Agenda 2030, multiple PSYOPs incoming: Energy Lockdowns, Famine & Meningitis Plandemic outbreaks
(fileditchfiles.me)
NWO
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
The community discussed, voted that some new mod was needed, and mentioned about 7 different names. After review, admin told u/Thisisnotanexit that they were likely to appoint her (as someone who's been on Conspiracies about 2 years longer than you) and she announced this. After 2 more months in which no serious objection or contestation arose from the community, she was appointed.
Individuals are free to object or seek community action, but so far none has been coordinated.
What was the number of those in approval and what is their recorded forum names? Who is "admin" ?
By your own admission, this planted spy has been sitting dormant many years and then magically gets assigned power. typical jew spy behavior.
Voters were listed at https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARK0RBc7L/community-question-your-response/c/4eXueGRlA3U
Admin are the known admin accounts (C, Perun, Doggos), TINAE didn't say who represented them.
As a fellow Christian, please take my public accountability to Scott Lively and my elders and SwampRangers.com, and TINAE's public accountability as my sister as stated at c/Christianity for the past 5+ years, as sufficient testimony. I respect your right not to take our testimony, but it's appropriate for sovereigns to negotiate rather than to act unilaterally, especially when admins and mods have authority stemming from platform ownership.
LOL so only 4.5 votes allowed you to hijack this forum?
What if i accumulate more than your 4.5 votes in favor of removing this new moderator from power? Then does the same procedural process work for me?
It was up to admin last time and it'll be up to admin anytime it's challenged.
The community had a chance to argue in favor of having no active mods. It still hasn't put forward a case that there is a consensus for that.
What a deceptive list of votes, where were they compiled? I distinctly remember myself and many others aside from your 1 listed being against the need for moderation: https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARK9l6ukF/x/c/4eXuKkvGsCZ
Do you have notes on moderation?
Well, your link sure doesn't show a consensus of any kind. It shows haggling about rules, which is now mostly stabilized.
The link I gave you is the compilation. You can click the links to view all comments to see the individual votes.
The fact that a community exists with rules is a default consensus by its founding members that carries over to members who joined later such that overturning those rules requires a large, clear, new discussion.
I encourage anyone interested to do as I have, post a binary (yes-no) question for discussion and analyze the votes. There was one question proposed about alternate moderation and, it not being binary, my recollection is that every contributor had a different idea from every other.