2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

unusual

Sensual. Hence heart over mind. The mind is being tricked with idolatry aka sign language (traffic sings) to confirm and proceed, while ignoring that the heart at center adapts to any change within its circumference.

synchronicity

Aka syn (together; with) chronos (time; to divide) city (center)...few suggest synchronism to tempt each one of many to ignore that circumference (all) divides into center (one), hence setting EACH center apart from one another...not together.

A heart doesn't synchronize...it differs.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Get new jobs

  • JOB; noun (Hebrew Iyyobh) - "hated; persecuted; hostile to; enmity"
  • JOB; verb - "to deal in public stocks on one's own account; to cheat, betray; to pervert public service to private advantage"

https://www.etymonline.com/word/job#etymonline_v_6472

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

cities are sterilizing people

a) Fertility implies through center outwards...few suggest city centers to draw many into, hence sterilization by inversion of fertility.

b) Nature fertilizes person (per sonos; by sound)...few accumulate each consenting person (singular) into a suggested people (plural), which also sterilizes fertility.

eating better in the big city than I have been in the smaller city

The trick... few export from smaller cities to import into big cities. The exporting stresses the circumference, while the importing calms the center.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Who knows how to lay the four corners?

Left/right + up/down + front/back implies ones perception within all perceivable, hence ones perspective seeing four corners wherever ones eyes bring anything to a point by convergence.

The issue...to lay implies "causing to rest, hence laying down", which tempts one to ignore being an effect within a moving cause, hence "no rest for the wicked".

There ain't no rest horizontally, while being (life) moved (inception towards death) vertically.

original builders

Only within origin can one build, and it's the moving origin, which internally divides into each builder (or destroyer).

literal

a) Literal (by the letter) implies oneself using free will of choice to "let" happen. Lateral (pertaining to sides) implies letter (choice) holding onto a side (imbalance), hence bound between covers.

Iteration (repetition) implies as choice within balance, hence frequent adaptation.

b) The foundation of let/le - "to allow; to depart from; to let go" implies all allowing ones by departing internally, which establishes a balance (needing to let go/wanting to hold onto) for each ones free will of choice.

The founders of the foundation,seen fractally

a) Foundation implies singular (all for one, one for all) hence whole for each fractal within. Few within suggest pluralism (founders) to tempt consenting many together aka fictitiously joining real fractals.

b) To see implies as ray (matter) within spectrum (momentum) of light (motion) aka re-frac-tion (reacting to the fragmentation of action).

need spell-ing lessons.

One needs all sound; yet wants others to spell it out for one, which when consented to "lessens" one to one another.

associated words

Letters associate words, hence ones consent "letting" the suggestions by another shape words. Sound dissociates refraction, which only then allows intercourse for more off-spring.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

It Is to Find Something

Which implies another deception...only within a foundation can something be found. To find implies seeking an outcome, while foundation implies origin.

Laying Foundations

Only within a foundation can one lay.

legal definition

Natural law cannot be defined (affixed) without ignoring that it moves...those within natural law can easily be tempted to ignore perceivable motion by holding onto suggested definition.

All...were equally founded

All implies equal foundation for each different one within. ALL cannot be founded, cause there cannot be more than ALL to found upon.

all of society

Society implies ONEs aggregated together within ALL setting each one apart from one another.

There's no such thing as "all of"...only each one of all.

-1
free-will-of-choice -1 points ago +1 / -2

CAN implies ones expressed potential; SHOULD implies a suggested motivation by another, tempting one to suppress self by wasting expression.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you show me an example of AI adapting to inspiration instead of information?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Questioning "when" permits those who answer to date/datus/dare - "to give; grant; offer", which ones consent to the answer then takes.

b) The natural order doesn't generate "common people", but each unique person. Ones consent to suggested common-ism and popul-ism permits few to ordain many into groups.

c) A birth implies a setting apart of an off-spring. Few exploit birth-daze to date birth, hence gaining control over an affixed date, while distracting each off-spring from the passage of self-discernment aka the coming into being from origin.

Thanks to birthdays...ones origin can be buried within calendars, which makes one accountable to others, who also utilize numbers to distract ONE from discerning self. Calendars utilize DAZE (days) of the WEAK (week) to distract from sun (son) and moon (month).

d) Celebrate/celeber - "frequented, crowded"... a suggested inversion of action (perceivable) setting frequent reactions (perception) apart from one another. Consenting to a suggestion crowds many frequencies together, hence distorting them.

In other words...each ones free will of choice implies frequent adaptation, while following the choices of others lowers ones frequency.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

Can you show me a bot that can respond like this? A bot that can adapt to inspiration?

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +2 / -2

definition of politics is "who gets what"

a) To define implies to affix..."who gets what" implies moving distribution. A contradiction. Few tempt many to wholesale think in contradictions, while ignoring what they got, which in return permits few to get it.

b) Politic/polis - "enclosed space; ones city" aka ones free will of choice, enclosed within self until freely opened up to others. A politician tricks ones private free will of choice to become public domain by voting representatives aka selecting a chosen one.

enemies

Enemy aka en (in) emy/amy/ama - "to take, hold"...hence the enemy within self when taking and holding onto what another suggests, which then establishes a conflict of reason between amity vs enmity.

to the victor go the spoils

Because the conflict in-between winning vs loosing spoils both participants. The one spoiled less is declared the winner/victor.

the very core of the meaning of the word

Suggested words and attached meaning distract one from being the perceiving core within perceivable sound.

what, when, where and why

What? Energy! When? Now! Where? Here! Why? Causing (inception towards death) effects (life)!

MEANS by which there are decisions

Only ones choice can decide...others suggest meaning to tempt ones choice to select a chosen ones suggestion as the deciding factor; noun - "commercial agent, deputy, one who buys or sells for another"

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

hate honesty

To HONE implies sharpening an edge from both sides...reasoning (love vs hate) implies inclining to one side, while fighting the other. That's how few manage to blunt and dull many.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

a) Certain/certus - "fixed" contradicts birth/bear/bher - "to carry forth"...

b) Few suggest date/datus/dare - "to give", hence daring many to take.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

a) Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) can only strengthen itself by resisting.

b) To affirm implies ad (towards) firmus (strength), hence affirmation tempting form to seek strength by moving forwards with flow.

c) AI mimics confirmation aka con (together) firmus (strength), while tempting affirmation from consenting users. This establishes a feedback loop where the strength of a user seeking af-firmation is drained by artificially joining with con-firmation.

In short...seeking affirmation is self destructive, hence a suicidal tendency of being (life) towards outcome (death).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

The United States is an occupied government - this is am example of (jewish) power structure.

To unite states is how a jew structures power...

"The jewish people as a whole is its own Messiah. Its kingdom over the universe is obtained through the uniting of other human races, through the suppression of frontiers and monarchies, which are bulwarks for particularism and hinder the erection of a world republic where citizenship is everywhere recognized to the jew. In this new organization of mankind the sons of Israel, who at present are scattered over the entire earths surface, will all be the same race and of the same traditional culture, without, however, forming another nationality, and be without contradiction the leading element in all parts, particularly if it is successful in laying upon the masses of workers a permanent leadership by some jews. The governments of peoples all pass with the formation of the universal republic effortlessly into the hands of the Israelites in favour of the victory of the proletariat. Then the personal property of the rulers will be able to be suppressed by the rulers of the jewish race who will everywhere govern over the property of the peoples. Then the promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled, that when the time of the Messiah has come, the jews will have the goods of all peoples of the world in their possession."

~From a letter by Baruch Levy sent to Karl Marx

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

cradle of civilization

a) A cradle rocks to and fro aka balancing the choice at center. A civilization implies many joined together around centers (cities), which imbalances each ones choice.

b) Rocking to and fro allows a cradle to mimic ones choice of adaptation as free will of choice (matter) towards (motion) balance (momentum).

Few "rock and roll" many together into conflicts of reason (circular logic) against each other.

Sleight of hand: The pioneering rock song "rock around the clock" was written by Max C. Freedman (maximum seeing freed man)... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/billhaleyhiscomets/rockaroundtheclock.html

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

reverse psychology

Psycho/psyche - "animating power" implies motion; velocity; forwards direction. It's those within (life) animation (inception towards death) turning against (verse/versus) each other, within conflicts of reason (logy/logic), that represent reverse psychology.

made to sell

Tempted (suggestion) to buy (consent), while selling self out (free will of choice)...

Ones choice can only sell self out by selecting/buying into a chosen ones offer.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

centres of civilization

Civil implies public (plural); centre implies private (singular). Each one implies center of all...few suggest civil centers (cities) to draw many together, which positions few at center of many, with the sole power to cut off circumference (circumcise).

everywhere Babylon is, Babylon will fall

a) Only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life)

b) BA'BEL, noun (Heb) - "confusion; disorder" build up always collapses upon its foundation...within the natural order.

Confusion implies the fusing together (con) of many, hence dividing each thereof (dis) from natural order and against each other.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ar-yan aka or-ion aka OR (choice between alternative) ION (action)...

Aka alternating reactions (life) within action (inception towards death) aka the ship (matter) within the mother (momentum) of father (motion).

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

We started with a simple question about existence. About being thrown into consciousness without asking for it.

Started with a question...without asking.

consciousness

Con (together) contradicts scious/scire (to know)...knowing implies each ones perception within all perceivable, hence a setting apart from one another to allow awareness of one another.

Senses are sensing moving differences...few equalize differences among many by establishing a hivemind aka a con-scious (knowing together). That's why many aren't aware of what few are up to.

being thrown into

That implies taking a being from somewhere and throwing it somewhere else...an inversion of reality, where each one is thrown (inception towards death) into being (life).

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +2 / -2

Christmas = Christ-Mass Parade - A Mass of people Parading For Jesus Christ

a) Christ (anointed one) + mass/missa/mittere - "dismissal; to let go; send"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mass#etymonline_v_9684

Sending (inception towards death) each anointed one (life) apart from one another...that's what "christ-mas" implies.

b) Before a people (plural) can be amassed together, each one implies a person (singular)...

c) FOR implies being (life) forwarded (inception towards death), hence moved A CROSS, which each one needs to resist, hence the symbolic use of X-mas.

Who would attack a mass of people

Nature generates each person...a jew amasses gentiles into a people aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together), which nature continuously sets apart aka velocity (inception towards death) separating resistance (life).

That's why no civilization; nation; society; community; group; family; collective etc. can sustain itself for long...and only a few remain.

Who is Anti-Christ?

Each ones (christ) choice to turn against (anti) another.

synagogue

Aka SYN (together) AGEIN (put in motion, move)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/synagogue#etymonline_v_22521

It's the amassed gentiles which represent the synagogue, within which each jew operates as satan/stn - "one who opposes, obstructs, or acts as an adversary" aka diabolos - "slanderer; one who throws something A CROSS the path of another"

That something thrown across implies the kike/kikel/circle aka circular logic within self tempting conflicts of reason against others. Logic implies the obstruction within self, reason the mutual conflict among adversaries.

the goverment...

...controls (govern) the mind (ment) by tempting mass consent with suggestions from few.

The german...is controlled

Control implies "rolled together"...which obstructs GERM-ination.

It is demoralizing that ZOG is not attacked, but instead scapegoats or plebians at random.

Morals implies the conflict between right vs wrong; good vs bad...a conflict of reason among gentiles stoked by a jew from both sides through talmudic reasoning.

The random attacks are designed to frighten (Latin terrere), hence a jew suggesting terror-ism to brand each consenting gentile a terror-ist. That's what the "war on terror" is about, and of course it's mocking and testing a MASS of CHRISTians with "do not be afraid"...

Christian Zionists, who...

...willingly gave consent to follow suggested zionism.

indirectly responsible

Only within direction (inception towards death) can one respond (life) to being directed.

Ones response-ability (free will of choice) cannot be shared...only ignored.

damning themselves in the process

The process implies ones life sentenced from inception towards point of death, hence each inception of life implying a death sentence, hence living within the process of dying.

Damn/dap - "to apportion in exchange"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/damn#etymonline_v_752 aka apportion (division into portions) as expression (life) within change (inception towards death).

Living implies damnation; the process of dying implies salvation...hence dissolving each portion within.

allies

a) ALL LIES...and yet gentiles keep falling for it.

b) ALL cannot "ally"...what would all ally with? More than all?

c) Ally/alligare - "to bind one thing to another"...tempts one to ignore that all sets each one apart from one another, or from the christian perspective...God (all) setting apart each Christ (one).

A jew suggests religion/religio - "to bind anew" to trick ONES CHOICE to select a CHOSEN ONES suggestion.

misplaced loyalties and zionist cultism.

One misses ones place (perception) within all (perceivable) when consenting to suggested loyalism; zionism or cultism by another. It's consent to an -ism which makes one a loyalist; zionist and cultist.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Not for those believing in it aka those WILLING it into existence. Look who has more power...those holding onto truth or those shaping lies.

Notice that those holding onto are restricting their ability to wander (space), while those who shape are free to make others wander/wonder internally.

b) To know implies to perceive, while a hoax can only be suggested. One perceives things within motion, hence space/spatior - "to wander", yet ones consent to a suggested hoax tempt one to hold onto it, hence ignoring motion.

c) A jew suggests space as a place outside of self to wander to (or wonder about), which tempts those who consent to ignore that space/spatior - "to wander" implies oneself wandering.

It's a dirty little trick, but it works because ones free will of choice has the power to will the shaping of fiction into reality...even if it's just within ones mind/memory.

You know space is a hoax

Phrasing it like that, even without the question mark, tempts others into a conflict of reason aka confirm vs denial...only the jew suggesting space benefits from that conflict among gentiles.

hoax

Whatever hoax a jew shapes can only be shaped within reality, hence it needs to use all the building blocks reality offers to shape the fiction that distracts a consenting one from reality.

Here's a sleight of hand for space... https://genius.com/Babylon-zoo-spaceman-lyrics and here's the jew connection... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qqg6MJeL_k

Edit: Notice that "space is fake and gay" represents a CATCH-PHRASE aka the use of phraseoLOGY to catch those who consent within circular logic and conflicts of reason against others.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +3 / -3

to blame

Implies one blaspheming all by finding fault with another.

Christians

There can be only one Christ...pluralism (Christians) was suggested by few to tempt consenting many together, which in return offers easy pickings to few.

through a Christmas Parade

Not a parade...a market, where few tempt many to sell out by buying into.

Parade/parare/pere - "to produce"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/parade#etymonline_v_7166

All produces each one, which in return permits each one to re-produce. Any sold product tempts those buying into it to ignore that, hence ignoring reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested).

Buying from another tempts each Christian to ignore God.

Who is responsible?

Questioning another distracts from ones response-ability (free will of choice)...which cannot be shared; only ignored.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

space is fake

Space/spatium/spatior - "to wander"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/space

One can only wander within all...not "outer space". Only one within all can experience extension outwards aka growth.

strand in space

Strand/ster - "to stretch out"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/strand#etymonline_v_22144

Hence one wandering (space) within (in) all stretching (strand) outwards.

view more: Next ›