Agenda 2030, multiple PSYOPs incoming: Energy Lockdowns, Famine & Meningitis Plandemic outbreaks
(fileditchfiles.me)
NWO
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
The last sentence is attacking the person, not the argument and this needs to be edited for your comment to be approved.
Argument:
u/SwampRangers
Here we go. White people caring more about White children than your cursed anti-Christ greedy lying rat faced jew children is a crime and gets censored.
Perfect example how you ruined this forum. Right here.
You were censored for your attack on the user, your argument was kept intact and now we are continuing debating your argument, which I think is hypocritcal.
Explain to me how it is a White man's burden to care for or protect jews or even to host them in our nations?
The bible clearly gives particular nations to particular races of people, and promises kingdoms to those obedient to God, and curses kingdoms. Also God instructs Solomon to commit genocide against the Amalekites including the women and children and even their animals. So according to my religion, genocide is permitted by God because God never sins. Stop being a BIGOT!!!!! This is my Christian Religion. I don't care about your fake virtue system. By what moral system do you determine right versus wrong?
We're not arguing white man's burden. I agreed with you that genocide including children is permitted in the Bible in certain very regulated cases. Obviously you don't want the cases drawn so loosely that it justifies the next idiot who decides on his own recognizance that he can commit "genocide" against any individual of his choosing without reason. That would be murder. So let's find out what crimes your avenging by your genocide, you haven't said.
If you get 4.5 votes for, and 1 vote against, on some binary proposition that contradicts the prior vote, that would indicate that the prior voters had become passive so it might be a start on new consensus. However, if you don't get a margin of 3.5 it would be a less conclusive total. Plus, just as last time, it's not on any of us to interpret results finally but only on admin. Admin didn't announce how they would implement the vote in favor of a generic mod, instead they approached TINAE rather than anyone else and negotiated a plan and let her publish it. So please feel free and see what the community does and what the admin does.
You can do all this without namecalling, which is still a Rule 1 violation.
If we were to get more users here to demand your removal as moderator than the petty 4.5 votes (sock puppets?) that made you moderator to begin with, then it is YOU who is the hypocrite for objecting to the procedures you utilized to benefit yourself.