1
CriticalObjective 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bro is out here doing some level 1 attacks bringing up nicea

Didn't get past reading this. And even thou I wasted a couple of seconds. Then 3 more seconds to block you. A total of 5 seconds I will not get back.

Somewhere tree is producing oxygen for you. I’m sorry for it.

2
CriticalObjective 2 points ago +2 / -0

I find this strange for a man who claims to be a Christian. On Easter Sunday Donald Trump prayed to Allah, but not Jesus Christ.

Also, he did not attend Easter church services, instead hosting private events and touring Washington, D.C.

2
CriticalObjective 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow... that would mean the whole fake state of Israel.

2
CriticalObjective 2 points ago +2 / -0

All of the above. The poor people are the goyim and according to Gates "we will not need most of them" when asked about AI replacing human jobs. The question from the journalist was about jobs, but the laugh from Gates at the end of answering the question told me Bill was thinking eugenics.

3
CriticalObjective 3 points ago +3 / -0

Have you watched the movie Pilgrim's Progress: Journey to Heaven? it's the story of a Christian believer on a journey from the City of Destruction to the Celestial City. That sums up perfectly what you're saying.

1
CriticalObjective 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, "let me tell you the Gospel

That's all I read, didn't have to read any further. Go tell the Gospel to your relatives, I don't have time for you.

1
CriticalObjective 1 point ago +1 / -0

Things to think about.

I don't and I won't. But, if you choose to think about, then good on you.

have you considered the differences between gilgul, metempsychosis, and transmigration

No, I haven't... and don't plan to consider it in the future. I choose to focus on my own journey and how to connect with pure consciousness. If you wish to call me selfish I wouldn't be upset with you.

is a person not free to lock that desire in because such desire will always be thwarted sooner or later?

Maybe you think too much. But, again if that's want you want to do, by all means do it.

2
CriticalObjective 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have relative respect for universalists who don't insist on everyone else agreeing with them

I wouldn't call myself a universalist, but I can see where you're coming from. And you're not wrong. And likewise I'm fine with other people having a different opinion. I do hold the belief that every person will ultimately enter heaven, e.g. achieve Christ consciousness. It may take thousands of lifetimes, but that's end result. I'm sure a loving God would not condemn anyone to eternal torment.

Sympathy for the devil?

No idea what you mean by this.

2
CriticalObjective 2 points ago +2 / -0

There were Messiahs all over the place in those times

And probably there are many today. But, It's not what I'm talking about.

Even today, in the US, at any given time, there are multiple people claiming to be the Messiah, a prophet, whatever

Again, I'm pretty sure you are correct, but you are talking about something completely different.

Messiah is the Hebrew term mashiach, meaning "the anointed one," referring to a savior or liberator chosen by God to restore a group of people. This is something that the Jews have made up. And Christians adopted. In Christianity Jesus of Nazareth is believed to be the Messiah who fulfilled the Old Testament prophecies. But, IMO this is just a made up story. God, and I happen to believe there is one, I call him pure consciousness, has never chosen anyone, an individual human being, and never will. This God has chosen to create Humanity, and for that purpose he chose all 8 billion of us. We're all his sons and daughters, whoever says otherwise is only trying to divide us. The divine spark is the portion of the true, transcendent God (pure consciousness) that resides within each human being, trapped within the material world we are born in.

All you have to do is recognize the portion of God that resides within each one of us (within yourself), the inner divine spark, and connect. Once you do that then you become a Christ, or a Messiah, which is nothing more than a title. Jesus is just a name, just like yours may be Michael or John, but it's not who he or you are. You are a divine spark (a small portion of the infinite consciousness) temporarily housed in a material body. I hope you now understand what I meant by "many Jesuses".

1
CriticalObjective 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know what you mean. But, like I said, it doesn't mean the Church is right. The Church managed to change a lot of things, from seeing Jesus as his own disciples did during his ministry, as a Jewish man with an apocalyptic message of coming destruction, to seeing him as something far greater, a preexistent divine being who became human only temporarily before being made the Lord of the universe. It was not long after that that Jesus was declared to be the very Word of God made flesh, who was with God at creation and through whom God made all things. Eventually Jesus came to be seen as God in every respect, coeternal with the Father, of the same substance as the Father, equal to the Father within the Trinity of three persons, but one God.

This God Christ may not have been the historical Jesus. But he was the Christ of orthodox Christian doctrine, the object of faith and veneration over the centuries.

2
CriticalObjective 2 points ago +2 / -0

he does not deserve the titles creator, deity, demiurge, or Yahweh

Yahweh, you mean the god of the OT, the god of the Jews. He would be so proud to see his chosen people doing so much good in the world today. From Gaza, to Lebanon and Iran. Spreading goodness and love all over the place.

1
CriticalObjective 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus is the part of the Trinity as God's Form

That's what the Church teaches. It doesn't mean they're right. Jesus does not say “I am the Father” or “the Father and I am one.”. He says “the Father and I are [plural] one".

Even Tertullian admitted: “Thus the Father is distinct from the Son, being greater than the Son, inasmuch as He who begets is one, and He who is begotten is another”. That didn't go well with the orthodox theologians at that time. Some even called it heresy. After much debate orthodox settled for the paradox of the Trinity: there are three persons, all of whom are God, but there is only one God. One God, manifest in three persons, who are distinct in number but united somehow. Many people, myself included, find this mind-boggling. As many have already noted it's a notion that challenges human logic and the law of non-contradiction.

1
CriticalObjective 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, you are another Christian apologist like Tertullian. If I'm not mistaken, it was Tertullian who became the first Christian author to adopt the term Trinity as a way of understanding the relationship of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

Jesus does not say “I am the Father” or “the Father and I am one.”. He says “the Father and I are [plural] one". I don't care if to you "Trinity" literally just means threeness, or triunity, or three-in-oneness... to me is extreme confusion.

2
CriticalObjective 2 points ago +2 / -0

You basically have to choose between believing in written history and his existence or not believing anything from written history and his existence

You can believe anything you want to believe. I'm fine with that. But, I don't have to choose anything that you suggest.

Lol his existence is not in dispute. His divinity is.

By divinity you mean the Holy Trinity, that is... God is nothing and everything? isn't why emperor Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea in 325? to affirm the full divinity of Jesus, declaring him to be of the same homoousios as God, rather than a created being. To me Trinity means God is both real and not real. God is a symbol and reality itself. It is the weirdest idea I've ever come across in my life. btw, you can laugh all you wish, I don't care.

1
CriticalObjective 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm surprised you don't know this. In Gnostic belief systems, Jesus prayed to the Father (Monad) as the ultimate, ineffable source of all being, often referred to as the "God above God" or Bythos, distinct from the lesser creator deity known as the Demiurge (aka Yahweh in the OT). Gnostics viewed the Monad as a singular, formless essence without name, emotion, or form, from which all spiritual emanations (Aeons) flow, including the Christ spirit. That's what many of the early Christians believed as well.

2
CriticalObjective 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's my opinion that your reliance on the Gospels as historical sources is flawed. Having said that, it is possible a real man named Jesus of Nazareth lived in the first century, even if the religious details surrounding his life are legendary. It is also possible this person really understood the meaning of "Christ". Christ embodies the universal consciousness that transcends individual identity serving as the essence of spiritual enlightenment.

1
CriticalObjective 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no evidence of a historical Jesus. But, that doesn't mean he didn't exist. Maybe there were many Jesuses at different times in the history of mankind, when we needed someone to wake us up. Maybe instead of calling them Jesus we could just simply call them Awaken.

1
CriticalObjective 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe that's why Jesus was praying to the Father and not the god of the OT. When Jesus said, "I and the father are one," he was not claiming to be Yahweh. He was describing his consciousness in complete synthesis with the ultimate source beyond all creation.

3
CriticalObjective 3 points ago +3 / -0

Charlie's not dead

I agree with you. It's all a Hollywood production stunt. “Rest now, brother. We have the watch, and I’ll see you in Valhalla.” - FBI Director Kash Patel

Turns out Valhalla is in New Zealand: https://www.geomap.nz/valhalla

I have no doubt Charlie was taken into witness protection. I don't think Valhalla is a code name, but a physical location. How long would they keep Charlie alive, we can all take a guess. IMO, probably not that long. They can finish him anytime they want, after all he's already dead.

1
CriticalObjective 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nicotine has health benefits

Nicotine is healthy, improves memory and alertness. You can find nicotine in many plants. Tobacco plants contain nicotine which constitutes 0.3% to 0.5% of the tobacco plant's dry weight. After that, Eggplant contains the highest level of nicotine, 100 nanograms, or 0.1 micrograms, of nicotine per gram of eggplant. But, Tomatoes, Potatoes, Bell peppers, Papaya all contain high levels of nicotine.

The government is putting a generic name labels

There is another reason the Government is against nicotine. French researchers knew nicotine could protect against Covid-19. Looks like they all knew this back in March 2020 (IMO much earlier), right at the start of the Covid plandemic. here is the link

1
CriticalObjective 1 point ago +1 / -0

The inventors of AI were John McCarthy and Marvin Minsky

Before John McCarthy and Marvin Minsky, McCulloch and Pits had already published a 1943 paper talking about neural networks using binary logic (0 and 1). How did they now about that, when they didn't have a computer to test it on? It is however true that John McCarthy coined the term “artificial intelligence” in 1956.

Babylon is Judaism, Babylon is the Jewish people

I would agree with you here. 97% of the 20 million of the world’s Jews are not descendants of Abraham. The various groups of Jews in the world today do not share a common genetic origin, and their genome is largely Khazar. In fact even the word Jew is a relatively recent invention, going back to 1775. Prior to 1775 the word "Jew" did not exist in any language. Sheridan used it for the first time in his play "The Rivals".

next to the Devil you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real Jew

Makes sense since the Bible talks about two distinct bloodlines (offsprings). Jews represent the seed of the serpent. You may call them Edomites and Canaanites, but not Israelites. "I'll place hostility between you and the woman, between your offspring and her offspring. He'll strike you on the head, and you'll strike him on the heel." - Genesis 3:15

3
CriticalObjective 3 points ago +3 / -0

discuss the moon landing

What Moon landing? You mean the Stanley Kubrick production film?

view more: Next ›