Sooo, impeach him?
Why even announce this? If you have proof, go to the DoJ and start legal proceedings.
Unless you're looking to play softball in return for political favours?
Anecdotal but I had two uncles, on different sides of the family, getting fast acting cancers in the last 2 years.
One died and one is still trying chemo. They're older so it's not unexpected, but these are among the first of my parents generation to start dying (only one before this) and they're also both vaxxed.
There's this conception of sentience that a sufficiently complex system will become self-aware. I think that's backwards; there is a Conciousness that exists outside the physical universe that requires a system of sufficient complexity to manifest in the physical universe.
This flips the philosophy on it's head.
If we are just complex coincidences, then the maintenance of the physical body is paramount because we disappear when it does.
However, if we are just interfacing in this reality, then our physical forms are far less important than our actions. Even though we place a high priority on maintaining our interface with this world, and we should, it's really just a sort of dream from which we inevitably wake.
BUT AT LEAST THEY GOT TO GO TO MCDONALDS!!!
If it's not a mental illness, they why the hell should the treatment be subsidized?
It's possible but it raises the question of why they are then seemingly working at cross purposes.
For example, the target population is, alledgedly, something like 500mil. At the beginning of the 20th century the global population wasn't far from that, but it's since ballooned (recall that America had a larger population than China until the 70s or 80s). Why let, or even help, populations to grow if you want them small?
The same goes for many technologies. Why allow the rise of the personal vehicle and convenient travel if your plan is to keep people in 15 minute cities? Why allow oil to dominate fuel and economies if you were going to try to ban it later? Why raise the life expectancy with new medical technologies if you don't want to have to support the elderly?
Unless the plan is far more subtle than it seems, I suspect their control likely only goes back as far as the 50s or 60s.
We wuz heeros and shiet...
Don't these faggots have dogs to shoot?
I especially love the "they were going to shoot up a McDonalds so we had no choice but to massacre children" bit.
This is extremely plausible, I'm just not convinced that these governments are competent enough to pull it off.
The idea that they were messing around with bat viruses, screwed up, and then panicked seems a lot more likely. After that they took advantage of the confusion to profit, which is par for the course.
But again, it's plausible. I'll keep an open mind.
This is the guy who headed up the WHO team that declared that the virus couldn't have come from the Wuhan lab.
Not to be confused with his identical, but estranged, twin brother, Deter Pazak, who was the guy moving money from NAIAD to the Wuhan lab to fund gain of function research on bat coronaviruses.
This is the classic tactic that has led to the subversion of capitalism; hostile actors use venture capital to gain influence at a company and place their allies in high positions. Once they're in a secure position they oust the founders and anyone with the integrity to oppose them and begin to loot the company, both directly via corner cutting and layoffs as well as indirectly via share buyback schemes and the like.
It's good to see them getting caught red handed.
Considering all the businesses with "no cash" policies, it's not even legal tender anymore. If businesses can refuse to accept it as payment, it's just a barter good with no intrinsic value.
I actually think this is much simpler than it appears.
Hanlon's Razor states: don't attribute to malice what could equally be attributed to stupidity.
Fact 1: Doctors don't do their own research into new medical procedures or even best practices. They rely on journals and their professional associations.
Fact 2: Journals and professional associations don't do their own research (and most studies are never replicated); they're generally made up of elected boards of people who get there by playing politics rather than scientific or medical accomplishment. They hedge their decisions on the opinions of global governing bodies, like the WHO; even when in Russia and other "non-allied" countries.
Fact 3: There's no incentive for doctors to fact check anything. Doctors who go along with the "scientific concensus" are protected in court by judges who, also not doing their own research, rely on said concensus and take it as fact, even in the face of contrary evidence. Doctors who go against the concensus, even with evidence, open themselves to liability and even expulsion from their professional association (ie their career).
We've turned our medical institution into a Ford Model-T plant; it's much more efficient than having every employee able to build a complete car, but now no one knows how to build a complete car. The bosses aren't the people who started the whole thing, they're politicians and bureaucrats who don't know how to build a car any better than the employees do.
The reason the pandemic response was uniform wasn't because someone forced all the countries of the world into it, it's because everyone was trying to do what everyone else was doing so they wouldn't face blame; basically the same attitude that allowed Chernobyl to catastrophize. All the WHO had to do was to loudly state the "concensus" and everyone gratefully jumped on it.
I'm now less worried about a globalist cabal of the most powerful people on the planet than I am of the idea that all of our systems have integrated with each other and become self-sustaining because, even if it's possible to overthrow the cabal, even they can't overcome the system itself.
We all volunteered for our systems because they radically improved the quality of life for us. But if they're self-sustaining, that's no longer necessary. The system itself, acting through agents like Gates and Schwab, will adjust things like population, resource allocation, innovation, and anything else it needs, regardless of the effect on people.
We can't get off the train because it's moving so fast as to destroy us as we exit, even though we once lived on the still ground.
As a Dad who can keep his kids away from porn, I think this is dumb. Nobody is going to access porn tied to their ID except for unabashed coomers and if the government could stop people accessing things annonymously, they would.
If we're going to use digital ID, maybe we should start with the people in porn? How do cam sites ensure their models are adults?
AI bud, give it a week...
I suspect that's what the bunkers are really for: a fall back in case they break everything.
The idea that they're in total control is nonsense. They depend entirely on "plebs" for day to day essentials (ever see one of them fix a leaky faucet?) and us plebs need them less and less. Yeah, they may have food and supplies for 50 years, but then what? They can't replenish it without help, at which point they'll emerge and try to take control again.
What they're doing is playing a game of chicken. They're trying to cause a break down in our systems that they can appear to save us from, and thus maintain control (see Covid, Ukraine, climate change, supply chain failure, etc, etc). The message isn't "look at how we're above consequence", it's "you will die if you don't listen to us".
But it's a fine line between everything working without them (and us not needing them) to everything breaking so bad that they can't fix it (in which case, we eat them). Hence, they build bunkers to weather the collapse that they are courting through their actions.
Definitely not that one thing...
Depends which FE model you're using; many of them think that there is no "disc" and the Earth just keep going forever beyond the "ice wall".
FE is boring anyways, I prefer Mobius Toroid Earth :p
"Math is fake"
"Don't trust your lying eyes, goy! There is no truth but mine; everything else is fake"
When the present has given up on the future, we must listen for the relics of the future in the unactivated potentials of the past.
Terrence McKenna talks about something like this where, as society becomes incoherent, people reach back into the past to a point that things make sense, and try to build a future from there.
I think that's why we're seeing a rise in racism, sexism, and nationalism; things don't make sense anymore and, whether or not that's because we abandoned racism et al, it did make sense when those things were the norm.
It's really an education to see the birth of new governments and what that looks like.
I looked at the history of municipal govs in my area a few years back, and it's not what people think.
Everyone thinks we pay taxes for roads, power, etc. but that's not how it starts; in the beginning, the prominent members of the town decide they need something and they pay for it. The government is just a tool to establish right-of-ways and coordinate the project between multiple backers. Factory owners want power to their buildings so they pay to install the lines. Farmers want roads to get into market, so they build them. The public gets to opt in, it's not built on their behalf. The taxes only come in later for maintenance.
But look at projects today: governments build new infrastructure all the time. Who asked them? It's not their job to decide these things, they just take it on themselves, and tax us for the privilege.
“That’s why the DNR is in place, we have places for these animals. We just can’t rehab every animal that we get a call on. I understand that Julie took in everything. But what happens is, she has to call us and say she has it,” Gorno said. “We just don’t want everybody to do it and not be inspected because then you’re going to have facilities that aren’t good for these animals.”
The conspiracy is that these governments seem to think that no one but them is qualified to do anything, thus stealing agency from the people for no reason whatsoever. Make everyone sick, weak, and dumb so they have to rely on the system.
Seriously, the reason is "if we don't kill it now, we might have to kill it later", assuming this person is going to put these animals in a situation so bad that death is preferable. He straight up admits that the government doesn't have the resources to do the job, but can't allow anyone else to do it because they need to be in charge.
Totally off topic, but I'm logged out, viewing comments, and I get a "show offensive comments" tab. I click it, thinking I'll get some spice, and it's literally a couple comments saying "God bless".
Is that what twitter considers "offensive" now?
Yeah, this is fine for the meme boards, but it would be good to require OP to explain/link screenshots in a comment.
Considering the global population today is something like 10x what it was 200 years ago, they're doing a pretty bad job, yeah?
Like, I don't deny there is a conspiracy to reduce global population levels but either they only started in, maybe, the 60s or they're completely incompetent.