Oof... Salty loser... Spamming is not cool, mkay
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (111)
sorted by:
Accepting death by the hands of others doesn't quite trigger the "will over respiration" achievement...
To show implies to perceive, hence by one within all. All cannot perceive all, because perception implies differentiation of all into ones.
Temporal within ongoing passing through one another aka sprouting/germination/offspring...
What comes out of the process of dying? Each living one coming to be within. All perceivable implies "input" coming out of process of dying; each ones perception implies living within.
a) One who needs wants to ignore it.
b) One who responds to seeking (re-quire) aims at suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable FOUNDation, hence "seek an you shall find".
Living implies resisting the process of dying, which tempts one to ignore resisting. Resistance implies ones re-sponding stance within velocity as choice within balance.
a) Loss generates growth ; growth re-generates during loss.
b) Motion (all) utilizes momentum to generate matter (one)...only matter coming to be within momentum experiences growth (living) during loss (dying).
c) All implies generation of loss (action) and growth (reactions) internally. Only growth experiences loss.
d) Where would all lose ones to? Only ones can lose themselves within all.
e) All would be contradicts one being will.
Utilizing guide to grow life, while others chase after death. To guide implies to direct...nature directs being; being reacts (life) to direction (inception towards death) by resisting the temptation thereof.
...of living.
a) Because each one comes out alive into the process of dying, before being moved back into it...
b) Having perception implies that one came out of perceivable...circumference (motion) generates center (matter).
Form resisting dominating flow by free will of choice.
If loss of form is partial, then WHOLE could grow...which contradicts whole. This line of thinking is based on ones consent to creationism, which suggests the whole creation and then some aka one creator added to all creation.
In reality...ONEs addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (whole into partials) can only operate within ALL.
Each temporary one dies within ever forwarding all.
That implies multiplying "ongoing", while ignoring that only temporal can be multiplied within ongoing by division.
In that line of thinking...addition (living) during subtraction (dying).
Just because perceivable implies dying, doesn't mean that ones living perception has to ignore itself for it.
Temporal matter forwards and back (choice) within momentum (balance) of ongoing motion.
Spirit, into your (All) hands.
Which self is first (original)?
Then, process of dying, (towards) to death, forever and ever back.
Then, forever and ever back.
Responsible.
Reality: Form within flow (parts) represent whole. Loss acts/subtracts (to flow) and growth reacts/adds (from flow) upon parts within whole (all).
If each temporary one within, then each one contemporary (con-tempo): forever and ever back. Suggesting each one dies ignores spirit returning (turning fro and back). Forever and ever back implies multiplying tempo both forward and back (within ongoing by division between forward and back).
Then, dying implies living: discerning self ....
All through spirit into one...
a) All implies first; each one implies second/seco - "to divide"
b) All implies first (inception) and last (death) for each one (life) within.
Forever and ever implies multiplying forward; while back implies a division...a contradiction.
In reality...forwards (motion) and backwards (matter) are balanced (momentum). The position of being implies backwards within forwarding origin.
If "forever and ever back"; then no forwarding of temporal being.
Aka reaction (re) enabled (ible) by sponsoring (spons) action.
CON (together) contradicts ONE (apart from one another).
a) Suggestion tempts one to ignore by consent. Few are suggesting to gain consent by many aka the allegory of the vampire asking for permission to enter.
To ask another implies the temptation to ignore perceivable all for a suggestion by another one...that requires resistance.
b) Inception implies death for ones perceiving life, because all perceivable moves, hence directing input through one, which diminishes ones resistance through velocity.
Spirit doesn't respond to a turn; ones response implies the turn within directed spirit, and as a reacting choice within an enacting balance, one struggles fro and back to sustain self.
Few are tempting many with suggested spiritualism to consent and hold onto "spirit" as a possession, all while ignoring that breathing implies the need to let go.
a) Implication (if/then) requires the same velocity so that different resistances within can utilize it to discern self.
b) If all is one in energy, then multiplication can only happen after the division of all (whole) into ones (partials), because only then can intercourse for off-spring multiply being.
c) Tempo/temporal/ten - "to stretch" implies ones free will of choice to balance (increase/reduce) different forms of resistance during the same flow of velocity.
Only within the momentum of motion can matter stretch...stretching partials cannot increase or decrease whole.
...if one chooses to discern self by adapting to perceivable, while resisting consent to suggested.
For ever implies multiplying forward, back ever implies dividing backward, dividing balances multiplying. "Backwards (father) within forwarding (son)."
Con-tra-dicts? "Temporary one ... within" implies "temporary one con-", in:
Inception implies dying; then, each temporary dying one, and each temporary dying within, balanced.
"Shall the dust return ...: and the spirit shall return." Spirit turns fro, and turns back. Exhale and inhale, enact and react?
Then, for ever and back ever implies tempos (times) multiply forward, and multiply back (divides). Velocity changes, implication adapts.
Stretching partials (contemporaries) increases, and can decrease, partials.
Ever aka always aka way of all implies forwards...each TEMPORARY one within implies backwards.
Forwarding (inception towards death) divisions (life)...
Con-dicere (speaking together) aka suggested words meeting con-sent, thereby contradicting being send apart from one another.
That's why suggestion contradicts perception...since nature doesn't utter words by putting letters together. It's ones consent LETTING others shape LETTERS into words with attached meaning.
ONE (apart) + CON (together with)...there's the contradiction tempting ignorance. Once one sees it, and lets go of "con" it implies "temporary one within ongoing all".
Life needs to resist the temptation to view coming into being (inception) as getting moved out of being (death) or else life's gonna be a lot shorter.
Self discernment is about ones living position within process of dying.
Ones response to spirit can make turns in-between inhaling and exhaling. Filling belly/chest and lungs allows all kinds of opportunities for vibration/compression/eddying mass aka turning/bending into a vortex etc.
Enacting breath (momentum) of God (motion) into reacting spirit/spiro - "to breathe" (matter).
The issue here is suggested spiritualism which tempts believers to hold onto THE SPIRIT, while ignoring that breathing can't be held onto...for long...until needing to let go of.
Another rhetorical trick used for spirit is "soul", which also tempts one to claim it, while ignoring SOLE...how does one claim one and only?
The spirit you describe as "turning fro and back" implies matter; while the directed spirit implies the momentum (breath) of motion (God). Ones choice "turns" incoming spirit within the formed vessel of matter...or however else one chooses to blow it.
a) Ever forwarding (inception towards death) temporal reactions backwards (life)
b) Ever forwarding divides from all into ones, motion into matter; action into reactions etc.
Temporal backwards reactions multiply through each other (intercourse for off-spring) in-between addition (inception) and subtraction (death).
Velocity implies constant change, which resistance adapting within perceives as implication (if/then)...unless ignored for suggested temptations, which establish reason (versus aka turning against one another).
Hence living (increase) within process of dying (decrease), while wielding the free will of choice to increase or decrease oneself and one another.