you're back
Never left.
haven't heard from you in months
Wasn't on my side. I still comment almost daily. Either you had a block on or there was a conspiracy afoot to hide comments from one another.
Internet of Bodies" (IoB), Hive Mind.
Consensus...a mental net; internally holding bodies together within a hive/hufr/keup - "round container" aka circular logic.
You'd hear the term, eh.. but they meant it "literally".
Literal aka by the letter, hence each ones consent LETTING few shape a consensus among many. Furthermore...consensus limits (terms) thought.
Nature doesn't shape letters...it gives each being free will of choice, which includes ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape a LETTER out of ones choice. Consent lets another do stuff to one.
track
Why track if many already follow the leads of few willingly? Why would life; on its one way track from inception towards death...need to be tracked by one another?
electrical conductivity to power
Ones consent to any suggestion implies electing conduct, thereby transferring the power of ones choice to a chosen one aka an inversion of power.
From the electrical perspective...the power suggesting implies converter; the power consenting implies inverter. The transfer only works because one side (few) is tempting the other side (many) to ignore natures electromotive force.
the most insane ponzi scheme
Pon (shortened form of upon; upwards so as to get to) zi (to see)...therefore understanding (to stand under) represents the largest pon-zi scheme assembling hierarchies of thought schools with ever more students under fewer and fewer teachers.
The burden of understanding exponentially grows...
there is an actual veil blocking
It's the factual (suggested) which veils the actual (perceivable) by blocking the re-actual (perception). It's each being response to factual over actual which sustains the veil.
The way it works is that the less aware we become, the less we see
Awareness within way implies each unit (perception) within singularity (perceivable)...it's suggested plurality (we) which diminishes the awareness of any member within.
unaware...because of some sort of agreement
Ones consent to any suggestion of another shapes an aware mind by agree-ment into an unaware mind, which also shapes a conflict (agree vs disagree) among unawares.
lots of problems
Solution (inception towards death) casts each problem (life) apart from one another...not into lots. It's one consent to any suggestion by another which implies the drawing of lots aka artificially sharing with one another what nature makes unique.
prevent more awareness by slowing it down as much as possible and in some cases, reversing it.
Consenting to any suggestion a) slows ones perception and b) reverses ones position withing perceivable (linear) into suggested (circular).
The tools used are technology and brainwashing
Techno (artifice) logy (logic) prevents perceivable washing through ones perceiving brain.
Perceivable inspiration "washes" through ones "brain"...it's suggested information which dirties ones mind if held onto.
At some point
The only point within a line of progress represents the death of ones life-line. Any point made within a moving line...tempts one to ignore motion.
aligned with the will of God
God implies linear procession (cause > effect)...each ones will within needs to resist the wanted temptation of alignment with one another. Why? Because living needs to resist the wanted temptation of dying. Why is dying a temptation? Because ignoring to resist dying represents the path of least resistance for living.
In the Bible...
God generates letters by letting each one within wield free will of choice...few suggest spoken and written letters to bind ones free will of choice by letting another do it.
higher, purer, more holy way
Way implies holy/whole...the separation of whole into partial implies a higher/lower balance for each partial choice in-between.
Purification requires each partial to balance IN-BETWEEN high/low, while resisting the temptation to imbalance choice by choosing to take any side over the other. Choosing high or low establishes a conflict (high vs low) representing impurity for any participant.
divide in 2
Two implies addition aka one + one. Division implies oneness dividing into each one within. Few suggest dualism to tempt each one to ignore self for others, hence adding a many together...
where many will vanish while others remain
Many added together are willingly vanishing, while permitting each chosen one to remain.
The deep state are those
Theos (God) implies singularity; those implies plurality aka an inversion of God by ones ignorance aka the state of deepening self by consenting to any suggestion of another for the attainment of understanding (standing-under).
causes the soul's awareness to go backwards
Soul aka sole implies "one and only" aka the one and only cause for each effect within...a forwards procession. It's ignoring the forwarding origin for trying to reach outcomes, which corrupts awareness.
How could one become aware of anything that didn't happen yet? Nature inspires being to resist being (life) forwarded (inception towards death)...the more one resists, the more one becomes aware of motions temptation upon matter.
the dark side
Choosing to hold onto a SIDE darkens ones SIGHT in-between. Only in-between light can there be darkness.
refuse to consent to any wars ever again.
a) Refusal implies versus acceptance...a war.
b) Con (together) sent (a dispatch from one place to another)...nature sends (inception towards death) being (life) apart from one another. It's choosing a side which sends both sides together into war.
Refusal consents to acceptance and vice versa...FREE will of choice needs to resist the wanted temptation to bind self to any side.
What other free speech forum there?
Assembling with another within a forum curtails ones free will of choice to shape speech. Whatever one shapes within a forum will be judged by consensus, which binds free will of choice.
they overtake groups to control
Few suggest groups to tempt each of many to TAKE a place within it, which in return positions few OVER many.
to seek
Seeking implies towards outcome; seeing implies in response to origin...seeking diminishes seeing.
to seek other forums, or create them yourself
Forum implies a gathering together of many under few...few suggest creation-ism to tempt each creation-ist among many to consent to a gathering of consensus called a "forum".
Withing nature...one cannot create; only transform. Many can be tricked with creationism into ignoring transformation; which in return permits few to create fiction within a transforming reality.
I joined this forum because...
...I ignore that cause separates being from one another. Few suggest the word "because" as an inversion of "causing to be" aka sound causing instrument to be.
speaking the truth
Speech implies the articulation of natural sound, hence speaking tempting one another into a truth vs false conflict.
it slowly deteriorated
Nature implies deterioration (inception towards death) of being (life)...how fast or slow depends on resistance to temptation.
disorganized echo chamber (but still with free speech)
Free implies from one another...it's the want to assemble (forum) with one another which establishes an echo chamber of artificial repetition by reflection.
badges of honor
A badge implies a "token; device worn by servants or followers to indicate their allegiance". Few suggest badges of honor to make it easier for many to hide disgrace; like the disgrace to join in uniformity hidden underneath badges of justice.
will be ultimately hated by the majority
Will (life) implies from initiation (inception) towards ultimate (death) aka a choice in-between balance...love vs hate implies imbalance.
This forum will never be as strong
Strength resides within being...assembling beings within a forum makes those assembled weak, and those assembling strong.
To join a forum willingly implies ones consent to being moderated by a chosen one, which in return weakens the strength of ones choice.
won the real war?
RE (to respond) AL (all) aren't at war with one another...RE implies each piece/peace within AL.
War implies response vs response aka mutual destruction while ignoring all (everything) for absolutely nothing.... https://genius.com/Edwin-starr-war-lyrics
Apparently they did the same thing
The jewish tricks are based on deceiving gentiles with appearances like "same thing"...only within everything (same) can each thing (difference) come into being.
There cannot be any "same thing" because the same nature differentiates each thing within apart from one another.
revolution
Aka re (to respond) volu (to turn) tion (action)...action implies nature; response implies each reacting being within, and turning implies artificially against one another, while ignoring natural animation.
A jew suggests the word "revolution" as a synthesis of reaction (re) and action (tion), while adding a turn (volu) into it to turn gentiles against one another. That's how spell-craft works and how it's being used to shape appearances into deception.
"In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, to stir up the basest passions. Our mission is to destroy, not to edify. The passion of destruction is a creative passion." ~Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin
"The immediate task of perishing in the revolutionary world storm. The coming world war will cause not only reactionary classes and dynasties, but entire reactionary peoples, to disappear from the face of the earth. And that will be progress. Their very name will vanish." ~Karl Marx
Revolution against reaction... that's the deception.
Trust the plan" in their controlled newspapers to keep the population docile.
To trust implies choosing to hold onto, while keeping for self...jewish control is based on gentiles consent to keep for self what a jew entrusted, while ignoring that nature moves and can not be held; kept; take into possession; stopped etc.
what are the odds that QAnon was a jewish psyop?
Psyop aka psycho-logical-operation...psycho implies natural animation; logic implies artificial movement, and operation implies artifice shaped within natural.
A jew tempts gentiles to ignore natural for artificial, hence from linear animation into a circular movement against one another aka at "odds" with one another.
Within nature...each beings free will of choice can only be at odds with one another if chosen. A given choice taking the chance of odds implies gambling.
4chan; QAnon
Both represent a consensus shaped by a jew to tempt gentiles to join together. Doing that assembles ones natural choice under the artificial control of a chosen one.
The one who shapes becomes the ruler of those who hold onto shapes. It doesn't matter what gentiles write to each other about jewish crimes on /pol/ or greatawakening if the labels "4chan" and "QAnon" are representing the jewish overseer for whatever gentile underlings are doing within confinement.
An even larger label for gentile confinement...world wide web.
"Edgar’s (Bronfman) commitment to equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people is one of the lesser- known aspects of his legacy"... https://www.keshetonline.org/news/for-edgar-bronfman-humanity-to-lgbt-people-was-intuitive/
none of these indicate...narrative control
Didn't the 1905 release of the Protocols include narrative control through media?
foreknowledge
Knowledge forwards being. All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies prescience.
just random
God implies justice, which isn't random (course without direction) by directed. Few suggest randomness to tempt many to ignore choice by origin for chance of outcome.
two common terms, "six million" and "jews"
Six/seco (to divide) and each chosen one implies unique...not common. Few suggest terminology to terminate many into common logic.
statistically meaningless
Choice within balance implies variable...suggested statism (static) and definitionism (meaning) tempt one to take measurements while ignoring balance given, which in return imbalances choice.
Problem, reaction, solution
Enacting solution (inception towards death) generates reacting problem (life)...few suggest problem > reaction > solution to a) put solution from beginning towards end, and b) to divide problem from reaction, hence tempting many into reacting with "not my problem".
AI taking
Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) being (life)...few suggest artifice to tempt many to take, while ignoring given.
AI cannot take anything...taking AI tempts a being to give up oneself within nature.
promoted as the solution
An inversion of solution (inception towards death) forwarding (pro) particle (mote) being (life). Whatever few promote aka put forwards within motion...tempts many to follow along.
migration
Aka changing (inception towards death) place (life)...that's the status quo of being (life) moved from one state (inception) towards another (death).
The trick...nature migrates being from one another; while few are migrating many into one another.
A repeated jewish suggestion to establish a consensus among gentiles. Why does that work? Because nature moves which allows repetition to accumulate. Why does it work on gentiles? Because gentiles ignore being moved by nature, while holding onto jewish fiction...
forgotten connection
Forgotten aka for (forwards) gotten (got into possession)...that's a connection to establish a contradiction within ones line of thinking. Being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) tempts one to GET, while ignoring that what one GOT cannot be held onto.
circle the globe in a straight line
Only within a line can a circle be shaped...few suggest globalism to shape the consensus of many into a circle which prevents each one within from thinking straight.
great circle
Great implies vs small aka two sides TURNED against one another within an inward (logic) and outward (reason) circle.
Todd Howard is apparently the reason they went with this story
Todd Howard shaped a suggestion to tempt each player into conflicts of reason against one another about the suggested. Holding onto the suggested implies STORING it, which permits Todd Howard to shape STORIES with what players store within their minds.
The concept of shaping anything within someone else implies the anthropomorphic animation of a golem/gollum/goyim...
bisecting the equator
Separating (sect) equal (equator) into two (bi)...contradicts equal by putting two different sides at odds with one another.
In reality...equator (inception towards death) intersects difference (life) from one another.
forming a perfectly aligned circle
Only within a perfect line can an imperfect circle be shaped aka only within perfect flow (inception towards death) can imperfect form (life) be shaped.
onto an ark to survive the...Flood
Each being implies an ark (life) within the flood (inception towards death)...others suggest Noah; from Hebrew Noach - "rest" to tempt one to ignore being moved.
If one chooses to rest instead of resisting, then a formed being drowns faster within the flood/flow of nature.
to herd examples
Example implies "an object of imitation"...a jew shapes suggestions into objects imitating perception to herd gentiles into a consensus.
Indiana Jones game
Computer said no :(
revealed on a compressed
Compression conceals.
timeline
Line reveals; time conceals. Time implies a measurement taken within a line of progress given.
history
His story implies the storage (store) of possession (his)...the opposite of revelation.
origin of Christianity
God
if our timeline is altered
Only within a stable line (inception towards death) can there be alternation (life)...taking measurements (time) into possession (our) tempts one to ignore that. Ones ignorance can be altered by the suggestions of another.
Virginia Giuffre; born as Virginia Louise Roberts aka "Virgin Robber"...
freeLife
Only each living beings free will of choice implies a free life...the suggested "freeLife" tempts one at liberty to another aka ones free will of choice into bondage to a chosen one by consent, which represents a debt/death-contract.
FreeLife implies "bondage to death"...using the label to hide the inversion.
rentry
A synthesis between rent + entry aka tempting one into entering a rent agreement with another. By doing that...the users of rentry are willingly giving the owners a monopoly to abuse.
porn
Aka porn/perə/per - "to traffic; sell"...few are selling temptation by suggestion, which tempts many to use consent for buying into it.
To buy into any sold temptation implies selling self out, so the sell price represents "interest" upon the selling of ones "soul" to another, and how does one shape consent? By FREE will of choice.
Any step one chooses to make onto uncharted territory implies extraterrestrial...both physical and mental.
Humam
"Individuals named Humam are frequently depicted as leaders, warriors, and figures of considerable moral standing, underscoring the valorous implications of the name." https://venere.it/en/the-meaning-and-history-of-the-name-humam/
Sakhnini
That's not Gnosticism, that is Judaism for sheep.
a) Gnostic implies "to know" aka ones perception...it's the suggested -ism which contradicts it, while making self into a sheep under a wolf.
b) Juda implies "betrayer of Christ" aka ones ignorance of self (perception) for another (suggestion). Adding the suggested -ism collectivizes betrayers into an anti-christ consciousness aka a hivemind of ignorant sheep being led by each insolent wolf hiding in sheeps clothing aka "Hey, fellow gentiles..."
a) Merging implies plurality...singularity implies internal separation of units within oneness.
b) All cannot be merged...only ones within all can be merged together aka gentiles merged together by each jewish chosen one.
c) Consciousness implies a sum (con) of singular units (scious) aka a consensus among gentiles about any jewish suggestion.
d) SEELE aka Soul implies sole aka "one and only".
e) Being implies solid (life) within liquid (inception towards death) which each jew links and connects together into a gentile consensus aka hivemind aka collective consciousness aka commonwealth etc.
f) Identity (sameness) contradicts shape (forming within flow)...a jew shapes identities to prevent gentiles from shaping.
g) Third impact implies first cause > second/seco (to divide) effect > third impact by affection to one another.
h) Primeordial aka first order of all implies the established mode (life) of proceeding (inception towards death)...not the orders a jew suggests gentiles to follow.
i) All cannot be caused...all implies cause for each effect within.
j) To be implies one...one cannot be more or less than one; only increasing or decreasing oneself.
Becoming implies coming into being, hence as being (be) within God (el). One cannot become; only come into being. The suggested word "become" represents an inversion.
As for ringing the being (be) within God (el)...that's about drawing an inward (logic) and outward (reason) ring to tempt a being into circular thinking, which turns one against one another into circular conflict.
Example...the suggestion of upvote or downvote next to each comment represents the first circle (logic), while choosing either side establishes the second circle (reason) aka commenters arguing against one another within a like vs dislike conflict.
Com (together) ment (mind)...that's a synthesis tempting ones singular mind to ignore analysis. Putting minds together represents a hivemind aka a collective consciousness aka gestalt intelligence aka an egregore aka groupthink aka mental coalescence etc.
Both a distraction from the numerous bells that where taken across the world, and fundamentally BE (being) EL (God) aka BA'AL aka bhel (to sound).
Furthermore...the rhetoric "to ring a bell" tempts one to believe that resonance aka ones response (re) to all sound (sonance) emits circular instead of linear.
the balance of powers
Choice represents the only power within balance...consenting to any suggestion permits another to impose (trump) the suggested upon one.
i dont think he knows anything from what a tariff is
From arabic ta'rif - "information, notification, a making known"...if one makes known, then one knew before. It's those who consent to what others make known, which didn't knew before.
Sharing information isn't knowledge...being moved as perception within perceivable inspiration is.
stop eating meat
What about kosher meat? Eating jewish flesh should be save, right?
Matthew Liao
Born in 1972; looks and sounds like 20...what did he eat?
Liao wrote a book called The Right to Be Loved, which explores the foundations of children’s right to be loved and whether love can be an appropriate object of rights.
Aka to appropriate (take possession of, take exclusively) child love...
Would you question a bot that? Also...if you thing is questioning AI to fish for weaknesses, then why wouldn't you try to take apart the free-will-of-choice "bot" used on a conspiracy forum?
Again...not because of me. I've been commenting daily for over five years, including plenty comments to your posts. What if the new mod lady cleaned the house and took some restrictions off? Would it be surprising if users on a conspiracy forum are further restricted from reaching each other?
As if I was hiding and thereby contradicting the whole FREE will of choice thingy...