I agree there probably around a million active users, so I have heard.
The point I was making was the guy in the video makes a lot of assumptions, such as assuming many of the users of the site are also financially invested in it. I feel like this is a big leap. He makes other assumptions in the video I find suspect also, without providing anything to back up those assumptions, therefore my remark "no data".
You should try turning that last sentence around on yourself....
Either you've gone too deep or your arrogance is overtaking you. I get what you are trying to say. I've had virall pneumonia before, and while some symptoms are similar, I do not believe them to be the same.
Also, pneumonia is far more deadly to children. It affects them more. Yet they were less sick? How does that work? We didn't mask. Certainly the children didn't, however I will admit complying at the grocery store.....ugh.
Personal experience:. Whole family is unvaxxed.
We got omicron. Hit me n the wife kinda hard, worst flu ive had for a while and loss of energy for about 2 weeks after. Still manageable and not deathly sick. Just a bad flu.
2 kids under 5 both seemed to just get a slight fever, no cough, congestion etc. It was basically nothing to them. They still played and had near normal energy.
Id tend to agree with the article based on experience.
When we finally understand this in a public sense, we will have mastered the ability to travel among the stars at high speed.
We need to change our fundamental concepts and understanding about magnetism, electromagnetism and gravity.
If they had done their due diligence they would have found as indicated in the paper I posted that the simulation was missing critical structural elements, that, had they been included would have shown via the simulation that their theory on the collapse was incorrect. It was physically impossible for the tower to drop into it's own footprint at near free fall speed with the anti walk pins in place.
While I agree that at times the truthers as you call them are motivated by emotion or a need to be right,and this can be problematic in terms of credibility, I don't really understand this need to 'prove' this in some way toeither yourself or others. It's obvious you already hold this belief and it would seem you cannot be persuaded otherwise, so why even bother.
Beyond this, it does seem like you are trolling the community. You can take our conversation here in this thread as evidence of this. You committed 2 logical fallacies that I can think of for the moment, appeal to authority and failure to address the arguement, I.e. you dismiss the paper out of hand despite it being a university level peer reviewed and published paper with a very specific point, that the simulation was technically incomplete. Just because you don't like the author, doesn't mean you can outright dismiss the substance of the arguement.
So i didnt post a video, it was a paper. Good to know you are reading this accurately.
The engineers that backed the NIST report didnt do their due dilligence if they endorsed a flawed simulation
Why do you keep posting this thread every month if you dont like the answers you get?
Sounds shilly to be honest.
Ok, if it's shit, then explain why NIST needed to remove the key structural elements outlined in this paper in order for their simulation to match what happened in reality?
Why were the anti walk pins not included in the simulation?
This peer reviewed university study refutes your NIST report.
I think the claim they refute is that there are mass Graves, I.e. a pit with multiple bodies in it.
We know there were children who died and were buried nearby. The Graves were not unmarked, they were marked with wooden crosses that fell over and decomposed.
There may be users on freecanada that believe no one died, but I would say those are not the majority.
The issue is the media is on a tear against white civilization and one way to attack it is to make it seem like the white man genocides natives at the schools the same way the Americans did on the plains to the tribes, but this isn't true.
Yes people died at the schools, but there could have been many reasons they died, not just abuse. We simply don't know.
So you are saying as people lose faith in governments, they will turn to the leaders of the anti vaxx movement for guidance?
Which leaders / members do you believe are controlled, as generally I would say most of the current prominent names came up fairly organically and tended to lean anti establishment even if they are not explicitly so.
I generally agree with your premise that both sides are controlled, but I fail to understand how you think the anti vax crowd is being controlled / led?
Certainly there are a few personalities that are prominent like Steve kirsh and mcolough, but I wouldn't say they are leaders, they don't direct the movement, I feel like it's mostly headless, personal and these 'leaders' continue to provide data to back up the decision to be anti vax.
Curious about your thoughts on this.
My telescreen has not told me to kill anyone.
I was just having my 2 minutes hate.