So, what, every "pond" has it's own little sun that goes in a little circle directly above it? Oh, and the suns are actually spotlights that shine straight down and nowhere else, allowing night to happen. And you can't see the beams because the matter in the atmosphere is enough to completely block them when you're far away, but not enough that light is refracted when you're close.
Man, that sure sounds like something you could easily demonstrate and replicate under controlled conditions.
The reason I say toroid Earth is because that's essentially the only way to have the sun move as we observe it to move without a globe. So literally every other idea is retarded.
To answer your question: no, this is not a joke. This very image was sent to me by someone on this board, years ago, as an apologia for FE. People, who call themselves critical thinkers, actually think this is possible.
Yup...long winded, drawn out explanations that need to be go into mental gymnastics to try to explain the idiocy of tge heliocentric model. It's expected at this point.
U know when a kid makes up a lie and then it compounds into a convoluted explanation?
That's what always happens when arguing the stand point of the mainstream narrative based on lies.. That's why we see NDG getting tripped up calling the shape a pear now...😅
We aren't moving, nor is there any curve. Trust your senses not a bunch of masons.
What if the flat earth ball was actually a flat ball earth ball flat Frisbee ball pancake banana?
Nope, still retarded.
So, what, every "pond" has it's own little sun that goes in a little circle directly above it? Oh, and the suns are actually spotlights that shine straight down and nowhere else, allowing night to happen. And you can't see the beams because the matter in the atmosphere is enough to completely block them when you're far away, but not enough that light is refracted when you're close.
I'll compromise on toroid Earth, that's it.
Man, that sure sounds like something you could easily demonstrate and replicate under controlled conditions.
The reason I say toroid Earth is because that's essentially the only way to have the sun move as we observe it to move without a globe. So literally every other idea is retarded.
To answer your question: no, this is not a joke. This very image was sent to me by someone on this board, years ago, as an apologia for FE. People, who call themselves critical thinkers, actually think this is possible.
Finally some good one open to question everything
"you actually cannot reliably see the curve from the ground. "
True but i can be tested, which it has thoroughly at a dregration of 8inch per square mile.
All tests show lasers at up to 40miles across a lake in perfect view- weird
Here's one of your guys Neil degrase Tyson calling the shape of earth a "pear" 🤣
I love how the goalpost have to be moved with long winded explanations that only confuse.
When the truth is quite simple...as
https://youtu.be/KB8bawW1am4?si=4sW9Jje3pFiBczkT
Yup...long winded, drawn out explanations that need to be go into mental gymnastics to try to explain the idiocy of tge heliocentric model. It's expected at this point.
U know when a kid makes up a lie and then it compounds into a convoluted explanation?
That's what always happens when arguing the stand point of the mainstream narrative based on lies.. That's why we see NDG getting tripped up calling the shape a pear now...😅
We aren't moving, nor is there any curve. Trust your senses not a bunch of masons.