I came across a similar thing a couple of weeks ago. The Gateway Pundit published a list (which I imagine originally came from somewhere in the Chosenite Psyop Command) showing 40 young women purportedly still missing. You can see the photos about halfway down the page:
Barbarians: Hamas Admits that Several of the Hostages They Plan to Turn Over to Israel Are Already Dead (TGP 5/7/2024)
"It is not clear how many Hamas is still holding." Uh, didn't anyone ask? Isn't anyone worried enough to follow up on that?
Of course no one asked because the list is phony. Taste varies, but all of the women are well above average in attractiveness. My guess would be these were just harvested from the social media accounts of serving IDF, who were each instructed to keep their fucking mouth shut.
TGP is--it turns out--blindly Christian Zionist, so they never questioned this. Also, some fun Semitic hoax encoding: the number "40" is used colooquially for a large, indeterminate number. That's why you see it recurring so often in the Bible. So this is like a poster in English that says, "Wanted dead or alive for a jillion murders".
An angle on this which I never see mentioned is the simple, straightforward, foundational question: "Are viruses alive?"
I won't answer the question because anyone who considers themselves a critical thinker will have to come to their own conclusion, but I only suggest it as a starting point of investigation for those who ask themselves the question--as I once did--"Just what TF are viruses even supposed to be, anyway?"
This brings up an important point in regard to disinformation. Both normies and conspiracy theorists conceive of disinformation as a program to sell you a lie, or at least an incorrect or incomplete version of the truth. In cases that are simple, unimportant, or crude, this is true.
In cases of any importance and where there is enough evidence available so that one could get to the truth with some work, a more sophisticated approach is taken. The goal is not to sell you a lie, but to keep you away from the truth.
Many different versions of the "truth" are presented to you like magazines on a rack in a bookstore. You are meant to look at the covers, find the one that appeals to you, pick it up and walk out the door. A free choice was made, was it not? Although they will contains bits and pieces of it, certainly none of them are the truth.
So we see this movie as yet another glossy magazine on the rack that you can select if you choose. It joins others on that rack, like this judo flip reversal out of Richard Hoagland, which is here shadow-promoted by the ever reliable Smithsonian:
Yes, the United States Certainly DID Land Humans on the Moon (Smithsonian Magazine 5/16/2019)
Conspiracy theorist Richard Hoagland has asserted for many years that the Apollo program discovered large artificial glass structures on the lunar surface that has been kept from the public. Besides other conventions common in a cover-up, Hoagland made the claim that the astronauts that went to the moon had been hypnotized and any memories of extraterrestrial encounters were removed. Most interestingly, Hoagland has argued that NASA deviously orchestrated the origins of the moon-landing denials as a disinformation campaign to mask the discovery of extra-terrestrial structures on the lunar surface.
Wow! Of course, these days you can also join the FE crowd and choose to believe the Moon is undefined (in some undefined sense). Anything is possible! (See how it works?)
The key observation is that even though these various disinformation programs contradict one another, all the promoters of said disinformation programs never get around to calling out all the others as promoters of disinformation. What, they just never thought it through like I just did, and thought it worth telling you like I just told you? Well, you see, that would give away the game, wouldn't it?
I believe that, clearly, the reason he was barred from research is because this is the effect--intended or unintended--of a bioweapon, and "They" do not want him figuring that out.
As stated in the article, Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease is a result of prions, and it turns out prions are bioweapons. I wrote up a very short summary putting together the main pieces of evidence in comments to this post from a few months ago:
Alzheimer’s passed to patients from cadavers (r/conspiracy_commons 2/2/2024)
The same thing happened with the Iraq War: Casualties of the Iraq War
For a long time, they tried to get away with about 100-200k, but in 2007 the Opinion Research Business (ORB) poll came out with an estimate of a million dead due to the conflict. IOW, a 5-10x multiplier. That's probably the most reliable number, and there are a couple of reasons why we might believe that.
First, I have never one single time heard any official or "expert" dispute it, then make an argument in favor of another number. They do not want to "Streisand" the issue then lose on the merits.
Second, you can see right on that Wiki page where They're trying to hide it. Look at that nice, neat table labeled "Scientific surveys". It does not include the ODB poll, even though the fundamental concept of extrapolation via survey is precisely the same as the three listed. Leaving it out is a crude but effective trick.
Let me square the circle: It turns out the Fallen Angels were aliens. Nimrod was not one of the Nephilim, but the leader of the Fallen Angels. He is one and the same as the entity known to the Babylonians and Sumerians as Marduk. In fact, the two names are simply different ways of reading of the very same cuneiform.
Much of the research in this area really involves just straightening out what is already known and putting the pieces back together. It seems counter-intuitive, but you must gather data from many different sources. In hindsight, you can see that the story was splintered over time and each source was corrupted in various ways.
That may sound high-falutin', but it's no more mysterious than talking to a dozen witnesses to a car accident six months in the past. Memory fades and is edited, everyone has their own perspective, and impressions may not have been properly interpreted in the first place.
With a lot of work it can be accomplished, but what I have found is that everyone appears to have fallen off the track before that lot of work was completed. Usually, it seems, they found what they wanted to hear and stuck with it.
So you think she thinks exactly the same things as ten years ago? Just because you can't learn anything in that amount of time doesn't mean no one else can. Maybe you'll learn that in another ten years. We'll see how that goes.
Not edit: that's exactly what retarded is... lolol
Let's hope for the best with Claudia. The fact that she is Jewish (secular) may turn out to work in favor of Mexico and the world. That sounds crazy but I will explain.
She's a member of AMLO's Morena party, and he is a populist who has done well for the Mexican people. Sure, there are all kinds of criticisms to be made of the situation there, but none of his creation.
Both the people and the government of Mexico have become openly anti-Israel. Just within the past few days, Mexico joined the prosecution of Israel for war crimes in the ICJ and the Israeli embassy in Mexico was burnt down. Remember, this is leading up the landslide election of a non-crypto Jew, so the Mexican people themselves apparently do not hold it against her.
So as Mexico adds their efforts to the worldwide opposition to the Zionist entity, Scheinbaum being a Jew is a positive. That is, Israel has been reduced to calling everyone in the world anti-Semites, but how would that play in Mexico? "Ay, chingada, la nueva presidenta es una Jewess! WTF do you want? Fuck off!"
Again, no need to look for trouble where there may not be any. There's already plenty to go around.
We're in Opposite World. Shouldn't they release it and say, "This is the official version, now out in public and part of the historical record. Anything at variance to it is a DeepFake." More disturbing, really, is how basically no one will notice this complete inversion.
I think that for the upcoming election they should just say, "Given the multiple threat vectors for election interference, we can't take the risk of voting. The winner is... Joe Biden for Permanent Fuhrer. Isn't it more fun when it's surprising?"
It seems like conspiracy theorists have the subconscious impression that various people are "on the payroll", that they appear in some gigantic pyramidal org chart in a Rothschild mansion, and that instructions appear every morning in a text from the CIA or some such thing. I would say that these various "revolts" we're seeing is evidence that the situation is far more subtle.
Specifically, these people are influenced by various means, pushed and pulled without touching, like magnetic fields. In most or almost all cases, what they do is their own idea, rather than commandments handed down from above. The insidious part is that the whole time, they think of themselves as good people doing the right thing, or at least doing that which is necessary under the circumstances. To whatever extent they are corrupted, they have corrupted themselves and have no chains to pull against or even to show you. All in all, diabolical.
The problem with that system of free will, of course, is that they can choose to walk out of the cage at any time, because there was no cage to begin with.
Fun association many surely noticed: "Astar" is almost certainly a reference to "Ishtar".
Deeper association few are aware of: Ishtar is the basis for the phony name used for the Jewish queen in the Book of Esther. The events recounted in that book are the basis for the Jewish holiday of Purim, which commemorates (yet another) genocide by the Jews.
Further association no one is aware of: Ishtar was apparently, for a time, the consort of Satan himself. Much longer story there, as one can imagine, but it may be possible to see how the threads start to weave together.
I mean, it's weird neither one has been, uh, let's say "gunned down by a dirty terrorist Hamas infiltrator who paraglided in". It's a real indication of just how much TPTB are losing their grip on that power.
Fingers crossed for that paraglider, though!
If I had to guess what the problem is, it's that homicidal lunatic Binyamin Netanyahu is a rabid Zionist, but there is one thing more important to him than even Zion: Binyamin Netanyahu.
So at a time when--as much as they love to exterminate Palestinians--they are getting their asses handed to them militarily and getting spit on before they even get to the steps of the court of public opinion, so for the survival of Israel and the preservation of the Zionist cause, they should probably back off the genocide for now and pick it up another day. But Binny knows that as as soon as the war is over, he's going to lose his job and likely his freedom.
Given this, I think the calculations on all sides are clear.
I've looked at the "phantom time hypothesis" fairly closely, and it looks like 1800 years was added. The problem is, it's not just that someone took every date and added 1800 to it. The timeline is actually a giant mess.
First, the gap of 1800 comes from the work of Sylvain Tristan. He puts it as going from (what we now call) 500 BC to 1300 AD. There are certain reasons to think this gap should more profitably be thought as running from 600 BC to 1200 AD. Now, why would that be?
The beginning date marks the start of what even the mainstream acknowledges as the "Axial Age". There's even a wiki page for it but I have casually collected several times more evidence than they tell you about on the page. The human race seems to have "woken up" at that time. (There's a much longer story as to why.)
The later date I believe to be related to the actual date of the Crucifixion, in what we now refer to as the year 1185 AD. The Nativity was, correspondingly, in the year 1152 AD. There is quite an amount of evidence for these dates collected in Chapter 1 of Anatoly Fomenko's book, "Tsar of the Slavs".
If this all sounds like lunacy, I'll add an even loonier point as a bonus:
There is a theory not far out of the mainstream that calculates that Jesus was born on September 11. Some conspiracists then believe that the 911 attacks took place on that that date as an occult ritual mocking of Him.
In that Fomenko book, Chapter 2 goes on to advance the theory that Jesus was actually based on a real historical Byzantine emperor, Andronikos I Komnenos. I've never studied his hypothesis so I don't have an opinion on it yet, but I did notice this: Andronikos died on September 11.
Weird, right?
I recently came across an old show from Mark Passio where he discussed "service to self", "service to others", and "service to the truth". Each person lives his or her life in one of these these frameworks. Events are cast into that particular framework and evaluated according to whether or not it advanced the service.
What I would add to this from personal research is that the framework is set by (and may even properly be said to be identical to) the individual's inherent level of consciousness, although a higher potential can be prevented from developing to that level.
Given that, if someone is happy because of their promotion or their new car, we should be happy with them and for them, rather than hold it against them as being a person of a lower consciousness. It may be possible they have developed as far as they are able. In fact, to hold it against them is itself a sign of lower consciousness.
Thus, a person at the highest level of development takes as "good news" that which serves the truth, however it personally affects them, those around them, or even society as a whole. IOW,
"Fiat veritas, ruat caelum"
That election was to replace President Hamid Karzai, who apparently could speak more plainly after he left office. He said something like, "Al Qaeda doesn't exist. In ten years as president, I never saw a single intelligence report.that mentioned them."
So hey, even if he hadn't been barred from a third term, under no circumstances was that guy ever going to get reelected.
Minor historical note I'll wedge in here for those interested in very deep geopolitics:
"They" didn't abandon Afghanistan, but were driven out. Why would "They" ever give up a state, failed or otherwise? The struggle actually continues to this day.
What was probably the fatal blow came with this incident:
CIA mystery: Did Iran kill ‘Ayatollah Mike?’ Nobody is talking after Michael D’Andrea, the CIA’s top Iran Mission Center chief, is allegedly killed in plane crash (Asia Times 2/7/2020)
D'Andrea ran the whole West Asia operation. And indeed, no one is talking about it because "They" always erase their big "L"s from consciousness as quickly as possible so that no one ever tries to uncover the true story, understand the real dynamics of the Black World, and mark progress against Them.
That's why it's a virtual certainty that for anyone reading this, it's the first time you've heard of the late, unlamented Ayatollah Mike.
I never thought I'd be saying it, but I think a ton of content on r/conspiracy is now AI generated. I would guess they were forced to do this because of declining human participation. Can't keep the corral going if all the cows think the other cows have wandered away.
Then in a weird flip confirming this, I think they're actually being honest about something now. Out of 2.1M+ members (supposedly), there are only about 500-700 online at any given time. Judging real human user engagement, I think that's accurate. On r/conspiracy_commons, the numbers are 200K and 50, which I also think is accurate.
Whatever TF an "organoid" is, it's gross:
World's first bioprocessor uses 16 human brain organoids for ‘a million times less power’ consumption than a digital chip (Tom's Hardware 5/26/2024)
Also, I couldn't help but notice that the subject of the article linked in the OP was Dr. Brett Kagan. That's just what the world needs, another Kagan. Talking to you, Toria.
These things are supposed to cost $700 million each. For that kind of money--plus maintenance, operational costs, training, and bombs--why don't they just get regular planes and drop bundles of cash on potential enemies with little post-its that say:
"Have a nice day! Love, America"
There's a subtle revelation here of how naive these people actually are, including Tucker with all his experience. The term of art is "handler". You'd think Tucker would recognize that right away.
It's a laughable as some dude referring to his dope dealer as his "buddy".