What would you expect from the type of person who expects the government to raise their kids for them?
Is that "emitted in total"? Like since the beginning of the industrial revolution? So we're not even remotely close?
Or is this study just an excuse for Bon Jovi?
Im not gonna argue or debate with ingenuine intent
Exactly, that's why I didn't even read the rest of your comment, let alone write a paper in response.
If you can't explain it, you don't understand it.
Summarize. I'm not arguing with someone else arguing on your behalf.
Oh cool, the Flat Earth crowd is finally abandoning that tack and now it's "there's no such thing as germs".
I'll reiterate, I'm fully willing to accept that germ theory isn't complete or accurate. Go ahead and provide some evidence, or a competing theory. But your "arguments" are shit.
All you've said, any of you, amounts to "anyone who believes in viruses is a shill normie loser" and "watch a bunch of youtube videos that I'm credulous enough to be fooled by". I don't doubt that you'll be spamming all sorts of sensationalist tripe on these boars over the next few weeks.
I'll consider this idea seriously when you (personally, not a link to some video) can put forward a theory of illness that explains everything that germ theory does plus everything that you claim germ theory fails to explain.
Until then, Ima assume you're just here to poison the well for good faith conspiracy theorists.
Nope, it's electron microscopy in most cases.
I mean they do colour it, so maybe it is fake?
Okay, same arguments (and attitude) as Flat Earth, gotcha.
Why would they need to prove something that everyone already believes?
It's like saying "If they actually had rockets and satelites, why wouldn't they use them to prove the Earth is a globe?" They don't need to.
I'm not saying germ theory is definitely true, just that there really isn't any doubt of it in most people's minds.
Edit: I really can't say I understand the point in denying germ theory; what difference would it make if it was completely made up?
Right now it seems to explain quite a bit via feasible mechanisms. For example, if I get a cut and it gets dirty, I get an infection. If I keep it clean, or clean it with alcohol (or any number of anti-biotic agents) to kill the supposed microbial germs, it doesn't get infected. So why is that happening, if not germs? My son got Scarlet Fever when he was younger, which was no joke, and he got better hours after being treated with anti-biotics so, again, how did that work if germs aren't real? What did they treat him with that so obviously worked?
If it is fake, so what? The claim was that the vax would stop the spread of illness, regardless of the cause, and the numbers show it doesn't. Compare this to the polio vaccine where we can easily see the different rates of polio in places that use quality shots versus those whose treatment is spotty or use the Gates killshots.
I'm no fan of the varicella shots, but it's pretty obvious that rates of chickenpox are way down today compared to when I was a kid, so clearly many of these treatments are functional.
What then, would the difference be if germ theory were a conspiracy? As opposed to the difference of the clot shot being "safe and effective" versus it being useless and killing people?
0.5 Wearing your mask while driving alone under your nose.
Good for Chad for sticking it to big oil but...remember Venezuela? Just having access to the equipment and oil does not translate to having the expertise to extract it, like Exxon does.
Hold on, Poilievre isn't PM yet, lol.
What's he going to do about the actual problem of nitrogent fertilizer regulation that will, according to farmers, result in famine? Nothing. Just going to bitch constantly against one tax, among thousands, which is going to happen anyway and, frankly, I don't really care about.
When is he going to bring up the fact that over a quarter of Canadian money on circulation today was printed during Covid, for useless vaxxes, and that's what's driving inflation?
When's he going to admit that our health systems are understaffed because 10% of nurses were fired for not getting the useless vaxxes, instead of trying to import foreigners who won't resist? (Not that it's any of his business anyway, as a Federal MP, but that doesn't stop the Liberals).
When's he going to mention the fact that our Constitution, according to our government's investigation of itself, isn't worth the paper it's printed on and can be ignored whenever lawmakers feel like it (it was signed by Trudeau's dad, btw).
Poilievre is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic and people who vote for him will get what they pay for.
Yep, and Poilievre is planning to do exactly nothing about it cause "we need nurses" (that were fired for being invaxxed).
That's a quote from the article.
Did you read between the lines?
They (the people making and pushing the shots) talk about "chasing the tail" of outbreaks all across the continent just to have them "spring up again", and needing more vaccines because low coverage is causing outbreaks. It's from the exact playbook as Covid.
And since when is polio dangerous to children? I'm not an immunologist but everything I've read abouy polio says it behaves like chicken pox and that reactions in children are rare, while adults are heavily affected by the disease. Why are kids getting sick at all?
They're assuming that none of the thousands of severe cases they're seeing have to do with their shots, because they haven't looked into it. These seven are people waking up, just like the adverse events with Covid.
They literally have "experts" saying things like "we hoped this wasn't going to happen, but knew it was possible"; so they obviously didn't do proper testing, probably because it's on impoverished African kids so who cares?
“It’s disappointing but not entirely unexpected,” says Aidan O’Leary, who heads GPEI.
"Oh well, you win some, you lose some"
"What, paralized African children?"
"Yeah"
Hate to say it, but I was wearing a mask for a while.
Back in the beginning, when governments were still saying Covid wasn't a big deal (and maybe a bit racist), the idea was that it spread through droplets. Not only did I wear a mask, I wore gloves too. It wasn't until a neighbor told me they heard that Covid was airborne that I looked into it further.
A much better definition; woke is authoritarian, but not all authoritarians are woke.
Also, if someone gives you shit for not being able to easily define woke, ask them to define facism. Some ideas are too complicated for soy-fed midwits to coherently discuss.
"Get woke, go broke" also extends to anyone doing business with the woke, and their families.
they have decided there are too many of us and we need to be culled and have been culling us for the past couple hundred years via famine, disease, war, democide, vaccines, psychological operations (convincing us not to have children, making having children difficult).
Considering the global population today is something like 10x what it was 200 years ago, they're doing a pretty bad job, yeah?
Like, I don't deny there is a conspiracy to reduce global population levels but either they only started in, maybe, the 60s or they're completely incompetent.
Sooo, impeach him?
Why even announce this? If you have proof, go to the DoJ and start legal proceedings.
Unless you're looking to play softball in return for political favours?
Anecdotal but I had two uncles, on different sides of the family, getting fast acting cancers in the last 2 years.
One died and one is still trying chemo. They're older so it's not unexpected, but these are among the first of my parents generation to start dying (only one before this) and they're also both vaxxed.
There's this conception of sentience that a sufficiently complex system will become self-aware. I think that's backwards; there is a Conciousness that exists outside the physical universe that requires a system of sufficient complexity to manifest in the physical universe.
This flips the philosophy on it's head.
If we are just complex coincidences, then the maintenance of the physical body is paramount because we disappear when it does.
However, if we are just interfacing in this reality, then our physical forms are far less important than our actions. Even though we place a high priority on maintaining our interface with this world, and we should, it's really just a sort of dream from which we inevitably wake.
BUT AT LEAST THEY GOT TO GO TO MCDONALDS!!!
If it's not a mental illness, they why the hell should the treatment be subsidized?
It's possible but it raises the question of why they are then seemingly working at cross purposes.
For example, the target population is, alledgedly, something like 500mil. At the beginning of the 20th century the global population wasn't far from that, but it's since ballooned (recall that America had a larger population than China until the 70s or 80s). Why let, or even help, populations to grow if you want them small?
The same goes for many technologies. Why allow the rise of the personal vehicle and convenient travel if your plan is to keep people in 15 minute cities? Why allow oil to dominate fuel and economies if you were going to try to ban it later? Why raise the life expectancy with new medical technologies if you don't want to have to support the elderly?
Unless the plan is far more subtle than it seems, I suspect their control likely only goes back as far as the 50s or 60s.
What's a hate group? A bunch of observant people pointing things out?