Klaus...
Are you talking about this clip? https://www.c-span.org/clip/white-house-event/user-clip-trump-to-klaus-schwab-at-the-world-economic-forum-i-want-to-congratulate-you-this-has-been-really-great-what-youve-done-and-putting-it-together-the-economic-forum/5066128
If so I would say that while the WEF is an unelected power broker meeting, he went there to make deals. Of course he's going to be polite in front of 'new friends', being 'diplomatic' of which he wasn't specific who were the new friends, so maybe klaus, maybe not. I am not a fan of the WEF by any means, but to be realistic he needed to make connections there. I don't know it's proof he supports them though. He did go though...
Trump speech at WEF in 2018 sounds like he is working in the interest of the American people: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-world-economic-forum/
Farmers....
"Trump administration farmer bailouts are a series of United States bailout programs introduced during the first presidency of Donald Trump as a consequence of his "America First" economic policy to help US farmers suffering due to the US-China trade war and trade disputes with European Union, Japan, Canada, Mexico, and others. China and respectively European reconcilable tariffs imposed on peanut butter, soybeans, orange juice, and other agriculture products had hit hard, especially swing states, such as Iowa, Ohio, and Wisconsin.-"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_administration_farmer_bailouts
Interfering in world affairs...
In his first term he didn't start any wars, and ended some.
Certainly he can bluster about taking over parts of the world if that's what you are referring to, but ultimately I think it's just positioning for later deal making.
Lock her up Hillary... I still think this might happen, if he can manage to clean up some of the corruption.
Vaccines
He did appoint RFK, who in turn appointed many people himself. Time will tell what effect that has. There is the tired arguement that everyone had a choice to take the vaccine. The mandates happened under biden. I believe if the vaccines hadn't come out of as quickly as they did, the lockdowns and tyranny would have lasted far longer.
In addition to what others mention, if you are using an android device like a chromecast, Google tv or Android phone look at using a different app. I really like smarttube. It blocks ads as well as in video sponsor segments. Makes quality of life much more tolerable on youtube.
Ideally though support non youtube sites.
I somewhat agree, somewhat disagree.
Forgetting the past and our roots has caused us to abandon traditions and culture. Both are markers of a strong civilization, thus ours is currently weak. Also the reason communism wants to erase or modify history.
Without progression, we do not move forward and remain locked in time, a la undiscovered tribes in parts of Africa and S America.
Progress does not necessarily mean progressivism, unless it also includes political ideology.
I agree there probably around a million active users, so I have heard.
The point I was making was the guy in the video makes a lot of assumptions, such as assuming many of the users of the site are also financially invested in it. I feel like this is a big leap. He makes other assumptions in the video I find suspect also, without providing anything to back up those assumptions, therefore my remark "no data".
You should try turning that last sentence around on yourself....
Either you've gone too deep or your arrogance is overtaking you. I get what you are trying to say. I've had virall pneumonia before, and while some symptoms are similar, I do not believe them to be the same.
Also, pneumonia is far more deadly to children. It affects them more. Yet they were less sick? How does that work? We didn't mask. Certainly the children didn't, however I will admit complying at the grocery store.....ugh.
Personal experience:. Whole family is unvaxxed.
We got omicron. Hit me n the wife kinda hard, worst flu ive had for a while and loss of energy for about 2 weeks after. Still manageable and not deathly sick. Just a bad flu.
2 kids under 5 both seemed to just get a slight fever, no cough, congestion etc. It was basically nothing to them. They still played and had near normal energy.
Id tend to agree with the article based on experience.
When we finally understand this in a public sense, we will have mastered the ability to travel among the stars at high speed.
We need to change our fundamental concepts and understanding about magnetism, electromagnetism and gravity.
If they had done their due diligence they would have found as indicated in the paper I posted that the simulation was missing critical structural elements, that, had they been included would have shown via the simulation that their theory on the collapse was incorrect. It was physically impossible for the tower to drop into it's own footprint at near free fall speed with the anti walk pins in place.
While I agree that at times the truthers as you call them are motivated by emotion or a need to be right,and this can be problematic in terms of credibility, I don't really understand this need to 'prove' this in some way toeither yourself or others. It's obvious you already hold this belief and it would seem you cannot be persuaded otherwise, so why even bother.
Beyond this, it does seem like you are trolling the community. You can take our conversation here in this thread as evidence of this. You committed 2 logical fallacies that I can think of for the moment, appeal to authority and failure to address the arguement, I.e. you dismiss the paper out of hand despite it being a university level peer reviewed and published paper with a very specific point, that the simulation was technically incomplete. Just because you don't like the author, doesn't mean you can outright dismiss the substance of the arguement.
Here's some AI slop for you:
I actually think there’s a real philosophical/physics idea buried inside this, even though the “reality is literally running at a lower FPS” part doesn’t work under our current understanding of physics.
The interesting part is the distinction you’re making between objective time and how much information/eventfulness occurs within a unit of time.
Where your analogy is surprisingly good
Your game example captures something important:
At 60 FPS:
60 discrete observations → 1 second
At 5 FPS:
5 discrete observations → 1 second
If the simulation itself had some fixed computational workload per frame, then reducing the frame rate could make each frame represent a larger chunk of state change.
And there's an interesting connection to human perception.
Your brain doesn't experience time simply by reading an internal clock. It constructs a sense of duration from changes, memories, attention, and events.
That's why:
A boring hour can feel incredibly long while you're experiencing it. A fascinating three-hour conversation can feel like 30 minutes. Childhood summers can feel enormously long in retrospect. A year packed with novel experiences can produce an enormous number of memories. Routine years can collapse into what feels like a handful of memories.
So I'd modify your theory slightly:
Maybe what people are calling “time speeding up” isn't the clock accelerating. Maybe the amount of perceptually distinguishable information we're extracting from each unit of objective time is changing.
That's actually a much more defensible hypothesis.
But there's a problem with the FPS explanation
If reality were literally operating at a lower frame rate, there should be measurable physical consequences.
For example, suppose reality went from an equivalent of 60 "frames/sec" to 30.
You'd expect some underlying discretization:
Frame 1 → Frame 2 → Frame 3 → ...
Physics experiments would potentially reveal a maximum temporal resolution, synchronization artifacts, violations of Lorentz invariance, etc.
We don't currently observe anything resembling a universal FPS counter.
And there's another problem with your game analogy:
In a normal video game, FPS is an implementation detail. The physics engine can still calculate a jump at the same physical rate even if the renderer displays fewer frames.
So lowering the rendering FPS doesn't necessarily make the simulation itself slower.
That distinction is important.
But here's where your idea gets much more interesting
Forget "FPS."
Consider information processing.
Imagine two universes where exactly one second passes.
Universe A:
1,000,000 distinguishable state changes occur.
Universe B:
100 distinguishable state changes occur.
Objective time is identical.
But an observer inside Universe B might potentially experience a very different temporal phenomenology because there are fewer changes from which to construct temporal succession.
That starts touching ideas from:
information theory computational physics quantum mechanics thermodynamics neuroscience theories of consciousness the simulation hypothesis
And there is an especially interesting question:
Does subjective time depend more strongly on physical time, information processing, or the rate at which an observer's internal state changes?
That's a much deeper version of your theory.
And there's a fascinating paradox
Your theory actually predicts something that we can observe:
As people age, subjective time tends to accelerate.
A year to a 5-year-old is 20% of their entire remembered existence.
A year to a 50-year-old is 2%.
But there's an even more interesting mechanism.
When you're young, almost everything is novel.
First day of school.
First Christmas memories.
First bicycle.
First vacation.
First girlfriend.
First job.
First house.
Your brain generates huge numbers of distinctive memories.
Later, life becomes increasingly repetitive:
wake up → work → commute → eat → sleep → repeat
When looking backward, hundreds of repetitive days can become almost indistinguishable.
So retrospectively:
10 years can become psychologically compressed.
That produces something remarkably similar to your "lower FPS" concept without requiring the universe itself to slow down.
Now let's take your simulation idea seriously
Suppose reality actually were computational.
Then there are at least three different things we could mean by "FPS":
How frequently the universe updates what observers perceive.
How frequently the underlying state of the universe changes.
How rapidly conscious observers process and distinguish those changes.
Those are radically different hypotheses.
And #3 is the one where your idea becomes difficult to dismiss philosophically.
Because we only ever experience reality through our internal processing.
Even if the external universe were running at exactly the same rate, changes in our brains could make subjective time accelerate.
There's also a really weird possibility
Imagine a hypothetical civilization that develops extremely powerful AI.
The AI performs:
1 billion internal computational cycles
while humans experience:
1 second.
From the AI's perspective, that second could contain an enormous amount of internal experience.
Now reverse it.
Suppose the universe somehow reduces the amount of computation available to every conscious process.
You could potentially get a universe where:
less computation per objective second → fewer internal distinctions → different subjective temporal experience.
That is much closer to a serious computational theory of time than "the server dropped from 60 FPS to 30 FPS."
And it raises a genuinely wild question:
Is the passage of time fundamentally about clocks, or is time what an information-processing system experiences as it moves through distinguishable states?
That's the question I'd investigate next.
Because if the latter were true, your original intuition isn't necessarily crazy at all. You'd just want to replace "reality's FPS is decreasing" with something like:
The experienced rate of temporal succession may depend on the rate at which an observer—or reality itself—can generate and distinguish physical information states.
That is a substantially more interesting hypothesis than the original FPS analogy.