Skimmed it because reading too much Urantian nonsense at once is hazardous to peace of mind.
They've been developing their lies for millennia and this is some of their best excrement and it still stinks. Deification of creation, denigration of creator, never mind finding a unifying source, because meaninglessness agrees with your desire to sin though only up to a point. But our advanced methods delay accounting for so long, look at the national debt.
I had a revelation at 10:10 on 2023-01-28, about all things at once actually, so it was about this. The core is that every revealed aspect of the present age and the coming age is accessible at every moment. The application here is that any scifi access they claim to councils of pluripotencies and ZPE harnessing and any other transhuman dream is something we the Yahwists had already and can prove our access to whenever needed (which is why we do so seldom).
I haven't been cleared to reveal it all, and I will be talking about it in various ways on various days, but it's all going to be this same vision for awhile for me.
Early in this board, a professing Luciferian came here claiming to doubt whether he could go on in the system. His roleplay was aligned with the claim that they really do believe this, though ultimately it's impossible to really believe this so there's that. It's not so important to us to understand the details of today's lie, because it's just Dumuzid again, with bells. What's important is that truth exists and rewards its seekers, and that's what the real Dumuzid believed.
Just to throw Bible literalism in here, Noah left the ark in 2337 BC, and the Ice Age events all fit into the next 700 years of geology. Walking across 12 miles of ice is no different from Ice Road Truckers in the same place. You have communities around the world in a couple generations, each with copies of the same Noachian records of things that came before. Ice Age events didn't make everything a constant winter, as we've found plenty of mammoths in Siberia with tropical plants in their stomachs and meat that can still be eaten (I believe Solzhenitsyn mentions this last one) due to very sudden climate change consistent with global catastrophe. Scholarly summary.
No need for missing culture. Atlantis was submerged by the flood and we have all the record we need of its culture in the Bible. Afterward, many Hamites went east, including the Sinites who gave their name to China, while some remained like Mizraim who gave his name to Misr (what the Egyptians call Egypt); so both Pacific and American are accounted for among them. The extinction of megafauna is also explained in the link.
All the claims of old age are based on retrospective study and theory building on theories of others, not on clear evidence nor on history. If anyone would like me to review one or two such claims I can take time for it. In the San Diego case that sounds like a prima facie convincing case of human-mastodon interaction other than its anomalous date, the kicker is in the dating method: "James B. Paces [USGS] determined how much uranium in the bones had broken down into another element, thorium. That test revealed, to their surprise, that the bones were 130,000 years old." Well, of course it's a surprise because all their other evidence (e.g. stones and bones as tools) suggested more recent dating. Genesis 10 linguistic evidence would put these people in the late 3rd mill BC. Further, U234-Th230 is less reliable for bones, and there is no validity to assuming things like no initial thorium, as Pope Peter told us in 2 Peter 3:4-7. But if you run the tests the way Big Science approves you get controversial results and money and the Ochs paper will publish your name.
Incidentally, wokism at that paper is revealed in the last editorially added clause of this sentence, which is unnecessary except to defend against misuse of a particular word that any good scientist would let stand on its own: "Dr. Deméré and his colleagues say only that their findings 'confirm the presence of an unidentified species of Homo,' a reference to the human genus."
You have six fingers on your right hand. Someone was looking for you.
Just letting you know I've seen a lot of good posts from you this twelvemonth for the consumption of the scattered twelve tribes. Sorry I haven't had a chance to pick up on them more and copy out some of my twelvemo notes. It's after twelve o'clock here so I don't have time to list all the fascinating twelves that this relates to.
Tell her, "Because Jesus celebrated Hanukkah" ("Dedication" in John 10:22). And a happy Feast of Lights to you.
Thank you for posting on our community after making this comment. I appreciate that you are trying to learn the rules that community has asked for, and that you are making a civil case for your rejection of Christianity. Further interaction may help us get to shared truth and love as you seek.
Incidentally, it might interest you to know that a majority of the forum board has decided not to change the ban of your friend u/allmodsarefags, but further appeal is possible if there is some change in his behavior similar to that which you have shown. For that reason unless I am charged with censorship again I will not publish either of your private correspondences.
To answer your question, the comment directed to u/dipshit8841 was copied to you because you were mentioned in it. I can understand your confusion when you are copied on a question that is not directed to you.
To answer your question in your other comment, you are right that alts are not prohibited unless they are used to evade other prohibitions. If you two are not alts, you march so in lockstep that you can be considered meatpuppets. Either way the publication of evidence that you think alike is valid.
We can stop anytime you can stop asking questions and/or making demands.
To answer your request for ban, for the reasons expressed to you in private (i.e. your account's offenses did not rise to that level of infraction), we are not banning you. If you would like me to publish your correspondence, please advise. We can "let it go" as soon as you can.
Not mad, just answering your questions. Would you like your mod correspondence published as well as u/allmodsarefags?
I'll publish the mods' entire correspondence then. You're the one not letting go of it by talking about me behind my back and continuing the private dialogue. None of us have anything to hide.
It's easy for me to copy-paste-edit one comment to another when the cases of your two alts are so identical.
Since you are asking about me:
You are mistaken. u/dipshit8841 is not currently banned from c/Christianity, but was banned by the mods for 1 day a full month ago, as the public logs show. You privately appealed your ban and that appeal is under consideration. Both you and your "friend" came to c/Christianity by following u/jack445566778899 and making comments against his flat-earth position. Your comments were deleted because our rules against obscenity and attack may have been stricter than you are used to. If you think we are censoring you, we will be happy to publish your entire conversation with the mods and the deleted comments here.
The fact that your "friend" seems to have immediately responded to a private message to a different user and seems to have gotten confused about the sequence of events, the identical nature of your and his public and private comments, your shared difficulty letting go of conversations, and the similar language you both use in this thread all suggest strongly that you two are the alts. Or bots.
None of the mod board of Christianity recalls anything about u/Mad_King_Kalak.
Since you are asking about me:
You are mistaken. You were not banned from c/Christianity in the past few days, but you were banned by the mods for 1 day a full month ago, as the public logs show, and you are currently free to post there. Both you and u/allmodsarefags came to c/Christianity by following u/jack445566778899 and making comments against his flat-earth position. Your comments were deleted because our rules against obscenity and attack may have been stricter than you are used to.
u/allmodsarefags received an indefinite ban at that time, which we recently reduced to a 1-year ban out of charity. The fact that you seem to have immediately responded to a private message to a different user and seem to have gotten confused about the sequence of events, the identical nature of your and his public and private comments, your shared difficulty letting go of conversations, and the similar language you both use in this thread all suggest strongly that you two are the alts. Or bots.
None of the mod board of Christianity recalls anything about u/Mad_King_Kalak.
You also jumped on the flat earther.
I'm over it. No stalking going on, just replying to your and his replies. Now that you've made yourself clear I have no further need to satisfy your proposal to discuss it in public.
Well, I have good news for you! You are welcome to post anything in any of my free-speech forums with a complete exemption from any ban or tool threat. I recommend c/FreeSpeech, but c/Truth might work too.
I say this because you messaged the mods of c/Christianity suggesting that you wanted to have a public free-speech discussion on certain things. (Would you like me to quote you precisely on that?) Rest assured that you Scored is robust enough to "do this in public", and if you want any of the other mods involved I can appeal to them too. Looking forward to your contribs.
Don't dare me to write my own book and start my own cult, I've already stared down that temptation. However I do have plans to write a book about advanced wisdom and tech that will not start a cult, so maybe I'll sneak in some digs at Urantia too.
Anyway, I'm open-minded, but the evidence has to be presented before it can be received by the mind.
But LightBringer, they lie. Even if Wilfred Kellogg did all the handwriting of the book while asleep, why should we trust his source if it's not independently verifiable? I could never read more than a few pages of Urantia at a time because it is exactly the genre of sci-fi that I find the most depressing and dismal of all, namely explanatory fiction apologetic for phenomena that do not exist except in the writer's mind. If it disagrees with observable population growth, recent common ancestor genetics, universal clocks such as ice cores, and Klee diagrams, then I might conclude it was just influenced by them rather than subject to independent research. But Sadler didn't even want to admit who wrote it anyway, because it was probably a group of more than Kellogg.
I would be better off saying everything Tolkien ever wrote was the gospel truth and hobbits are more real than reptilians if Urantia were my only source for the latter. It's the same larp.
I recalled that you weren't solid on that belief, which is why I referred instead to Y-Adam and mitochondrial Eve, the most recent common ancestors for each gender, who were not necessarily "Adam and Eve" or even contemporaneous with each other.
But others are asking you for sources about the more specific dates and sequences too. This is why I say, remember that some sources lie: it seems you can remember it when it comes to the Bible. And "Lucifer" is a relatively modern title, we should probably stick with the Hebrew word Helel so we know which imp we're talking about. So what research have you got?
Well, if you put the dawn of man that far back then yes they'd be newcomers by that standard too. But that early date for man is being challenged by population growth theory and freshly by the dating of Y-Adam and mitochondrial Eve, which together are likely to bring humanity to less than 200,000 years old.
The giants were all genus Homo, were interfertile with H. sapiens, and qualify as humans just like Neanderthals do. Some call them watchers, some not. Their DNA is probably well-mixed into our own now, i.e., inconsequential, but when there are purer ones it's much harder for them to integrate. Noah and David tell us they remained among us, but it's likely there are none left of them with the full original DNA.
These regressive giants only arise where Homo sapiens gives them the space to thrive. Because they are parasitic if there is no cooperation they cannot survive alone. They are not the same as the extra-tall Homo sapiens we see today in the record books, who are acromegalic rather than gigantist.
Was just looking into it. Each time there is a wave of them, humanity roots them out in decades or centuries; but each wave, because they lie, pretends to be continuous with all the others. They have no continuity whatsoever, only loose confederacy, easily broken. There were some before 1800 but each group gets stamped out only to be replaced by a new infestation from elsewhere that pretends to be the same thing.
Great summary! Going places. But remember:
-
They lie, so don't take their word for being around hundreds of thousands of years. They haven't been, they're new at this.
-
They lie, so don't take their word for their needing baby blood. They don't, but pretending they do makes them sympathetic to those who get a high off the blood.
-
And always crosspost to c/Reptilians.
Oh, I'm in perfect sympathy with you, I just like to advert to others how much was said and how much we inferred; and we need to be alert to what the new proposed control will be.
Scored has been a godsend to break up these lockdowns.
Good gloss. But what they actually said was:
Social media and content moderation experts said Twitch’s quick response was the best that could reasonably be expected. But the fact that the response did not prevent the video of the attack from being spread widely on other sites also raises the issue of whether the ability to livestream should be so easily accessible.
“I’m impressed that they got it down in two minutes,” said Micah Schaffer, a consultant who has led trust and safety decisions at Snapchat and YouTube. “But if the feeling is that even that’s too much, then you really are at an impasse: Is it worth having this?”
The argument is that you should have 50 followers to livestream. Like you should have 50 "employees" before you're really a business. I'm getting Edison Carter Live & Direct vibes.
Not really. Both "melech" and "baal" were neutral words for any human king or lord. In time a particular form of melech, Moloch, became a name, but melech remained perfectly fine, including in modern Hebrew. On the other hand Baal also became a name, without any untouched revocalization, and so it was largely lost for other purposes.
But the creator was never tied down to a title, and for the most part when the name Yahweh was revealed it worked so well that very few tried to counterfeit it (that's happened more in our era than theirs). Basically either you worship Yahweh, or it doesn't matter what you worship because you're toasted by natural consequences.
Usually comparing consonants would work, but Amalek is really Amaleq and has a different, foreign root (some suspect Emeq). Moloch, Molech, Molek, Milcom, Milchom are all the same, but melech, melek, melchi are generic words of kingship. Most certainly king and deity are confusable, and continue to be in the present day. The solution is to find the one deity that rules all others and is a reliable source of good and justice (hint: talk to Jesus).
It's true that, after the Israelites left Egypt (a phase of the Hyksos Expulsion, 15th dynasty, 1539 BC), they were rapidly beset by, and acceptant of, worshippers of Baal and Moloch claiming to attribute those names to Yahweh. The key to remember is that Yahweh worshippers left no artifacts, but the others left plenty of sex toys and other figurines. The only way we can spot a good city of Yahweh worshippers is the lack of pig bones; and that doesn't help us determine the counts of nomads at all. So you summarize it pretty well as half this half that, because many archaeologists fail to note these points and say all Baal and hardly any Yahweh at all.
Nebo was the Hebrew spelling of Assyrian Nabu as in Nebuchadrezzar and works out to be the same as Thoth, Mercury, and Hermes. Because of identifications, you want to be very sure of your source if it says that Lucifer, Satan, Abaddon or the like are independent; sometimes they're just sockpuppet accounts. If your source is from the spiritual side, remember that they lie. If it's from a human testimony it can be tested.
Anyway, all that was to say the OP is a great opening dossier page and it helps to know who influenced whom when. The symbols and patterns haven't changed much today.
cc: u/Primate98
The real Dumuzid the Shepherd was Abel, he's one of the earliest whose stories got perverted, it's all just been slop on top since then.