Get ready for a wave of "Covid causes myocarditis, get your jab now" propaganda.
I mean, they can say what they like but good luck collecting from an American company.
I wonder if the lack of rational thought and impulse control makes MKUltra techniques more effective on them?
Imagine if all the BLM riots were actually directed by three letter agencies?
Yeah, not like you TOTAL CHADS on c/feminism constantly seething about ConPro...
A month or so ago, I though I thought my phone was stolen so I tried to log into my gmail to change the password (it's the only thing logged in automatically).
Not only could I not log in on any device I hadn't already used (luckily I had on my PC), I couldn't change the password even then.
This means that the (theoretical) thief had access to my e-mail, which I couldn't prevent, and if they somehow got my password, they could have changed it to lock me out entirely. For reference, I never setup my phone as a 2FA; this was done automatically just because I had logged into gmail using said phone. Using my phone to "prove" my identity is worse than useless, and it's already in place.
Try to get into your gmail without your phone and see what happens.
I appreciate those who are able to keep up this effort after so long, but I'm pretty thoroughly demoralized.
What can we do? Even if we get some kind of law passed or write a pandemic plan that enshrines the right of people to not be guinea pigs, they threw everything out the window as soon as the "emergency" hit. And 85%+ of people allowed it.
My only real hope is that people have woken up to how much damage government can do when given free reign, but I think even that is a long shot.
They come with built in butt plugs.
Hey Imp, how many can we put you down for?
I think "23 and me" would sort that "context" out pretty quick. It's not as though a quadroon is Black a quarter of the time and White the rest...
Nobody regrets not getting the shot...
That's it? While two ISIS was rampaging through Syria and Iraq, seizing infrastructure and enslaving the (muslim) natives, a couple of guys shot a two border guards in Israel.
Kind proves his broader point, no? If this is the worst attack from the "Islamic" State against Israel that you can find, it begs the question: "why do they hit their own people so much harder than their supposed enemies?"
can they prove
Ima stop you right there.
No, you can't "prove" any religion empirically. That would be science which, while being well suited to dealing with the physical universe, is completely useless in dealing with questions like "how should I live my life?" or "what is Good?"
If you can prove something, faith is nonsensical. I don't believe that objects accelerate due to gravity (within a myriad of qualifiers) because I don't need to, I can prove it experimentally.
I believe that it is Good to honour my race (although not, perhaps, as the highest goal) and no amount of evidence can change that.
Nothing you have ever said has resulted in anything being added to a conversation.
Also, there is no digital ID program in Texas. While the law says there should be, they never actually implemented it.
Do some research before posting next time, this took me all of 30 minutes.
Why can't you get your facts straight? You're always almost right, with some seemingly correct information interspersed with nonsense and outright lies. Maybe it you were technically accurate (in your attempt to get humanity to commit suicide) I wouldn't have to "um, actually" you. Be better.
I went and reviewed the Heritage Foundation board of directors (which you didn't link) and the majority are atheists. Most of the remaining Christians are explicit Zionists (ie Jews with extra steps). Where are the Christians?
On that topic, the author of the bill you mentioned, Mike Lee, is a trustee of the HF, but didn't join until after the publication of Project 2025; another reason accuracy matters. Also, for no particular reason: https://www.trackaipac.com/states/utah?rq=Mike%20Lee
As for Project 2025, this is just a nickname for a report that's published every year since the 80s. The current regime has already explicitely rejected several of their proposals, including some around immigration, so it's not as though they're running the show. Further, while the report does call for criminalize pornography, it says nothing about digital ID, which makes sense as DID is a method of legitimizing pronography by creating mechanisms of exclusive access to it. Why would any anti-porn group want a way to make porn accessible to anyone?
After having done your research, I think it's not very likely that Mike Lee was paid almost $400,000 by Jews and then decided afterwards to join the Heritage Foundation (an avowed pro-America group) in order to express his "Christian beliefs" by finding ways for adults to access porn. I think it much more likely that a bought-and-paid-for Zionist intentionally infiltrated a pro-America group in order to obfuscate the source of his bill which clearly aligns with Jewish interests (ie using porn to blackmail specific individuals).
That's why details matter.
That's funny, why are so many of it's proponents avout atheists (including atheist Jews)?
Which Christians support DEI?
Name me a single parent calling for this (other than professional politicians).
-
Project 2025 is not a group, it's a report by a group called the Heritage Foundation. While the Heritage Foundation has some Christian members, they also have their fair share of atheist billionaires and Zionist shills.
-
I couldn't find anything linking Project 2025 to digital ID. What are you referring to?
-
The only place in the US that is actually trialing digital ID is California, the atheist hellscape.
Real ones shout outside.
Is it really "far-right" to say "White children have a right to live"?
Yes.
Yeah, but that's swinging back pretty quickly. I don't think we're going to have a generation that is both born and dies with the idea that homosexuality is morally neutral.
Ah, you don't proofread your own posts. That makes a lot of sense, actually...
I agree with this. No church has the power to assert the authority of God, and they certainly have no business in Earthly matters. Someone using holy authority to justify political influence is called the king, not the church.
Okay, but if the system collapses, none of this digital ownership/collateral will matter; it will simply be the case of the most ruthless taking real assets from the physically weak.
Even if they hire mercenaries to protect them, what is the incentive for the merc leaders to not just kill them and seize their land/posessions? Fake digital money? Running on an infrastructure maintained by jeets?
Everything they're doing is predicated on the idea that the electrical grid and global internet continue to function, but they're simultaneously eliminating the only people who can keep said infrastructure running.
We're still living in majority White nations but already seeing unambiguous degredation of our systems due to "diversity hires". Do they not see this or do they actually think they can keep these complex systems running using peoples who tear up White-built roads to burn for fuel?