1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

All the states that had trigger laws had clear exceptions for ectopic pregnancies, and the Catholic Church itself doesn’t consider treatment for them to be an abortion since it essentially just a miscarriage. Don’t know why PP would do that.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

He’s always been a “pro elite” kind of guy, that a better society can happen if someone with a better vision is just given free range to build it, but a paranoid public, created by a sensationalist media, prevents that from happening.

I think he has a lot of interesting ideas, but he comes across as just this blackpilled Socialist guy. Someone who really believed that the communist utopia would eventually be created by the USSR or European Socialist and when both of those failed, he just accepted that fact instead of going into denial or thinking it will come back but also thinking that capitalism has no future either. He just thinks we are circling the drain now.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting thing I saw. There was an interview with the leader of this Donestk militia who was an outspoken communist. The guy had a hammer and sickle badge on his hat, a Soviet styled uniform, and spoke about how Ukraine was ruled by Fascist oligarchs and that he wanted to restore the USSR. And then, one of the things he complained about was the capitalist west imposing LGBT propaganda against Russians, specifically targeting children.

4
Cyber1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

While he was very friendly to zionist interest, pointing to a quote of him denouncing anti-semitism in direct response to a synagogue shooting is really retarded.

4
Cyber1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

OnlyFans was originally created as a not at all pronographic website. It was a place you would pay a subscription for video and audio clips from musicians and film makers ect.

Then a webcam company bought out the majority of the stocks and shifted the focus away from that into porn

2
Cyber1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

For all their bullshit, Europe has been pretty good in cucking big tech for shit like this. The EU slapped Google with a pretty serious fine for breaking anti-trust laws a while back.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was an investigation into the claims of it being bombed with thermite or demolished by NIST who found that it did indeed collapse from the out of control fires. Here is an article about that investigation from Popular Mechanics.

Heres a Q&A section from the NIST website about their investigation

and here is a digital mockup of the events as they happened cooperating the NIST investigation findings.

Im not trying to drown you in sources, Im just giving you what Im basing my post on. If you have an argument against this then let me hear it.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

This whataboutism is getting tiring. The OKC bombing and WTC7 on 9/11 are two different things. WTC7 was right across the street from WTC6 tower. After that tower was hit, burning chunks of the building fell into the south side of WTC7 causing severe structural damage (these photos are conveniently never shown by truthers) and of course also caused fires to spread throughout the building. These fires burned for ~7 hours uninterrupted due to the sprinkler system failures in the building due to the structural damage and the citys water system being depleted due to the fact that the city was under a terrorist attack and the entire WTC complex was being attacked and facing severe fires and structural damage.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

In that picture you posted, how many of those not only had a fire, but had severe structural damage as well from burning debris crashing into them? This is a MAJOR thing I dont think you guys are taking into consideration. Interesting how that picture shows the entire building structure of the other ones, but selectively chooses to zoom in on WTC7. The entire back of the building was cut in hard by falling debris.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Small fire? This building was directly under the twin towers, of which giant sections of it crashed in on top of it. I cant stress enough how utterly retarded "truthers" are for thinking this is some smoking gun. Take your own advice and shut up.

-1
Cyber1776 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Not at all. WTC 7 is such a non issue to anyone whos actually done any research into it and I dont know why "truthers" think its such a smoking gun.

Burning debris and giant chunks of the world trade center had fallen on top of and crashed into 7, which caused fires to break out throughout the building, and after hours and hours of sustaining severe structural damage and burning, it caved in on itself.

Theres a lot of suspicious things about 9/11, but this aint one of them.

2
Cyber1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jim Morrisons dad was George Stephen Morrison, an admiral in charge of the fleet stationed in the Gulf of Tonkin during the infamous attack that triggered the Vietnam War.

3
Cyber1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

Russia and a bunch of middle east countries are all heavily involved in South American affairs, to the point where Americas lack of stake in the game, especially compared to its past, is embarrassing. This is all done through illegal stuff, like the Russian mafia setting up camp in some country down there and then taking out totally not real actions on behalf of the Russian government. Real cloak and dagger shit and what espionage is really all about, just a government back door into the underworld of organized crime.

Middle East countries are really good at this in South America, much more than people realize, and especially Iran. Hezbollah, Irans proxy militia, is like the world leading organization in coke distribution. The Venezuelan government is too and so are their friends in Colombia, FARC (the communist terrorist group that makes all its money through cocaine) Iran and Venezuela are both international pariah and work with each other through shit like illegal arms and drug sells.

This is a really good article on it.

-2
Cyber1776 -2 points ago +2 / -4

The Al-Jalaa tower was the one Israel hit in an airstrike. It had a bunch of businesses that used its offices including Associated Press and Al-Jazeera, but it also had offices being used by Hamas and acted as an HQ for their operations. Israeli military warned everyone from the AP, Al-Jazeera and the buildings owner of the attack hours before to give them time to evacuate the area before hitting it.

AP in America raised a shitfit over this and said they had no idea of Hamas using the building as well as if that really means anything other than to showcase how gullible they are that they dont realize their business neighbors for the past 15 years were a terrorist group.

So yes, the building that was attacked that AP was using WAS coordinating missle launches against Israel and no, they didnt kill anyone with the AP since they warned them well in advance of the attack.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Youre just outrigh ignoring anything that disproves or challenges your theory that the holocaust never happened. The whole video is him directly addressing a chemistry based argument on zyklon-b and the gas chambers, one made by the very book you yourself posted, and him explaining why the argument you are for is wrong. And this isnt just some random asshole, hes a chemist which is why hes arguing against these chemistry based arguments.

the whole video is this so I dont really know what you want me to do with the "where in the video does he go over it"

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok now try actually watching the video. He specifically mentions this book, the use of Zyklon-B and the Prussian Blue staining on the walls of the Auschwitz gas chambers.

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

'The Chemistry of Auschwitz" like most denier propaganda, is complete horseshit. I mean deniers have such flimsy arguments that Im starting to believe that deniers know the holocaust happened, but are just nihilistically lying in an attempt to trick people into thinking it didnt happen.

Here is an actual chemist talking about that book

https://youtu.be/eQISe1GGNMc

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Youre just lashing out randomly. Why did Anne and thousands of other die in Bergen Belsen of typhus, starvation, and other preventable diseases if they were deloused with Zyklon-B? 19K died at the Bergen Belsen camp, HERE is video footage the British took when they liberated the camp so you get a clear picture of just how horrible it was. How do you explain things like Aktion 14f13?

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats not at all the point Im saying, that the allies were without flaws or anything like that. Im directly responding to some of the things you said concerning the nazi camps and the holocaust which are just not true.

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

Anne died in Bergen-Belsen, no Auschwitz of typhus specifically because the conditions of the camps were god awful and zyklon b was not used as a delousing agent. The Belsen camp was so horrible that after the British separated all the corpses that just littered the camp making it even more disease prone and moving the survivors out, they just had to burn the cabins and living quarters down because they were so rodent and lice and disease infested that they couldnt be salvaged and used as shelter for the newly liberated inmates.

I would love to see a denier take the zyklon b challenge and get together with a team of chemist to recreate a batch of it and then expose themselves to it on stream to prove how its just a harmless delousing agent lol

Also, the things like the theater at Auschwitz were clearly amenities for the guards and not the inmates, this is such a dull witted attempt to make the camp seem like a luxurious resort.

-1
Cyber1776 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Much like all Hiterboo stuff, this is just a straight up lie concerning the death camps. The implication you are getting at is that the soviets just made up the holocaust for whatever reason after the war, which is a really retarded idea. The first actual outside reports of the camps were from the Polish, not Soviet, forces who were compiling info and giving it to western allies as early as 1942. It is NOT the only event protected by law since countries with laws against holocaust denial also have laws against denial of other genocides too. And Churchill DOES mention the death camps in his history.

The rest of your reasons are reasons at all, just vague bullshit about "da banks"

view more: Next ›