This visual work by Marcia Ramalho (The Blue) is one of the clearest collections of Old World evidence you can find. This video explores the architecture and electromagnetic design of cathedrals, star forts, airships, and “White Star Cities”, showing how sound, resonance, and light once powered the world.
It is produced from a non-religious, non-Biblical, perspective, however what she calls the “Previous Civilization”, is what someone from a Biblical pov would call the Millennial Kingdom of Jesus Christ. Later this civilization was destroyed and most of it buried during the Little Season.
Indeed. The Mud Flood theory suggests that some of these structures
survived a major catastrophe and were later excavated, modified, or simply
partially buried beneath new cities.
This is how they destroyed Tartaria. Not with a war, but with disasters. This was late 18th century and early 19th century and these disasters happened like clockwork. Fires began burning everywhere there were magnificent buildings. And also the mud flood. You are looking at the event they erased from every history book on Earth. Early 19th century, a cataclysmic event buried the entire Tartarian civilization under 20 feet of mud. Thick, mineral-rich clay that hardens like concrete and seals everything beneath it.
And This was not natural. No volcano produces mud across six continents at the same time. No earthquake buries cities uniformly to the exact same depth on at least three continents. No flood leaves the upper floors of buildings perfectly intact while filling the lower floors with packed earth (mud). This was a weapon.
Yes, same. Long video but worth watching imo. I think it's a good testimony to the Millennial Reign. Although Marcia calls this "Previous Civilization", others call it Old World, or Tartatria. How else would we be able to explain all the magnificent buildings and other incredible objects we can see with our own eyes today? I'm talking about the ones still standing, that they haven't managed to destroy yet.
a) What if EN (within) ERGY (ergos; work) implies a division in-between outer and inner, and aether (either) tempts one to ignore that?
b) What if ERGY was before EN can come into being? What if suggesting what IS tempts ones perception to ignore what WAS perceivable?
energy that was captured
What if ongoing ERGY (inception towards death) generates temporary EN (life), which would make capture impossible?
Yet...what if temporal can manipulate one another to ignore the free state (perception) for a captured state (suggestion). What if suggestion can "capture" ones consent for as long as one willingly holds onto it?
energy that was captured through towers
What if only within a decline (inception towards death) can each tower be erected (life)? What if ones ignorance of decline permits another tower to build an arc; bridge; connection; link; junction etc. for harvest?
obelisk
a) OB (towards) EL (God) ISK (of the nature of)...what if the nature of God implies forward motion?
What if tower within decline implies matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion?
b) What if obelisk represents the male (upward triangle); while odalisque represents the female (downward triangle)?
Triforce aka motion > momentum > matter...remember the LINK for capturing energy mentioned earlier?
energy stored
Energy implies process (inception towards death) generating potential (life)...storage implies potential holding onto possession while ignoring process.
What if few tempt many with hiSTORY to sacrifice potential by holding onto possessions like information? Why is it that the merchant who sells (suggestion) possessions for consumers to buy (consent) has a monopoly over storage?
Before storing (suggested) consider supply (perceivable) and demand (perception)...
a) Being implies essence (interior) as opposed to abstract (exterior)...abstraction (inception towards death) generates essence (life).
Aether as "either" implies the division of abstract (cause) and essence (effect). Aether/aithēr/aidh - "to burn" implies cause burning effect aka loss generating the heat of growth.
b) Abstract WAS before essence can come into being. Only while divided from one another can essence suggest what aether IS.
Buried would be closer to reality than lost
How could a solid (life) be buried within a fluid (inception towards death)? It's fluid loss which brings forth solid growth, while growth (living) struggles to sustain self within loss (dying).
As for closer...that contradicts the essence of being divided from one another.
EN (within) ERGY (work) implies a distance from one another...not a closure.
Aether: the lost technology of the millennial reign
This visual work by Marcia Ramalho (The Blue) is one of the clearest collections of Old World evidence you can find. This video explores the architecture and electromagnetic design of cathedrals, star forts, airships, and “White Star Cities”, showing how sound, resonance, and light once powered the world.
It is produced from a non-religious, non-Biblical, perspective, however what she calls the “Previous Civilization”, is what someone from a Biblical pov would call the Millennial Kingdom of Jesus Christ. Later this civilization was destroyed and most of it buried during the Little Season.
So AETHER (either) one chooses artificial (suggestion) or natural (perception)...
To collect (synthesis) contradicts one (analysis)...what if ERGY (work) clears up EN (within) by dividing each one within from one another?
What if few collectivize many together to obfuscate analysis (perceivable > perception) with synthesis (consent + suggested)?
Clearance requires one to set collections apart...
Aka ELECT (choice) MAGH (to be able; have power)...easy to ignore unless one chooses to analyze to synthesis others suggest one to uphold.
CATHED aka cathode aka kata (down) hodos (the way) as oppose to anode aka ana (up) hodos (the way).
Cathode (inception towards death) generating anode (life) or Cathedrals anno domini.
Only all (cause) can pro (forward) duce (to bring) each one (effect) within...non was suggested by another (affect).
Non aka nothing implies ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything for one another.
Buried would be closer to reality than lost
Indeed. The Mud Flood theory suggests that some of these structures survived a major catastrophe and were later excavated, modified, or simply partially buried beneath new cities.
This is how they destroyed Tartaria. Not with a war, but with disasters. This was late 18th century and early 19th century and these disasters happened like clockwork. Fires began burning everywhere there were magnificent buildings. And also the mud flood. You are looking at the event they erased from every history book on Earth. Early 19th century, a cataclysmic event buried the entire Tartarian civilization under 20 feet of mud. Thick, mineral-rich clay that hardens like concrete and seals everything beneath it.
And This was not natural. No volcano produces mud across six continents at the same time. No earthquake buries cities uniformly to the exact same depth on at least three continents. No flood leaves the upper floors of buildings perfectly intact while filling the lower floors with packed earth (mud). This was a weapon.
In case there is an issue downloading the video from Fileditchfiles.st, here is another link to view/download the video.
u/Thisisnotanexit
Same video is available here.
That didn't load either. There may be an issue with the file site, another user uploaded a vid that won't load either. I'm trying to look into it.
I don't think so, it's an X post. Try the direct link.
Direct link worked, thanks. Is this the same vid as the fileditched link?
Yes, same. Long video but worth watching imo. I think it's a good testimony to the Millennial Reign. Although Marcia calls this "Previous Civilization", others call it Old World, or Tartatria. How else would we be able to explain all the magnificent buildings and other incredible objects we can see with our own eyes today? I'm talking about the ones still standing, that they haven't managed to destroy yet.
a) What if EN (within) ERGY (ergos; work) implies a division in-between outer and inner, and aether (either) tempts one to ignore that?
b) What if ERGY was before EN can come into being? What if suggesting what IS tempts ones perception to ignore what WAS perceivable?
What if ongoing ERGY (inception towards death) generates temporary EN (life), which would make capture impossible?
Yet...what if temporal can manipulate one another to ignore the free state (perception) for a captured state (suggestion). What if suggestion can "capture" ones consent for as long as one willingly holds onto it?
What if only within a decline (inception towards death) can each tower be erected (life)? What if ones ignorance of decline permits another tower to build an arc; bridge; connection; link; junction etc. for harvest?
a) OB (towards) EL (God) ISK (of the nature of)...what if the nature of God implies forward motion?
What if tower within decline implies matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion?
b) What if obelisk represents the male (upward triangle); while odalisque represents the female (downward triangle)?
Could the female be hidden within the male... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triforce
Triforce aka motion > momentum > matter...remember the LINK for capturing energy mentioned earlier?
Energy implies process (inception towards death) generating potential (life)...storage implies potential holding onto possession while ignoring process.
What if few tempt many with hiSTORY to sacrifice potential by holding onto possessions like information? Why is it that the merchant who sells (suggestion) possessions for consumers to buy (consent) has a monopoly over storage?
Before storing (suggested) consider supply (perceivable) and demand (perception)...
Aether is BEING
a) Being implies essence (interior) as opposed to abstract (exterior)...abstraction (inception towards death) generates essence (life).
Aether as "either" implies the division of abstract (cause) and essence (effect). Aether/aithēr/aidh - "to burn" implies cause burning effect aka loss generating the heat of growth.
b) Abstract WAS before essence can come into being. Only while divided from one another can essence suggest what aether IS.
How could a solid (life) be buried within a fluid (inception towards death)? It's fluid loss which brings forth solid growth, while growth (living) struggles to sustain self within loss (dying).
As for closer...that contradicts the essence of being divided from one another.
EN (within) ERGY (work) implies a distance from one another...not a closure.