did not believe that history necessarily progresses
To believe implies storing what process necessitates...resisting the temptation to hold onto.
Others suggest "history" to tempt ones "belief" to hold onto it.
Mozi's moral teachings emphasized introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity, rather than obedience to rituals + Mo Zi is credited as the founder of...
Taking the credit/creed/belief of others to be a founder contradicts introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity.
Taking the credit/creed/belief of others to be a founder contradicts introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity.
True, and wise - to clarify my thoughts, I see Mo Zi and the school(s) he established as exemplars of the innate process(es) available to everyone (or, perhaps just every man, there is logic pointing in both directions). While these processes are available to every-one, rare are the ones who follow the path steadfastly. These are the Christs, the Buddhas, the Immortals (though a more accurate name is perhaps “those who choose the time of their death”), they have been known by as many names as there have been congregations of humans. In fact, a few years ago i came across a new name which I believe finds its source in this vein, a very interesting name indeed, u/free-will-of-choice
Often, and increasingly so as the congregation grows, people come to mistake the teacher for the lesson they came to teach. I think that’s one of the main impediments to our forward momentum vis a vis this subject
Innate implies potential born (nasci) within (in) process, hence inception towards death procession giving potential life to "each" one.
One process for each potential within aka one cause for each effect within aka one action for each reaction within etc.
Others make pluralism available to distract one from singularity, and thereby self discernment aka "introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity".
there is logic pointing in both directions
Logic implies circular thinking aka two sides pointing at each other (conflict of reason). Direction aka directed by action implies linear progression.
Only within linear can circular be shaped...logic tempts one to hold onto the shape.
"One way or another...I'm gonna get you". One way implies the natural way aka one direction (inception towards death) for each one (life) within. The other (circular logic) is where I'm (suggestion) gonna get ya (consent).
processes are available
Only within singularity can plurality be made available to each separated unit by few suggesting many to join together.
rare are the ones who follow the path
a) What's rarer than being one within all? Simultaneously...what's more common than being one among one another within all?
Self discernment implies rare; common consensus diminishes that rarity.
b) If there's only one path (inception towards death) for each one (life) within, then following it implies what? If others suggest plurality and one follows many different path within the confines of circular logic, then what does that imply?
Following the path like a hamster in a wheel...
those who choose the time of their death
Aka wasting potential (life) by taking measurements, while ignoring that only process gives (inception) and takes (death).
Taking implies giving self up...giving implies tempting others to take. The narrow path...letting go of what was given, while resisting the temptation to take.
congregations of humans
a) Human aka hue of man implies color aka spectrum of light separating each ray within from one another.
Only within animation (animal) can a hue of man (human) bring differences to each beings sight.
b) Con (together) gregare (to collect)...one can only artificially collect together what nature separates apart.
as the congregation grows
Procession (inception towards death) grows division of potential (life)...congregation grows indigestion within potential.
to mistake the teacher for the lesson
Taking implies missing given. Teaching implies responding to given while learning, and vice versa. Lesson/less/loss cannot be taken without giving up growth.
impediments to our forward momentum
Forward momentum (inception towards death) forwards matter (life)...impediment implies mentally ignoring physical momentum. "Our" implies collective consciousness tempting singular mind to take possession during a given process.
Impeding ones mind doesn't prevent ones body from being moved forwards.
one of the main
One (perception) of the main (perceivable)...any suggestion is minor to it. Ones consent to any suggestion impedes ones mind with the suggested into becoming one of the minor aka those who under-stand.
Just as you are forced to put your innate wisdom and your wisdom of the innate into words in order to help others grow (which seems a type of cosmic irony innate to physical existence), so too have all the others who have recognized this, just as it will continue to be for those who come to recognize this
The soil from which truth grows is this:
What others profess, I will also proclaim:
“Forced principles will not be viable”,
Let this be the heart and soul of the message.
Tao Te Ching verse 42
what is a good man but a bad man’s teacher? What is a bad man but a good man’s job?
Sound doesn't force one to articulate words...articulated words tempt one to ignore the force of natural sound.
Force/for - "forwards"... that implies sound, not words held onto. You may think to put words forwards, but without others carrying them, they go right back into origin (sound).
Before one can put artificial words to one another...nature forces each being apart from one another.
your wisdom
DOM (balance) sets one FREE (choice)...choosing to take into possession (your) binds one to the possession, hence becoming possessed.
Wis/wise - "to see; know" implies each ones perception within all perceivable...a process of separation (analytic); not a possession (synthetic).
all the others
Each one within all..."all the others" implies the sum of all things. Being isn't a summation; but a divination/division.
The more one sums up from others (information); the less one recognizes all (inspiration).
The soil from which truth grows
Being implies seed within soil...taking what grows prevents growth. Indulging in the fruit of ones labors tempts one to ignore growing fruit. Growing potential implies during the process of loss...holding onto potential implies holding onto the process of loss, which sucks potential dry exponentially faster.
What others profess, I will also proclaim
a) Before others can speak (fess) forward (pro)...all separated each one from one another.
b) If FREE will of choice CLAIMS, then it binds itself.
c) PRO implies forwarding need; CLAIM implies wanting to hold back during forwarding need.
Forced principles will not be viable
Being implies viability (life) by force (inception towards death)....principal aka primus (first) capere (to take) implies viability making itself unavailable by holding onto force.
Whatever others are suggesting cannot be prin/prime (first)...first perceivable; then perception.
Will was made viable before "not" can be willed. Not/nothing/nihilo implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable.
what is a good man but a bad man’s teacher? What is a bad man but a good man’s job?
What's good and bad but the temptation to choose a side, while entering a ring (circular logic) for mutual destruction (good vs bad reasoning)?
To believe implies storing what process necessitates...resisting the temptation to hold onto.
Others suggest "history" to tempt ones "belief" to hold onto it.
Taking the credit/creed/belief of others to be a founder contradicts introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity.
True, and wise - to clarify my thoughts, I see Mo Zi and the school(s) he established as exemplars of the innate process(es) available to everyone (or, perhaps just every man, there is logic pointing in both directions). While these processes are available to every-one, rare are the ones who follow the path steadfastly. These are the Christs, the Buddhas, the Immortals (though a more accurate name is perhaps “those who choose the time of their death”), they have been known by as many names as there have been congregations of humans. In fact, a few years ago i came across a new name which I believe finds its source in this vein, a very interesting name indeed, u/free-will-of-choice
Often, and increasingly so as the congregation grows, people come to mistake the teacher for the lesson they came to teach. I think that’s one of the main impediments to our forward momentum vis a vis this subject
Innate implies potential born (nasci) within (in) process, hence inception towards death procession giving potential life to "each" one.
One process for each potential within aka one cause for each effect within aka one action for each reaction within etc.
Others make pluralism available to distract one from singularity, and thereby self discernment aka "introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity".
Logic implies circular thinking aka two sides pointing at each other (conflict of reason). Direction aka directed by action implies linear progression.
Only within linear can circular be shaped...logic tempts one to hold onto the shape.
Here's a modern sleight of hand for it... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/onedirection/onewayoranotherteenagekicks.html
"One way or another...I'm gonna get you". One way implies the natural way aka one direction (inception towards death) for each one (life) within. The other (circular logic) is where I'm (suggestion) gonna get ya (consent).
Only within singularity can plurality be made available to each separated unit by few suggesting many to join together.
a) What's rarer than being one within all? Simultaneously...what's more common than being one among one another within all?
Self discernment implies rare; common consensus diminishes that rarity.
b) If there's only one path (inception towards death) for each one (life) within, then following it implies what? If others suggest plurality and one follows many different path within the confines of circular logic, then what does that imply?
Following the path like a hamster in a wheel...
Aka wasting potential (life) by taking measurements, while ignoring that only process gives (inception) and takes (death).
Taking implies giving self up...giving implies tempting others to take. The narrow path...letting go of what was given, while resisting the temptation to take.
a) Human aka hue of man implies color aka spectrum of light separating each ray within from one another.
Only within animation (animal) can a hue of man (human) bring differences to each beings sight.
b) Con (together) gregare (to collect)...one can only artificially collect together what nature separates apart.
Procession (inception towards death) grows division of potential (life)...congregation grows indigestion within potential.
Taking implies missing given. Teaching implies responding to given while learning, and vice versa. Lesson/less/loss cannot be taken without giving up growth.
Forward momentum (inception towards death) forwards matter (life)...impediment implies mentally ignoring physical momentum. "Our" implies collective consciousness tempting singular mind to take possession during a given process.
Impeding ones mind doesn't prevent ones body from being moved forwards.
One (perception) of the main (perceivable)...any suggestion is minor to it. Ones consent to any suggestion impedes ones mind with the suggested into becoming one of the minor aka those who under-stand.
Just as you are forced to put your innate wisdom and your wisdom of the innate into words in order to help others grow (which seems a type of cosmic irony innate to physical existence), so too have all the others who have recognized this, just as it will continue to be for those who come to recognize this
The soil from which truth grows is this:
Tao Te Ching verse 42
Tao Te Ching verse 27
Sound doesn't force one to articulate words...articulated words tempt one to ignore the force of natural sound.
Force/for - "forwards"... that implies sound, not words held onto. You may think to put words forwards, but without others carrying them, they go right back into origin (sound).
Before one can put artificial words to one another...nature forces each being apart from one another.
DOM (balance) sets one FREE (choice)...choosing to take into possession (your) binds one to the possession, hence becoming possessed.
Wis/wise - "to see; know" implies each ones perception within all perceivable...a process of separation (analytic); not a possession (synthetic).
Each one within all..."all the others" implies the sum of all things. Being isn't a summation; but a divination/division.
The more one sums up from others (information); the less one recognizes all (inspiration).
Being implies seed within soil...taking what grows prevents growth. Indulging in the fruit of ones labors tempts one to ignore growing fruit. Growing potential implies during the process of loss...holding onto potential implies holding onto the process of loss, which sucks potential dry exponentially faster.
a) Before others can speak (fess) forward (pro)...all separated each one from one another.
b) If FREE will of choice CLAIMS, then it binds itself.
c) PRO implies forwarding need; CLAIM implies wanting to hold back during forwarding need.
Being implies viability (life) by force (inception towards death)....principal aka primus (first) capere (to take) implies viability making itself unavailable by holding onto force.
Whatever others are suggesting cannot be prin/prime (first)...first perceivable; then perception.
Will was made viable before "not" can be willed. Not/nothing/nihilo implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable.
What's good and bad but the temptation to choose a side, while entering a ring (circular logic) for mutual destruction (good vs bad reasoning)?