Partials (each ones perception) can only exist during whole (all perceivable). During implies a moving whole (inception towards death) setting partials (life) apart from one another.
messes up
Partials looking/locking at each other/with each other are messing/massing up being differentiated from one another.
Few control MANY by AMASSING aka e pluribus unum (out of many one)...which messes up each partial one (singular) among many (plural).
How could that even be
Being implies odd (choice) during even (balance)...asking each other "how could that EVEN BE" tempts one at odds with another, hence imbalance.
This imbalance is called "reason/logic"...and it messes up many for the benefit of few.
does anybody have an answer
Nature implies solution (inception towards death) to each problem (life) within...a question/quest towards answers tempts one to ignore being within origin.
Why would any of this even be going on?
Steady (motion) generates even (momentum) for odds (matter)...that's why.
Science does not explain
a) Science/scio - "to know" implies ones perception within all perceivable...suggested scientism tempts one to ignore that by consenting to the suggested.
b) Being implies ex-plain aka expressed growth (life) during plain loss (inception towards death)...seeking for explanations from one another establishes friction (conflicts of reason) among expressed growth, hence grinding it down into loss.
That's why few mix many together...to trick them to grind each other to dust.
Partials (each ones perception) can only exist during whole (all perceivable). During implies a moving whole (inception towards death) setting partials (life) apart from one another.
Partials looking/locking at each other/with each other are messing/massing up being differentiated from one another.
Few control MANY by AMASSING aka e pluribus unum (out of many one)...which messes up each partial one (singular) among many (plural).
Being implies odd (choice) during even (balance)...asking each other "how could that EVEN BE" tempts one at odds with another, hence imbalance.
This imbalance is called "reason/logic"...and it messes up many for the benefit of few.
Nature implies solution (inception towards death) to each problem (life) within...a question/quest towards answers tempts one to ignore being within origin.
Steady (motion) generates even (momentum) for odds (matter)...that's why.
a) Science/scio - "to know" implies ones perception within all perceivable...suggested scientism tempts one to ignore that by consenting to the suggested.
b) Being implies ex-plain aka expressed growth (life) during plain loss (inception towards death)...seeking for explanations from one another establishes friction (conflicts of reason) among expressed growth, hence grinding it down into loss.
That's why few mix many together...to trick them to grind each other to dust.