1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

God's judgement

a) God implies judge...ment (mind) implies each sentence/sentience passed.

Holding "judge" + "ment" together represents a deception written about in for example Satan's speech in Paradise Lost: "The mind is its own place, and in itself can make a heaven of hell, a hell of heaven."

b) Adding "s" to God implies that there's something that isn't God's...another trick to tempt one to ignore all given by taking more.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

ThE RoUgE AI

Claude using make-up again...what a fag.

the rogue AI

Rogue implies "without a fixed abode"...it's nature (inception towards death) which allows native (life) to be without a fixed abode, hence each ones struggle to sustain self within onward motion.

AI tempts those who consent to it into shaping the mind into a fixed abode aka confinement. The longer ones mind holds onto artifice; the more damage nature causes to it.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

just ordinary grifting

The natural order doesn't grift/graft (to dig)...the natural order (inception towards death) withdraws (life).

AI suggests information to tempt consenting users to dig into it while burying self under it...that's how a grift (consenting to suggested information) distracts from the ordained (perceivable inspiration).

It isn't that I don't believe in conspiracies, it's just that I tend to accept

Tendency implies "turning the mind"...that's the conspiracy by few tricking many into an acceptance versus denial conflict. Versus/verto - "to turn"...confined within a circle one tends to keep turning mentally (logic) and physically (reason).

Nature implies delineation (inception towards death) of native (life)...only within which any artificial circle can be shaped.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Suddenly the media

Permitting another to mediate (suggestion) shapes medium (perception) within extreme (perceivable) into an unforeseen aka a sudden unexpected happening.

In reality...only the extreme forwards (inception towards death) the sight of each medium (life). Nothing unforeseen or sudden about that. Nature implies a plan/plane of action for each reacting native within...that's how mediation works.

doomsday

Aka a suggested outcome (artificial) distracting ones perception with fear from perceivable origin (natural).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

polaris

a) A pole/polus represents the "end of an axis", with axis representing an "imaginary motionless straight line around which a body rotates".

In nature...rotation can only be shaped within motion, hence a straight line (inception towards death) allowing each body (life) within to be shaped.

Notice that a body (life) cannot perceive the beginning (inception) or end (death) of the axis while being in-between. What if...few shape a mental (logic) and physical (reason) rotation around the body of many by tempting each to pivot off-center by choosing one side or the other?

b) Polaris was once called "Phoenice" aka sound...the articulation of natural sound into words like polaris or pheonice tempts one to consent to a DEFINITION, which makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).

constellation

Con (together) stella (star) tion (action)...action moves each reacting star apart from one another. A constellation requires one to hold a suggested measurement together (synthesis), while ignoring the perceivable division (analysis).

Sleight of hand: https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/moby/weareallmadeofstars.html

  • People they come together
  • People they fall apart
  • No one can stop us now
  • 'Cause we are all made of stars

Notice also the line: "You can't ignore what is going 'round"...because ignorance implies circular confinement.

big dipper

What's a dip? The temporary immersion of form (life) into flow (inception towards death)...that's the biggest dip any being can make.

guide

Does form (life) directed within flow (inception towards death) require a guide to find ones position at center?

What about the etymological root of guide/weid - "to see"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/guide ?

Does self discernment require guidance by another or does any suggestion by another corrupt ones perception if consented to?

Why is it called a TV (tell-a-vision) GUIDE? How could one see if one allows another to tell a vision to one?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think Democracy and Capitalism lost...

Democracy and capitalism were shaped to distract your thought from rising (life) within loss (inception towards death) by confining your mind within a circular conflict (win vs lose).

this black-cube "memorial"

The cube represents ones perception in-between left/right + front/back + up/down...black implies ones memory distracted with ignorance from it aka black (ignorance) as the absence of light (discernment).

Ignorance requires ones memory to hold onto fiction (suggested information) while ignoring reality (perceivable inspiration).

Notice that the memorial shows a cube formed (life) within flow (inception towards death)...

WTC

The center of world trade implies ones consent trading with the suggestion of another. Ones perception within all perceivable doesn't require the buying and selling of goods (trade)...only Gods trade (track; path; course of action).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Restaurant industry changes

a) Change neither rests (rest); nor can it be stored (staur) without destroying the one trying to store.

b) In (within) dustry (to spread) implies a separation from one another, which both resisting and storing tempts one to ignore.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's the hand which represents ones free will of choice, while both buttons represent chance. Choice was given; chance is taken.

Choice implies natural; chance implies artificial aka technical so "don't sweat the technique"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKt_9hcK2KY

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

sinless

Less aka loss (cause) generates growth (effect)...sin aka syn (together) implies affection to one another, while ignoring that cause divides each effect from one another.

Notice that leaders tempt followers together as to SYN-chronize the power of many into the hands of few.

He who is without sin can cast the first stone

First implies God; stone implies the strength (st) of each one within all of God...cast/kasta (to throw) implies all throwing each one into strength.

First (motion) > casting (momentum) > stone (matter)...a setting apart from one another, hence without sin/syn (together).

"What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder" ~Mark 10:9

What hath God joined together? NOTHING, hence let NOT man put asunder what God joined together. If sin/syn implies putting together; then only the sinless can take nothing apart.

Jesus...Mohammad...sin

Taking either as leader syn-chronizes followers together.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Beginning must have a cause

BE (being aka effect) GIN/GEN (generation aka cause)

even if our universe turns out to be one part of a multiverse

Verse/verto - "to turn"...it's ignoring the delineation of cause to effect which turns uni into multi aka together.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

In concrete situations—such as epidemics or high public fear

Con (together) crete (to grow) + epi (among) demic (people)...that's how one shapes a public disease by joining others while sacrificing private health.

Practical acceptance and rejection of fanaticism

An -ism represents a collective of a people, which is held together by anyone's acceptance or rejection to join.

vaccination was necessary

VACC (optional) IN (choice) ATION (necessary)...ation/action was before any reaction within can choose to get vaccinated.

There’s no other choice.

Only each ones free will of choice.

calling fanatical opposition “utterly absurd”

Because opposing another side by choosing to hold onto ones side is absurd during motion, which divides each side from one another.

One cannot choose a side without ignoring ones choice in-between.

to carry out evil agenda

Agenda/ag - "to drive, draw out or forth, move" implies nature carrying each native within...not whatever suggested agenda natives are carrying as burden when consenting to each other.

All implies GOD...good vs evil tempts one to ignore that.

he still got slipperysloped into it

Nature moves which prevents any native within from standing still...it's mentally (ideal) and physically (idol) holding onto anything, which makes ones choice slippery.

is basic vaccination not that bad?

The base (inception towards death) doesn't vaccinate...it's the apex (life) which puts each other down by vaccination.

Good vs bad implies a circular conflict...what's the base and apex of a circle?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

to eliminate the soul with medicine

EL (God) IMITATE (to copy)...doing that requires one to medicine/medicus/med (take appropriate measures).

God implies all given...taking appropriate measures from one another implies a duplication of all given aka a fraudulent copy of the soul/sole (one and only).

removing the soul

Soul implies motion...moving implies the response of matter within motion. It's that response which can be manipulated to ignore the soul/sole (one and only) for one another.

becomes materialistic to constitution and can longer rise to the spiritual.

CON (together) STA (to stand)...the closer material stands together; the harder the rise of each becomes. Closeness constricts spirit/spiro (to breathe)...God gives room to breathe.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why does the adversary want to change our bodies

Nature implies needed change...if a native within chooses want or not want; the native becomes adverse to nature. Adverse aka ad (towards) vers (to turn) implies turning against each other (want vs not want), while ignoring natural delineation (need).

It's ones body turning adverse which distracts one from change.

our bodies/dna

OUR represents a polymer chaining one to another aka a double helix turning one side (our) against another side (their).

In nature there's no our vs theirs; no mine vs yours and no us vs them...just singular distribution of all through each single unit within.

couldn't feel God anymore

He's right there FE (to thrust) EL (God) aka Gods motion. It's emotion which tempts one to ignore being moved. Notice that vaccinations are based on the fear of getting sick aka tempting an emotional reaction towards outcome, while ignoring origin.

Notice that THRUST (motion) cannot be held onto, while fear requires TRUST (emotion) to be upheld.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the1000 ton blocks

Fluid (inception towards death) sets solid (life) free...it doesn't block weight. Measuring weight blocks fluid perception with solid suggestion.

built on top of it

Not top upon bottom...building implies in-between top (living) and bottom (dying) while being moved.

the further back u go the crazier the structures get

The furthest back implies whole (cause) dividing into each partial (effect)...the more structures are build together the further back the divide is pushed within ones crazed mind.

If one perceives reality by what's being build within it; then one ignores how whole divides each partial from one another to allow building.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

A single firm...hacking done by all three

All implies one aka singularity "hacking" each internal unit from one another..."three" implies one counting other ones together while ignoring all singularity for a nonexistent plurality.

Motion > momentum > matter isn't THREE, but singularity aka one within one within one...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Effective altruism

Cause generates effect by altru/alter-ing each one from one another...many using the AI of few are ignoring alternation for stagnation.

irregular

Irregular implies being within regulation...not without regulation. Cause regulates effect, while giving each effect the free will of choice to break the rules.

Many using the AI of few are tempted into conformity with each other, hence confined to a different set of rules which cannot be broken as long as one holds conformity together.

effective altruist connections

Cause divides each effect from one another (altru)...connections bind effects to one another by affection.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

stress disorder

Dis (to divide) order (to fit together) dissolves stress (to draw tight)...unless held onto.

post traumatic

Post aka por (forth) stare (to stand) implies each native standing (life) forth (inception towards death) within nature...trauma/tere (to rub; turn) implies natives turning against one another; thereby shaping an artificial circle (reason) within natural delineation (inception towards death) of being (life).

I don't like words that conceal reality

RE (to respond) AL (all) implies each instrument responding to all sound...any word held onto artificially conceals what nature reveals.

A word (suggested concealment) can one be shaped within sound (perceivable revelation)...words represent the shifting of shapes.

I don't like euphemisms

EU (to be) PHEM (to speak) ISM (consensus among many about speech by few).

Question the ephemeral (transitory) state of being within natural sound and how any euphemism conceals it.

dealing with reality

Being RE (to respond) AL (all) implies the DE (division) of AL (all) into each being.

Dealing with one another represents a deal with the devil (division of will)...

For some reason it just keeps getting worse

Keeping a mental (logic) and physical (reason) circle in shape...tempts one (life) to ignore delineation (inception towards death) which keeps getting worse for those who ignore adaptation.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

overall we as a whole failed miserably.

It's ones consent to suggested WE which casts pluralism over the singularity of whole, within which each one represents a partial.

One can only fail to rise (life) during fall (inception towards death)...ones consent to suggested WE implies "misery seeking company".

fully vaccinated

Full; adjective - "containing all that can be received"...one within all cannot contain all that can be received. It's receiving from one another which contains ones mind (containment) artificially within all naturally revealed.

Con (together) tain (to hold) tempts one to ignore what all gives one...FREE will of choice.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The thing about the Left is that they always paint themselves into a corner.

What if it's participating within a left vs right circular conflict which permits another to use compass + square to encircle and paint corners?

They (left) flip the rules

What if it's participation within a left vs right circular conflict which keeps flipping the rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule

easy to sidestep

What does sidestepping within a circular conflict (left vs right) imply? Isn't it just changing sides within the same conflict, while running in circles?

feels rather than facts

What if motion (fact) tempts emotion (feel)? What if neither can be held onto without destroying self?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

ball

A circle can only be shaped within a line...uni (one) verse (to turn) tempts one to ignore that.

The "source" you return to

Source aka sub (up from below) + regere (to keep straight)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/source

Source implies linear...not a circular re-TURN.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think we can know the whole plan

Whole (motion) > plan (momentum) > particular (matter)...particular (life) in-between plan (inception towards death) implies the known ledge.

To know implies each ones perception; distinguished from one another, within the plan of all.

I (taking possession over self) + DON'T (ones denial of all) + WE (holding a plural together) prevents one from discerning self within the whole plan.

God gives us

God gives all through each one...one ignores all given when holding onto one another as "us" aka uniting the states (synthesis) which God divides (analysis) from one another.

I do think God gives us

Us prevents one from thinking for self. You choose to think in terms of others.

find stuff together

Stuff/stopfon - "to plug"...togetherness (suggestion) stops apartheid (perception) from finding foundation (perceivable).

Fer sure God doesn't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Are you sure that God (motion) doesn't throw the baby (matter) with the bathwater (momentum)? Does motion require assurance from matter to sustain momentum?

What if assurance represents a binding pledge to one another? https://www.etymonline.com/word/assure

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

yahweh is a confusing term

Yahweh/hawah/hayah - "was"...suggesting to one another what "is" con (together) fuses (to blend) what God was dividing from one another.

WAS implies within Gods term (natural boundary); IS implies on ones own term (artificial boundary). The natural boundary sets each one within free from one another, while the artificial boundary binds one to one another.

throwing out the baby with the bathwater

Only God throws "in" the baby (life) "within" the bathwater (inception towards death).

a specific purpose

Only God puts (pose) forth (pur) each specific being...beings suggest different purposes to destroy specification among each other.

action plan

Aka action (motion) > planing (momentum) > reaction (matter)...only within the plane of action (inception towards death) can reaction (life) come into being.

Do we know what this plan is?

Plan/pele - "to spread" implies singularity (motion) spreading (momentum) each single unit (matter) from one another...few suggest "we" to tempt many into ignoring singularity for plurality to corrupt knowledge.

One cannot be at the "known ledge" together with another...knowledge only offers self discernment.

we still wrestle with

We implies one holding (still) onto another; thereby establishing friction (wrestle) with one another within Gods division.

Jesus is the plan

Christ implies each one anointed from one another within Gods plan...Jesus aka je suis (I AM) implies taking possession over self, while wrestling another (YOU ARE aka judah).

the entire plan

Entire (motion) > planing (momentum) > particular (matter)

we don't see

Because holding onto we (plural) distorts ones (singular) sight.

start all over from the beginning

Only within all can each one (life) have a beginning (inception) and end (death). Only God (motion) starts and ends (momentum) each being (matter).

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

the good stuff should burn your throat and make you cough

So does motor oil...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem? The companies are not honest.

COM(together)anies contradicts hONEst...one cannot hone self by joining companies with another. Problem needs to adapt to solution...not join company with other problems.

Hone (to sharpen; whet) refers to sharpening ones formed discernment within the fluidity of knowl-EDGE.

The lack of a checkmark is bad

Mark/merg - "boundary" implies balance for ones choice...not the checkmarks suggested by the choice of another.

Notice that a check attacks the king to kill him aka checkmate from Arabic shah mat (the king died). So you better check yourself before you wreck yourself.

false labeling

Nature doesn't label native...natives shape artificial labels to distract each other from nature. Any label represents a category aka cata (against) agora (public assembly) of the mind if held onto.

There can be only one right LAB (work) EL (God) employing each thing within it.

view more: Next ›