▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

The sound of doing

Nature does; each being within re-does. Nature does in silence; beings tempt each other with noise to ignore that.

Motion has nothing to oppose...only matter within motion can oppose each other. Motion implies sound; matter implies instrument; opposing each other implies noise.

our tales of

Tailing one another like ouroboros. A tale implies recounting a piece of information, while ignoring all inspiration, which permits others to hold one accountable.

What one tells to another...all makes available. A "tall-tale" implies the tower of babel/babble...which always collapses upon its foundation.

maybe people will listen?

Listening from list/leizd (border/band) to one another does what to ones FREE will of choice? Bondage!

Even Without words

Even sound generates odd instruments...words tempt instruments at odds with one another.

they are there

They implies plural; there implies singularity...they was put there by ones consent to the suggestion of another.

Inception and death implies one momentum of one motion for each one matter living within...it's describing "them" with words which tempts ONE to ignore that.

come to know

One came to be into all known...others suggest that knowledge is coming to those who consent to carry information forwards, hence burdening self during the relieving revelation of all known.

What does all known revelation reveal? Each ones FREE will of choice.

here is something beyond

Being (be) at a distance (yond) implies each beings divided stance from one another...within all aka each thing within everything.

Others suggest something aka the "sum of things" to distract one from distance (divided stance)...ones consent to any suggestion closes the distance to it, while bringing the suggested information not just nearer, but into ones mind/memory.

a foundational reality to be shared, don’t you think?

Sharing implies carrying...carrying implies burdening "free" will of choice. Each one implies a share within all...sharing with one another ignores the all sharing process.

Share/sker - "to cut"...a separation from one another. Carrying shares implies putting together.

If a part within whole shares with another, then it sacrifices self.

The fruit of ones labor aren't for one to give to another, but ones response to all given. Ignoring this by sharing fruit as results/resilire - "to rebound"...binds ones responding free will of choice to another.

In short...foundation cannot be shared. Each part build on it represents a fundamental share; not to be shared with one another.

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

What is the “right”

Right/reg - "to move in a straight line". Right was forwarding before one comes into being.

interpretation

Aka being within (inter) traffic (preta/per) of action (tion)...the issue is trafficking artificial "rights" among one another, while ignoring natural "right" aka the one and only way of life.

Christianity, the Way, or more generally, the Truth

Way implies all generating each anointed one within...a process one ignores when holding onto truth.

Im not here to preach

  • Papa don't preach...I'm in trouble (inception towards death) deep (life).
  • I made up my mind (with suggested information by others)
  • I'm keeping my baby (babel; confusion; disorder, hence babbling on whatever suggested information one keeps).

what are your thoughts

Not yours unless choosing to take possession of, at which point one becomes possessed by thoughts others can inject.

bring us all any closer

All brought each one apart from one another to allow analysis...others try to bring us (united states) together to distort analysis by synthesis.

desire/require

Desire implies want; require implies need...wanted temptation needs to be resisted.

speak as generally

General aka "generating all" implies all sound generating each instrument within...speaking as implies the articulation of sound into words aka spell-craft.

autistically hyper-focused

https://gifer.com/en/DNj

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

you are forced to put...into words

Sound doesn't force one to articulate words...articulated words tempt one to ignore the force of natural sound.

Force/for - "forwards"... that implies sound, not words held onto. You may think to put words forwards, but without others carrying them, they go right back into origin (sound).

Before one can put artificial words to one another...nature forces each being apart from one another.

your wisdom

DOM (balance) sets one FREE (choice)...choosing to take into possession (your) binds one to the possession, hence becoming possessed.

Wis/wise - "to see; know" implies each ones perception within all perceivable...a process of separation (analytic); not a possession (synthetic).

all the others

Each one within all..."all the others" implies the sum of all things. Being isn't a summation; but a divination/division.

The more one sums up from others (information); the less one recognizes all (inspiration).

The soil from which truth grows

Being implies seed within soil...taking what grows prevents growth. Indulging in the fruit of ones labors tempts one to ignore growing fruit. Growing potential implies during the process of loss...holding onto potential implies holding onto the process of loss, which sucks potential dry exponentially faster.

What others profess, I will also proclaim

a) Before others can speak (fess) forward (pro)...all separated each one from one another.

b) If FREE will of choice CLAIMS, then it binds itself.

c) PRO implies forwarding need; CLAIM implies wanting to hold back during forwarding need.

Forced principles will not be viable

Being implies viability (life) by force (inception towards death)....principal aka primus (first) capere (to take) implies viability making itself unavailable by holding onto force.

Whatever others are suggesting cannot be prin/prime (first)...first perceivable; then perception.

Will was made viable before "not" can be willed. Not/nothing/nihilo implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable.

what is a good man but a bad man’s teacher? What is a bad man but a good man’s job?

What's good and bad but the temptation to choose a side, while entering a ring (circular logic) for mutual destruction (good vs bad reasoning)?

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

innate process(es) available to everyone

Innate implies potential born (nasci) within (in) process, hence inception towards death procession giving potential life to "each" one.

One process for each potential within aka one cause for each effect within aka one action for each reaction within etc.

Others make pluralism available to distract one from singularity, and thereby self discernment aka "introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity".

there is logic pointing in both directions

Logic implies circular thinking aka two sides pointing at each other (conflict of reason). Direction aka directed by action implies linear progression.

Only within linear can circular be shaped...logic tempts one to hold onto the shape.

Here's a modern sleight of hand for it... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/onedirection/onewayoranotherteenagekicks.html

"One way or another...I'm gonna get you". One way implies the natural way aka one direction (inception towards death) for each one (life) within. The other (circular logic) is where I'm (suggestion) gonna get ya (consent).

processes are available

Only within singularity can plurality be made available to each separated unit by few suggesting many to join together.

rare are the ones who follow the path

a) What's rarer than being one within all? Simultaneously...what's more common than being one among one another within all?

Self discernment implies rare; common consensus diminishes that rarity.

b) If there's only one path (inception towards death) for each one (life) within, then following it implies what? If others suggest plurality and one follows many different path within the confines of circular logic, then what does that imply?

Following the path like a hamster in a wheel...

those who choose the time of their death

Aka wasting potential (life) by taking measurements, while ignoring that only process gives (inception) and takes (death).

Taking implies giving self up...giving implies tempting others to take. The narrow path...letting go of what was given, while resisting the temptation to take.

congregations of humans

a) Human aka hue of man implies color aka spectrum of light separating each ray within from one another.

Only within animation (animal) can a hue of man (human) bring differences to each beings sight.

b) Con (together) gregare (to collect)...one can only artificially collect together what nature separates apart.

as the congregation grows

Procession (inception towards death) grows division of potential (life)...congregation grows indigestion within potential.

to mistake the teacher for the lesson

Taking implies missing given. Teaching implies responding to given while learning, and vice versa. Lesson/less/loss cannot be taken without giving up growth.

impediments to our forward momentum

Forward momentum (inception towards death) forwards matter (life)...impediment implies mentally ignoring physical momentum. "Our" implies collective consciousness tempting singular mind to take possession during a given process.

Impeding ones mind doesn't prevent ones body from being moved forwards.

one of the main

One (perception) of the main (perceivable)...any suggestion is minor to it. Ones consent to any suggestion impedes ones mind with the suggested into becoming one of the minor aka those who under-stand.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

did not believe that history necessarily progresses

To believe implies storing what process necessitates...resisting the temptation to hold onto.

Others suggest "history" to tempt ones "belief" to hold onto it.

Mozi's moral teachings emphasized introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity, rather than obedience to rituals + Mo Zi is credited as the founder of...

Taking the credit/creed/belief of others to be a founder contradicts introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

gigantic block

a) A solid can only come into being within fluid, which in return permits any solid to be shaped within fluid.

b) Nature implies all for each one within...gigantic vs miniature implies one within all taking measurements, while ignoring all given.

c) Nature cannot be blocked...a being can block itself by ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion). A mason of free (will of choice) suggests the ignorant ones "building blocks" to play with...

basement

What's the foundation (base) of mind (ment)?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a ring used to "seal demons"

Demon aka dai (to divide) mon (to provide)...the ring to seal those divided within all provided implies circular logic (internally) turning into conflicts of reason (externally).

why a sigil

Drawing a sigil implies shaping division within provided...consenting to a suggested sigil "marks" and "seals" oneself.

Nature reveals sight...any artificial sign con(s/c)eals sight.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

To Seek Justice

Seeking distorts seeing...seeing implies in response to origin (perceivable); seeking implies narrowing sight towards outcome (suggested).

Option To Seek

Option aka op (to choose) tion (action). Action (balance) moves towards reaction (choice)...seeking tempts one to ignore that process.

"Seek an ye shall find" implies that no matter what; where; when; why one seeks...foundation was always there for one to seek within.

all people

People (plural) implies an aggregation of person (singular)...person implies per sonos (by sound) aka each one within singularity of all sound.

One wasn't born a people, but a person. One chooses to identify as a people, hence joining others mentally (ideal) and physically (idol).

trapped inside

a) Trap implies a "contrivance for catching unawares"...consenting to any suggestion makes ones perception unaware of all perceivable.

Ones consent gets one caught within a consensus with others.

b) IN (life) SIDE (inception/death) implies being given SIGHT WITHIN...which one ignores when choosing to hold onto any side.

government approved credentials

Aka ones consent to the suggestion of another, hence a credit/credence given to approve another to govern ones mind with the suggested.

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Holocaust...It happened.

This is called a sponsored post aka advertisement aka state funded propaganda. The so called "rant" represents the sales pitch for it.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Virginia Giuffre to be with Prince Andrew

  • Virginina/virgin/virgo (pure; unblemished) + Giufree (god free)
  • Prince/prins (sovereign) + Andrew/andros (man)

This is script-writing aka a woman who has had no carnal knowledge of man (virgin) meeting a sovereign man (andrew).

How did Epstein "force"

a) Ep/apa (water) + Stein (stone) aka fluid (inception towards death) forcing solid (stone) to resist temptation.

b) Telling a virgin (virginia) that a man (andew) is her sovereign (prince)...tempts her to loose her virginity aka sacrificing her resistance.

Nature forces being to resist temptation...other beings utilize the force of nature by tempting resistance with the path of least resistance...ignoring to resist, while falling for temptation.

Temptation coerces resistance if chosen...

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

what they're teaching

Darkness over light...

creation

Creatio ex nihilo aka "The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo

Everything implies light; nothing implies darkness. Light was before darkness can be shaped within.

What denomination

Nominare (no name). Naming implies "identifying by mark". Nature doesn't mark/merg (to bind)...each being within is set free (will of choice).

Ignoring natural for artificial implies DE (division) NO-MINARE (no name), which is where creation out of nothing (creatio ex nihilo) comes into play.

Noah looks black

a) Noah from Hebrew Noach (rest)...nature moves; ignoring that implies ar-rest-ed development within being. Ignorance implies darkness; discernment implies light.

b) Black implies absence of light; white implies pure light...being implies within the visible spectrum of light, hence in-between white/black...neither of which one can perceive.

c) Look/lock implies resting sight aka ignoring that the visible spectrum of light moves.

d) Noah aka two animals each on one arc...being implies one animation (inception towards death) for each part of a curved line (life) within.

Noah (rest) implies a beings resting mind ignoring natures motion aka two contradicting animations (two animals) within each beings arc of life.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Being implies rise (life) during loss (inception towards death), which implies ones need to resist wanted desire.

▲ 4 ▼
free-will-of-choice 4 points ago +4 / -0

After Axeotl_Peotl left...

Atl (water) + xolotl (slippery one)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/axolotl

It would contradict nature for axolotl to remain in place.

focus our energy

Only at center of energy can one focus...collaboration with one another distracts ones focus.

primary topics

A topic cannot be primary, since it implies a secondary topping upon a primary foundation.

where is the collaboration?

Collab/collar/collum - "neck". Working together tempts one to ignore that work (energy) sets each power within apart from one another. Cause and effect aren't collaborating with one another...

Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Wu-tang-clan-protect-ya-neck-lyrics

"Watch your step/stebh (to support)...protect ya neck (to collaborate)"

to push their own idea

Only nature pushes (inception) and pulls (death)...others push ideals/idols to pull one in, by tempting one to hold onto (own).

Nature cannot be owned... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rights_of_nature

in a united manner

So like united states; united nations; soviet union; european union; united kingdom aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together)?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

departed from God

Being within God implies each beings divided (de) partial (part) mind (ment). Coming into being implies departmentalization.

lost God’s favor

God implies ongoing loss; each being within temporary growth aka the partiality (favor) given to each being.

given them in past time, and had been promised them for the future

Promise aka per (forward) + mittere (to send)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/promise

Therefore...God giving (inception towards death) promise (life). Taking it tempts one to ignore that, like taking measurements (past; present; future), which implies oath breaking aka taking careless invocations of divinity.

of all nations

Nati (native) ion (action)...the latter implies all action; the former each ones reaction within. NATI implies of ION. Plurality (nations) contradicts singularity (nati-ion).

offered up to God

God implies all offered...each one within a recipient (perception) of all offered (perceivable). God offers up (inception to life) and down (life to death) simultaneously.

Those within God have "nothing" to offer God...only self sacrifice by ignoring the one and only offer given.

nation to be overthrown

A native (nat) within action (ion) cannot be overthrown...only understand (standing under) other natives by free will of choice.

invitation to happiness

Happi/hap - "chance"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hap#etymonline_v_1453

God gives choice...others shape invitation (suggestion) to tempt choice to take a chance (consent).

God cannot invite because that would imply from outside of God. Inception and death of life implies within God aka internal division/divination.

to pass to others

Passing to others (consent towards suggested) tempts one to ignore being (perception) passed (perceivable) within God. It's passing to others which establishes a market; a merchant, and a product for sale.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reasons why Muslims are much better than jews

a) A jew distinguishes between revelation (perception) and reason (suggestion), which in Muslim terms goes: "giving priority to the Qur'an and the Hadith (the practice of Muhammad) and only then look at the consensus of the Muslim jurists (ijma) and analogical reasoning (qiyas).

Ijma implies the one shaping the suggestion; Qiyas implies the resulting conflict among those consenting to the suggested...both of which distract from perception.

b) The golem/goyim only ever choose a side within reason, hence "are much better" implying...are vs aren't; much vs less; better vs worse" aka circular logic; no matter which side one chooses to fight for.

c) In nature reason implies ones response (re) to all sound (son)...not to one another's words.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

satan's cross

a) Leviathan's cross; from l-w-h - "to wind, turn, twist"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/leviathan

Nature directs being (life) across (inception towards death)...artifice turns being from perceivable origin towards suggested outcome.

b) Notice the difference between the leviathan's cross bottom (infinity) and the oreo cross bottom (circle)...the former goes on; the latter eats (boros) it's own tail (oura).

The leviathan's cross also represents propagation, hence penis shaped.

c) The double cross implies ones perception being moved across all perceivable, while being "double-crossed" by another ones suggestion.

Example of double-cross...Union Jack

d) Look at the cookie...white (discernment) in-between black (ignorance), which implies cooking - "turning over within mind"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/cook

Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."the letter C stands for Cookies". Letter C implies "letting see", hence if ones lets perception see suggested, then one gets cooked.

https://genius.com/Cookie-monster-c-is-for-cookie-1995-lyrics

Edit: Another example for leviathan and propagation...LEVI...all about the jeans/genes.

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Supernatural Deep State

Super implies "beyond" aka being yond (alienated in mind; wandering/wondering)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/yond

Ones state within nature deepens if one goes yonder...

Hell is...

Hell/kel - "to cover; conceal"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hell

Heaven implies "to heave" aka lifting/raising oneself up aka enlightenment, which ignorance conceals. Being implies in-between heaven (discernment) and hell (ignorance).

crossing over to the next level

a) Level implies balance (inception/death); being implies choice (life)...balance evens out each odd choice within.

b) There cannot be a next balance...only ongoing balance for each temporary choice coming into being "next" in line.

c) Life being moved from inception towards death implies being moved "across" aka over the river styx...styx/sticks because the river (inception towards death) tempts those crossing over (life) to hold onto.

Homer called it the "dread river of oath"...the more life holds onto one another by oath; the more life dreads death.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most Victims...are Muslims

Muslim (one who submits) from aslama (he resigned)...how to sacrifice someone who self sacrifices?

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a logo celebrating original sin.

Logos (word) distracts from origin (sound)...sound sets instruments apart from one another; words tempts instruments to sin/syn (join together aka syn-chronize).

Consenting to words establishes a synchronized consensus within the origin of sound.

Apple/apply - "to join or combine"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/apply

The etymological sense is "bring things in contact with one another", which inverts nature setting each being apart from one another.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, you connect their meanings.

Taking words apart allows one to discern self within the process of sound. Meaning implies "taking" measurement, while ignoring sound "given".

Sound cannot be held onto...words tempt one to ignore that by holding onto meaning. An example to describe this...holding onto a DEFINITION makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).

Are sandwiches actually witches turned into sand?

Connecting sand + wich turns one from actual (analytical) to artificial (synthetic)...doing that implies witchcraft aka insert (suggestion) between two other things (all perceivable and ones perception) aka a sandwich.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

He connects words

free-will-of-choice sets words apart (analysis).

nonChristian

guywholikesDjtof2024 connects words together (synthesis).

case and point

a) Con (together) nectere (to bind)...binding together binds ones free will of choice to another.

b) Non (nothing) implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of perceivable.

c) Christian/christen (to anoint) implies separation of each one within all from one another.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

How does EL imply ALL?

  • HOW implies cause (all) forwarding effect (one)
  • DOES implies doing (do) essence (es) aka all doing each ones essence.
  • IMPLY aka Implication aka within (im) fold (plica) action (tion) implies each ones reaction within the fold of all action.
  • ? implies one marking a quest (outcome) within all action (origin).

Is there a Hebrew lexicon which suggests that?

a) https://biblehub.com/hebrew/413.htm aka "into, unto, denoting motion towards", hence from all into/onto each one within.

b) All "was" perceivable before one can suggest what "is" to one another.

c) Consenting to any suggestion tempts ones perception to ignore all perceivable.

d) What if he-brew his-story to make you/jew fall for it?

Notice that brewing implies dissolving ingredients by mixing together, and storing implies accumulating quantities. Holding onto history accumulates quantities of gentiles, which a jew mixes together...

I don't think

Thinking implies ones potential (perception) within all process (perceivable)... I implies holding oneself in possession, while don't implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested.

In short...both "I" and "don't" corrupt thinking.

I don't think vessel and vassal are related etymologically

a) Relate aka re (to respond) latus (to carry) implies burdening oneself within all by carrying words along.

b) Etymo (true) logi (logic) al (all)...logic implies circular thinking within oneself turning into a conflict of reason (true vs false) against one another, which ignores that all moves each ones life from inception towards death, hence straight...not circular.

Only within a line can a circle be drawn. A jew tempts gentiles with words (logos) into an inward (logic) and outward (reason) circle, while seeing offense in the word kike/kikel - "circle".

nor to the word "all"

One can only shape a word within all sound. Holding onto a definition makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).

Sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/sound

wiktionary...vessel/vassal

a) Craft for transportation (vessel) + servant (vassal) aka all transporting (inception towards death) each one servant (life).

b) Trans (transfer) port (to lead) ation (action) aka all action leading each ones reaction within a transfer.

c) Servant/serve aka to be (life) in service (inception towards death).

Dominance (inception towards death) setting free (life) implies FREE (slave) DOM (master). A jew inverted this by tempting gentiles to freely enslave "ones choice" to a "chosen ones" suggestion, which makes the latter the master of the former.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) EL implies ALL...only within all can ones essence come into being.

b) It's easier to see in vessel/vassal aka vass (servant) al (all).

c) Words can only be shaped within sound/sanus - "whole; entire; all"...

d) Make/mag - "to knead, fashion, fit"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/make

Holding onto anything shaped implies "make-believe"...like words shaped within sound aka spell-craft.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

restricted to those of...Levi.

Levi/levy - "to raise" aka ones rise (life) during fall (inception towards death).

Rising requires ones free will of choice...suggested restrictions bind ones free will of choice if consented to.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›