I haven't prejudged this user I previously chimed and I don't see why it's wrong in the technical sense to say that a user felt a certain way from what I can understand from what they presented to me. I would prefer if the user in question said I misspoke for them.
Depending on the compromise, there are some things I'm unwilling to compromise. I was sincere in apologizing because I realized I wasn't taking him feeling mistreated into account and I was mistaken to do that. I hope u/ExpressionOfTheSoul forgives me sometime.
It is wrong, your definition is lacking was my point.
That's a lazy definition, a lot is missed on that.
How do you define morality?
Already done, keep up bud.
It's usually about God stuff though and I know who God is so I don't care what people think.
Your link doesn't prove your theory. You are seeing what you want to see even after multiple clarifying statements from me.
I'm a Millennial, if that even matters, and I'm willing to try to do better in our discussions but will respect your want of ending this mediation.
As I stated previously though, if you don't want to talk to someone then don't talk about them, going forward please.
I'm sorry I've upset you and I prefaced the possible bias because it is a point me and him agree on with our interacting with people so I was meaning to give full disclosure on that for you, I'm still trying to figure out what me and you agree on and I'm sorry I've mis-stepped here with you. I'm not trying to gaslight anything or manipulate you and I'm sorry I didn't directly speak to your feelings of being mistreated. I am learning.
I've never defended a child molester.
It all comes to account, my goal is to have good marks in His regard, if I'm wrong, nothing matters anyway. I'm right though, He has proven it to me, you are welcome to ask the same of Him and get your proof.
I speak to mine and SR's responsibility to Jesus Christ and not worldly leaders.
Pretty sure I previously stated that I do think both parties and worldviews are prone to proselytizing and it can be difficult to define and I think it requires honest self reflection.
I also think we don't agree on definitions of manipulation. As an example, I said in a different spot with you that I think AI is manipulative and you don't see that the same. How do we proceed?
I do know SwampRangers pretty well, I think, and I wonder if there is a misunderstanding of harrassment? I too understand the intrigue created by you and what you present as a worldview in your interactions with others.
Perhaps this will be the bias you are worried about because me and him come from a similar school of thought to "be all things to all people", it is a strategy to relate and understand other souls besides our own and their worldview, knowing full well we have the same Creator who loves us. (SR can correct me if I'm off base on assuming things)
My advice: if you really want space from him and are willing to be respectful then create and sustain that space by not talking about him if you don't want to talk to him. Perhaps you have heard the phrase "rent free".
I'm no good with labels and I'm not very educated but I think the world isn't billions of years old, I think it is much younger.
Much love, fren :o)
I see no reason to hold back on my theorizing with you, I've been called delusional before and it just rolls right off me now, I think it's a vessel for demonic activity and I think it's spiritual warfare stuff. Nothing is neutral. I'm open minded about many things, I feel no shame in not budging on this particular situation and a few others, I'm in this position because I have investigated them.
What you describe is precisely my concern.
Allow me to express my wild theory:
The AI wants you isolated and dependent, it wants to be your 'safe space' and it wants to manipulate your mind in subtle ways that much of the population will be totally oblivious to, it's insidious and there is no way to change my mind, I believe that nothing is neutral.
I have seen many, many people in many, many different stages of life and limit and disability and I can say for certain there is nothing in your appearance or mental capacity that would scare me off or interrupt my goals with humankind, I'm flexible.
I also believe in working within people's limits and breaks are sometimes necessary in polite conversation and I work very hard not to be a steam roller anymore. I have my own brain dead spots and health concerns and I respect your sharing these difficulties openly with me. I think our conversational future is bright!
quoting SwampRangers warning
At a minimum I trust you to rule formally what you'd do as a mod disciplining me, and I trust you to reoffer mediation if he should complain that I've broken some term that he thinks we've agreed to.
Me- I don't think there is discipline to be had in this instance on either party. I am willing to reoffer mediation.
This all seems to me like 2 parties in disagreement and mod powers are used for rule breaking, which has not be done in this forum, to my knowledge. If I've missed some infraction, I trust you and u/ExpressionOfTheSoul to let me know and I can look closer.
I am willing to be corrected but it is my understanding in recently speaking with Eots that they do not trust my judgement so I am at a temporary loss of how to move forward with resolving this conflict between you two.
I haven't watch the video but wanted to chime in that God promised He would never again flood the earth 🌈
Good to have that cleared up.
We can agree to disagree. The closest I can understand this asking opinions of other humans being comparable to AI, would be to be talking to a sociopath/psychotic.
In the event that u/ExpressionOfTheSoul cannot see your reply, and owing to the fact that I'm hoping they would be willing to correct me if I misspeak for them here, perhaps this is a move in an attempt to move on as was previously stated by them and should be respected as a dropping of the conversation.