take the sides or the party line being pushed onto us
That hits on something that has become so clear to me lately as a fundamental mechanism of control.
Almost all of us define ourselves as a collection of attributes: Democrat, firefighter, consumer, American, Red Sox fan, Person of Color, whatever. We wear these "identifications" like little merit badges on a sash that we use to signal others. And there's no doubt we think of these as "merit" badges, because no one "shamefully confesses" they're really a minarchist.
"They" know this and the mechanism of control is attaching tiny little strings to these badges to pull us around. That is, They simply declare that as a "good" fill-in-the-blank, you "should" do-thus-and-so. If you don't or you disagree, you're bad and should ashamed of yourself. They magically bridge the is-ought distinction and no one ever seems to see any of this happening.
Every once in a while we see someone removing one of these merit badges and freeing themselves. The one we see frequently now is when a black person declares they're a Trump supporter. They're accused of being a race traitor, of course, but without that merit badge and that tiny string, that person's attitude becomes, "I couldn't give a fuck what you think."
Maybe, but I know that for me it's become very much the opposite.
I mean, I recently stumbled onto this guy William H. Parker, who made the LAPD the military occupation force it is today. I just knew he had to be connected to the Parker family of generational Satanists scattered all throughout American history. I spent like an hour and a half finding that connection, and felt an acute compulsion the entire time not to stop until I did. I haven't got around to writing it up because I knew very well all along that only about six people will read it and care. I had to find out for myself.
OTOH, on the rare occasion I try to spend a little time researching an investment, after about 5 minutes I'll be like, "Good God, release me from this torture! How can this be worse than high school?"
It's hard to believe that anyone could get involved in conspiracy theory to any extent and then give it up, but there you have it.
My only theory is that fear finally takes over: they get exposed to so much material that generates fear and which their subconscious judges to be potentially true that, in order to relieve that anxiety, they find a reason to quit.
We all battle against that same phenomenon. Pretty much nothing in the study of conspiracy reveals good news. It is only the love of truth in a higher consciousness that can overcome it.
It's a pain to transcribe to this format, but here's a link to a post that includes a long comment where I wrote up the hilarious fable told to us about the original Apollo moonsuits:
New Artemis lunar space suits will cost 1 Billion and take 15 years to design and make. Apollo suits were made by Playtex the bra manufacturer (r/conspiracy 1/20/2023)
That brings up the untold story underlying the untold story, and a part of what first drew my attention to the issue....
Maybe a decade or more ago, after the "Axis of Evil" thing came out, I watched an interview with a documentarian who had made a film about it called, "The Principle". He somehow got all the big mainstream astrophysics names: Laurence Krauss, Michio Kaku, Max Tegmark, Lisa Randall, etc.
But the thing was, the new findings violated the Copernican Principle: that there were no special places in the Universe. Thus the title. It all finally dawned on these geniuses and they tried to back out, but they had signed all the paperwork.
To top it off, this guy was a Christian and took it as confirmation of, you know, whatever. So lawsuits flew and all the rest and the film virtually vanished. Last time I looked, you could still scrape up some remnants of it's existence, but it wasn't easy.
There's an interesting and untold story underlying the "Axis of Evil". In very brief:
It looks like Science(tm) wanted to back up their Big Bang fable by studying the Cosmic Microwave Background. They sent up first the COBE then the WMAP satellites.
These were some rigged and bullshit experiments and--sure enough!--they proved the Big Bang and the age of the Universe, etc. But the rigging seems to have unintentionally induced a bias that shows itself as this Axis of Evil. Ooops!
So they had a real dilemma. On the one hand, they could get rid of the Axis of Evil by saying that their experiments were fucked up, but then their confirmation of the Big Bang goes out the window with it. On the other, they can stand pat and just let everyone forget about the whole Axis of Evil business.
The public memory being what it is, they're holding on to the Big Bang and gambling on the forgetting.
God knows what Stephen knows, but I suspect it could be a lot through his brother.
My conclusion as to the shooting of Halyna Hutchins by Alec was that it was a blood sacrifice to allow him entry to the next level, namely politics. That's why there's so much nonsense and contradiction and so little punishment surrounding the incident.
As an addendum, I think Alec is actually dead now. That's why almost all the talk of him entering politics had died away. They're just continuing to drag out the psychodrama of the shooting as another ring in the circus of distraction.
A couple of notable items just from the photo alone:
-
It looks like we're supposed to think Putin is behind this, but the big colorful sign conveys the opposite. If you didn't know what this was about, you'd think, "That nasty-looking man is promoting faggotry in Bulgaria and these people are against it." I feel more and more that the social engineers of the world, in their confusion and desperation, have actually lost the thread of what they're trying to accomplish.
-
So we're clear where this is all coming from, the article was published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, which is the spawn of the CIA:
Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty: The CIA Years and Beyond (Woodrow Wilson Center Press with Stanford University Press, 2010)
It's enlightening to think through the simple fact of the existence of this announcement. You can leave out whether COVID exists, or was he really vaccinated, or is he actually already dead and this is just CGI. The fact is that "They" wish us to believe this is true.
The gambit, I would guess, is to encourage more people to get vaxxed, along the lines of, "Even the vaxxed and boosted are still in danger and you better get moar." The psychological risk, of course, is that people may easily think, "Jeez, that fucking thing clearly doesn't work for shit and I'm done with it." That seems a huge risk.
Maybe what is being revealed here is that "They" know the target audience really does not "think" these things through at all, and that there is no risk.
I remember when the Kyle Rittenhouse trial was going on, some woman tweeted something like, "I've been following this case for a year, ever since it happened, and I just found out today that the people he shot were all white."
I think even without social media algos or AI or whatever else you might point to, people have been living in very different "realities" for quite a long time.
The angles I think about are the ones no one talks about, no one sees, no one even seems to suspect. I've been meaning to write up big posts on some of these, but as I alluded to in first comment, there are only a handful on the same wavelength to receive them.
Take, for example, the book "Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon" by Dave McGowan which has rightly become legendary. Essentially, the book was about the children of the MIC pumping out programming through your local FM station, right? It has gotten so much worse since then.
I stumbled onto the fact that the same "money guy" was behind Napster, Facebook, and Spotify. I realized that "They" had clandestinely changed the entire media landscape and installed a stranglehold on society's listening habits (and we know it's all about habits).
So we've gone from rock bands with suspicious origins to completely manufactured acts and songs. We've gone from a handful of talk radio shows to hundreds of "independent" podcasts either infiltrated or constructed from scratch as psyops. All this gets pumped out through Spotify and Apple, where they know exactly what you're listening to and when. You used to turn the dial yourself, but now their "algos" put each of us in our own personalized Skinner Box.
There's a level of conspiracy beyond the one where "conspiracy theorists" operate, and getting them to realize that is exactly and precisely the same as convincing normies that conspiracies exist. So, you know, that's why I haven't got around to posting about this yet... lol
It's really gone the other way: there's almost no theory left in conspiracy theory.
Picture the classic conspiracy theorist meme of a wall covered in pushpins and red string. Reduce that down to two pushpins and one bit of string between them. The pushpins are facts and the string a theory of their connection, and each of these elements may not be well known or even unknown. To say that 5% of conspiracy posts fit this model of theory may be an overstatement. Two percent? Sub one?
To be blunt--and not to single him out but only because he was specifically mentioned--James Corbett is not a conspiracy theorist either. He's a stenographer, a collater, a documentarian, but not a theorist. Nothing he says breaks new ground or reveals that which was previously hidden.
Frankly, I suspect he's a certain type of long-running disinfo mole. I didn't realize it until he made certain comments on the Ukraine War. How could any self-respecting conspiracist be in total agreement with the NYT and WaPo without having deep misgivings? And even if you somehow did, you'd still feel compelled to begin with a disclaimer such as, "It's bizarre to me that I'm in agreement with these people, but...."
Just as the normie world has official narratives set by the mainstream media, so too does the conspiracy world, set by people like Corbett. Could anyone possibly believe that "They" would infest and dominate one world, but it completely slipped Their minds and Their grasp not to do so with the other? That's retarded.
From another angle, you can see he has nothing to say about issues where you'll stir up a real controversy in conspiracy circles. Did planes crash into buildings on 911? Were the towers nuked? Were Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuked? Did anyone actually die at the Vegas shooting? Who shot JFK? Nope, none of these questions were intriguing enough for him to wish to find an answer.
We know this item is important--even key--because the mainstream is silent about it (obviously) but even more tellingly it isn't blazed all over r/conspiracy with the rest of the disinfo gambits. No one wants to talk about it, so we'll do that here.
First, is this news itself disinfo? No. It's quite anomalous, and doesn't fit into any conspiracy theory out there. Nor does it neatly suggest a new conspiracy theory. And who would bother planting disinfo right after the event that not one in a million people will ever come into contact with?
So it's the truth, but still puzzling. How could blood end up in the sink? And whose blood?
Let's dispense with the "officer cut his hand" story they'll try to float. The blood was found when police first breached the building and were searching for a shooter or an accomplice. It wasn't a clumsy cop cleaning up while everyone else is running around with hot rifles at the ready.
Long story, but TMC was a patsy, shooting five rounds from a .22LR loaded with blanks. After he finished with his distraction, he was executed by a single shot to the side of the head by a compromised agent in a concealed position in the second floor window behind him.
Then either that guy or another agent has to make sure TMC is dead and swap out his rifle. He scrambles up to the roof and checks TMC, then grabs his rifle out from under him. His fatal head wound has cause him to bleed all over it.
The agent apparently feels he has to step back a bit so he can't be seen swapping, but he drops the rifle he's been carrying and takes TMC's with him. That's why TMC's rifle ended up seven feet away on his weak side. That's a related fact no one wants to talk about.
TMC's rifle was as generic an AR-15 as you can get and would not raise eyebrows if an agent had it, but now that it's covered in blood it sure would. He ducks into the bathroom and rinses it off as best he can. He's rushed and fails to clean up the sink properly.
It's TMC's blood and that's how it gets there.
I just heard an old interview on Tin Foil Hat with Christopher Jon Bjerknes regarding Einstein. That guy wrote a (IIRC and this is not a typo) 2,900 page book exposing Einstein. Amazing amount of detail and nuance to the story.
Given the curious timing of this revelation, so long after the event, I have to speculate as to whether this information from "whistleblowers" is actually a warning shot for Kimmy to keep her mouth shut regarding the Trump assassination attempt.
That is, does she want to be the only person involved in the Butler incident to be dragged into court over something that had nothing to do with the Butler incident?
Well, since you bring it up, I also think conspiracies is full of useless dumbfucks with pointless comments that they use to jerk off their own egos. I guess because their dicks are too small they stroke their keyboards?
So, you know, I've gotten that far. But thanks for your input! :)
Invermectin seems to have a pronounced effect against three conditions (1) parasitic infection, (2) COVID, which is either a bioweapon or relabeled influenza (and further that neither COVID nor influenza is caused by viral infection), and (3) vaccine injury.
Given that these are widely varied in both cause and effect, it makes you think that Science(tm) really has no idea what is going on and is dead wrong about a lot of fundamental matters.
This document preserves some of the historical diplomatic finger-pointing about how the Gulf War began:
A Bum Rap for April Glaspie — Saddam and the Start of the Iraq War (Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training 2/23/2016)
The topic of paramount importance in the study of any war is why it happened, and particularly how it could have been avoided. That topic is studiously avoided, except to assert that the Enemies of the Empire are bad, bad people who start wars for no reason except that they are as crazy as they are bad. Proof!
In the article, the diplomats not only cannot see the forest for the trees, they've lost track of the concept that a forest is a collection of trees. Bottom-line, they mention in various ways that had the US simply expressed it's objection to an invasion of Kuwait, Saddam would never have invaded. This is proof the US wanted Iraq to invade Kuwait, and to then use that as a pretext for the US invasion of the Middle East.
We have, once again, the typical inversion: that which is simple is made complex. No diplomat or historian seems to be able to conceive in their mind the simple question: "If the US really objected to Saddam invading Kuwait, did anyone ever just ask him not to?" Nope, no one.
When I was first researching this a long time ago, the item that got me was Hicks doing his "Goat Boy" bit. I thought, "If you didn't know what this was, you'd think it was someone doing his dead on Alex Jones voice impersonation."
I wonder if they're going to magically discover that he was posting a TikTok:
"Sup folks. Just wanted to let y'all know that I'm acting alone and certainly not in concert with the Secret Service, FBI, or any other intelligence agency. I'm thinking about posting another TikTok where I name specific individuals that definitely have no knowledge of my actions or any association with me whatsoever."