▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Languages are different sounds for the same data.

a) Different languages are shaped (suggestion) within same sound (perceivable). That implies spell-craft and it's utilized to build a fictitious layer (suggested information) within reality (perceivable inspiration).

The trick...information tempts one to hold onto; while inspiration cannot be held onto.

b) DATA (Latin datum; things given) from root DO (to give)...nature gives all (perceivable) to each one (perception). The suggestions by others tempts one to "take", while ignoring that all is already given.

If I give you an apple and you'll take it; then you ignore that seed and soil where given before fruit came to be.

Ones consent to another ones suggestion implies taking (to buy) + giving (to sell)...a mercantile contract based on ones ignorance of being FREE will of choice within all nature offers.

One cannot give what nature already gave and one cannot take without ignoring that nature moves.

Separate the word, the sound, the letters from the meaning.

a) SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken; whole"

b) Sound implies all; each one within implies "insane person" aka in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound) aka all setting itself apart internally/inherently into each one instrument (mind structured within).

c) Few suggest the words "insane person" to distract one from perceivable sound (in sanus + per sonos).

d) It's called "letter" because shaping perceivable sound into suggestible words requires ones consent to LET it happen.

Oneself is the LETTER of whatever words another suggests.

e) As for meaning...one signal moves (perceivable inspiration) another signal tempts one to hold onto (suggested information). Few tempt many to attach meaning to latter, while ignoring former.

The root of MEAN aka mei implies "change"...not truth; belief; proof; definition; information; accuracy; certainty; legitimacy; principle; actuality; axiom; correctness; verisimilitude etc.

If you look for meaning in words...

...then you're a deaf phonetician (definition) aka deaf to phonics (sound), hence ignoring perceivable (sound) for suggested (word) aka falling for spell-craft.

looking during the day light

Ones sight within all light implies by FREE will of choice...looking/locking implies focusing on the suggestions by another, hence narrowing ones sight.

search with a flash light

a) Being implies flash (life) within light (inception towards death) aka "spark of life".

b) Ones doesn't need to search for; one needs to resist wanted temptations, while being (life) forwarded (inception towards death).

c) Those within light don't need to search for it...each one needs to discern self (enlightenment), while resisting the wanted temptation of ignorance (darkness).

Sleight of hand: "Exit light (out of discernment) enter night (into ignorance) take my hand (consent to my suggestion) and we're off to never-never land (denial of potential)"... https://genius.com/Metallica-enter-sandman-lyrics

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Coherent implies sticking together...free will of choice implies wielded apart from one another. It's many who are being tempted to stick together, when consenting to suggested choices by a few chosen ones.

In short...coherence tempts each disciple to follow motivation.

b) What if others tempt one to "try" for something suggested; while ignoring to be re-trial within everything perceivable?

What if nature offers everything (perceivable) to each one (perception)...while the suggestions by another imply a trial of ones resistance among temptation?

It's like you are not even

Free will of choice implies odd (choice) within even (balance) resisting the temptation to respond like others.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

very few options for "friends".

a) Few suggest "options" to tempt many to ignore "option" aka each ones "mandatory" free will of choice.

b) Consenting to any suggestion puts one into a conflict of reason (friend vs enemy) against all other ones...no matter which side one chooses.

c) Imagine a child choosing his/her first "friend"...at that moment everyone else was branded a chosen enemy.

In other words...suggested "friend or foe" tempts anyone who consents into the same conflict of reason.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It stands to reason that the Friend of My Enemy is My Enemy

Reasoning implies friend vs enemy...no matter which side one chooses.

majority...stands with the jews

Each jew stays apart from any majority... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Political-History-1789-1939/dp/0199246815

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

1 + 1

If all implies one, then how could one add to all?

1 + 1 =

Why set ones apart from one another, when addition makes equal? Who benefits from equalizing differences...those equalized or the ones remaining different?

= 0

The absence of all quantity equals what?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ed White

EDWARD aka ead (wealth, prosperity) weard (guardian) WHITE (pure light)...guarding the wealth of light thorough obfuscation of ignorant many by enlightened few.

That's the great work/magnum opus of freemasonry aka utilizing masonry (suggestion) to corrupt free (perception).

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

people who aren't awake yet, cannot be convinced

Convince aka COM (together; with) VINCERE (to conquer). That's what few do...conquer many by tempting together.

NASA (Hebrew nasha; to beguile/deceive) is being suggested by few and consented to by many. Deception requires consent.

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's about mass...sacrifice

Nature offers all to each one within by setting apart...few within amass others together, which when consented to, permits few to pick apart masses.

Notice how the bolsheviks were tempted by quotas (a proportional part or share) to sacrifice masses. Happening right now under the name of DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion)...

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) MICHAEL (Hebrew Mikha-el; who is like god) + NELSON (nell; weak-spirited person) + BENDIGO (bend; bhendh; to bind)

EL breathes life into those within by setting apart...those within bind weakness (consent) together, hence suggesting BANK to bind TRUST.

b) Due implies owning to...ones internal re-view (response to visual perception) doesn't own anything to another ones views.

c) Politic implies public matter; banking implies private matter, hence ones trust by free will of choice.

d) Australian/austral/aus-tero - "towards dawn" implies ones response to perceivable...-ist (nationalist) implies ones submission to suggested (nationalism).

Watch your tongue, mate...someone tries to play you for a drongo.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Saturn

a) Latin satus - "to sow" aka towards (inception towards death) sow/scatter/seamen/season/seed (life).

b) In Akkadian, the planet was kaiamanu, literally "constant, enduring," hence Hebrew kiyyun, Arabic and Persian kaiwan "Saturn."

Aka constant (inception towards death) enduring (life) aka ones rise during all falling.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

away from fear towards faith

a) Both faith (want) and fear (not want) tempt one towards outcome; while ignoring origin (need).

b) Instead of "away from" try form (life) within way of flow (inception towards death)...

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mind over matter won't do anything.

Indeed...matter (ones perception) exists within mind/memory (all perceivable).

Discipline follows motivation

Motivation (inception towards death) generates discipline (life)...others tempt one to follow instead of resisting.

will attempt to use their thoughts to change their state

Thinking implies during change. Memory implies momentum of motion for matter "thinking" within.

This will ALWAYS fail. You can't change...

Because each one (life) exists within all-way (inception towards death) as reaction within action.

One cannot change anything; one adapts to everything perceivable changing...or ignores it for holding onto suggestions by others.

action over thoughts

Thinking implies re-acting to en-acting input. Only nature acts; those within react to either nature (perceivable inspiration) or each other (suggested information)...aka artifice.

I don't do religion

"don't" aka doing nothing implies ones consent to suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing). Consenting to suggested implies religion (Latin religio; to bind anew).

All perceivable sets each ones perception free (will of choice)...misusing that to consent to anything suggested by another implies binding self.

The trick of religion is that ones consent seals the deal...not whatever is being suggested as religion by another.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the frequency of vibrations?

Each ones frequent use of free will of choice vacillating to and fro within balance to sustain ones vigor.

shorter waves mean faster vibrations and vice versa. So "slow vibrational frequency" will have long waves, not short.

Wave (life) during line (inception towards death)...as short/long or slow/fast as frequency of ones choice vacillates it.

Hertz unit

Ones Herz (heart)

without that Hz values there just nothing to talk about.

a) Everything (perceivable) implies value; each thing (perception) implies evaluation...nothing (suggested) tempts one to de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) that.

b) "without" implies being within (life) outside (inception towards death) aka as partial within whole...not the lack of anything.

The merchant tempts the consumer to be "without" unless buying into...

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

"natural causes" and problem solved?

Natural cause (inception towards death) dissolves each problematic effect (life).

they are just dragging this up

Many drag "Julian Assange" along as an ingredient within a soup of suggested information...few simply steer it to see if it's dissolved yet.

Notice the difference between "Assange" and "Hitler"...the former is burning out; while the latter gets stoked...all within the minds of the many.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

must have great security

a) Secure implies "free from danger"; being implies free (life) within danger (inception towards death).

b) Notice that both those taking the shots (insecure) and those ready to shoot (security)...are willingly taking orders from those who suggest danger.

He's someone I see

Seeing implies ones sight within all; looking at/gazing/beholding implies ones focus on another one...which others tempt by showing what to watch.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dr. Fauci

Anthony

St. Anthony (4c.), Egyptian hermit, was patron saint of swineherds, to whom one of each litter was usually vowed... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Anthony#etymonline_v_13519

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The same you in another dimension

Or your own DI-MEN (phonetic demon) aka divided mind aka ones mind/memory divided in-between perception and suggestion...

I don't know about meditating

Mediate/medius/middle aka choice finding balance by discerning self as center (ones perception) of circumference (all perceivable)...suggestion tempts one off-center, hence others utilizing MEDIA to mediate suggested information 24/7; all around the clock, and from all sides as N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh).

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

things wouldn't be the same

Can you show two "things" that are the same without being at different positions from one another?

dark matter

Matter/material can only exist in-between bright and dark, otherwise it couldn't sustain a perceivable shape.

▲ 4 ▼
free-will-of-choice 4 points ago +4 / -0

a) "jews are to isms, what Italians are to operas"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jirPUjrqQP8

b) Opera implies collaboration between a composer (suggestion) and a librettist (consent).

c) ITALY aka IT A LY (it's a lie)...

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

fake Latin

Try Greek dēmokratia... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=democracy

Bot

Aka bot; robot (Latin roboro; robur) - "strength"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Roboration

absolutely nothing

How could nothing be free from limitation (absolute)?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is outside that model?

a) Can one model (form) outside energy (flow)?

b) MODEL, noun (Latin modulus, modus) - "pattern of something to be made; any thing of a particular form".

What if a partial can only exist within whole?

c) What if outside implies side (momentum) within out (motion) for those within (matter). Does one exist in-between (life) sides (inception/death)?

all is an illusion

ION implies action; ILLUDO implies reaction....ignoring perceivable for suggested makes former illusive under the curtain of latter.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

idea actually crossed my mind

What happens if suggested idealism crosses the flow of perceivable inspiration through ones perceiving mind/memory?

What if ones consent to another ones suggestion implies a double-cross?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a democracy has to meet certain criteria

DEMOS (common people) KRATOS (strength)...everyone's a critic.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

what do you call it then....if nothing has ever existed before by your definition

Sound exists before any definition can be worded.

if you know something but cannot share that knowledge you are imprisoned by the idea

Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) or idealism (suggested information)...the latter implies shared among partials; while the former implies being a partial share within whole.

Each ones perception implies a share within all perceivable knowledge.

Share (perception within perceivable) or stash (consenting to suggested)...

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

no​tice the truth

a) NOTICE (Latin notitia) - "being known" is given; truth and lies are taken.

b) Nature gives a notice which cannot be taken...perceivable inspiration. Those within nature tempt one to take notice of...suggested information.

Those who take (suggested) ignore that which is given (perceivable).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›