Notice how much of the strongest opposition to Jewish rule is often Catholic (going back to Reverend Coughlin and now E Michael Jones/ Nick Fuentes). Long before Jews were prominently in power, the Catholic church was recognized as the seat of anti-Christ and matches up well with the Book of Revelation.
The Vatican is also on board with the NWO agenda, just as much as the Jews are. So if/when the public does wake up to Jewish rule, the occultists will already have another faux Christian power structure ready to take over and lead you to hell.
This is why the only way forward is to actually get right with God and follow the true Messiah Jesus Christ. Following Freemasons, Popes or Jews (or your own ego -- ahem Atheists) instead will lead you to hell.
The Catholic Church has officially been destroyed by the Vatican II reform.
The Orthodox Church opposes the NWO agenda and has been calling out the jews for 2000 years. That's the true eternal Church of Christ.
I've seen some criticism of Orthodox theology, and some of it seems suspect. But that's not to say Eastern Orthodox can't be saved Christians.
Personally I just consider myself a born again follower of Christ.
The problem with Protestantism is it defies authority and everyone is basically their own pope doing their own interpretation. But that's exactly what's behind the societal collapse we witness - rampant individualism and lack of grounding in tradition and truth.
The Church is the body of Christ and the ark of salvation. Orthodoxy is the unchanged faith from the creation, the time of the prophets, the coming of Christ and His apostles to this day - it's the wholeness of the faith.
Do we not believe the Holy Spirit can lead those who are born again to good theology? The Bible is already clear about what a saved person looks like and what the unsaved look like. It's clear to those willing to seek truth.
If you're talking about prophecy and end times, even within an Orthodox body will every two people agree? And are those prophecies supposed to be crystal clear to everyone? It does not appear so. And cannot two saved people disagree about specific future predictions and still have saving faith? I don't see why not.
Is recorded in scripture better than in any man's traditions. In fact Jesus had some stark warnings about religious traditions going astray of God's commandments.
It absolutely isn't clear and that's why there are such great variations in interpretation from denomination to denomination and from person to person in Protestantism. The problem is that Scripture, just like any text, isn't interpreting itself and there needs to be an authority for interpretation. Protestantism poses that every individual is such an authority by the grace of the Holy Spirit while Orthodoxy claims authority within the apostolic Church, established by Christ when He sent the Holy Spirit on Pentecost.
It's obvious there can be no unity in Protestantism because it's pluralistic from the get go, yet the true Church of Christ is one, united, eternal and bears no contradictions. It's also obvious man is fallen and succumbs to sin, error and spiritual delusion (prelest). You say the correct interpretation is evident because it follows the scripture, but that's circular because that judgment is contingent on how you interpret scripture (as I said the correct interpretation is at question here).
There are disagreements within the Orthodox Church but not in terms of theological dogma and doctrine. There's only one Orthodox eschatology, Christology and cosmology.
Scripture is the liturgical text of the Church. It was compiled by the Church. So protestants appealing to sola scriptura and denouncing the historical church are basically cutting off the branch they're sitting on. This is why it follows that the correct interpretation of scripture is to be found in that tradition.
When listening to preachers, there is a clear link between good theology and good morality being preached. Preachers who teach a clear Biblical based salvation using scripture to interpret scripture come to the same conclusions on moral issues overwhelmingly.
And bad morals follow bad unbiblical teachings of salvation. That's when they are adding their own "interpretation", which is more like adding meanings outside the text which are contradicted by God's commandments. There is no real "interpretation" of scripture supporting sodomy, for instance, but delusional people can claim anything. They could also call themselves Orthodox Christian, while doing so, since they are already calling themselves the misnomer of 'Christian'.