4
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Take that, crazies! How do you kooky tin foil hatters feel, now, huh? The upper echelon of the arm of the government that would have had to be involved in a killing investigated their underlings, and found nothing.

by pkvi
2
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

My prior neighbor's smoker had BT, a 0000 PIN, and good range. Not sure what to do with it, on BT, but...

Someone nearby probably had the same brand of TV, and neither owner had done anything to secure their devices. This is the cost of excessive convenience.

2
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nothing important. It's been run and modded by lefties practucally forever, now, and there's been some suspicious timing, regarding COVID subs popping up, from certain users, just before they seemed, "needed." This is their wheelhouse.

Is the legacy media pushing 5v or 3.3v? Core or Ryzen? Veritas or vintage Stanley? Pi Pico or ESP32? I stopped with anything remotely political there, ages ago. It was the IPO/API thing that got me off of it.

by pkvi
1
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except that the metaverse has been a colossal failure, and I need 15 minutes to get into the city.

2
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

The, "theory," that was thoroughly, "debunked," almost 2200 years ago, and whose, "debunking," was responsible for accurately navigating the seas for the last two thousand years.

0
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 0 points ago +1 / -1

The first link is midwit mental gymnastics. The sabbath/Lord's day was reinterpreted for New Testament reasons - Christianity is not messianic Judaism. The first commandment has the other "2nd" in it. However much some protestants like to say it's not so, Catholicism bans idolatry. As well, the exact division of them had not been settled, for a long time before that occurred. 2 to 17, inclusive (Exodus verses), is not 10, nor divisible by 10.

Not defending the purity of the middle ages Church, though, and the Vatican has become something else entirely, over the past many decades...at least, publicly. Privately, it may have been a very long time coming. Good riddance, in the future.

-1
Respect_Mah_Covfefe -1 points ago +1 / -2

I’m sure older members are able to remember the warning at the beginning of DVDs when they existed threatening you with prison time for breaching copyright.

First, they still exist. Second, BDs have the same thing. Third, what countries are you talking about? Fourth, how did you go from that to Jews Bad?!

Fed bait? IDF bait?

1
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 1 point ago +2 / -1

I watched it. IMO, issues with its content are a bit exaggerated. I've seen old shock and exploitation films that were worse - but, were entertaining, or had a real message. Cuties, OTOH, was generally terrible, which leaves you remembering the shock aspects of it more than anything else.

It didn't use any good character archetypes, the characters and their motivations made no sense, the plot made little sense, and the MC making up with her mom at the end also made no fucking sense. I can understand a David Lynch movie better, after the first viewing. The movie was made of a bunch of woke checkboxes, and probably an excuse to let Hollywoodsexual cameramen get some youngin cameltoe shots, rather than a story.

FI, if she started making money, becoming an instathot, with the fame and money corrupting her and her parents along the way, you could have a compelling story for the current age. Contraversial content would make for good PR, and be justifiable. But, leave NPCs to try to make something that requires human understanding, and nuance, and you get...this.

2
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Si, wait, we had the meme wars as a meme, yet the government was seriously utilizing meme concepts and implementations as information warfare?

I admit, I do like this clown world, sometimes.

6
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 6 points ago +6 / -0

...and they won't stop, until raping and murdering your underage employees is either straight up legal, or at least legally defensible.

"Hey, Noah. Need any help with that boat?"

1
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Lucy skeleton has its share of contraversy (its probably not a single skeleton, for one, and I don't think anyone has tried to see if there's DNA to check out in it), but what exactly is even conspiratorial, here? Upright primates are not exactly a strange concept (though the really like to keep quiet about the breadth of different homid bones and fossils found over the years, especially in long-dry regions, like much of Australia), and this kind of modeling has just been waiting for cheap enough computing, and bored STEM majors in need of something to publish. It just looks to me like a filler article, for a slow news day.

by DrLeaks
2
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Victimhood is power, d00d.

But, anyway, the medical establishment has spent well over a century, now, downplaying people hearing voices, such that they are to believe they are all either their own thoughts, or random hallucinations (except that they never tell anyone to do anything that ends well for them). If you take a dive into it, that is just evidence-free handwaving, to keep up the materialistic facade. There's good circumstantial evidence that most people hearing voices in their minds are actually hearing voices in their minds, of some thing, or things, that is not them, and has cause to use them. Likely, everyone gets this to some degree, just not so bad as those people.

Was it demons, was it the government, or was it just simply a psychotic breakdown.

Could it be two of the above, or even all three? The demons help lead this weak woman to a psychotic breakdown, and use the latest evil trends, supported by the government propaganda, to help do it, because even they want maximum results from minimum effort.

1
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Until they're held accountable, we will have no republic. Congress does not have the authority to do this, by a long shot. Not that it won't happen, but it's unconstitutional through and through.

1
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, you're out in public, with cameras on you, and you have one of those dried up, half-dislodged, itchy AF boogers that needs to go. What do?

Answer: ignore the booger, and pray upon large swaths of fatherless young men.

1
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are plenty of gays that just want to be able to more easily deal with illness and death, like any sensible people. Their mother wants to keep life support on? Tough titty. Nephew thinks he deserves the house, and you're not even related? Sucks to be you, with that old will. I've known some on both extremes, and the sensible exist. I was still against legalizing gay marriage, though, because of those people obviously being used as pawns, and were thrown under the bus as soon as SCOTUS legislated from the bench.

Ultimately, this is like a pandemic, or wildfire. You have to get your own family out of danger, but otherwise let it spread and cause a great deal of damage. It will burn itself out, and create a traditionalist backlash...or Hitler 2.0 (and today, I'm not that sure that wouldn't be deserved, or even a better outcome).

1
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

It wasn't dark because nothing went on. It was dark because the people went back to, well, normal, and didn't record every skin tag their granny got. Much ofthe time, they were too busy surviving, and making war with their neighbors. The Romans were highly unusual, in how meticulously they documented everything they could.

As well, the Christians often forced old knowledge to be lost. There was much written that's only recently been discovered, or translated. There are many a bard's tale that have been found to have historical basis.

The conspiracy here should be the creation of the hubris-filled lazy modern mainstream archeology and anthropology, that like to make careers out of not letting the boat rock - we got it all figured out by the early 20th century, so stop looking into anomolies!

1
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably more like Baal. Baphomet without a body and peace sign is basically nothing.

2
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just hope their rhetoric inspires people that believe what they say, so that it backfires explosively on them.

1
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe of your soul. But even he had to make whips and get Medieval, so to speak, on low-level bankster types, and allegedly said, at a time before firearms, that people should spend their last dime to buy a sword.

2
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, they were just big birds that couldn't handle a mere asteroid impact. Pussies.

One thing that's not hard to find out, but that MSM and the Scientism Orthodoxy like to conveniently ignore, is that genes have changed far less over time than they used to predict, now that we can get whole genomes of current creatures, and sizable portions of long dead ones.

A great deal of adaptability is baked right in to animals. What seem like radical changes might only take a few tens of generations, rather than the millions of them that random changes plus natural selection would manage (as well, the more complex the animal, the fewer random genetic changes will stick, over time). Meanwhile, the totality of the genome is surprisingly stable over those millions of years, as most of the random changes that make real differences get culled out, over time.

1
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not much of an effect, though, compared to breeding out intelligence, which is a secondary effect of welfare states, and general material abundance. Low infant mortality is allowing us to collapse from that much faster than Rome did. Alleles related to higher intelligence are reducing in concentration the world over, and CO2 can't make that happen. Women that don't have to fear a lack of planning ability and complex problem solving skills from their baby daddies, however, do make that happen.

Natural intelligence in recorded history peaked around the middle of the Industrial Revolution, in the West. It would have begun lowering later anyway, but removing natural infant mortality gave it a head start. IQs rose for a bit yet, based on environmental factors helping to maximize the, "book learming," aspects of IQ tests, before the general negative trend could be seen. FI, Jeb, a rural farmer of the past, would do poorly on the more scholastic parts, but would not actually have been dumber than his long lost rich city boy twin, that would have scored several points higher, thanks to years of going to school.

If we need to be genetically more intelligent to compensate for a bit more CO2, natural and sexual selection will do that. It will also increase lung capacity over time. Brains are energy hogs, so they don't get bigger or more complex than they need to be, to keep the population reproducing.

1
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

What were the MACs? You can figure out the company involved by the MAC, and sometimes more. That's the info that could prove or disprove it. A lot of people don't realize they're keeping several BT-enabled devices on them at any given time. That said, the latest BT standards allow for power levels and weak signals that could be in the realm of a microscopic device siphoning tiny bits of power biologically.

If I let my current phone scan, at home, it finds jack shit beyond my walls. My previous one, though, or my desktop PC with an external 2.4GHz antenna, OTOH, find TVs, speakers, various iDevices, a fridge, a grill (srsly), and a smoker, all between 75 and 250ft away.

This is something I can believe possible, but not probable, unless we get lists of suspicious MACs. At least one guy actually did a local experiment, and came up empty. But, regional secret government and megacorp experiments on humans has sadly been a well-documented reality, with no end in sight.

2
Respect_Mah_Covfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Luckily, it's not about good business. It's about political and social control (ultimately, thought control, but I have my doubts about the success of that, long term).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›