called mean words too. You trying to censor people for naughty words means you are gay or else a feminist trying to dominate male spaces, where you don't belong. We don't care about your conditioned visceral emotional trained propagandist responses to naughty words.
3 simple rules Vlad,
Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.
Rule 3: No subversion.
Hey Vlad, sorry to keep asking, but did we establish that the vast majority of Jewish children were guilty of some crimes in your opinion? Either yes, we should name the crimes, or no, we should modify the oversimplified statement "it's the Jews". And what was it called before Judah was born in 1793 BC? I say it's the satanists.
Words that attack persons without evidence of crimes would break Rule 1.
The community discussed, voted that some new mod was needed, and mentioned about 7 different names. After review, admin told u/Thisisnotanexit that they were likely to appoint her (as someone who's been on Conspiracies about 2 years longer than you) and she announced this. After 2 more months in which no serious objection or contestation arose from the community, she was appointed.
Individuals are free to object or seek community action, but so far none has been coordinated.
What was the number of those in approval and what is their recorded forum names? Who is "admin" ?
By your own admission, this planted spy has been sitting dormant many years and then magically gets assigned power. typical jew spy behavior.
Voters were listed at https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARK0RBc7L/community-question-your-response/c/4eXueGRlA3U
Admin are the known admin accounts (C, Perun, Doggos), TINAE didn't say who represented them.
As a fellow Christian, please take my public accountability to Scott Lively and my elders and SwampRangers.com, and TINAE's public accountability as my sister as stated at c/Christianity for the past 5+ years, as sufficient testimony. I respect your right not to take our testimony, but it's appropriate for sovereigns to negotiate rather than to act unilaterally, especially when admins and mods have authority stemming from platform ownership.
LOL so only 4.5 votes allowed you to hijack this forum?
What if i accumulate more than your 4.5 votes in favor of removing this new moderator from power? Then does the same procedural process work for me?