I stopped watching when I saw today's fiat debt based usury system labeled as "real money". Let's not pretend we have a working financial system in place.
We all have morbid curiosity I guess. Let it rain - I have my place, gold and BTC and if shtf I could leave for the countryside tomorrow. I'm just looking for an excuse to ditch the degenerate cashless surveillance grid they call city either way.
It doesn't matter if it gets the job done. People got brainwashed and took the stabbies. They could do a fake and gaylien invasion and still get results considering how deluded the masses are.
Labour (fabian socialists) always supported communism, which is a jewish doctrine.
It's called deduction you idiot.
I asked you over and over again - what was the test about and why it was decided they had competitive advantages against women competitors? Use your brain this time.
You filthy dishonest pigsnake. I copy-pasted you the association ruling where it officially states the dudes "were subject to a separate and recognized test... This test conclusively indicated that both athletes did not meet the required necessary eligibility criteria and were found to have competitive advantages over other female competitors."
If you read their rulebook, you'll see the "eligibility criteria" concerns the gender of the participants. Do you deny this is the reason they were disqualified, or do you suggest they failed other non-gender related criteria and their gender was never the issue? Are you that much of a disgusting liar?
You can read the meeting briefing here: https://www.iba.sport/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/BoD-meeting-minutes_New-Delhi_FV-approved.pdf
Go to sleep, shill.
How does one fail a gender test, genius?
I'm not feeding you, troll.
We wish to make the following points in these regards:
On 24 March 2023, IBA disqualified athletes Lin Yu-ting and Imane Khelif from the IBA Women’s World Boxing Championships New Delhi 2023. This disqualification was a result of their failure to meet the eligibility criteria for participating in the women’s competition, as set and laid out in the IBA Regulations. This decision, made after a meticulous review, was extremely important and necessary to uphold the level of fairness and utmost integrity of the competition.
Point to note, the athletes did not undergo a testosterone examination but were subject to a separate and recognized test, whereby the specifics remain confidential. This test conclusively indicated that both athletes did not meet the required necessary eligibility criteria and were found to have competitive advantages over other female competitors.
The decision made by IBA on 24 March 2023, was subsequently ratified by the IBA Board of Directors on 25 March 2023. The official record of this decision can be accessed on the IBA website here IBA Board of Directors Meeting Minutes.
The disqualification was based on two tests conducted on both athletes as follows:
Test performed during the IBA Women’s World Boxing Championships in Istanbul 2022. Test performed during the IBA Women’s World Boxing Championships in New Delhi 2023. For clarification
Lin Yu-ting did not appeal the IBA’s decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), thus rendering the decision legally binding. Imane Khelif initially appealed the decision to CAS but withdrew the appeal during the process, also making the IBA decision legally binding. Our Committees have rigorously reviewed and endorsed the decision made during the World Championships. While IBA remains committed to ensuring competitive fairness in all of our events, we express concern over the inconsistent application of eligibility criteria by other sporting organizations, including those overseeing the Olympic Games. The IOC’s differing regulations on these matters, in which IBA is not involved, raise serious questions about both competitive fairness and athletes’ safety.
Go suck Imane's dick now.
Infowars - exposing everything except you know who. "But let me tell you about transdementional aliens now".
I won't do reading comprehension with a shill. The test was about gender eligibility and they both failed it. How does one fail such a test do you think?
Because the association confirmed it dumbfuck. Go drop off a building shill.
"Neanderthals" are a jewish lie.
"If God exist, why didn't He create things the way I think they should be?"
Basically, an argument from incredulity. Also, why are all the things you mention objectively bad? Based on what standard for morality? How is it not just a subjective matter of preferences?
Why the "problem of evil" is always about the big things? Why don't you complain about how a perfectly good God wouldn't create us with the need to breath air in order to live? Just think how much cooler it would have been if we could live without having to breath?
The test is confidential. They underwent a test for gender eligibility and failed it. They could appeal it but didn't? Isn't it strange they opted out of demanding justice be served and forfeited their medals?
Shilling like clockwork. How come you're always here supporting the libtard mainstream narrative? Every single time. And here you are now denying basic biology. What happened to trust the science?
The XY part is a speculation but it's the most logical one. Tell me what else could this mean: "they were subject to a separate and recognized test, whereby the specifics remain confidential. This test conclusively indicated that both athletes did not meet the required necessary eligibility criteria and were found to have competitive advantages over other female competitors."
It's either a full blown dude or an intersex person with genetic chromosomal abnormality like Sawyer syndrome or other male congenital ailment. By the looks of it OP is correct and those degenerates scout for such rare freaks of nature to smuggle them along with the women.
What I said in my other comment - he could have appealed the decision in front of the court of arbitration for sport, get another test and prove the impossible - that he's a she.
It's the claims made by the federation that disqualified those guys on the grounds of not meeting gender criteria. Claims which the boxers didn't appeal for some reason. They could have easily taken another test proving their sex.
Wrong again - it's a genetically abnormal man (XY).
Why didn't "she" appeal in the CAS, smart guy?
Here's IBA's statement - they tested the guy and found he was indeed male. He could have appealed the ruling but did not:
No, there are genetic mutation leading to abnormalities in males and females.
Has anyone confirmed it's a case of Swyer syndrome?
I see you don't need others to tell you to do that. I've researched the topic and I have a fairly good idea what money is, what it isn't and how is it made.
If money is not backed up by value it's not real. The trillions being printed in excess are not backed up by existing value, they are credit given by the Fed and the Central banks to the governments. They ultimately devalue the existing money through inflation - basically it's theft of value people have generated through their work. You don't have to be a financial genius to realize the money you've saved 20 years ago lost half of their value.