Sound doesn't force one to articulate words...articulated words tempt one to ignore the force of natural sound.
Force/for - "forwards"... that implies sound, not words held onto. You may think to put words forwards, but without others carrying them, they go right back into origin (sound).
Before one can put artificial words to one another...nature forces each being apart from one another.
your wisdom
DOM (balance) sets one FREE (choice)...choosing to take into possession (your) binds one to the possession, hence becoming possessed.
Wis/wise - "to see; know" implies each ones perception within all perceivable...a process of separation (analytic); not a possession (synthetic).
all the others
Each one within all..."all the others" implies the sum of all things. Being isn't a summation; but a divination/division.
The more one sums up from others (information); the less one recognizes all (inspiration).
The soil from which truth grows
Being implies seed within soil...taking what grows prevents growth. Indulging in the fruit of ones labors tempts one to ignore growing fruit. Growing potential implies during the process of loss...holding onto potential implies holding onto the process of loss, which sucks potential dry exponentially faster.
What others profess, I will also proclaim
a) Before others can speak (fess) forward (pro)...all separated each one from one another.
b) If FREE will of choice CLAIMS, then it binds itself.
c) PRO implies forwarding need; CLAIM implies wanting to hold back during forwarding need.
Forced principles will not be viable
Being implies viability (life) by force (inception towards death)....principal aka primus (first) capere (to take) implies viability making itself unavailable by holding onto force.
Whatever others are suggesting cannot be prin/prime (first)...first perceivable; then perception.
Will was made viable before "not" can be willed. Not/nothing/nihilo implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable.
what is a good man but a bad man’s teacher? What is a bad man but a good man’s job?
What's good and bad but the temptation to choose a side, while entering a ring (circular logic) for mutual destruction (good vs bad reasoning)?
The sound of doing - which is not carried on the wind, but on our vulgar words fashioned for the purposes of sharing the lessons we’ve experienced - our tales of glory and good and evil
“Be the change you want to see in the world” - and maybe people will listen? Even Without words?
You say
What's good and bad but the temptation to choose a side…?
But ultimately they are there so that we may come to know there is something beyond them, just as our vulgar/fleshy words grasp at the formless divine, this “beyond” is the ultimate terminus of the journey from inception to death that you’ve identified as a foundational reality to be shared, don’t you think?
Nature does; each being within re-does. Nature does in silence; beings tempt each other with noise to ignore that.
Motion has nothing to oppose...only matter within motion can oppose each other. Motion implies sound; matter implies instrument; opposing each other implies noise.
our tales of
Tailing one another like ouroboros. A tale implies recounting a piece of information, while ignoring all inspiration, which permits others to hold one accountable.
What one tells to another...all makes available. A "tall-tale" implies the tower of babel/babble...which always collapses upon its foundation.
maybe people will listen?
Listening from list/leizd (border/band) to one another does what to ones FREE will of choice? Bondage!
Even Without words
Even sound generates odd instruments...words tempt instruments at odds with one another.
they are there
They implies plural; there implies singularity...they was put there by ones consent to the suggestion of another.
Inception and death implies one momentum of one motion for each one matter living within...it's describing "them" with words which tempts ONE to ignore that.
come to know
One came to be into all known...others suggest that knowledge is coming to those who consent to carry information forwards, hence burdening self during the relieving revelation of all known.
What does all known revelation reveal? Each ones FREE will of choice.
here is something beyond
Being (be) at a distance (yond) implies each beings divided stance from one another...within all aka each thing within everything.
Others suggest something aka the "sum of things" to distract one from distance (divided stance)...ones consent to any suggestion closes the distance to it, while bringing the suggested information not just nearer, but into ones mind/memory.
a foundational reality to be shared, don’t you think?
Sharing implies carrying...carrying implies burdening "free" will of choice. Each one implies a share within all...sharing with one another ignores the all sharing process.
Share/sker - "to cut"...a separation from one another. Carrying shares implies putting together.
If a part within whole shares with another, then it sacrifices self.
The fruit of ones labor aren't for one to give to another, but ones response to all given. Ignoring this by sharing fruit as results/resilire - "to rebound"...binds ones responding free will of choice to another.
In short...foundation cannot be shared. Each part build on it represents a fundamental share; not to be shared with one another.
The fruit of ones labor aren't for one to give to another, but ones response to all given. Ignoring this by sharing fruit as results/resilire - "to rebound"...binds ones responding free will of choice to another.
In short...foundation cannot be shared. Each part build on it represents a fundamental share; not to be shared with one another.
Hmm…well, I thank the go(o)d of the universe for its never ending cycle of giving good, and in response each one giving good back to the universe in turn(ing the wheel of time), such that your fruit today was part of the universe shared with me - as usual with your generosity, you give a lot (of nutrition) to chew on. These temporary bindings are how we grow! The oak grows stronger in the wind!
How does one shape a circle? By drawing a line and combining beginning and end together. The never ending implies the line...not the circle shape within. It's ouroboros again aka circular logic preventing one from thinking straight.
giving good
Nature doesn't give good...natures gives all to each one within. A being is tempted to ignore all given for wanting (good) or not wanting (bad) from one another.
wheel of time
Time implies taking a measurement of linear progression, which by setting artificial beginning and end, establishes a wheel (circular logic).
A line (process) cannot be taken (possession) without contradicting the potential of each one within.
you give a lot (of nutrition) to chew on.
Only nature gives and takes, which in terms of nutrition implies "hunger"...not whatever a being chooses to chew on.
These temporary bindings are how we grow!
a) One grew free before choosing to bind self to others (we).
b) Freedom implies temporary during ongoing...any bonds made restrict the temporal from freely responding to ongoing.
Sound doesn't force one to articulate words...articulated words tempt one to ignore the force of natural sound.
Force/for - "forwards"... that implies sound, not words held onto. You may think to put words forwards, but without others carrying them, they go right back into origin (sound).
Before one can put artificial words to one another...nature forces each being apart from one another.
DOM (balance) sets one FREE (choice)...choosing to take into possession (your) binds one to the possession, hence becoming possessed.
Wis/wise - "to see; know" implies each ones perception within all perceivable...a process of separation (analytic); not a possession (synthetic).
Each one within all..."all the others" implies the sum of all things. Being isn't a summation; but a divination/division.
The more one sums up from others (information); the less one recognizes all (inspiration).
Being implies seed within soil...taking what grows prevents growth. Indulging in the fruit of ones labors tempts one to ignore growing fruit. Growing potential implies during the process of loss...holding onto potential implies holding onto the process of loss, which sucks potential dry exponentially faster.
a) Before others can speak (fess) forward (pro)...all separated each one from one another.
b) If FREE will of choice CLAIMS, then it binds itself.
c) PRO implies forwarding need; CLAIM implies wanting to hold back during forwarding need.
Being implies viability (life) by force (inception towards death)....principal aka primus (first) capere (to take) implies viability making itself unavailable by holding onto force.
Whatever others are suggesting cannot be prin/prime (first)...first perceivable; then perception.
Will was made viable before "not" can be willed. Not/nothing/nihilo implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable.
What's good and bad but the temptation to choose a side, while entering a ring (circular logic) for mutual destruction (good vs bad reasoning)?
The sound of doing - which is not carried on the wind, but on our vulgar words fashioned for the purposes of sharing the lessons we’ve experienced - our tales of glory and good and evil
“Be the change you want to see in the world” - and maybe people will listen? Even Without words?
You say
But ultimately they are there so that we may come to know there is something beyond them, just as our vulgar/fleshy words grasp at the formless divine, this “beyond” is the ultimate terminus of the journey from inception to death that you’ve identified as a foundational reality to be shared, don’t you think?
Nature does; each being within re-does. Nature does in silence; beings tempt each other with noise to ignore that.
Motion has nothing to oppose...only matter within motion can oppose each other. Motion implies sound; matter implies instrument; opposing each other implies noise.
Tailing one another like ouroboros. A tale implies recounting a piece of information, while ignoring all inspiration, which permits others to hold one accountable.
What one tells to another...all makes available. A "tall-tale" implies the tower of babel/babble...which always collapses upon its foundation.
Listening from list/leizd (border/band) to one another does what to ones FREE will of choice? Bondage!
Even sound generates odd instruments...words tempt instruments at odds with one another.
They implies plural; there implies singularity...they was put there by ones consent to the suggestion of another.
Inception and death implies one momentum of one motion for each one matter living within...it's describing "them" with words which tempts ONE to ignore that.
One came to be into all known...others suggest that knowledge is coming to those who consent to carry information forwards, hence burdening self during the relieving revelation of all known.
What does all known revelation reveal? Each ones FREE will of choice.
Being (be) at a distance (yond) implies each beings divided stance from one another...within all aka each thing within everything.
Others suggest something aka the "sum of things" to distract one from distance (divided stance)...ones consent to any suggestion closes the distance to it, while bringing the suggested information not just nearer, but into ones mind/memory.
Sharing implies carrying...carrying implies burdening "free" will of choice. Each one implies a share within all...sharing with one another ignores the all sharing process.
Share/sker - "to cut"...a separation from one another. Carrying shares implies putting together.
If a part within whole shares with another, then it sacrifices self.
The fruit of ones labor aren't for one to give to another, but ones response to all given. Ignoring this by sharing fruit as results/resilire - "to rebound"...binds ones responding free will of choice to another.
In short...foundation cannot be shared. Each part build on it represents a fundamental share; not to be shared with one another.
Hmm…well, I thank the go(o)d of the universe for its never ending cycle of giving good, and in response each one giving good back to the universe in turn(ing the wheel of time), such that your fruit today was part of the universe shared with me - as usual with your generosity, you give a lot (of nutrition) to chew on. These temporary bindings are how we grow! The oak grows stronger in the wind!
How does one shape a circle? By drawing a line and combining beginning and end together. The never ending implies the line...not the circle shape within. It's ouroboros again aka circular logic preventing one from thinking straight.
Nature doesn't give good...natures gives all to each one within. A being is tempted to ignore all given for wanting (good) or not wanting (bad) from one another.
Time implies taking a measurement of linear progression, which by setting artificial beginning and end, establishes a wheel (circular logic).
A line (process) cannot be taken (possession) without contradicting the potential of each one within.
Only nature gives and takes, which in terms of nutrition implies "hunger"...not whatever a being chooses to chew on.
a) One grew free before choosing to bind self to others (we).
b) Freedom implies temporary during ongoing...any bonds made restrict the temporal from freely responding to ongoing.
Only during temptation can resistance grow.