TL;DR: Actor Jameson Parker looks like (including literally) a member of the Parker family of generational Satanists stretching back over four centuries. Coincident Information reinforces the case that Sean (of Napster, Facebook, and Spotify fame) and Robbie (of laughing about his kindergartner purportedly getting gunned down fame) are both of the same family.

As a refresher from what seems so long ago now, and particularly important for anyone coming into this cold, the claim here is that Jameson is yet another member—among many we have discussed previously—of this same Parker family:

How generational Satanists took control of what goes in your ears (bonuses: a demonically-possessed novelty podcasting light and a connection to Sandy Hoax) (conspiracies.win 10/16/2024)

First, a note for those who did not live through the 80’s about how famous Jameson Parker was. It’s not very specific, but “everybody knew who he was”. Think of any famous Chris: Evans, Hemsworth, Pratt, Pine. Now add them all together. In its heyday, four out of every ten households watching TV had it tuned to Simon & Simon when it was on. Don’t forget the show was on weekly.

There is nothing comparable to that in our current times. Game of Thrones does not even come close numerically, if that’s what you were wondering. Culture was quite different then, and you can see how everybody knew who Jameson Parker was. The point is, there was one of “Them” in the glaring spotlight in front of tens of millions of viewers and no one had “They Live” glasses on to see.

So what did I find out about Jameson that convinced me he was one of those Parkers? Well, let me start with the item that I discussed in the “Second bonus” of that linked post, the one I mentioned as personally the most convincing that Sean and Robbie were related: hair color.

If you have any familiarity with bleach blond beach boy A.J. Simon, driving around San Diego In his white convertible VW Rabbit, you know for a fact that Jameson had sandy hair. Well, apparently, he had undergone the Clairol transformation. Check out all his pics on IMDB, particularly “Rita Moreno and Jameson Parker in Anatomy of a Seduction (1979)”. Whaddaya know, his natural color appears to be a pretty distinctive medium-dark reddish-brown.

Maybe just an extraordinarily unlikely coincidence? Sure, so let’s see what else we can find. Now, Wikipedia plays this angle down, but Jameson began a writing career and I came across this autobiographical profile:

His father was a high-ranking Foreign Service officer who subsequently retired to become director of a small museum in Virginia…. As a result of his father’s career, Jameson was educated at a variety of preparatory schools in America, Germany, Belgium, and Switzerland....

Not to jump to conclusions, but his father really seems to be a spook. Remember who else was a top-level spook running around the Swamp in those days?

If you thought the Phoenix Program in Vietnam was demonic, that’s because it was run by Evan Parker from a family of generational Satanists (conspiracies.win 8/23/2024)

Wiki tells us that our Jameson is actually a Junior, and his father was the original Jameson Parker. The genealogy of Jameson Parker is so scrubbed we can’t even tell if we have father or son. One tiny quantum left unscrubbed is the Wikitree record for Jameson J. Parker. which is definitely for the actor. I’m not on the “Trusted List” and cannot see more, but somehow I feel that there is nothing much further They will allow us to see.

Foiled, as far as having their genealogical information aired like all the rest of us, but Wiki disclosed (probably accidentally and against their will) that Jameson’s father “had been general legal counsel for the Parker family steel mill….” A clue!

There is indeed a Parker Steel Company, specialists in metric sizing, but it’s located in Toledo, Ohio. Not somewhere spooky or suspicious, right? But then in their “History of Parker Steel”, we read this puzzling factoid:

Though Parker Steel was established in 1955 by Leo Goldner, his son Paul Goldner renamed the company to Parker Steel International in 1991….

Why would either Goldner call his company “Parker Steel”? We were just told it’s not located anywhere called Parker. Welp, They are just lying to our faces once again. Of course it was founded by these Parkers. Interestingly, there is another Parker Steel in the UK, and I’m 99% sure it belongs to Them too. The UK branch probably told the American branch to stop acting like provincials and move to metric.

More compelling is that Jameson attended a fancy prep school in DC, St. Albans School. Well, I know this may be surprising, but guess who attended Chantilly High, less than 20 miles away? That would be Sean. Did you go to high school that close to where your parents went? I suspect that the answer for most is, “Not at all.”

Google up images of Jameson Parker and since he’s an actor you’ll find plenty of good head shots from his prime. Now take a look at the wiki profile pic of Sean. Hair color aside, the similarity is quite striking, isn’t it. Think of all the fathers and sons you know. Do they look that much alike? Infrequently, right? It’s virtually always a resemblance at most, an echo of the father mixed with the mother. At this point, I might have speculated that Jameson was secretly the father of Sean.

But are we at the end of the road? Nope. Being the persistent type, I thought I might be able to “backdoor” Jameson’s genealogy somehow through Sean’s line. I punched the name of Sean’s father, “Bruce Parker” (which to me sounds like it would be pretty common), into Wikitree hoping to get lucky. And did! I found the record of Bruce G. Parker aka Mott. Paydirt!

I can’t really say I know exactly what that “aka Mott” part means. Just another glitch in a manipulated and scrubbed record, I suppose. The gem, though, is that they admit his wife’s name was “Yvonne Mott”. That record is scrubbed but we already have the key association: the marriage of a Parker to a Mott. And where did we last see that?

Colonel Tom Parker, the handler of Elvis Presley, was a Parker (yes, one of the generational Satanist Parkers, but we’ll have to get through several layers of disinformation to get there) (conspiracies.win 10/26/2024)

As stated, the catalyst for that post was noticing that Col. Tom had married Marie Francis Mott. Also note Wikitree’s non-specific factoid that Bruce is “Father of [private son (1970s - unknown)]”. Sean was born in 1979.

The primary conclusion here is that we have the right Parkers. The secondary conclusion is that there really is a person called Bruce and that he, not Jameson, really is Sean’s father. Frankly, that makes the resemblance between Sean and Jameson even more striking.

Jameson was born in 1947 and Wikitree states that Bruce was born in 1945. Way back in that Geni record, we were allowed to know that Jameson was the “Brother of Private; Private; Private and Private”. Nearly certainly (given all the scrambled and deleted evidence) Jameson is Bruce’s kid brother and therefore Sean’s uncle.

Bonus: I also think Jameson is a psychopath. And no, I don’t think he’s a violent murderer or gets up to “Eyes Wide Shut” occult insanity or anything like that. Psychopathy is universally misunderstood, and the nature of it is more subtle than is portrayed in popular fiction. “They” take advantage of this misunderstanding and, of course, do not want to clear it up.

In Jameson’s case, I noticed something long, long ago in Simon & Simon. Jameson plays the calm, reserved, conservative counterpart to his brother’s emotionality and impetuousness. You’d really have to watch an episode--or even several—to see this, but A.J. Simon was too… flat. He lacked affect, in a very subtle way.

Without watching the show for yourself, the closest I can come to generating the same impression is this: you know how when you watch an actor playing a role, you get a feeling for the personality of the character, or the actor, or a fusion of both. You often hear people say something like, “I hope (blank) is a nice person in real life. I like their character so much that I really want to believe that’s how they actually are.”

I used “(blank)” on purpose, because that’s how Jameson is: (blank). In fact, if you still have those images of him up, you may be able to see what I mean from just that. There’s something lacking in his expression, isn’t there?

But okay, who cares if he’s a psycho? Well, it seems that these generational Satanists cultivate psychopathy. It would probably be a short book to go over all the evidence, but if you ever wondered how in the world They get people to go along with their outrageous plans, those plans aren’t outrageous to a psychopath.

It’s been a while since I saw Sean Parker interviewed, but IIRC he had that same flatness. I believe these bloodline Satanist families may be primary (i.e. genetic) psychopaths and, reflexively, that’s part of why bloodlines are so crucial to them. They can’t afford to get any normie blood—let alone whatever causes elevated levels of consciousness—mixed in there.

TL;DR: This is a very long post and not necessarily startling or shocking (although it should be) but more “for the record” regarding the Cabell family. Since this information is not part of the “conspiracy canon”, I don’t want to have to keep saying, “There are these Cabells, you see, and…,” every time I mention them and their importance. Easier to simply link to this post.

But it’s worthwhile for anyone to read because, by examining the Cabell family as an exemplar we can see how “They” operate just outside the spotlight of history. If you’re trying to find the Bad Actors and you’re talking about whoever’s face is on the news or whose name is in the headlines, you’ve probably got someone down the chain.

Advisory: Lots of talking and few links in this post. We’re examining tiny ripples on the surface reflecting monsters swimming deep below. In the style of Pulp Fiction we’re going to skip around in the timeline.

Conspiracy theorists may begin by applying this litmus test in regard to the assassination of JFK: were you familiar with the Cabell brothers? Brownie points if you were, but if not, Earle Cabell was the Mayor of Dallas at the time of the assassination, which would surely be advantageous were you conducting an assassination in Dallas. His brother, Gen. Charles P. Cabell, was probably even deeper in the plot. We are told in his wiki that, “Cabell was forced to resign as deputy director [of the CIA] by President Kennedy on January 31, 1962, following the failure of the Bay of Pigs Invasion.”

The way that’s written, it’s as if Cabell was fired by JFK for sucking at overthrowing governments. Let’s try to explain it another way. Could we say that the events of the historical record are also consistent with Charles being one of “Them”, orchestrating the Bay of Pigs operation, failing to provoke a war, being recognized by JFK as a Bad Actor, and getting tossed out? There’s a much longer story about who JFK was and why They ritually murdered him, but this scenario makes far more sense to me.

Before this time, Charles was already deep in the Deep State inventing the modern UFO phenomenon. There are no good summaries of his involvement, but if you scrape around, add things up, and read between the lines, Cabell was the primary actor behind Projects SIGN, GRUDGE, and BLUE BOOK. Mentions of him in this regard attempt to give you the impression that Cabell was some kind of open-minded general officer just searching for the truth and national security. I do not believe that’s what motivated him. The narrative he had a part in selling to all of us was and still is, “Flying saucers are real, but the government is keeping it secret from you.” It’s been pretty effective, really.

Jumping far in the chronology: I thought I knew quite a lot about Thomas Jefferson. I had listened to every episode of The Thomas Jefferson Hour podcast until the host contracted a case of TDS that became so severe the show should have been renamed The Social Justice Hour featuring Slave Rapist Thomas Jefferson. Therefore I was quite surprised that I had never one single time heard of the very long association between….

Thomas Jefferson and the Cabell Family (1743-1826) (University of Virginia Library)

Though Jefferson thus worked with literally dozens of Cabells, his friendship with Joseph C. Cabell proved the most enduring. Jefferson worked intimately with him to build the University of Virginia, the last great project of his life.

Again, I must reiterate that I had never heard any of this before doing this particular research, and I have had my radar activated for the Cabells for many years. This illustrates what I try to keep emphasizing about these spooks being visible, yet never being seen. It further creates a bit of suspicion that it was other than happenstance that the high-profile mass shooting of just over two years ago took place there. Also, keep in your back pocket for a moment the fact that wiki sees fit to inform us of the seemingly trivial biographical detail that that the purported shooter purportedly “attended eighth grade at John Rolfe Middle School.” That’s one of twelve middle schools in Henrico County.

Now we’ll jump simultaneously to the beginning and the end. Oriented either way, the time spread is from the Mueller investigation to the Mayflower landing on Plymouth Rock, written up in detail here:

To recognize Thanksgiving, I present… Myles Standish: From the Mayflower’s Spook Extraordinaire to “Mueller Time” (conspiracies.win 11/25/2024)

There, we revealed Ann Cabell Standish Mueller, the wife of Robert Mueller, as the child of one of the intermarriages between the Cabell and the Standish bloodlines. That carries us all the way back to 1620 but isn’t the end of talk about the Mayflower, and in a strange revelation we’ll end up going back even before that landmark event.

We first need to finish up on Ann and the Cabells. Good luck finding any information on her because she’s a ghost. That’s expected, though, when you’re looking under certain rugs. I don’t want to drag this post down to a grinding halt like a poorly edited movie, so let me just claim without detailed presentation that I have, in fact, done the work on the fractured evidence available and she is, in fact, a descendant of these same Cabells. In trying to scrape up what I could regarding her genealogy, I came across this article:

THE CABELL CABAL AND RELATED FAMILIES (D-State Analytics 9/16/2019)

Some great information, but the site is also puzzling. The content is, in fact, quite reminiscent of what you’re reading at this very moment, but I just do not know what is going on there. It has some really good stuff but they also wave away like bad smells what I know are important issues. It starts and end in 2019, as far as I can tell, and it also goes off quite assuredly in assuredly unimportant directions. I don’t know if it’s a disinfo project that got shut down or just guise whose presuppositions and overconfidence led them off into the weeds. A perfect illustration:

Her full name is Ann Cabell Standish Mueller. Her mother was Dorothy Lucille Cabell. General Cabell and Dorothy Lucille Cabell (Bob Mueller’s mother-in-law) are 5th cousins.

Then they run you off into the weeds about Richard Bissell and Gibson Island. In fact, they seem really hung up on Gibson Island. Maybe I missed the boat but I never heard of it before. If they want to talk about an island, it should be Nantucket. As much as I’ve written up about Essex County, there’s probably just as much about Nantucket. If D-State has missed both, that really makes me think it’s disinfo. Actually, I only got Ann’s mom’s name from them. That’s how hard it is to find.

One idea I believe they get dead wrong—and which I think you should avoid—is calculating the degree of relation. Fifth cousins? Who gives a rip! That’s what they’re implying. But we’re talking about bloodlines here, as in aristocracies. In the peerage, degree of relation generally does not come into play. The first legitimate son of the 3rd Earl is going to be the 4th Earl, etc.

Aristocrats actually play pretty loosely compared to these bloodline families. Titles are created and uncreated, aristocrats without a male heir will have their son-in-law take the family name and inherit the title, that sort of thing. For example, the Duke of Buckingham had its fourth creation in 1822, went through three Dukes, then died out in 1889. Weak! Even with our present example of the Cabells, we’re seeing direct bloodline connections across four centuries. I daresay “They” take it more seriously.

Now comes that strange revelation I teased earlier, and a startling connection that D-State Analytics should have picked up but did not: Standish and Pocahontas. They are silent. Maybe you’re also thinking, “Uh, wut?” I wouldn’t blame you... until after we’ve taken a closer look.

We saw that Ann Cabell Standish is descended from Myles Standish, and now get this: the Cabells are descended from Pocahontas! Talk about your Thanksgiving miracles! There was actually a person along the line named Pocahontas Rebecca Cabell (Bolling) (1754-1803). (BTW, I dare anyone to bring this up over turkey with the family.)

Crazy genealogical novelty? Maybe, but you know what that D-State article refreshed me on? Woodrow Wilson’s wife was a Bolling of this line, and would bring up how she was descended from Pocahontas. Oh, and she also ran the United States for a year or two after Woodrow stroked out. Frankly, it all makes you wonder if Woodrow really just stroked out, know what I mean?

Make of all this what you will, but to me it marks out a Very Small Club that has been influencing American history from just outside the spotlight for many centuries. And here comes yet more on that in the….

Bonus: This is territory where I don’t have firm historical evidence, but I want to shine a light on associations I see but cannot substantiate (yet). You know how I always say these bloodlines intermarry? There was a person named Mary Cabell (Hopkins) (1735-1811). Three associations of which to be aware:

1. Stephen Hopkins: A signatory to the Mayflower Compact:

“He was apparently a prosperous man who boarded the Mayflower with his wife, four children (with one son born later at sea), and two servants. He was the only Mayflower passenger with prior New World experience, being shipwrecked with others in Bermuda in 1609 for 9 months…. In Jamestown, he worked for two years under Capt. John Smith and may have come in contact with the legendary Pocahontas, wife of fellow Bermuda castaway John Rolfe.

John Rolfe and Pocahontas spawned the line that led to the Bollings and then to the Cabells. Here they all are, kicking it together in the New World a decade before your history textbook started the story of the Mayflower. Small f-ing world.

And just so everyone remembers, the Mayflower was already known to be infiltrated. There was a “Masters Mate John Parker” aboard, about whom no one in history is curious except me (well, us, I hope).

2. Matthew Hopkins, the “Witchfinder General”. He was leading phony witch hunts in Essex, England, half a century before there were phony witch hunts in Essex, Massachusetts. If you read his wiki, he hoaxed his death too, obviously.

3. The “Hopkinsville Goblins”. I previously made a parallel to the “Gloucester Invasion” which went on at the exact same time and just miles from the phony Salem Witch Trials. That one wasn’t goblins from space, it was spectral French-Canadians. My God, it’s so funny after a while! Anyway, I’d say this is why the Hopkinsville Goblins were in Hopkinsville.

Hope you enjoyed, thanks for reading, and Happy Thanksgiving!

TL;DR: Robert Mueller’s wife, Ann Cabell Standish Mueller, is a direct descendant of Myles Standish. He was a premier Military-Intelligence-Banking-Deep State Spook all rolled into one. If you think the connection is merely a delightful coincidence rather than an indication of how deeply “They” are buried and how long “They” have been at work, you may as well stop reading now.

Let me put it this way: Suppose the special counsel investigation (the one that kept waiting for a crime—any crime!—to manifest itself) had been run by Special Counsel Robert Cabell Standish. I think more than a couple of conspiracy theorists might have paused to ask, “Hey, is the guy trying to take down the President related to Charles and Earle, the guys that helped take out the brains of that other President?” I don’t have a high opinion of most conspiracy theorists, but that’s a flashing red light.

Alternatively, suppose the wife of Robert Mueller was Chana McJesuit DeMason. There would have been no end to the wig-flipping among conspiracy theorists. They would have felt they had cracked the code, exposed the evildoers, and (most vitally) been right all along.

Turns out It’s not quite that straightforward, although it’s not far beyond that. The name “Ann Cabell Standish” rang in my ears just like “Chana McJesuit DeMason” does in many others. But let me emphasize this property: we’re looking at a direct bloodline connection stretching back over four centuries.

None of those other power structures has anything like that pedigree. “The Jews” had to be invented for the purposes of Zionism in the late 19th Century. The Jesuits were suppressed for many decades by the Catholic Church itself starting in the 18th Century. And we just saw that the “Morgan Affair” was a psyop against the Masons, because apparently they were doing too much good in the US.

In other words, there’s a lot that goes into understanding the significance of an association like this. The shortcut, though, is that if you believe it to be solely an interesting genealogical novelty, ask yourself, “Why the hell is this the first I’m hearing about it?”

So let’s discuss the man of the Thanksgiving season itself, Myles Standish. A pre-American hero, if you will, but I bet you couldn’t actually say anything about him. That’s because he’s a spook! Of course we’re never told anything important about him. But as in They Live, if you put on the special glasses you can plainly see for yourself that he was Military…

On February 17, 1621, the Plymouth Colony militia elected him as its first commander and continued to re-elect him to that position for the remainder of his life.

And running the joint, and a banker…

Standish served at various times as an agent of Plymouth Colony on a return trip to England, as assistant governor of the colony, and as its treasurer.

And Intelligence…

Little is known of Standish's origin and early life: his place of birth has been debated by historians…. No definitive documentation of his birth exists in either Lancashire or the Isle of Man.

And Deep State…

They appointed Standish instead; he was apparently already known to the Pilgrims.

And a death-cult Satanist…

During these actions, Standish exhibited skill as a soldier, but disturbed more moderate members of the colony due to his brutality toward Natives….. Standish supported and defended the Pilgrims' colony for much of his life, though there is no evidence to suggest that he ever joined their church.

And an Elite guised as whatever we’re supposed to be celebrating Thanksgiving over…

a gentleman, born in Lancashire, and was heir apparent unto a great estate of lands and livings….

Does he sound like a dude that’s going bail on his great estate of lands and livings to help out shoe-buckled religious fundamentalists in the howling wilderness on the far side of an ocean? C’mon.

Now, is Bob’s little lady really a direct descendant of this suspicious and scary fellow? Well, again, you’d think they would have told us already, right? No, here’s the fluff bullshit we’re handed:

Who Is Robert Mueller's Wife? New Details On Ann Cabell Standish: They were high school sweethearts. (YourTango 9/25/2018)

Fine, it should be pretty easy to confirm or deny on our own, right? We’ll begin with the genealogical record of Robert Swan Mueller, III.

Haha, brick wall! From here, “They” don’t make it easy on us but this is why I pull down the big bucks. I was able to locate some sort of announcement in the society pages:

future wife of Robert Mueller (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Fri, Jun 22, 1962, Page 10)

HER AUNTS, Mrs. William Lloyd Standish III and Mrs. Robert Nevin Standish… daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Anderson Standish, Jr., of Oliver Road, Sewickley….

Bingo! You can easily locate her father, Thomas Anderson Standish, Jr. (1907-1979), and her mother, Dorothy Lucile Standish (Cabell) (1919-?). Starting at Tommy, just drive upwards through the “Son of” link to arrive at good old (very old) Capt. Myles Standish, "Mayflower" Passenger (1584-1656).

Final note: I know this one single connection may seem a little “thin”, but this post was split off from another post about the Cabells that was getting way too long. We’re trying to rebuild history out of something other than smoke and horse poop, so we have to take it one small bite at a time.

Thanks for reading and Happy Thanksgiving!

TL;DR: This puzzling echo back in time is, well, not something you can summarize. You just have to read it, for entertainment purposes if nothing else. But with some very high-octane speculation we may be able to make some sense of it all, and even gain a tiny bit of insight into how the world really works.

Let me hook you into this by describing two families. One is that of Richard Cusack who married Joan and had children John, Anne, and Susannah. The other is that of Richard Cusack who married Ann and had children Joan, John, Ann, and Susie. One is a family of actors including an A-lister, the other is the family of a witch executed at Salem well over three centuries ago. If you don’t consider that really bizarre, you may as well punch out now. Otherwise, read on….

I don’t know if the fact that the Salem Witch Trials were fake (17-page PDF) and was filled with other actors makes the whole thing less bizarre or more, but there we have it. Now, I did do some rounding for dramatic effect. There is another child, Bill, in the second family, but you can verify the rest in the page of the famous actor’s father, Richard John Cusack. The first family had a number of additional children I left out, but you can verify the rest in the genealogy pages of the witch and her father:

Susannah (North) Martin, Salem Witch Trials (1621-1692) Geni

Susannah (Susanna) Martin formerly North (1621-1692) Wikitree

Richard North, of Salisbury (1595-1667) Geni

Richard North (1590 - 1667) Wikitree

Except you can’t. Well, not anymore anyway. Richard’s last name, as you can plainly see, is North and not Cusack. Or is it that simple? This where this all takes a very unexpected turn and we’ll have to back up to see how I got here.

I sat down this morning to quickly check into whether NICAP (National Investigations Committee On Aerial Phenomena) was connected to the witch trials of 1692. A peculiar question but it seems normal to me now. Anyway, please don’t ask exactly what I searched on because I surely don’t recall at this point, but in the snippet of one of the results, I saw that someone named “Richard Cusack North” had some connection to the Salem Witch Trials. “Oh, no,” I thought, “not John, too!” Fearing the worst, I searched for that person.

And searched and searched and searched. You can’t find anyone by that exact name. Now, get on this quick because the evidence of these search snippets is transient by nature. Here is what you’ll find when you search on “richard cusack north” using:

Google search: Susannah (North) Martin, Salem Witch Trials – Geni with snippet “Richard Cusack North, Joan North (born Bartram)…”

Bing search: Richard North - Historical records and family trees – MyHeritage with snippet “Richard Cusack NORTH was born circa 1590, in birth place, to William NORTH and Agnes Pratt.”

and also Susannah North - Historical records and family trees – MyHeritage with snippet “Susannah NORTH was born in birth place, to Richard Cusack NORTH and Joan BARTRAM….”

Yandex search: Susann North - Historical records and family trees – MyHeritage with snippet “SUSANN Martin (born North) was born on month day 1621, in birth place, to Richard Cusack North and Joan North (born Bartram).”

The results are consistent across engines, websites, and verbiage. No mere “glitch”. Since the time these pages were crawled, the genealogical record has been scrubbed clean, to the state you see it now, and for a reason we have yet to determine.

These are definitely the same people and our Salem Witch Trials connection is still intact, but some information has been vaporized: that Richard’s middle name was Cusack, and that his parents were William North and Agnes Pratt. Click around the current genealogies as much as you like and you will not be able to connect to anyone named Cusack. Further, it looks like any record for both William North and Agnes Pratt have been vanished.

There’s also something messed up about who Richard was married to and who the mothers of his children were. For example, Geni says he married Mary Scott and they had a daughter named Ursula, then Richard later married a woman named Ursula. That does not seem likely at all, does it? Perhaps this happened when “They” were (ehem) updating the records.

If we trace John’s Cusack line, we only get a few generations back to Manhattan in 1852. Now, Cusack is not a common name in America, but why would we think John Cusack was connected to this Richard Cusack North that bumrushed his way across America’s open borders four centuries ago into Salisbury, Massachusetts? Well, it’s no smoking gun, but John’s mother, Ann Paula (Carolan) Cusack was from Newton, Massachusetts, about 40 miles from Salisbury, passing Salem along the way. Small world, huh?

Here it is: I do not think Richard Cusack North was just one of the tired, the poor, the huddled masses. I think his was one of the “bloodlines”. There was already an oddity there: Why would an ordinary 17th Century English blacksmith (as we are told) have an Irish surname as his middle name? Well, as the Elites do it, the middle name is reserved for the maternal line. Since Pratt was his mother’s name, this would have been his paternal grandmother’s name. Not that any of this can be confirmed any more. But I mean, it was only days ago we talked about Pratts overthrowing the LDS.

Also, Richard’s Geni page tells us that he came over in the very same ship, the Susan and Ellen (spellings vary widely), that had five years previously carried over Thomas Parker and John Proctor, two Family names that figure bigly in the SWTs.

So WTH is going on here? Is it all mere happenstance? But how does happenstance include the recent scrubbing of genealogies? Was it all just written into The Simulation? What, for one person out of 8 billion to find and ten persons out of 8 billion to read? Do we live in Wonderland, where everything can and will have happened for no reason whatsoever? Personally, I reject all these. Let’s get serious!

WARNING: EXTREME AND UNFOUNDED SPECULATION AHEAD

Maybe there’s a way we can make it all make sense, but we have to start at the other end and flow forward from there. These Spook Families, generational Satanists apparently, have worked together and intermarried for many centuries. Eventually, they invaded the future America together (although actually, you find out they were behind the colonization in the first place).

So the Cusacks are one of these Families. I’ve never seen the name come up, so perhaps they’re on the periphery. But with this crew you are either In or you are Out and the Cusacks are In. But if so, shouldn’t there be more evidence of that? Not if you think it through. If you imagine even a couple of dozen families over, say, four centuries, there must be thousands of bloodline members extant. Yet of all the evidence I’ve collected, I could only name a few dozen that have appeared on the American stage. That’s all that was ever needed, you see?

This also explains the eerie repetition of names. We just saw the same thing earlier today (as I write this) with Linda Moulton Howe’s granddaughter having the same name as her ancestors three centuries in the past. These bloodlines are evidently of paramount importance to Them, extending even to their first names. I mean, not to give any of Them any ideas, but if They just picked names out of whatever the equivalent of a phonebook is today, none of this work would be possible. But shit, They know no one’s looking.

So John is in, but as you should understand that doesn’t mean he’s “active”, as only a tiny fraction are. If you read the “Political views” section of his wiki, that’s about as good as it gets for someone trying to recover from liberalism. It is mindbreaking for ordinary people to admit that they have been on the wrong side for a long time, you know? They have to always have been right, except.

In any case, it seems to me he spoke too loudly and his career was torched by “hidden forces”. Then suddenly he gets back in:

Cusack starred in his first TV series Utopia in 2020. In a 2020 interview with The Guardian, Cusack had admitted to the decline of his acting career. "In the last few years, I haven’t been able to get projects financed. That could be a function of getting older. Or it could be a function of being cold."

This is all very interesting, particularly that series, Utopia. Right in the heat of the “real” pandemic, the storyline is that global conspirators cook up a fake virus to get people to take a fake vaccine which will secretly sterilize then for three generations. The explicit plan is to get the herd down to 500 million (Guidestone number, of course, another of Their projects). I mean, whoa, pretty on the nose, right? Controversy! Which finally brings us to the speculation: what if a proposal was made to John?

“They”: Listen, John, we know that you object to some of the ideas we have. But we feel certain that we’re good people and doing the right thing. You’re one of us and we think you can come to understand it as clearly as we do. The series we told you about has a character that will notify the population of our plans, as we always do. That character will convince the audience that this is the right thing, a good thing, and he believes that completely. At the very same time, you, John, will convince us that you understand that this is the right thing, a good thing, and you believe it completely. Then all will be mended.

John: Okay, I’ll do it, but I want out. Myself and my whole family, back to the beginning. I want us stricken from the record, written out of history, no trace that we were ever involved with any of you and your activities. This is the end. You can do that, right?

Utopia: The Plan (YouTube 6/24/2021 3:22) (<- haha, the time!)

Bonus: I could not help but notice that Richard (no middle name) North’s newly updated mother is Anna (Hodell) North. Name ring a bell? The Black Dahlia murderer was George Hodel. I wrote up quite a bit on it here:

I plucked the Black Dahlia and found a coverup that began with a generational Satanist and continues to this day. We’ll discuss that coverup why it’s so important. (conspiracies.win 10/4/2024)

Get this #1: Look at the actual URL for Anna’s link. See how it ‘s “Hodell-1”? In their page naming scheme, that means it’s the first record they created with that name. I think they made this phony person as the most inside of inside jokes. Fake Anna’s fake father (“Hodell-2”) was born in Essex, of course, and they used “Hodel” as a subtle blackwash. Or maybe in honor. Who knows with these freaks.

Get this #2: That whole Black Dahlia story got so deep, so crazy, I never even posted parts 2 and 3.

Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: Linda Moulton Howe is related to one of the actors in the Salem Witch Trials psyop (17-page PDF). That doesn’t bear directly on her work, but… you know. We’ll see a lot more about these Ufologists soon. Warning: heavy on genealogies here, light on cattle mutilations. Stay tuned for the bonus because this story goes to January 3, 2027. You’ll see what I mean.

This will be a long post because we’re setting dynamite to the foundations of the nearly half-century long career of one of the most prominent Ufologists ever, so I feel we need to be as rigorous as possible. Although the connection may strike as a historical curiosity, I want to make sure everyone is looking at it through the correct end of the telescope. You see, I’m always trying to dig down to bedrock so we can begin to rebuild history from a firm foundation. Every time I try to do that, the mine floor collapses and I drop down another level.

In this instance, I had noticed a couple of associations between the modern UFO phenomenon and the Salem Witch Trials. When I went to flesh out this zany idea before writing it up, the floor collapsed into a ton of associations. When I zoomed in to write a post just about Ufologists and the SWTs, as an afterthought I went to see if I might include LMH. Then that floor also collapsed into an even deeper pit. Here we are with Linda and a long road that leads to the United States House of Representatives.

But how about those cattle mutilations? I couldn’t tell you what’s going on, but assuming it’s not all outright lies, I’ve long suspected that a relatively simple but not publicly known technology or technique was at work, as is characteristic of much stage magic.

Think of a Bic lighter and Amazonian tribesmen. If you wished to amaze and enthrall them with it, would you hand it over and carefully explain its principles of operation? Of course not. You would set mystifying fires and make impossible lights appear. Meanwhile, a person you trusted implicitly because she was secretly your daughter, and whom these tribesmen would come to trust as an explorer into the mysteries, would carefully and at length explain to these primitives why the gods were angry. See how LMH being one of “Them” parallels this example?

Let’s dive in: Can we connect Linda to the Salem Witch Trials? In a previous post about fake atom bomber Gen. Leslie Groves, I promised that we would fill out Linda’s genealogical connection to the Robert Moulton that testified at Salem. That’s what we’ll do here, as best we can.

Given the sort of “esoteric” field she’s in and that she’s a journalist, surely she would mention such a novelty in the bio posted on her own site, right? Nope, just little ol’ beauty queen Linda Ann out of Boise who gets a master’s from Stanford and gets juiced into all kinds of things. Feel good story of the year. Nothing to see here!

Lacking that, the connection is an easy layup for us, isn’t it? Let’s see… ah, yes, if you consult the list of people of the Salem witch trials we find an Elizabeth Howe right there. Could not be simpler! Except Linda was born a Moulton and not a Howe. That’s her husband’s name. Let me just look him up real quick and….

Linda Moulton Howe’s husband does not seem to exist. Neither her wiki, her bio, nor any genealogical site mentions him. What a ghost! I scraped up one source that claimed his name is Larry Howe. Isn’t he supposed to be the boring one? Maybe not, huh? We’ll see that single source a bit later, and it may provide a vital clue.

Never fear, though, let’s just follow up the that Moulton connection. If you look at the Salem list, it’s got a ton of names and most of those names are hot-linked to other full-on wiki pages about the participants. You know how history nerds love this stuff. Oh, and lately the SJWs cannot stop talking about the SWTs because of all the patriarchy and oppression of strong women and persecution of the otherized and all that. Let’s see, quick search on “Moulton”… not there. Welp, final answer, right? Except a Moulton most assuredly was there:

the testimony of Robart Moulton sener who testifith and saith that I waching with Susannah sheldon sence she was afflicted I heard her say that the witches halled her Upone her bely through the yeard like a snacke and halled her over the stone walle & presontly I heard her Controdict her former: disCource and said that she Came over the stone wall her selfe and I heard her say that she Rid Upone apoole to boston and she said the divel Caryed the poole

Haha, blew up my spell-check! Get it, “spell” check? To be serious, you can find the original right here:

A Guide to the Primary Sources of the Salem Witch Trials: Testimony of Robert Moulton Sr. Regarding Susannah Shelden, in Support of Rebecca Nurse

A mere oversight with mere centuries to correct? You decide, but it’s not like these Moultons were anonymous randos. The biggest island in Salem Harbor along with a smaller one nearby are together called the Misery Islands, but were formerly known as "Moulton's Misery".

Before we go further, if you plan on doing any research on this you’ll have to know that there are four Robert Moultons to keep straight (just the way it is), and you’ll see various seniors and juniors and numbers and nothings scattered among them. Here’s the rundown: “Robert I” (1587-1655) immigrated to America with his adult son “Robert II” (1616-1665) during the Puritan Great Migration of the 1630’s. (I’m thinking it should be called “The Crypto-Satanist Great Infiltration”.) The trial witness we just saw we’ll refer to as “Robert III” (1644-1731). His son was “Robert IV” (1675-1756), and he was the one that married Hannah Groves, ancestor of Leslie Groves, as mentioned in the previous post linked at the top.

Is Linda related to these Moultons? I can come excruciatingly close to proving that. Wiki casually mentions that her father was named Chet, and I was able to track him down: Chester Stephen "Chet" Moulton. His age is right, he’s the “Father of Private”, and he passed away in Idaho, Linda’s home state. I’d say we got him. Tracing back up his line, I can only take you as far as Lt. David Moulton (1702-1767).

The genealogy mostly vanishes there, but also gets jacked up. Wikitree lists seemingly the same person as Daniel Moulton (1735-1767). Same parents, same children as Lt. David. This “Daniel” was born in Ipswich, but Geni tells us “David” was born in “Probably Mansfield, Hartford County, Connecticut Colony”.

This is as achingly close as I can come to making the final connection: If you study the dates and places of the births of the fourteen (!) children of Robert IV and Hannah, it looks like between 1714 and 1716 they moved from Salem to Windham CT. Mansfield and Windham are literally adjacent to one another.

What is being hidden about Lt. David/Daniel? How many unrelated Moultons could be floating around this small area at the turn of the 18th Century? Well, time for me to give you that shocking final clue I teased earlier. I got Linda’s husband’s name from this page: Linda Moulton Howe: Top 10 Must-Know Facts About Journalist. No dates or links or sources. Pretty weak, granted, but it does say the following and it’s not the type of thing you make up out of nothing:

Her two-decade marriage to Larry Howe resulted in a daughter named Laura who has a daughter herself named Hannah.

Whoa, did not see that coming, did you? Of all the names, huh? In fact, Hannah Groves, wife of Robert IV, herself had a daughter born Hannah Moulton. She married a Fuller. You may consult the list to find a “Mary Fuller Jr., age 17 and living in Ipswich” with an acting job at the Salem Witch Trials. Tangled web, huh?

Bonus under the category of “They Live”, right out in the open yet no one sees it for what it is: These Spook Families settled in and operated out of Essex County, Their other hellpit being Nantucket. Most of Essex is included in Massachusetts's 6th congressional district. Guess who has represented that district in Congress for a decade? Seth Wilbur Moulton. I forgot to mention this also falls under the category of, “You cannot make this shit up.”

Literally born in Salem. Won his seat at the age of 36 in his first election ever. Campaigned for President during the summer of 2019 before dropping out. In fact, he was just reelected to the 119th United States Congress and will be in office throughout 2026. Did I mention Linda as being juiced in? Does anyone actually need to do Seth’s genealogy at this point? Haha, good luck! It doesn’t exist..

Even though a lot of what I cover is centuries old, I always try to get the message across that all this is not far away, not at all. It’s right there plain to see when you have the special sunglasses on. And people are worried Trump is secretly a Jew.

Thanks for reading this long one!

TL;DR: The early parts of the US atomic bomb program were run by General Leslie Groves, and his ancestry—like so many other Spook Families—traces back to the Salem Witch Trials. Those trials were fake, as were those initial “nukes”. We will also reintroduce ourselves to Deak Parsons, of the very Spooky Parsons Dynasty. The angle here is that “They” used Their own to oversee this grand atomic deception.

Just how the hell did I get here: I was way down at what I thought was bedrock and then found out that Groves was related to Linda Moulton-Howe. Surprising in itself, right? I was writing up so much on her I had to break off this atomic bomb angle. That’s how deep this all goes. You’ll have to temporarily take my word that there is much more to be said about good old Linda.

To begin to rebuild some semblance of real history, we’ll have to stipulate some items you may not be familiar with: the Salem Witch Trials were faked (17-page PDF), as were the Trinity test (16-page PDF), the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the first phase of the nuclear tests at Bikini Atoll (11-page PDF), known as Operation Crossroads. As for H&N, there is plentiful research on its fakery, easy to find, which is why there’s no specific link.

Disclaimer: All the preceding PDF links are classic papers from our gold-standard, the highest-level disinfo agent and revealer of hidden secrets, Miles Mathis. The standard caveat is that he surfaces plenty of evidence that you can independently validate, but you should accept no conclusions on his word alone and be conscious of the directions he’s pushing you.

Additional disclaimer: All American atomic bombs and nuclear power after this time—about 1946—are legitimate. Apparently, they didn’t have real ones finished during these early years when they were required by the scripting, so they simply faked it.

To begin, what seems like a helluva long time ago but I now see was only six weeks, we met the other Spook standing just outside history’s spotlight controlling events, the “Atomic Admiral” himself:

Captain Deak Parsons, the triggerman for the (fake) atomic bombing of Hiroshima and involved in all the other atomic fakery, was related to Jack Parsons and all the other historical fakery (conspiracies.win 10/7/2024)

We now see that all early atomic fakery (including the Manhattan Project, Trinity, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Crossroads) took place when this guy had control over it: General Leslie Richard Groves Jr. (1896-1970). He was Matt Damon in Oppenheimer, if that helps you place him.

The genealogy of Lt.Gen. Leslie Richard Groves Jr. is mercifully straightforward. Start at that link and drive your way up the paternal chain (seven generations, don’t get tired) to his ancestor Nicholas (La Groves) Groves (1644-1703). You’ll see that he has a daughter, Hannah (Groves) Moulton (1676-1764). Click on her and you’ll see that her husband was Robert Moulton (IV) (1675-1756). Click on him and see that his father was Robert Moulton III (1644-1731).

As you will see on his Wikitree page, Robert Moulton III most definitely testified at the Salem Witch Trials. Know what’s very Spooky, though? You will find no mention of him or his testimony anywhere in the numerous and lengthy Wikipedia pages devoted to those trials. He has been stricken from the record.

The same goes for the genealogy of Linda Moulton Howe. It takes a bit of digging and I can only come oh so close to formally proving that she is descended from these Moultons. That was why the original post turned out too long and had to be broken up. I’ll have to ask you to accept the genealogical connection and Linda’s Spookiness provisionally. (But seriously, at this point what do you think the chances are she’s not related?)

In closing, a note on disinfo: I alluded that I got here by looking into the UFO phenomenon. Well, you know how Eisenhower supposedly met with aliens in 1954? You should, because we hear about it over and over and over. Personally, I now conclude it’s disinfo. In fact, I now hear disinfo agents treat it as established fact and spin their tales out from there. It’s insane.

I can see now that it’s part of the big smoke cloud to keep us from seeing things like this passage regarding Ike that I stumbled across in Groves’ wiki:

The Chief of Staff of the United States Army, General of the Army Dwight D. Eisenhower, met with Groves on 30 January 1948 to evaluate his performance. Eisenhower recounted a long list of complaints about Groves pertaining to his rudeness, arrogance, insensitivity, contempt for the rules, and maneuvering for promotion out of turn. Eisenhower made it clear that Groves would never become Chief of Engineers. Groves realized that in the rapidly shrinking postwar military he would not be given any assignment similar in importance to the one he had held in the Manhattan Project, as such posts would go to combat commanders returning from overseas, and he decided to leave the Army.

I’d say Ike smelled a rat and drove that rat out. In the context we now see, Ike was right, and They don’t want us to be aware of and understand these things. But anywho, there were these flying saucers, see, and then Ike….

Bonus: There was another item in the Groves wiki that I was not aware of before:

At this point, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson intervened, announcing that he would be making the targeting decision [for the atomic bombings]….

I’ll write it up fully when I cover the “Battle of Los Angeles”, but from research I did for that, I knew that Stimson was descended from the Clarks, one of whom appears at the (you got it) Salem Witch Trials! History actually tends to make more sense after a while, when you begin to see the machinery in operation.

Thanks for reading!

TL/DR: This is the final part of an unintentional three-part series which will Ouroboros us back in the improbable loop of connections among and between Billy the Kid, Freemasons and the Morgan Affair, and Joseph Smith and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, with excursions to Mitt Romney and an alien invasion.

We pick up where we left off in what turned out to be part two:

Did you know William Morgan and Joseph Smith were Eskimo brothers? Now I think the whole “Freemasons murdered a guy!” thing was just another psyop (conspiracies.win 11/17/2024)

It was 1826 and William Morgan (anti-Mason) had just been fake murdered and left behind his fake widow, Lucinda (Pendleton) Harris (1801-1856). I have a few remarks about her genealogy.

In 1830, four years after the psyop, she marries a man named George Washington Harris Esq (1780-1856). His genealogy is virtually non-existent (sus). He was from Lanesborough, Massachusetts (home state of the Spooks) and when last we saw Lucinda, she was in Youngstown, NY, over 300 miles away (all pretty sus).

Also sus in a weird way: Lucinda and William had a son named Thomas Jefferson Morgan, and now she marries a guy who is also also named after a President? Maybe, but note that GWH was born while the Revolution was still in progress. If everything had not come out the right way that would have been pretty awkward for his entire life. In sum, my guess is that GWH was just another spook, and that his name and their marriage were both fake. By the end of this tale I think you might agree.

Lucinda’s Wikitree page linked above has a decent timeline with a ton of red flags. First, she married William when she was 18 and he was 45. Now, I would guess that by this point I’ve done more genealogical research than 99.9% of the population and those big age gaps were not common whatsoever. They are much more common today, actually. Then she marries George and he’s 20 years her senior. Okay, maybe she was into the daddy vibe but I’m thinking it’s all just spookery.

The timeline relative to the LDS is even more suspect. Lucinda and George move from NY to Terre Haute in 1834 and are baptized into the church. No reason given for any of this, but okay. The suspect move is this: “By August 5, 1835, they had left Terre Haute for Far West, Missouri.” The thing is, as we find out from the wiki of Joseph Smith:

By 1838, Smith had abandoned plans to redeem Zion in Jackson County, and instead declared the town of Far West, Missouri, in Caldwell County, as the new "Zion". In Missouri, the church also took the name "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints", and construction began on a new temple. In the weeks and months after Smith and Rigdon arrived at Far West, thousands of Latter Day Saints followed them from Kirtland.

Hang on—Lucinda and Harris beat him there by at least 2.5 years, didn’t they? What did they know about Far West that took Joseph Smith that long to find out? And that apparently no one else to this day seems to want to share? If anyone thinks of Far West as important it’s because of the LDS, but they weren’t there in 1835. It adds up to strings being pulled behind the scenes and the Harrises working for the string-pullers.

Then there’s all this lame drama (who cares) and everybody ends up in Nauvoo, Illinois. That’s where the real drama takes place:

"Sarah Pratt reported that while in Nauvoo Lucinda had admitted a long-standing relationship with Smith", though Compton admits that this statement is "antagonistic, third-hand, and late"; and that there is an "early Nauvoo temple proxy sealing to Smith". This marriage was polyandrous, as Lucinda lived with her husband George Washington Harris until about 1853. Compton believes the marriage occurred around 1838, when Smith was living with Lucinda and her husband.

I could not possibly read up on all the LDS nonsense, but it appears Joseph is the only Mormon ever to have married married women. Looks to me like this was Lucinda’s vector. So, you can believe it was just regular old polyandry if you like, but I think it was all part of setting up Joseph Smith. He gets smoked just a few years later and that’s when I assume the string-pullers finally took control of the LDS.

You’ll find that last quote on the page List of Joseph Smith's wives. That’s actually how I stumbled on to all this in the first place. That page is hot-linked on William Morgan’s page but under the name of his wife, and when I accidentally hovered over it, I saw a picture of Joseph Smith and went, “WTF?!” It was so bizarre that I actually spent several minutes trying to figure out the reason this connection would be logical and expected. No, it’s not either of those.

Did you catch the name of the source of the gossip, Sarah Pratt? That wraps us right around to the beginning of this three-parter:

Billy the Kid was the cousin of two Mormon OGs that overthrew Joseph Smith and the LDS, which should tell you one was fake and the other controlled from way back (plus the Parkers appear!) (conspiracies.win 11/12/2024)

There, I aired my speculation that Parley and Orson Pratt were behind the takeover of the LDS. Sarah was married to Orson. Apparently, she became disaffected, left the Church, and started telling tales. An early Leah Remini of sorts.

Bonus deep genealogy which you just cannot make up: Lucinda’s paternal grandmother was named Mary Cabell (Horsley) Pendleton. I was doing some (what I thought was) unrelated genealogy work that I finished just before I began writing this. You know how we talked about the “Hopkinsville Goblins” at the end of the last post? Well, Hopkinsville, Kentucky, is named after Congressman Samuel Hopkins. His direct ancestor, Col. Arthur Francis Hopkins, MD (1699-1767), had a daughter named Mary (1735-1811) who married a man named Joseph Cabell, Sr., M.D. (1732-1798).

That Cabell gave us Gen. Charles P. Cabell (Deputy Director of the CIA, fired by JFK), Earle Cabell (mayor of Dallas when JFK’s head got fired), and (I heavily suspect) Ann Cabell Standish, wife of Robert Mueller. It’s all pretty spooky after a while, isn’t it?

Thanks for reading!

PS: If you enjoyed the bizarre jaunts into the “alien” stuff, be sure to stay tuned for what will be at least a couple of posts on the deep connections between the “UFO phenomenon” and the Salem Witch Trials. You won’t believe it! (Except you probably should because I’ll be giving you all the links.)

TL;DR: Both men were, at different times, married to the same woman, and each was married to her at the time they were (purportedly) murdered. This coincidence is far too bizarre to believe it was mere happenstance, and as always you should be asking the question: “Why in the hell is this the first I’m hearing about this?” It takes some unraveling to make sense of it all, and that’s what we’ll do.

You may be supposing this came up because I was doing more research on how the Mormons were overthrown pretty early on, which I wrote about just days ago:

Billy the Kid was the cousin of two Mormon OGs that overthrew Joseph Smith and the LDS, which should tell you one was fake and the other controlled from way back (plus the Parkers appear!) (conspiracies.win 11/12/2024)

Nope, not at all. The world is far stranger than that. I was trying to answer the question: “Is there a connection between J. Allen Hynek and the Salem Witch Trials?” It sounds like what you’d hear around the asylum but, trust me, I have a couple of posts coming up where it will make perfect sense. Anyway, I noticed in his wiki that his thesis advisor was William Wilson Morgan.

“Aha, Morgan!” thought I. But that’s all I thought since, TBH, I had totally forgotten about that Freemason whistleblower/victim and was focusing on the name “Morgan”. If you’re thinking about J.P., yes, that’s them, but it goes so much deeper. I will tell you a little about the Morgans and America’s first “alien invasion” as a bonus, so stick around. My point is that when I was trying to look up WWM’s genealogy (which doesn’t exist, quite sus), I finally stumbled into our subject, William Morgan (anti-Mason). (<- look how They promote that aspect)

Every good conspiracy theorist remembers that name (except for me, clearly), and his narrative goes something like, “High-level Freemason becomes disenchanted with their nefarious activities and decides to out them by writing a book. Before it can be published, they kidnap and murder him as a warning for anyone thinking of exposing their secrets. A huge backlash entails, even resulting in the formation of America’s third political party, the Anti-Masonic Party.” Conspiracy Lore 101, right? For the love of Christ, even the mainstream pushes it on us:

One Man Exposed the Secrets of the Freemasons. His Disappearance Led to Their Downfall: Before his book could be published, William Morgan was dragged away by a group of Masons, never to be seen again. (History.com 12/19/2018)

Did you notice they contradict themselves between the title and the subtitle? If no book was published, then he exposed nothing, correct? Jeez, people just don’t read. But anyway….

Nope, I no longer believe it. Well, I don’t believe the “problem” part, but I do believe the “reaction, solution” part. To understand this, though, I feel I have to get you to see it from my angle, and that will take nothing less than shattering the Universal Paradigm of the Conspiracy Theorist. That may take a couple of paragraphs.

You see, the CT paradigm is, “The (blanks) are running the show.” From there, you’re free to choose anything you prefer: Jews, Masons, Jesuits, Black Nobility, Regular Nobility, Jews, Democrats, oligarchs, Phoenicians, Reptoids, Jews, bankers, etc. Choose as you wish and feel free to change any time. All are incorrect because the paradigm itself is incorrect, which is why the vast majority of conspiracy theory is ultimately harmless. It’s more subtle than that, and you can’t reason and research your way from one to the other. That’s what makes paradigms paradigmatic.

Think of the Great Pyramid, where each of the blocks is a center of power like those listed above. The whole structure is blocks arranged in a certain way but there is no cement between them. Each, theoretically, would be free to slide around anywhere it wanted but gravity and friction keep them all firmly in place, even over millennia. Similarly, the real Power at the Top keeps the blocks of power in place through seduction, infiltration and subversion. In our current case, it looks like the Freemason block was sliding out of place and needed to be shoved back in. I hope that makes sense.

Project BILLMORGAN now looks like a psyop to knock down the advances that Freemasonry might accomplish until “They” could gain or regain control. Indeed, the famous in certain circles letter written by George Washington in 1798 regarding the subject now makes perfect sense in this context:

It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Iluminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more fully satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or the pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of seperation). That Individuals of them may have done it, and that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects—and actually had a seperation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.

If at this point anyone wants to say GW was a dipshit or a double-agent or both, go ahead, because everybody knows “the (blanks) are running the show.” As for me, I see that he was hip to doctrines and principles being advanced by Bad Actors on the loose, but just not generated and organized through Masonry at that time. If Freemasons had been “making good men better” in the US—and would be doing so for the next two and a half decades—that would be a real problem for generational Satanists and Their Infernal Majesty, would it not?

Finally, to the analysis. Please refer back to that little narrative summary I wrote. I would include quotes right from Morgan’s wiki, but I feel we’re already running long. This is what you’ll find with a not even careful read: He was not a high-level Mason and maybe not a Mason at all. No such book or excerpt thereof exposing Masonry ever surfaced. No one reported seeing him killed or dead. No one ever went to jail or even to court. His body was never found—well, except long after the fact, a body was discovered that just might possibly have been his. But it was found in a grave with grave goods, which never happens unless you have some very thoughtful murderers.

Then there’s the flip-side of this analysis also. Masons take that crazy oath about “if you reveal our secrets, we’re going to cut your throat from ear to ear, pee on your stupid dead face, bury you at high tide, etc.” If this was them carrying that out because they’re zealots in a nutty secret society, why did they skip all that? Demonstrating their commitment should have been primary. I’m sure the porch Masons still got the message, though, and in any case main thrust was to blackwash Masonry to general society.

William’s genealogy has been mostly vaporized, which is SOP for a spook. My only note is that while the Morgans had previously been operating out of MA, William was “murdered” in Youngstown, NY in 1826 and Junius Spencer (JP’s dad) first went to Wall Street in 1833, so it looks like the Morgans were on the move.

To close, if none of this convinced you it was an op, then temporarily take my word that the narrative and circumstances surrounding Morgan’s wife, Lucinda (Pendleton) Harris (1801 - 1856) get far less believable. The fact that she later married Joseph Smith is just the tip, so to speak. It will all have to wait for a full post, if that’s any indication how much we’ll have to laugh at.

Bonus: I said that I had recently found out that the Morgans were very spooky, all the way back to the beginning, and that that’s what had originally drawn my attention. To set up the punchline, you have to understand that a guy named Miles Morgan (1616-1699) was the progenitor of the whole Morgan family. You’ll see good old J.P. on that page.

History also records a very early heavy-hitter was operating in Massachusetts called Captain Samuel Appleton (1625-1696). Morgan’s page admits that they must have known each other from an incident in 1675:

… Morgan's blockhouse became a fortress of the place, and, after the burning of the settlement, held out until messengers had been despatched to Hadley. Captain Samuel Appleton, with a force of men (the standing army of the Massachusetts Bay Colony), marched to Springfield and raised the siege.

I claim it went way deeper. In Morgan’s Wikitree page, we can find a reference to this book:

Morgan, Appleton. A History of the Family of Morgan, from the Year 1089 to Present Times. (New York, 1902)

An authoritative history of the Morgans written two centuries later by a Morgan named Appleton. The families appear to have stayed close. Anyway, a few miles away and at exactly the same time as the fake Salem Witch Trials, Captain Samuel Appleton is involved in (I would say hoaxing) an alien invasion, but it was in the style of the 17th Century! It’s sometimes referred to as the “Gloucester Invasion”. It’s very hard to find info on it, but you can read up on it here:

The Spectre Leaguers, July 1692 (Historic Ipswich 3/19/2021)

It’s hilarious! It will remind you very, very strongly of the story of the “Hopkinsville Goblins” and:

How the ‘Little Green Men’ Phenomenon Began on a Kentucky Farm (History.com 1/2/2020)

Did you see the credit for those little drawings? “J. ALLEN HYNEK CENTER FOR UFO STUDIES”. My God, frens, this material writes itself.

Double-bonus: That 1955 incident is more formally known as the Kelly–Hopkinsville encounter. Well it turns out that in the 1640’s, back before the Salem Witch Trials, they were running the same fake hunts for the same fake witches in Essex, England, the wellspring of these Spook Families. Guess who was leading the charge? The Witchfinder General Matthew Hopkins!

Coincidences? I feel they will never end.

TL;DR: Another expose of hidden genealogy, but the focus is actually on the disinfo surrounding Billy the Kid. The story of the Pratt brothers, Parley and Orson, as they seized control of the LDS would be much longer, so you’ll have to take that on faith for a while. The fundamental idea is that these three are closely related, members of Spook Families that control history from the shadows, but the relationships of that type are hidden lest we all become suspicious of the “history”. If I can show that hidden relationship, well… you should get suspicious.

To establish that we’re dealing with the same Spook Families that I hope are becoming familiar, let me exhibit a single example and tell you that these brothers, Parley P. Pratt (1807-1857) and Orson Pratt Sr. (1811-1881), trace their ancestry in a direct line back to this woman:

Elizabeth (Clark) Parker, of Saybrook (1622-1682).

(If you want to do it yourself, start with Parley’s Geni record and keep clicking the father’s link until you see the oddly named “Joseph Joseph Pratt”. Elizabeth was his mother.)

Elizabeth was born a Clark, and married a Pratt and a then Parker. Take my word that I checked it out and these are indeed the right families. Note that she was born two centuries before Parley and Orson. If we fast-forward, you find out the Pratt family spawned the Romney and Huntsman families, bringing us four centuries from Elizabeth. See how good old “Mittens” isn’t even worth mentioning in this context?

BTW, do you know what triggered all this? I happened to notice that Parley P. Pratt was Parley Parker Pratt. “Couldn’t be,” I thought. Was. I also noted that they changed the title of his wiki page from having the middle name spelled out to just the initial. Think that was just typographic styling? I don’t. Remember I said we were going to focus on disinfo.

Our subject, though, is Billy the Kid, and concerning his purported short and violent life, who knows what of it is true so I don’t have much to say. We’ll more closely examine the bullshit and nonsense that has been accepted only about something as simple as his name, and the disinfo starts right out of the gate on his wiki page (rearranged for chronological order):

Henry McCarty (September 17 or November 23, 1859 – July 14, 1881), alias William H. Bonney, better known as Billy the Kid, was an American outlaw and gunfighter of the Old West…. Shortly before McCarty's mother died of tuberculosis on September 16, 1874, William Antrim abandoned the McCarty boys, leaving them orphans…. In 1877, he began to call himself "William H. Bonney".

Two birthdays and a wide variety of names. It seems a little sus. You can see even more of Billy’s names and his claimed genealogy here:

Henry "Billy the Kid" Bonney (McCarty), II (1859-1881)

A lot has been shoveled at us to unravel, so let’s check in with our gold standard for bleeding-edge conspiracy theory/top-level disinfo, Miles Mathis:

What you don't know about Billy the Kid may surprise you (12/27/2017 10-page PDF)

You may [think you] know that his full name was William H. Bonney. But it wasn't. His name wasn't William at all. It is now admitted by the mainstream sites that his real name was Henry McCarty. So how did he get William Bonney from that? We aren't told, the story simply being that he began referring to himself that way at age 18. No idea why, but it is a question you should ask. You should ask it, because it happens to have an answer.

In the world of Mathis, just about everyone is exposed as a gay Jew, but not in this case. He goes on to explain to us that “McCarty” is a variant of “McCartney”, and that he had recently exposed Paul Macartney as being from the British peerage. Thus, Billy would certainly be an aristocrat also. Mathis tells us that, for example, Billy was baptized in a church on Barclay Street, another one of the Spook Families he has exposed. It gets more… exotic from there. I remember at the time finding all this analysis dazzling, which I suppose was the objective. I reserve judgment on the Barclays, but I can say that I’ve yet to encounter them in my research.

Perhaps, however, we can start to see what is behind the smoke that was just blown all around us. Except, however, that is a practical impossibility. We have to see through it first, then we can turn around and recognize that all the other “information” was indeed “disinformation”.

The first and crucial item is this: I propose that the human being around which the legend/psyop was built was given the name William Henry Bonney at birth. “They” have completely jacked around with Billy’s genealogy but, reminiscent of a Mandela Effect, a residue was left behind. The “real” Billy the Kid (for whatever that means in a sea of falsehoods) is reflected in the genealogical databases as this person, William Antrim

The “William Antrim” we’re told about in the wiki is the second husband of Catherine (Billy’s mom), a man they call William Henry Harrison Antrim. I don’t think any such person ever existed, but let’s just sort all this out so that you might see that too.

Luckily, that last record hooks us into the real genealogy, the one they wished to hide with the snowstorm of BS from both wiki and Mathis. That last record from Geni tells us that his mother was:

Catherine Antrim (Devine) (1829-1874)

Born a Devine, and “hooking up with”, in some fashion, a McCarty and an Antrim. His father is listed as:

William Harrison Bonney (1803-1862)

Do you see now exactly where Mathis ran us off into the weeds? The question he posed did indeed have an answer, but it was nothing whatsoever like the one he gave us. Rather, all this jumble of names associated with Billy fell out from his real genealogy. Again, regrettably, you can’t tell this from the disarray you’re handed. You have to know the answer first.

I believe this is also where we get the two birthdays. You can find specific dates of birth going back half a millennia, so recording such things accurately was the norm. Here, father and son had the same name, “William H. Bonney”, and after all the f-ing around with our “history”, “historians” located both and did not know what they were looking at. I conclude that this was also the source of that very mysterious “II”—a subject no one touches—in the title of the Geni link way back at the beginning.

Sharp as you are, now you’re asking, “Well then how the hell did you know the answer, you dang disinfo agent?” Fair question, and the answer is I stumbled into it, just like pretty much every other thing. Theoretically, once you found William Harrison Bonney, you could have clicked on his mother, found out she was a Pratt, and went, “Herr merr gerrd!” That’s not what I did, though.

I had been doing genealogical research on Parley Parker Pratt, trying to find out if he really was one of those Parkers. I random-walked my way to the Ancestry of Willard Mitt Romney and page-downed over the few key lines:

Obadiah Pratt m. Jemima Tolls

  Rhoda Pratt m. Levi Bonney

     William Harrison Bonney m. Katherine Boujean

        WILLIAM HENRY BONNEY (1859-1881)

And there it kicked off, when I recognized William H. fricking Bonney as Billy the freaking Kid.

That guy Obadiah Pratt is—as you may confirm—the grandfather of Parley and Orson. I fibbed a tiny bit for headline purposes and Billy is technically the “first cousin once removed” of those two. But then again I think we can conclude that his father, William Harrison Bonney, first cousin of those Pratts, must have been up to his tits in all this. I hope you think I was fair about it.

Let me close with this entertainment, something Mathis brought up but did not make a very good point about. He shows some pics on page 6 of his paper, but if you just search for images of Billy the Kid, you’ll see the one I’ll talk about in a sec, the one that everyone sees but no one notices.

First, though, go back to the wiki where you’ll find a photo and long discussion about how Billy the Kid was not actually a lefty in the section “Dedrick ferrotype”. Now in the images you looked up, look for the one of him seated holding a pistol. That pistol is in his left hand too. But still not a lefty? Actually, who cares.

Did you notice that’s a woman? Mathis says the photo is a fake and maybe it is, but my point is what they’re showing us is a woman yet no one notices. Look, I’ll give xer the fruity necktie as possibly an antique style, but we also have a scoop-neck sweater and what seems to be a pony tail. And that hat? Is s/he going to a gunfight or to drink mimosas at the Kentucky Derby?

Bonus: I feel bad with a post all about (what I used to consider dry and valueless) genealogy, so let me add some more genealogy as a bonus. You know how we briefly mentioned the Romney family? Well, father of the United States of Freedom, George Washington, had a father-in-law, a guy named Joseph Ball. It turns out that George’s wife, Mary Ball Washington, was actually the daughter of Joseph’s second wife. His first wife was Elizabeth Romney. Weirdly, they’ll try to push on you for no reason (other than disinfo) that somehow her name was also or was actually Elizabeth Rogers. Yeah, lying right to our faces is hardly beyond Them.

Thanks for reading and I hope you came away enlightened!

Let me hook you with this: Someone close to the Kardashians was Satanically ritually murdered, they’re pinning it on some patsy, and there’s a coverup mostly composed of running out the clock while no one pays attention. And another Parker is involved, if you can believe it, but you’ll have to wait to the end. Oh, also the Aurora Theatrical Massacre.

I never go looking for these things, but I still find them. In this case, I was tidying up some notes and came across this peculiar Reddit post I had saved years ago:

I saw this on Conspiracy sub and it's VERY strange (r/conspiracy_commons 1/1/2022)

You don’t have to read it because there’s not much there. You’ll see that my comment is… not wrong, but far from right. When I casually went to check if anything had turned up on this in the years since, it all blew up in my face. As it always seems to.

The story concerns a middle-aged woman in LA named Angela “Angie” Kukawski, who was tortured and murdered. It was brutal and tragic, and all too common. And it’s not that we’re not all somebody, but she was not just anybody:

Business manager to Kardashians found dead; boyfriend charged with murder, torture (LA Times 12/29/2021)

Variety reported that Kukawski worked at Boulevard Management in Woodland Hills, where she had A-list clients, including Nicki Minaj, Kanye West and Offset. She also worked at some point with the Kardashians and the estate of Tupac Shakur….

Well, there’s a lot of haze about what went on with Tupac and is going on with Kanye, and we can’t even get started with the Kardashians, can we? Nor was it that she simply worked at a firm who handled these high-profile clients. She seemed personally connected:

Boyfriend arrested in torture-killing of Angela Kukawski, manager whose clients included Kardashians: Police believe the victim's boyfriend killed her in their Sherman Oaks home, placed her in her vehicle and drove to Simi Valley. (KABC Television 12/29/2021)

"Angela was truly the best," the Kardashian and Jenner family said in a statement provided to ABC7. "She cared about everyone of us and made things happen that were impossible. She will be greatly missed and we send our sincere condolences to her family and loved ones during this most difficult time."

Kukawski also worked with rapper Nicki Minaj, who wrote in an Instagram story, "Hardest working, most reliable, sweetest person you could ever know. You didn't deserve this, Angela. My heart is breaking for your children. Rest In Peace."

The narrative, in short, is that she was tortured and stabbed by her boyfriend, Jason Barker, in their Sherman Oaks home on the 21st or 22nd of December 2021. Barker then loaded her body into her car and drove it about 25-30 miles away to Simi Valley, where he abandoned it on the street near where a relative lived. Angela’s daughter called the police on the 22nd to report a missing person when she could not contact her mother, became suspicious of Barker’s story, and found certain disturbing signs at her mother’s home. We’re told they got right on the case and worked through the night:

Former business manager for Kardashians, Nicki Minaj found dead, boyfriend arrested (NY Post 12/29/2021)

“At about 2 a.m. on December 23, LAPD investigators contacted Simi Valley Police and said they were coming into our jurisdiction on this investigation that was initially characterized as missing person investigation,” Simi Valley Police spokesman Officer C.Nicholson said. “About an hour later, LAPD recontacted Simi Police and said they located the missing person, but unfortunately she was deceased in the car.” Police found Kukawski’s body in the back seat of the car, Nicholson said. Nicholson also confirmed that Barker has a relative who lives on the street in Simi Valley where Kukawski’s body and vehicle were found. LAPD arrested Barker at the family member’s apartment without any incident, Nicholson said.

Does any of that make sense? I’ll leave it to you to decide, but I have all kinds of questions, none of which are addressed in any coverage you’ll find. Does the LAPD really move that fast on a missing person, an adult not even gone a day? If they knew exactly where her car was, why did it take an hour to find it? If they didn’t know exactly, how did they find it at all? How did they know Barker had a relative nearby? Why did Barker run, but not run away? No warrant for any of this activity? Would there be any crime in LA if cops there were actually that skilled and conscientious?

Now the story gets weird. After Barker was arrested, he appeared briefly in court on the 12th of January, then was not arraigned until the 10th of May. It’s all really taking a while for a fairly straightforward case, isn’t it? We’re told in the second story that:

Barker’s next court appearance is 8:30 a.m. June 16 in the Van Nuys Courthouse. A preliminary hearing date will be set at that time.

Well, that preliminary hearing did not come for more than a year and a half, where they blew it all off again:

Jason Barker appears in court for allegedly torturing and killing his live-in girlfriend, Kardashian business manager Angela Kukawski (DailyMail 1/16/2024)

After hearing the testimony of just these two witnesses, Judge Shellie Samuels, burdened by a heavy court calendar, continued the preliminary hearing to March 11 when a medical examiner and police officers are expected to take the stand.

So much for that “speedy trial” nonsense. Nowhere in any of this is there a comment from—or even mention of the existence of—an attorney for Barker. Nor does anyone at any time even bring up the subject of motive. Just a thing that happened, m’kay? And we’re almost a year down the road from that “proceeding” and I can’t find anything has taken place since.

Now the story gets really weird. That was the point of that Reddit post: essentially no information is available on the victim, even though she was involved with some very high-profile people. There’s not a single selfie with any of them or any other shred of info besides one page the OP dug up. Here’s an archived copy:

Angela Kukawski Biography: Age, Career, Net Worth and Death (Contents101 12/31/2021)

Those first two photos, as you may confirm, are of Anne Rice the author and Virginia Giuffre the purported Epstein victim. I mean… what? It claims her net worth to have been $5M, which could be right but just hang on to that for a sec. The third photo may be of Angie, who knows? I was able to dig up one other page, which only makes it more bizarre. That third photo is the same as that of this person:

Angela Kukawski: Notary public in Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 (Snapdocs)

Being involved in money management, Angela may reasonably have been a notary. That site, though, is for those low-bucks mobile notaries that drive to your house with a laser printer. It appears to show some activity, too. Are we supposed to believe her day was something like, “I’m with Kanye—sorry, Ye—right now, but I can be at your place by 2pm.”? That doesn’t sound realistic at all, and certainly not if you have 5 mil.

I suppose at this point you could wave this all away as… well, whatever. The mind is unstoppable at making up good reasons for that which your subconscious demands you believe. For me, though, I stumbled onto Columbo’s iconic "just one more thing":

Angela Kukawski, Business Manager Whose Clients Included the Kardashians, Dies in Suspected Homicide (Hollywood Reporter 12/29/2021)

The crucial part isn’t from the story itself, it’s on the byline, from the bio of Former Senior Reporter Ryan Parker. Click on his name to find:

… before that was part of The Denver Post reporting team that was honored with the 2013 Pulitzer Prize in the breaking news category for coverage of the Aurora theater massacre.

It’s a story for another post, but I checked out his “reporting” on Aurora and it was where we got all the original bullshit from the time of the “event” (actually, the day before the event too, which is funny). I’d say we have yet another of the generational Satanist Parkers that we have talked so so so much about, standing just outside the spotlight of history, unnoticed.

In summary: Aurora was bullshit and God knows what happened to Angie at the hands of these Satanists.

PS: Look at Ryan’s profile pic. Does he remind you more of Sean or Robbie? Chunky Robbie, in my book.

PPS: I have to wonder if the patsy’s name is actually “Parker”, and they modified it slightly for this role.

My real point with these posts is to get the things that I come across off my chest by manifesting them into the Conspir-O-Verse. My alibi is that I’m somehow helping to advance the cause of Truth, and alleviate human suffering through some mechanism or another.

However you want to view that is fine, but speaking of viewing, I wish others could see the world through my eyes, at least when they wanted to. I see “Them” all the time, and in such a way that I can’t take off the special glasses. Which brings us to today, when I was skimming this story about an event I’d never heard of before:

US Navy apologizes for Alaska atrocity: A Tlingit village destroyed in 1882 has accepted the “long overdue” gesture (RT 10/29/2024)

Read it, it’s shocking! You’d think with this and everything else that all the SJWs in the world would get on board and really start mean-mugging the military, right? But no, once again we see that SJWs are not really driven by a desire for justice. It’s something else entirely. Anyway, as I glanced down the page, this single sentence stuck:

According to the Navy’s version of events, a Tlingit shaman called Tith Klane died when a harpoon gun exploded on a whaling ship he worked on.

That was enough. You see, one of the main nests where “They” first lodged in North America was Nantucket Island. They proceeded to get into the slaughter of marine mammals and made a killing in the whaling game. Was there a connection to this outrage? You already know there is.

I should briefly mention that this took place in the context of the Alaska Purchase, supposedly ridiculed at the time as “Seward’s Folly”. That refers to Abraham Lincoln’s Secretary of State, William H. Seward. Most don’t know that Seward was a target of the same plot that assassinated Lincoln. Very few know that both were fake, my point being that—then as now—shenanigans were all about. Pressing on….

The incident in question is known as the Angoon Bombardment. It was a Zio-level slaughter. You can read up on the fairly disjointed narrative, but the scenario has a missing plot element from the very beginning. Did commercial enterprises just telegraph the US Military something like, “Hey, these ice bunnies are giving us some trouble. Could you get out here and stomp all over them? STOP” I sincerely doubt that. It seems more reasonable that someone had a word with someone who could do a thing, if you get my drift. So who was that?

The outfit that owned the ship where the inciting incident took place was the North West Trading Company. It had been established only three years previously by Henry Villard. This guy isn’t the jackpot, but his story is sus as hell:

He became a pacifist as a result of his experiences covering the two conflicts at home and abroad of the Civil War and European wars In the late 1860s.

But, uh, smoking these Eskimos was okay with him? Maybe they don’t count as people. Maybe none of us do. In any case, this guy, along with a man named Charles A. Coffin, stole General Electric out from under Thomas Edison. A story for another day but keep that other guy’s name in mind. For our story, the key sentence comes directly after that bullshit about Villard being a pacifist:

He married women's suffrage advocate Helen Frances Garrison (nicknamed "Fanny") and the daughter of famed newspaper publisher and slavery abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison (1805–1879)….

You see, I haven’t touched on it before, but the whole “social reform” movement of the second half of the 19th Century was the same as the “social justice” movement we have today. That is, both were basically entirely bullshit and should be more accurately called “social engineering”. Seriously, can anyone possibly be familiar with the full context—as we are discussing—and still believe that any of these “persons” had any interest in “reform” or “justice”? C’mon, man.

If you skim the very, very long wiki of William Lloyd Garrison, there are a lot of orange flags rather than red ones. That is, I would class this guy as “JV”, a hireling rather than a bloodline Satanist. That’s all the difference in the world for followers of “The Old Religion”.

Speaking of such followers, one of the red flags was that Garrison’s hometown was Newburyport, Massachusetts. That’s a quick shot straight up I-95 from Salem. And yep, that’s the other big nest, which eventually leaked all into the greater Boston area.

And speaking of leaking, did you ever hear the theory that Lyme disease was a bioweapon that leaked out of a lab on Plum Island? Well, that island is adjacent to Newburyport, just to the east and southeast. The majority of that island (I suppose the parts that aren’t military bioweapons research facilities) makes up the Parker River National Wildlife Refuge. Yes, that is “those” Parkers. Imagine that.

Now let’s take a quick look at how “history” is written, from the shadiest of institutions that is still somehow accepted as a “gold standard of science” but is here flogging us with social justice:

When Emancipation Finally Came, Slave Markets Took on a Redemptive Purpose: During the Civil War, the jails that held the enslaved imprisoned Confederate soldiers. After, they became rallying points for a newly empowered community (Smithsonian Magazine 2/26/2018)

Walking along the streets, northern journalist Charles C. Coffin saw the old guardhouse where “thousands of slaves had been incarcerated there for no crime whatever, except for being out after nine o’clock, or for meeting in some secret chamber to tell God their wrongs, with no white man present.”

Taking in these horrors, Coffin thought that perhaps some of the Massachusetts abolitionists, like Governor John A. Andrew, Wendell Phillips, or William Lloyd Garrison, might like to speak from the steps of the slave mart. Within a month, such a scene would take place.

Oh God, I told myself I wasn’t going to cry… (okay, better). But do you remember the Charles A. Coffin we were just talking about, working with Garrison’s son-in-law to screw over Edison? Does anyone feel they really need to see the genealogy on these two?

Let’s wind up with that joke I promised you, but you may need a bit of premise. Remember I mentioned Nantucket? It was settled in the mid 1600’s by a group led by Tristram Coffin, and they hired a local named Peter Folger. You’ve already seen some Coffins come in, right?

I also mentioned the “social reform” movement to be an op, and one of the big components was Feminism. The modern version was born in 1848 at the Seneca Falls Conference, put on by Elizabeth Cady Stanton (we will get to you one of these days, Liz) and Lucretia Mott, of Maude theme-song fame. Lucretia was the child of Thomas Coffin and Anna Folger. I wanted you to see how Folgers are mixed up in this with all the other Spooks. Also, if anyone isn’t up to speed, just know that:

The Tate Murders were a False Flag (Miles Mathis 6/29/2014 95-page PDF)

That’s a landmark paper, more than enough to expose the event as a phony. Mathis is also a phony, a top-level agent of disinformation. We take what we can use. Which is why I thought it was so funny--but then again maybe not--that I had read that entire paper but Mathis never mentions this guy once:

TIME CAPSULE: Local resident adds 'strange' details about gory Manson killing spree (Lancaster [OH] Eagle-Gazette 8/9/2009)

I never knew he existed before from any other source, either. I think his whole story is BS, and was included at the time to add “realism” to the narrative but dropped later on in “history”.

What a setup for a joke, huh? If you didn’t read the article, the name of this supposed near eye-witness is William Garretson. Uh, that’s awfully close to the “William Garrison” we’ve been looking at, isn’t it?

I get that that may seem like as stretch, but I would also remind you that the name of one of the supposed Manson victims was Abigail “Gibby” Folger, heiress to the coffee fortune and direct descendant of Peter Folger. Sheesh, her dad was even named Peter.

Thanks for reading and Happy Halloween!

(Stay tuned to the very end: yet another Parker shows up!)

This post is about Elites that were always visible, yet never seen, and biowarfare that was entirely out in the open, yet never entered our consciousness. I take pains to point this out because that’s how the Shadow War against us is really run at the highest levels. We don’t fight against it because we have no idea it’s going on.

I certainly didn’t. This is all as much news to me as it probably is to you. I mean, I kind of tried to avoid sugar because of the unnecessary calories. We don’t need food to be nearly as sweet are we’ve become used to. I had also heard talk out on the periphery about a link between sugar and cancer. But then, you hear a lot of stuff about our food, don’t you? So in another strange case of coincidental timing, Ron Unz published this on his site yesterday about just how bad sugar really is for us:

American Pravda: Is Sugar the Deadliest White Powder Drug? (unz.com 10/28/2024)

Diabetes ranks as the eighth leading cause of death, annually killing more than 100,000 Americans, while being a contributing factor in 300,000 additional deaths. Meanwhile, a study last year indicated that obesity substantially boosted the risk of death, potentially by as much as 91%, and with so many tens of millions of Americans suffering from that condition, the mortality impact has obviously been enormous. By contrast, the combined total of all our drug-overdose deaths is a little over 100,000.

As sort of canonical conspiracy theory, we have the CIA bringing in crack to destroy black communities, and fentanyl flooding across the border in a reverse “opium war”. Some will even claim that’s literally what it is, with the Chinese getting long overdue payback. (BTW, that claim is based on no direct evidence and I doubt they are initiating it.) So we're talking about something much bigger here, and more specific to our thesis is this article:

The Sugar and Cancer Connection: Why Sugar Is Called “The White Death” (The Truth About Cancer 7/1/2021)

Take note of the skyrocketing rates of sugar consumption starting before the turn of the 20th Century. I contend here that it wasn’t happenstance, but intentional. As to who is initiating what, let’s get around to naming some names.

When you hear “sugar” and “cancer” together, what’s the first thing that comes to mind? Is it… General Motors Company? I would not have thought so either until very, very recently, but it should be. Go ahead and scan that wiki and see if you can find the clue.

Okay, I know nobody wasted their time on that trick question. You can’t get to where we’re going by reading that wiki. Which brings up a meta-point: “They” hide their doings by snipping the tiniest threads and pushing dirt over a handful of critical shiny beads. That’s what They did here. The only reason I could see it is because we had just talked about one of those crucial shiny beads right here yesterday:

Peek behind the Flint water crisis and you’ll find the Motts (oh, and they also run General Motors and maybe the state of Michigan) (conspiracies.win 10/28/2024)

That shiny bead is Charles Stewart Mott. If you read his wiki, he ran the fucking joint for decades, but if you read the GM wiki they don’t even mention him! Does that seem right to you? Of course not. They snipped that thread.

You see, more crucial threads are in Mott’s wiki, but impossible to notice them while looking through the wrong end of the telescope. They seem absolutely innocuous. One is that in 1931, Mott purchased U.S. Sugar. The other is that, “His closest proteges at the helm of GM were Alfred P. Sloan, Jr. and Charles Kettering.”

The sugar angle is the easiest. If you look at the sidebar, you find who U.S. Sugar—raining down ungodly amounts of the White Death on all of us every year—is currently owned by:

Company's pension fund and employees (40% estimate), Mott Children's Health Center (22%), Charles Stewart Mott Foundation (19%), Community Foundation of Greater Flint (6%)

Okay, Mott and Mott, and we can guess who controls the pension and employees’ fund. Also, remember CFGF from the other post, pumping money into Flint to help with the water trouble? Either Michiganders on the border of Canada are interested in sugar too, or they are just a front for more Motts. Motts all around, eh?

The other angle, that of cancer and bioweapons, is harder to get at and thus more intriguing. Well, those protégés of Mott that were mentioned before take up an interest in cancer (or so we are supposed to believe) and set up what is now known as the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Did you scan that wiki for red flags? If you scroll almost all the way to the end you’ll see that one of the past presidents of the predecessor institution, the General Memorial Hospital for the Treatment of Cancer and Allied Diseases, was Laurance Rockefeller. If you spotted that you get… zero points. I didn’t even click on it.

Reflex to the mention of a Rockfeller is for the standard-issue conspiracy theorist, but we’re going deeper. The gold strike is this guy: John Edward Parsons, who ran the place for the first three decades. Name ring a bell? We’ve discussed a lot of Parsons lately, and one of the first we talked about a few months ago concerned a particular Parsons that is quite prominent in conspiracy circles:

The occult genealogy of Jack Parsons is not at all what you think (conspiracies.win 6/22/2024)

No matter how much you’ve heard about Jack, you never hear about his relatives, do you? The question here: is John Edward of “that” Parsons family? The answer, I firmly believe, is yes, but the evidence is not through direct genealogy. Rather, it’s circumstantial and will take us through—if you can imagine—the real roots of the financial behemoth JPMorgan. That’s a big future post, but for now I’ll have to ask a little provisional faith. I think at this point you’d be more surprised if John Edward was just coincidentally named Parsons.

We’re finally getting to it. If you go back to the MSK wiki, you’ll find this:

In 1948, Cornelius P. Rhoads became the director of Memorial. Rhoads had run chemical weapons programs for the United States Army in World War II, and had been involved in the work that led to the discovery that nitrogen mustards could potentially be used as cancer drugs.

Yes, they’re talking about mustard gas. Ever heard chemotherapy is just a bunch of poison? You can thank Cornelius P. Rhoads for literally introducing the use of chemical weapons on people to “heal” them. But, maybe he was a healer and this was the best therapeutic, right? I don’t know about that.

There had been a big scandal back in 1931 when Rhoads was working out of Puerto Rico. Shockingly, they admit to it right in his wiki, because no one’s ever heard of this guy anyway I guess. This article has a bit more detail:

Racism and “Dreams of Extermination” in Puerto Rico: U.S. Biological Warfare and the Legacy of Dr. Cornelius Rhoads (Global Research 3/28/2020)

I think it’s worth an extended quote from the notorious letter he wrote regarding the local population:

They are beyond doubt the dirtiest, laziest, most degenerate and thievish race of men ever inhabiting this sphere. It makes you sick to inhabit the same island with them. They are even lower than Italians. What the island needs is not public health work but a tidal wave or something to totally exterminate the population. It might then be livable. I have done my best to further the process of extermination by killing off 8 and transplanting cancer into several more. The latter has not resulted in any fatalities so far… The matter of consideration for the patients’ welfare plays no role here — in fact all physicians take delight in the abuse and torture of the unfortunate subjects.

Neat guy, huh? Let’s have him lead off the “Race for the Cure”! So now you see the plan: flood our diets with sugar, give us all fucking cancer, hire a psychopathic genocidal military bioweapons guy, tell all us fools they’re going to cure us, and give us even more poison. You’re welcome, plebs! That’s about it in a nutshell, isn’t it?

You saw the astounding Battle Damage Assessment in the quote from the Unz article. Look how far afield we had to go to get something like the real story. Whatever the opposite of “common knowledge” is, this is it.

Bonus/not bonus, because I don’t have the answer: There was another quote from that Rhoads letter that caught my eye:

The situation is settled in Boston. Parker and Nye are to run the laboratory together and either Kenneth or MacMahon to be assistant; the chief to stay on.

There is just no information whatsoever that I can find on who “Parker” is. If we’re starting a pool on whether this Parker is one the generational Satanist Parkers that are woven into this collection of Spook Families through the centuries, I know where my money is going. Add in the fact that it’s Boston. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy filled with these freaks.

By the time you get to the end of this, you may no longer be of the view that Gretchen Whitmer is just some loony leftist that came out of nowhere. Her puppethood may have something to do with the Motts, another of the Elite Spook Families. We haven’t talked about them very much and they really seemed like minor players when we encountered them in:

It’s a (very) Small World 3x3: 3 Elite Families working together in 3 locations (and no one ever noticed) (conspiracies.win 3/31/2024)

It turns out there’s more and more to say about them. It’s funny I came across them again so quickly, because they just came up in a post a couple of days ago about a very different subject:

Colonel Tom Parker, the handler of Elvis Presley, was a Parker (yes, one of the generational Satanist Parkers, but we’ll have to get through several layers of disinformation to get there) (conspiracies.win 10/26/2024)

Colonel Tom was married to a Mott. Since the Motts will be unfamiliar to some, I would briefly add—without pausing to document them here—a couple of references. Modern Feminism did not kick off as a CIA op, but began way back in 1848 with Lucretia Mott. Also, you know that famous painting of Washington crossing the Delaware? The local guide that led colonial forces to the boat launching point was John Mott. I hope everyone is getting a sense of the depth and breadth of the web that has been “occulted” from us all along.

As always, I stumbled into this, deep into a podcast about a subject in which I had no interest, the Flint water crisis:

#817: We the Poisoned: Uncovering the Flint Water Crisis with Jordan Chariton (Tin Foil Hat With Sam Tripoli [1:43] 9/24/2024)

(If you take exception to my lack of interest, allow me to interject this in my defense: it’s not that I don’t care about the people of Flint, but every single person—including the skilled and caring investigative journalist Jordan Chariton--is going to attribute the problem to “shitty pipes” or “capitalists” or “leftists” or “Jews” or “Jesuits” or whatever, and they will never, ever, ever get to what we’re talking about here. We’re hunting bigger game and this is our safari.)

Sam Tripoli is very entertaining (IMHO) and Chariton is very well-informed and articulate about the scandal (IMHO), so you may want to listen to the whole podcast. But if you fast-forward to 1:05:40 he starts getting to the part that I zeroed in on.

Specifically, he says that no national media would touch the story, even after he’d done all the work, always giving him some bullshit excuse. He actually mentions that the local rag, The Flint Journal, rents their building from the Motts. All due respect, but I don’t think Jordan gets how powerful the forces at work here are. At about 1:12, he starts talking about our jumping off point, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation.

Again, Jordan has no idea who he’s dealing with. My whole point in these posts is to spread the word on who we’re dealing with. He comments about the founder, Charles Stewart Mott, that “everything I know is he was a swell guy”. Not to bash, but you see how much he’s already missing? Let’s start with the basics:

For many decades Mott would remain the single largest individual shareholder in [General Motors], and accumulate wealth in excess of $800 million. His closest proteges at the helm of GM were Alfred P. Sloan, Jr. and Charles Kettering…. He served on the GM Board of Directors for 60 years, from 1913 until his death in 1973. He was Mayor of the City of Flint in 1912–1913 and was defeated for re-election in 1914, but was again elected in 1918.

In short, this guy ran GM and Flint for a long, long time. Okay, Mott may have been a Mott, but was he a swell guy? Well, take a look at his “Personal life” section:

C.S. Mott married Ethel Culbert Harding in 1900…. Ethel Mott died in 1924 at age 43 after falling from the window of her second-story bedroom. In 1927, Mott married his second wife Mitlies Rathburn…. She died on February 26, 1928 [age 36]. In March 1929, Mott married his third wife, Dee Furey, and filed for divorce in October of the same year. In 1934 Mott married his fourth wife, Ruth Rawlings….

That’s really ripping through a lot of wives, isn’t it? And how about dying from a fall through a second-story window? Maybe he had a big giant mansion and the windows were really up there, huh? Well, you know what else his wiki left out? I came across it in this article:

Flint mayor walks back water crisis accusation against Mott Foundation: Mayor Neeley claimed in a newly published interview that the powerful foundation handpicked the city’s emergency managers (Detroit Metro Times 6/12/2024)

Neeley also invoked the 2015 book Demolition Means Progress: Flint, Michigan, and the Fate of the American Metropolis, which alleged that the foundation’s namesake, General Motors stockholder Charles Stewart Mott, enabled and supported racist policies.

Noted racist, huh? Also, did anyone catch the ordo ab chao? Great stuff! If you read the article, Mayor Neeley says that it wasn’t the Mott Foundation, it was Governor Rick Snyder that picked the emergency managers. Alright, but that doesn’t close the circle, does it? Doesn’t that imply that the foundation controlled the Governor? I think they had that kind of juice:

Flint resident Jay Nino Ewell responded, “I ain’t seen nobody back pedal this fast since Deion Sanders was on the field.”

Neeley also goes out of his way to bash Chariton. I think we all get what went on. That article illustrates, in a nutshell, how the whole outrage was relabeled a “crisis” and covered up. But Chariton himself never closes the circle tightly: Motts were responsible for most of the original pollution of the river, Motts were responsible for a lot of the original Flint water system, Motts say their foundation is going to help the people, and Motts are fucking the people over. Oh, but how could I say they aren’t helping when wiki told us this?:

As of September 8, 2017, the Ruth Mott Foundation and the Community Foundation of Greater Flint had directed a combined $33,480,494 to various programs to aid both children and adults affected by Flint's water crisis.

A goodly amount of ducats for anyone, right? That ain’t no bullshit, neither. It’s confirmed with a citation and you can read it right in the very first paragraph:

See how $33.4M in Flint water crisis grants, donations have been spent (Michigan Live 9/8/2017)

Over the past 18 months, the Ruth Mott Foundation and Community Foundation of Greater Flint have directed a combined $33,480,494 to various programs to aid both children and adults affected by Flint’s lead-in-water crisis.

Wait, I missed that combined before. Hmm… hang on… here’s the breakdown later in the story:

Since February 2016, the Ruth Mott Foundation – which, Lindsey noted, is separate from Flint’s C.S. Mott Foundation – has directed a total of $818,300 in grant money toward water crisis-related causes. The Community Foundation of Greater Flint has garnered a total of $32,662,194 in gifts targeted toward the water crisis and recovery.

Oh, c’mon people, 2.4% is going to get you marquee billing in any news story, any time! That is weight in anyone’s book. I just hope the ingrate darkies that live in Flint don’t go blow the whole 2.4% on Newports.

In closing, let me ask something of anyone reading this. If you haven’t done so already, go listen to that podcast linked at the beginning, starting from the first time code. Knowing what you know now, listen to Chariton with the same ears as me. His finger gets so close to the electrified third rail we’re grabbing on to. Even though it’s only a millimeter away, that air gap of awareness makes all the difference, doesn’t it? You keep wishing to God he’d just make contact.

If you’ve read to the end, thanks. And if you’re thinking, “This is some outrageous bullshit no one is talking about,” well… it gets worse. If the names Sloan and Kettering mentioned above reminded you of something having to do with cancer treatment, you’re not going to believe what I have to say about cancer, sugar, Motts, Parsons, bioweapons, and slow-kill genocide.

For anyone who’s been following along, it seems like I’m stuck on blast with these Parkers. Frankly, when I began with them I thought they were all very minor compared to other families, so I wanted to “get them out of the way” first because it would be simple and easy. Honestly, I still think so, which should give you some indication of how much more crazy bullshit has gone on in “history”.

So it struck me yesterday that the handler of Elvis, one of the preeminent entertainers of the modern era, was… a Parker. Colonel Tom Parker, to be precise. It just never occurred to me before because the subject of Elvis had been covered in-depth nearly a decade ago by Miles Mathis, one of the preeminent conspiracy researchers of the modern era:

Elvis Aron Presley: Intelligence Project (Miles Mathis 12/15/2015 32-page PDF)

Yes, he’s disinfo and we’ll get there, but for now, in addition to other claims in this writeup you may not believe, when I went to check it out I was hoping for a dry well. Save myself the effort but keep a clear conscience, you know? Some people named Parker are just people named Parker. Of course I know that! But it’s not what we’re going to find in this case.

I thought I got off easy in the first sentence of his wiki when I saw that Parker was not even his real name. Louisiana Colonel Thomas Andrew Parker was born Dutchman Andreas Cornelis van Kuijk. Done! Except that my eyes drifted briefly down the page and I saw in the sidebar that in 1935, he married Marie Francis Mott. Mentally and emotionally, I felt like I fell off a cliff.

You see, way back when I thought there was almost nothing to the Parkers, I included them in this post as tied in to the Motts and Coffins across time and space:

It’s a (very) Small World 3x3: 3 Elite Families working together in 3 locations (and no one ever noticed) (conspiracies.win 3/31/2024)

Seems a helluva lot longer than seven months ago to me. There has been a lot more about the Parkers since then, like these writeups on the CIA’s Phoenix Program in Vietnam, Jim Jones and Jonestown, and LAPD Chief William Parker and the Black Dahlia. There is a lot more (but look how organized I’m getting!).

So, in a reverso, I believe Thomas Andrew Parker was indeed his real name. (I didn’t see that coming, either.) And here is sort of a deep reference which indicates to me it’s authentic. You ever hear of the King of England? His wife the Queen is (sorry to be crass but I’m trying to make a point) sloppy seconds. Camilla Parker Bowles used to be married to Andrew Parker Bowles. She got her name from him.

Very quickly in that wiki, right at the start of the second paragraph, they name drop the heavy hitters that he is the great-great-grandson of: Thomas Parker, 6th Earl of Macclesfield, and his wife Ann Parker Bowles. Also, well over a century later, the firstborn of Andrew was a son named Thomas Henry Charles Parker Bowles. Lots of duplicate names floating around, huh? We should also take a second to note that the children of the reigning Queen of the United Kingdom and Commonwealth realms are Parkers.

Now, what’s written in wiki is light-duty disinfo, and before we turn to the industrial stuff let’s take a look at something commercial-grade:

Colonel Parker Managed Elvis’ Career, but Was He a Killer on the Lam? The man who brought The King to global fame kept his own past secret. But what exactly was Tom Parker hiding? (Smithsonian Magazine 2/24/2012)

Without even reading it, I’m going to call bullshit. I will simply pose the question to you of what seems more likely: that the Smithsonian Institution traffics in conspiracy theory, or that this is some dirt thrown in the water long after the fact to give Elvis fans and conspiracy theorists a spicy and phony dead end to go down? On my scorecard, the Smithsonian is the conspiracy.

The “fool’s gold” standard for conspiracy theory on this topic was the paper by disinfo agent supreme Miles Mathis, as linked above. I suggest you actually read the section in the middle that discusses Parker. That’s what I did, many years ago. In fact, I lapped it up. I was so impressed at the level of knowledge, the powers of observation, the insight! I aspired—just a hope, really—to become such a researcher myself.

Fast-forward and I realize now just how much of it—true or not—turns out to be disinformation. Did Mathis mention any of the things we’ve looked at? You can keep an eye out as you read further to note if he discussed any of the points we’ll see next.

Basically, he pushes us to think that Parker is a Dutchman, and related to the Philips industrialists. Before we proceed, let me say that indeed there are mid- and low-profile Dutch families that have for centuries been up to a lot of sus activities in America: Roosevelts, Astors, Bushes, Hamiltons, Livingstons, etc. Examine the Schuyler family if you want to get a sense of the connections. General Hoyt S. Vandenberg, of Space Force Base fame, was the first Director of the CIA and set up the Roswell Incident hoax/coverup (a story for another day). My point is, these Dutch should be exposed for what they’ve done. Mathis doesn’t mention any of them, so you see what my real point is.

If you can find any real gold nuggets in anything Miles has to say about Tom Parker, good for you. A disinfo agent must always include some truth, after all. From Mathis we get, “He looks Dutch, doesn’t he?” Also, he spends a lot of time discussing how Parker was a colonel. Contrarily, I don’t think Tom was Dutch at all. I leave it to you to decide if he was or not, but here’s what Tom sounded like:

COLONEL TOM PARKER - Interview on "ABC Nightline" (Aug 15, 1987) (YouTube 7:03 8/15/1987)

No trace of a Dutch accent I can detect. One thing I’ve noticed about non-native speakers is that they never lose their accents completely, but only to a level they find comfortable and stop there for the rest of their lives. “Ahnold” is a good example of this. But for comparison with Col. Tom, here’s a gin-u-wine Southerner:

Pascagoula man recalls the time he was abducted by aliens (YouTube 3:40 2/16/2023)

Did you catch who that was? Calvin Parker. His accent is a bit more harsh because Pascagoula is halfway between Mobile and New Orleans. More Southern than that and the accent becomes Mexican. A month ago, we stomped all over that particular Parker’s claim to fame here:

The Pascagoula Abduction was another psyop by the Parker family of generational Satanists (with a bonus connection to Aleister Crowley) (conspiracies.win 9/25/2024)

If you’re new to the Parkers and were wondering how Satan fit into all this, you can find it there. But in any case, I think Tom was a legit Son of the South. When wiki begins the tale of the Lost Dutchman, it says that he was in the area of Georgia. Okay, yes, it’s just that I think he was actually born there. He floats around, but we finally get something concrete when he joins the Army and goes to basic training at Fort McPherson in Atlanta.

Now bear with me as we take a weird left turn (technically it’s right). If you start at McPherson and head east and a bit north, in about an hour and a half you’ll come to Elbert County, Georgia. If you’ve never heard of it, of course you haven’t. Few people live there and there’s nothing to see. At least not anymore, after the Georgia Guidestones got very mysteriously blowed up real good then erased from the face of the Earth.

Is that location mere happenstance? Well, in all the scrolling I’ve done on r/conspiracy and listening to of endless podcast interviews where occult nerds drone on with 100% certainty about numerology and gematria and ley lines and the like, I never once heard one of them suggest such an explanation for the location of the Guidestones. Or any explanation of any type, actually.

Frankly, I don’t know why they were erected there either if that’s what you were hoping for, but I do know one thing: a certain Chuck Manson-looking character showed there in Elbert County 240 years ago for no given reason. His name? Daniel Parker. Is there something there where there appears to be nothing, that They know about and We do not? Your guess is as good as mine. (Seriously, though, take a look because he does look like Manson. Those famous murders were another hoax put on by the same people, so… just sayin’.)

If you look on a map of Georgia counties (1-page PDF), I would also note here that similarly close to Atlanta but to the southeast are Putnam and Warren counties. Well, Parkers, Putnams, Warrens, and a raft of other families have been tied up together since before the “as seminal as they were phony” Salem Witch Trials (17-page PDF), the psyop that keeps on giving. What I’m saying is that They seem to have been operating out of the area for a long time, and it may not be pure happenstance that Fani Willis is running her 21st Century witch trial out of Atlanta.

Bonus: This is not evidentiary in any way, but I thought you’d like to know about this short clip:

"A Diabolical Genius In Every Way" - Tom Hanks On Colonel Tom Parker (YouTube 6:24 6/17/2022)

Yes, Parker was played in a movie by Tom Hanks (arch Hollyweird PDF file?) and he talks about it with Stephen Colbert (annoying douche and fellow PDF file?). I’d say don’t bother watching it, but at about 2:40 you find out that, in a promotional effort, Elvis was vaccinated for polio backstage of the Ed Sullivan show at that very theater. You cannot make this up. Also, as in the title of the linked clip, just know that technically speaking, “diabolical” means “of the Devil”. You really cannot make this up.

There are more subtle points. Colbert remarks that before he saw the movie, he knew that Tom Parker existed but didn’t really know anything about him, or even what he looked like. That’s the theme with these families we’ve been talking about. They are on-scene to manipulate major events, yet somehow remain outside the spotlight of the public consciousness. There’s real magick, if you ask me, and not the fake-ass Crowley kind.

Before playing a clip from the film, Hanks describes it as, “the moment the cultural zeitgeist of Western society changed forever.” That’s major, right? Yet only now do you realize the true context of it all.

Thanks for reading, and please be kind to your waitresses!

First, for reference, the mainstream publishes these vagaries about the mysterious events above the Earth:

Boeing-made satellite shatters in orbit, and nobody knows why: The Boeing-made Intelsat 33e satellite broke apart in orbit over the weekend. But company representatives don't yet know why. (LiveScience 10/23/2024)

Jim Stone at jimstonereloaded.com (archived here https://archive.is/sII25) has this to say about it:

America's Intelsat 33E destroyed by foreign powers

UPDATE: Rumor has it that moments after Intelsat 33e was destroyed, Russia sank the entire Ukranian black sea fleet, 22 vessels in total.

looking for details now but NOTHING is getting through the censors. Why would this be censored? Because if Intelsat 33E is gone, a U.S. response is going to be difficult, and more importantly, it is possible that the sinking cannot be "officially" confirmed with that satellite gone.

OK, for now, Intelsat33E is definitely gone. Waiting for real confirmation on the sinking of the Ukranian navy. With today's tech and serious countries like Russia as an opponent, ships are going to look stupid. Not viable, so the story sounds convincing but more proof needed.

UPDATE: The story is being morphed to imply Intelsat 33E was civilian. Reality: if it is not replaced, America can't attack Iran without "unacceptable" losses, Intelsat 33e was 100 percent military, the war machine needed it.

I am willing to bet however that there's a backup that will soon be active, they just need to shorten the life span of another satellite by telling it to use it's stability thrusters to reposition it where it can be used for war. So this story is not over. Let's see if the replacement suffers an untimely death also.

The US has not admitted it, but a debris field containing about 80 large pieces makes denying it stupid.

Intelsat 33E was the most important military communications satellite in the atlantic/african/European theater. Satellites don't just transform into debris fields and I think Trump's threat to strike Moscow probably had something to do with it.

Officially Intelsat 33E is a communications satellite that was deployed in 2017 for "government use". It had a throughput of about 50 gigabits per second which is 10X more than most communications satellites. And now the punch line:

Satellites are fragile, AND WITH THEM, WAR WITH ARABS IS EASY. Get my drift?

It's destruction was as big an act of war as sinking a battleship. That baby was not cheap. I wonder what the response from the Pentagon will be, when something that was definitely radar cloaked and probably Russian did it, with no way to prove it. Russia likely has assigned a toxic companion to ALL military satellites that are not theirs, how is that going to work out for a military that needs to suck data like a baby pacifier to win?

Things just got interesting.

Confirmed: Even the censors are admitting Intelsat 33E no longer exists. War with Russia is not going to be "plug and play".

I’m sure you thought Al Gore was just some stupid fat sack, an arrogant and corrupt lackey now looking to stuff his bank account instead of his mouth by pimping a multi-trillion dollar global swindle. That’s true, to be sure, but that’s not all he is.

File this set of outlandish hidden links under the heading, “You just can’t make this shit up”. The point of this is not so you’ll run out and do something about it, or even that you’ll have some high-octane fuel to ruin Thanksgiving for your normie family. The point, really, is to attempt to alter your worldview, so that you come to realize—as I have—that’s there is a shadow world all around us with an occulted history that They never mention on the news, and that has never been the theme of any popular TV show or film.

We begin with Sandy Hoax (which will seem like a tame and familiar prank by the end of this). Adam Lanza was almost certainly a made-up person, but his mother seems real enough. Part of the “event” was her retirement from public view. There’s a lot more to her backstory than that. I haven’t heard any mention of this in a decade, but one thread leading away from her is discussed in this article:

Sandy Hook, Hippie Communes, and US Homeland Security (Activist Post 8/14/2014)

The part we’re interested in is that Nancy had a brother—a police officer of all things—named James Champion. Now, for some reason—and it’s nothing I can substantiate or discuss further—I can’t shake the strange feeling that being a cop is an attractive job for a Satanist. Anyway….

Jim Champion used to live in Summertown, Tennessee. That’s a very tiny dot on the map, with a population well under a thousand even now. A couple of hundred of those residents live in some kind of hippie commune called The Farm.

Who knows whether it’s fully legit or a pure front for a secluded MKULTRA facility. It’s surprising to me that a collective of agrarian Gaia worshippers has a wiki page at all, and a very long one at that. Also note that they came out from Haight-Ashbury in 1971. Know who else was active there just before that? Chuck Manson. If you’ve studied the fake Manson murders (95-page PDF), then you may have the Haight Ashbury Free Medical Clinic and other organizations there marked down as CIA fronts. I’m just saying that Haight-Ashbury is not a very big neighborhood at all.

The Intelligence links will seem bland as our story takes the next turn. There was and is a house of worship just a couple of miles northeast of Summertown, on the opposite side from The Farm, named the “Sandy Hook Church of Christ”. You read that right. The founder of the commune, Stephen Gaskin, would speak to the congregation there:

“I think it’s been profitable for all of us”, said Bobby Williams, minister of Sandy Hook Church of Christ. “Our first impulse was to associate them with Charles Manson and their first impulse was to associate us with their unfavorable religious background.”

Maybe you should have followed that impulse, Bob. Anyway, here’s our next strange turn: that quote is repeated in the article linked previously but it’s originally from a 1972 article in The Tennessean, written by their very new investigative reporter, a young Al Gore. You read that right. At this point, let me just interject that I do not know what this all means, but I do not believe it to be delightful happenstance.

It would certainly seem a lot more like happenstance if Al was just a random fat fuck. Is he? I sincerely doubt it. To begin, the late writer Gore Vidal (he used his mother’s maiden name as his pen name) claimed up until the time of his death that he and Al were distant cousins. After he passed, “They” took great pains to “correct the record”:

Corrections on The New York Times' Gore Vidal Obituary Are Amazing: He did have sex with him; he called him a crypto-Nazi, not crypto-fascist; and he wasn't related to Al Gore. The corrections on the New York Times' Gore Vidal obituary are so perfectly Vidal. (The Atlantic 8/1/2012)

Dead men tell no counter-arguments, right? They will even show it to you formally with a genealogy, giving us this quite detailed Ancestry of Al Gore that yields no connection to Gore Vidal. Proof! Well, we’re not going to stop with what we’re handed (because that’s how They get ya).

When you think of Al, you think of Tennessee, don’t you? If you start with Al’s first ancestor in America, John Goare, you’ll see that for four generations they lived in Middlesex County, VA. Then the next generation lived in Shenandoah County, VA, then they moved out to TN. If you look on a map you’ll see that both of those counties are in the vicinity of today’s District of Columbia, about 60-70 miles away. Yes, Al ended up there in a grand way but that’s not the interesting part.

You see, Gore Vidal had a grandfather named Thomas Gore, who was himself a politician. In fact, he was one of the first two senators sent from Oklahoma. Oh, whoops! Are heading the wrong way? Nope, because his wiki tells us:

The Gore family was one of the nineteen original families who owned farmlands in what later became the capital of the United States, the District of Columbia.

Whaddaya know? Well, maybe there were just lots of random, disconnected Gores floating around northeast Virginia at the time, huh? Tom’s wiki continues:

The Gores were Anglo-Irish from Donegal and arrived in North America at the end of the seventeenth century and tended to intermarry with other Anglo-Irish families, particularly in Virginia. When the District was established in 1790, the families that had been dispossessed to make way for the capital city, including the Gores, reaped significant financial rewards. The Gores who remained either sold their land in lots, built homes or hotels, and all became rich.

How interesting. Dispossessed rich people. You’ll note back in that ancestry that Al’s great- great- great- great-grandfather John Gore (born 1761, so 29 when he got “eminently domained”) was the one that lit out for Tennessee. How even more interesting.

Now, did you catch that bit about the American Gores being originally from County Donegal? Fled from a potato famine or whatever, right? I doubt it. If you’re not up to speed on the Irish peerage, allow me to refresh your memory on the Gore baronetcies (all of which are still extant, as well as two earldoms and a barony):

The Gore Baronetcy, of Magherabegg (or Manor Gore) in the County of Donegal, was created in the Baronetage of Ireland on 2 February 1622….

So Al goes way back, which somehow They never got around to telling us about. But that’s not even the startling thing. Read down a little more:

The Gore Baronetcy, of Newtown in the County of Mayo, was created in the Baronetage of Ireland on 10 April 1662….

Can someone please tell me this is merely a four-century-old coincidence, the kind you encounter every day? I told you that you couldn’t make this shit up. But we’re not done….

If you’re with me on the point that Al is one of these Elite Gores that includes Gore Vidal back to Irish peers, then it will interest you to know that Vidal had a half-sister, Nina Gore Auchincloss Straight. Any of those names ring a bell? Her father was Hugh D. Auchincloss Jr.. Nina’s mother was his second wife. His third wife was Janet Lee Bouvier, making him the step-father of Jackie (Bouvier) Kennedy.

That may seem a trivial connection, but there’s actually far more to be said about Hugh. For now, though, let me bring it home. To all our homes, actually. You see, Hugh D. Auchincloss, Jr., had a first cousin once removed named Hugh Auchincloss, Sr. (1915−1998). His son (as you might guess from the Sr.) is Hugh Auchincloss, Jr..

Heard of him? Of course not. “They” hide just by failing to formally announce their presence. I bet you’ve heard of his former boss, though: Dr. Anthony Fauci. Yes, he was Tony’s deputy all through the entire recent assault on the human race. Personally, I would suggest he was the guy who ran it, not Fauci, staying just outside the spotlight on the off chance we came with the torches and pitchforks. See how They work?

Final note I can’t resist adding: The name “Newtown” itself, is there anything more to that? IDK, but there is a thought I would offer. You know the ancient Phoenician city of Carthage? It was famous for two things. The less well-known was child sacrifice. The more well-known was that Rome was bent on annihilating it (see “Carthago delenda est”, meaning something like “Carthage must be destroyed”). Historians never really come out and say it, but I think the latter had primarily to do with the former.

From personal research, I would add a third, which relates to the other two. It’s far too long a story for here, but the Carthaginians worshipped the entity better known to us as Satan. Remember I already mentioned Satanism once in this post. Anyway, if you look up the etymology of the name Carthage, you’ll find that in the original Punic it meant “new city”.

If you’ve read this far, you have my thanks. Sometimes it’s hard to know where to wrap up a four-dimensional web.

Without getting into too much detail for younger readers that never question the premise that things are like they always were only a bit different, things are most assuredly not like they always were. In this instance, what goes in your ears and how it gets there has changed drastically in the last couple of decades. Surprise not surprise, it’s for the worse in every significant way.

Briefly, in the 1990’s the recording industry as it had been known for decades was dying. Yes, learned conspiracy theorists know that “They” controlled it: Aleister Crowley on the cover of “Sgt. Pepper”, The Grateful Dead and LSD, grunge promoted as if it was good music, gangsta rap, the rise of Puff Daddy, Jim Morrison/Rush Limbaugh and the rest of the Laurel Canyon gang, the list goes on and on.

Beyond the artists, “listening” was in reality a fairly small universe. There were a few recording companies and small number of indy labels. Even those weren’t pure, as we came to realize about Miles Copeland Jr., Frontier Booking International, and IRS Records. There were independent terrestrial radio stations scattered across the land, no networks until the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (thank you, Bill). You listened to the radio in your car and maybe a bit at home. If you really liked what you heard, you went to the record store and bought the LP or cassette.

But it all began to suck so bad that They could no longer shove it down people’s throats. Prince complained he was getting ripped off by the record companies, getting only a small fraction of the money he was making for them. Well, kinda. You see, one act like Prince or Michael Jackson or Madonna had to support the next ten or twenty acts on the label that were all losing money. It was unsustainable.

It had to be sustained, of course, for purposes of social engineering. But you can’t just give it away, that’s too obvious. Limp Bizkit at 99% off makes people think too much about how valuable an artist Fred Durst really is in the first place. What to do? Enter Napster.

The scheme was brilliant. In the spirit of rock and roll, people were going to “stick it to The Man”. Or was that really to whom it was getting stuck? Napster started the sequence that reshaped… everything.

Let’s take a look at the model that absolutely predominates today: people subscribe to a streaming service and listen to music and podcasts through it on their smartphone. Do you already see the enormous difference? “They” know exactly what you’re listening to, and exactly when you listen to it. Worse, “They” now control the platform, and have the power to de-platform as and when desired. (History may include incidents of records being pulled from store shelves, but I certainly could not tell you about such an instance.) Worse, “Their” algos are shaping on an individual level what goes into your ears at all times. None of this power existed before.

Now let’s put some meat on those bones.

If you know something about the history of podcasting, you may think of former MTV VJ Adam Curry as “The Podfather”. True, but the organization that has come to dominate podcasting is iHeartMedia. As a minor sideshow in all this, with the hiring of Adam and the other VJs, MTV went from showing music videos to melting people’s intellects right out of their heads. I documented who was responsible for that in:

The new CEO of NPR is an obvious spook, but not obvious at all is that the CEO before last, Jarl Mohn, was a secret Nazi billionaire (not a metaphor) (conspiracies.win 4/19/2024)

As long as that post was, I said that Jarl hired the VJs but I didn’t mention who hired Jarl himself. It was Robert Pittman (media executive). Do you know what Bob is doing now? He’s the Chairman and CEO of iHeart. (I’d tell Adam Curry all this because he has no idea and I think he’d like to know, but my emails to him have been… tampered with.)

As I mentioned, though, this transformation all began with Napster. If you’re pretty old and have a good memory, you may recall the name Shawn Fanning. Another name has been lost to the popular conscious, which is the way They hide Themselves. Wiki remembers, though:

Napster was founded by Shawn Fanning and Sean Parker.

Say it ain’t so. Another Parker? For anyone familiar with my numerous previous posts, the name stands out like the red flag that it is. For those unfamiliar, just consider it as alarming as seeing the last name “Crowley-Rothschild” or something. You can read his obvious bullshit backstory for a laugh, but I’ll relate one personal anecdote.

Back in 2015 or so, I didn’t know any of the stuff I’m relating now or even who Sean Parker was. He had been a decade out of the spotlight by then but I happened to catch him in short video of some sort of NYT panel discussion. After about ten seconds of looking at him and hearing him talk, I thought, “Jesus, this guy is a clearly a spook. Didn’t anyone else ever pick up on that in all these years?” Nope. Not then and not yet.

So Napster was the primitive beginning and you can read the wiki for the details on how Sean was the low-profile money guy that made it all go. Now, as mentioned, all the cool kids listen on Spotify. Do you want to guess the name of the low-profile money guy that made it all go? Don’t let me spoil the surprise but you’ll find it in the wiki.

Here’s another fun one—not directly related to the recording industry—but have you ever heard of the cultural rat poison known as Facebook? Of course! The internal monologues of all the conspiracy theorists are saying “Zuckerberg” and “Winkelvoss twins” right now. If they’re advanced, then “DARPA LifeLog” is rattling around in there too. Okay, but do you know the name of the low-profile money guy that made it all go? The answer is once again in the wiki.

Before we get to the bonuses, I have to interject one thing: in the conspir-o-sphere, people lose their skulls over the “startling revelation” that J.D. Vance worked with Peter Thiel for a while back in the day. How does that compare with what we’re learning here? I just shake my head a lot these days.

The first bonus requires a preface. In many earlier posts on various Parkers, I have referenced that they are a family of generational Satanists up to no good for centuries. We add to their nefarious activities here, but the link to the Satanist part comes from the information related by a member of one of those families:

Jay Parker | Satanic Ritual Abuse, Entity Invocation, & The Power of Consciousness (The Higherside Chats 12/9/2017)

Hmm, “entity invocation”? Wouldn’t it be weird if we found such a thing in the material we covered in this post? I refer you to this interview, starting about 13:45:

True Scary Story Talk with Edwin Covarrubias - The Paranormal Podcast 853 (Jim Harold 10/15/2024)

For background, this is a very popular, mainstream podcast about the paranormal, nothing to do with conspiracy of any type. If you don’t want to watch the video, the interviewee—a fellow paranormal podcaster—relates a story he personally finds disturbing even to talk about, where on two separate occasions a novelty sign in his studio flickered when he said the word “demon”. You can see another version of the sign behind him. The sign is the logo of and was sent to him by (you got it) Spotify. Please, someone say this is mere coincidence.

Second bonus: If you’re a careful reader and a critical thinker, you should have noticed I didn’t do the usual genealogy work on Sean Parker to tie him to the Parkers in question. I have something else for this one that I personally find more convincing.

Take a look at the profile photo of Sean Parker used on his wiki page. Take particular note of his hair color: a medium-dark reddish-brown. It’s actually pretty distinctive, isn’t it? Now take a look at the photo used in this other article:

Newtown Father Looks Beyond Investigator's Report (WBUR 11/26/2013)

Normies think he’s a father who happens to laugh after the murder of his child. Conspiracists think he’s a douchebag crisis actor They grabbed off the streets. If you’re like me, you now know it goes deeper than any of that.

We’ll get the boring part of “showing our work” out of the way first, plus it sets the stage for holding Deak in some suspicion and viewing his story with a certain kind of “deep conspiratorial” filter. If you like, you can trace his genealogy for yourself courtesy of the Mormons by starting here:

Rear Admiral William Sterling Parsons (1901-1953)

Just keep clicking on the father’s link. Nine generations back you’ll get this to this key guy:

Cornet Joseph Parsons (1620-1683)

Then you can do the same thing beginning with Jack Parsons and tracing back the same nine generations to the same “Cornet Joseph”:

John Whiteside Parsons (10/2/1914-7/17/1952) <- FYI: the Mormons got the date of death wrong

Note that these are direct patrilineal lines, not by marriage or adoption. Is this just an interesting coincidence? No. There are a small number of Elite families organizing—well, a lot, going back centuries—and the Parsons are one of them. The Parsons in particular were discussed in a previous post:

The occult genealogy of Jack Parsons is not at all what you think (conspiracies.win 6/22/2024)

There, you can read more about how this all connects into a huge web of Elites and psyops. These are some weaving spiders, I suppose you might say. But we’re here to focus on William Sterling Parsons, better known as “Deak”. He was heavily involved in America’s atomic weapons program, enough to gain a (another) nickname based on that:

DEAK PARSONS – THE STORY OF THE ATOMIC ADMIRAL (Center for International Maritime Security 8/28/2023)

You’ll read that Deak was a key guy in the Manhattan Project, hand-picked by Vannevar Bush, and riding next to Oppenheimer on the first train trip to Los Alamos discussing how to set up the project. He was the weaponeer on the Hiroshima mission. After the war, he became technical deputy to the commanders of the of the atomic testing programs named Operation Crossroads and Operation Sandstone. You get the idea about how deep he was. Then you can take all that and match it up with the material in this landmark paper:

The Nuclear Hoax (Miles Mathis 1/24/2016 16-page PDF)

There is plenty of other research on atomic fakery but that’s about as good as you’ll get. We’ll pause to discuss two important issues that are brought up with that paper. Both have to do with disinformation.

First, I do not at all subscribe to the theory that “all nukes are fake” or any such thing. The evidence for something is the evidence for that thing. Some nukes are real and others are not. The heart of disinfo is not selling you a particular lie, it’s divorcing you from the truth. Normies who cannot depart from the mainstream “truth” will wave their hands around and say “all nukes are real”, and disinfo agents and their dupes will wave their hands around about “all nukes are fake”. Getting to the truth demands more than that.

Second, some may object to Miles Mathis as a disinfo agent. That’s true, and I know it better than anyone, but he’s the highest-level disinfo agent anyone could name. “High-level” means he has to give up important truths to sell you important lies, or to divert you from truths even more important than he’s giving up.

In this case, you can search that “Hoax” paper for “Parsons” and you will not find Deak mentioned. Similarly, you can search his paper Jack Parsons and JPL (10/23/2019 7-page PDF) and you’ll find no mention of Deak there either. Now, one could say that I’m just a better researcher than Mathis, or that I happened to stumble on something he did not, but the situation is also consistent with the “limited hangout” function of Mathis being to hide such connections as we are now examining. Isn’t that correct?

Finally, we’ll look at something that speaks to the depth and scale on which “They” actually operate. The Army Air Forces unit that did all that (fake) atomic bombing—both in war and in testing—was the 509th Composite Group. After the war, that unit was stationed at Roswell Army Air Field.

Now, you think I’m going to say something about UFOs, but we’re not there yet and it’s even stranger than that. You see, Deak was born in Chicago in late 1901 in what you would think was a well-to-do family. One of his mother’s grandfathers had been a US Senator from Wisconsin, and the other had been Governor of Illinois.

But for no reason stated, in 1909 the family moved to Fort Sumner, New Mexico. The 1920 Census lists the population as 777, and big city Roswell only had 7,033 recorded at that time. Settlements in the area, even today, are few and far between. Why did the Parsons pack up and go out to BFE? Who knows, but look on a map and you’ll see it’s in the immediate vicinity (judging by desert southwest standards) of the White Sands Missile Range (Trinity), Roswell AAF, and Corona (supposed Roswell crash site).

Did you notice the dates, though? Parsons was first there as a child, three and a half decades before any of these places were put on the map, so to speak. Can we really convince ourselves this was all a coincidence?

I personally don’t think so and I’ll give you a little factoid as a sort of bonus, because full discussion is beyond our scope here. Remember what I said about a web being woven?

The commander of the 509th was Colonel William H. Blanchard, and he had been the backup pilot for the Hiroshima mission. He had been involved in the fake atomic testing alongside Parsons. Also, if you boil it down, if Blanchard had never given the order for the a press release, none of us would have ever heard about the “UFO crash at Roswell”.

Now get this: the area of the huge White Sands military reservation had previously been much huger, when it was a privately held collection of rich lead mines. It was known as the “Blanchard Claims”.

TL;DR: The Black Dahlia murder was evidently just one of several similar ritual murders, done by a crew of rich weirdos in post-WW2 LA. It was covered up and buried by LAPD Chief Parker, from a family of generational Satanists. Because this murder was too close to Their nest and leads too close to Them, it’s covered up to this day.

So how did I end up here? I don’t care for the “true crime” genre at all. It’s just gross and sad, nothing to be done about it and nothing to be learned from it. But I ended up learning quite a lot in this instance, and I hope you can also learn by studying it.

The zero-th lesson (coming even before the first) has to do with the bubbles of reality in which most people live. What I find myself using to fight my way out is… a touch of OCD. Not something people really want, is it? In this instance, you see, I subscribe to quite a number of podcasts, and a lot of the guests and subjects are not really of any interest to me. Like true crime, for example.

But because of the aforementioned OCD, I force myself to listen to all the episodes of shows I subscribe to. I never even fast-forward. (I’ll often tune out mentally, but there are advantages to letting your mind flow freely, make no mistake.) I suspect very, very few other people do as I do. The problem is that you end up creating a comfortable bubble to pass the time, where you hear things you already know, you find out how smart you are, everyone agrees with you, and you find everyone well-informed, pleasant and entertaining. That is not a methodology for advancing your consciousness. If you find yourself doing that, I suggest you try to do something which is not that.

In any case, I saw there was an episode on the Black Dahlia and avoided it for a long time. What more was there to hear? We’ve all heard it a dozen or three times: the grisly, unsolved murder of a young, pretty woman with sexual overtones. It’s Jack the Ripper-lite for America. Well… I listened anyway:

Weird Tales and the Unexplainable: #133 - Black Dahlia (1:24 3/9/2020)

Want to know the first surprising thing I learned? It’s not unsolved. The second surprising thing? It was solved over two decades ago. Nor is the guy that solved it some conspiracy crank that I’m just latching on to. He was an LAPD homicide detective for 24 years and—imagine this—the son of the perpetrator. By the time we get to the end of this, you’ll believe that conclusion too. If you really want to examine the facts and circumstances of the case and the theory that George Hodel was the murderer, this is an excellent analysis:

The True Crime Database: George Hodel

Unless you’re the opposite of me and you like true crime, I don’t think you need to. You see, we’re going to pile up facts and circumstances around the case and examine those. If you don’t believe the Hodel theory, then it would be one hell of a goddamn coincidence that I was able to find all this other material.

Using the power of self-reflection, I was able to ask, “How was I so amazingly ignorant of all this before?” Well, it isn’t just me failing to keep up with current events. Quite bizarrely, no one else is up to speed on this either. Of the innumerable podcasts on the Black Dahlia, here’s one from only six months ago:

The Mystery of the BLACK DAHLIA (1947) / Dark World Ep.1 (4/14/2024)

In this very first episode of ‘Dark World’ we retell the story of Elizabeth Short, or ‘The Black Dahlia’ as the press would refer to her by…. To this day, her murder has remained unsolved.

Don’t listen to it, I didn’t. You see my point, though. You know who else was totally unaware of the evidence regarding George Hodel, the murderer? His son, Steve. His half-sister casually mentioned it after George died in 1999.

Indeed, the wiki for the Black Dahlia asserts it repeatedly and unambiguously (emphasis mine):

Short's unsolved murder and the details surrounding it have had a lasting cultural intrigue, generating various theories and public speculation. Her life and death have been the basis of numerous books and films, and her murder is frequently cited as one of the most famous unsolved murders in U.S. history, as well as one of the oldest unsolved cases in Los Angeles County. It has likewise been credited by historians as one of the first major crimes in postwar America to capture national attention.

This all seems like an odd situation, doesn’t it? Okay, let me tell you what’s going on up front so you have a framework available to hang the otherwise baffling evidence. We see that the “capture of national attention” was the problem. “They” deemed that the Black Dahlia murder hit too close to home. It could lead to too many things that were too vital to “Them”. It needed to be shut down and still needs to be shut down.

You’ll see the very same phenomenon—coverups running long after any plausible importance—in quite diverse topics like JFK, giants, and Satanic ritual abuse of children. Michael Aquino is dead, thankfully, and so is pretty much anyone who could have been involved in the JFK assassination. Who is being protected from liability? No one. And giants? Who cares if giants existed or did not exist? Clearly and demonstrably, “They” do, and “They” still care about the Black Dahlia murder. All this to cover up one single murder, with the murderer himself long dead?

The problem for Them is the same in all these varied examples: if the full truth were to be known about these subjects, it would expose too much about who They were, Their imperatives, and how They do business. It’s a judgment call and They have judged to put all of these in the hole.

For the Black Dahlia, that was accomplished two ways. In the beginning, it was your basic, “Records lost and everybody STFU.” That’s putting out the fire. The second phase is far more subtle and thus more interesting: building a “psychic firebreak” beyond which the flames of inquiry will never spread.

How did I get beyond that firebreak? Brilliance and sheer insight, of course! J/K. As I have already admitted, it was by accident, hearing an offhand comment in that WTATU podcast. Do you see the importance now of forcing yourself down paths you might not otherwise tread? Anyway, I recommend you blow through that firebreak yourself by skipping all the way to 58:20 in the WTATU podcast to Steve Hodel, the ex-detective who solved the case.

What did I hear that sent me into such a frenzy? At about 1:03:30, Steve casually mentions “Chief Parker”, and goes on to say that the department had previously suffered from so much corruption and they really just wanted to flush the Black Dahlia case away before the new boss got there. That’s why they destroyed all the records of it.

That doesn’t really make sense, but that’s how he filed it away in his mind. It’s important to note how easily any of us can file away things that don’t make sense as if they somehow did. Anyway, if you read my previous post regarding Parker, you know that Steve had no idea whatsoever what was really up with that guy:

Ever feel like “To protect and serve” was a big joke? It is! We discuss that and other occultism at the LAPD, featuring Chief William H. Parker, a generational Satanist. (conspiracies.win 10/2/2024)

“But wait”, you object, “that means the LAPD records were destroyed before Parker got there. Debunked!” Good catch, but near miss. If you refer to the list of Chiefs of Police of the LAPD, you’ll find that the Interim Chief preceding Parker was William A. Worton. Given that our tale is set in southwest corner of the United States, we first note that Worton was from Boston. Know who else was from Boston? The Black Dahlia herself. And the Parkers had first arrived there in the early 1700’s.

Worton was a Marine, though, a red-blooded American fighting man! Sure, but go halfway down the page:

Major Worton was assigned to the Far East Section of the Office of Naval Intelligence…. [H]e returned to China once again, and began to recruit agents who agreed to travel to Japan to secretly collect information for the US Navy. One of these may have been the French Jesuit Priest and philosopher, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.

ONI and working with that shady Jesuit, who they admit right there was a spook? We see what we’re dealing with here. But what did he have to do with Parker?

Worton was tasked by Mayor Bowron with the job of cleaning up the department. A little more than a year later, Worton resigned on August 9, 1950, and was replaced by his chief of Internal Affairs, William H. Parker, whom he had groomed for the office.

“Cleaning up the department” turns out to be destroying the records of an incipient murder prosecution and ushering in the Satanist. Great.

Let’s bracket that, though, with the guy that came right after Parker, Chief Thad F. Brown. Before we get to a disgusting little story about him, we should note from his wiki that Thad had a mole from the get go:

His brother, Finis Brown, was also on the LAPD, and was one of the noteworthy police officers who investigated the Elizabeth Short murder, also known as the Black Dahlia murder.

Then there’s the revolting story Steve recounts on his site concerning…

LAPD Chief Thad Brown & Steve Hodel- The 1966 Parker Center Photo (12/26/2009)

Thad Brown KNEW I was the son of the Black Dahlia killer, and it is obvious he just could not resist the “photo-op”. It would not be until after the completion of my investigation and the publication of my book that we would learn from an LAPD reserve officer, about the conversation between Thad Brown and actor Jack Webb, his close friend who played, LAPD’s Sgt. Joe Friday. In that confidential conversation Thad Brown discloses to Jack Webb, “We know who killed the Black Dahlia. The case was solved. It was a doctor in Hollywood, who lived on Franklin Avenue.”

We all know there are dirty cops but this is just gross, right? See why I don’t care for “true crime”? Anyway, that’s enough of the “hard” phase of the coverup. Now we turn the more subtle psychological work. You may want to start by taking a look at a presentation Steve made, where two things are clear. One is that he did indeed solve the case. The other is that the LAPD leadership still very much does not want to talk about it:

THE 1947 BLACK DAHLIA CASE WAS SOLVED By LAPD Detective III Steve Hodel #11394 (ret.) (28-page PDF)

You’ll see what I was saying about the ongoing coverup, even many decades later. I mean, cops are always always always looking for credit with their press conferences and perp walks and tables full of drugs and money. Not here. “Oh hey, we solved this super high-profile crime that everybody loves to talk about!” No? They’re too classy for that? Sure.

Know who else is participating in the coverup? Wiki, of course. We saw previously their insistence that it is unsolved. They have a page especially for Black Dahlia suspects. Know what it has to say about everything you’ve just learned?

Author James Ellroy endorsed Steve Hodel's theory in 2004.

That’s literally it. It says nothing about who Steve Hodel is or his theory of the crime. He’s written five books about it. At least wiki has one single paragraph about George Hodel on the main Black Dahlia page. Get this: it actually includes George’s confession from a police wiretap that had been presented to a grand jury, but it’s like no one notices it. I don’t know why I’m still shocked at this kind of thing, but I am. I suppose part of what I’m doing here is just getting it off my chest.

Finally, if some or all of this information about the case is new to you, take a moment to reflect on that fact itself. Interpret it as an indication of how well They can manipulate our consciousnesses. Misleading newspaper headlines and lame announcements from politicians are child’s play compared to guiding our minds down certain paths rather than others. This has been only a single example.

I don’t really have a juicy little bonus to close with, but I can say this: as long as this post was, leading forward from this case I have a lot more material left to write up. The Black Dahlia was just one of a bigger (possibly much bigger) set of occult ritual murders, carried out by a group of Elite weirdos operating in East Hollywood. Think Marina Abramovic meets Aleister Crowley plus the Podestas.

That in turn leads to faint signs that the deeply Hidden Elites have been operating there for a long time, and how They might have told us about what some of Them are really up to. As a bonus, I’ll show you how They confess to inventing the Middle Ages that never existed.

Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: The LAPD has set the standard for the militarization of the police and their brutality towards the population. Occult markings on the organization go back almost a century. LAPD’s most prominent chief was from a family of generational Satanists standing just outside the spotlight of history for centuries.

There’s nothing particularly shocking here, at least not to me anymore. It’s the same hidden dirtbag occultists running their operations that are public yet unnoticed. I’ll spice it up—if you like that kind of thing—in a future post with the strange and disturbing context surrounding the Black Dahlia murder. Or I should say murders, as we will see.

I included that hyperlink so you could easily try to find the connections to Chief Parker for yourself, as a sort of exercise. Good luck. It’s not really an exercise, actually, it’s an example. See, They don’t need to orchestrate a huge coverup or use AI to alter the timeline or whatever. They just very quietly snip the tiny threads that bind history together and then reweave their own narratives. You can sometimes put things back together, but the more fundamental problem is that virtually no one realizes this is how it all works.

For now, let’s press on with Bill….

In a list stretching back to 1876, Chief William Henry Parker III is surely LAPD’s most prominent chief. That is, until the widely reviled Daryl Gates came along. We may thank Daryl for the blessing of SWAT teams. the gift that keeps on giving. He originally wanted it to stand for “Special Weapons Attack Teams”, which at least would be more honest. He also set the stage for Rodney King and his riots with "scandalous racist violence... [that] marked the LAPD under Gates's tempestuous leadership." Maybe that should all be no surprise:

Among his roles as an officer, he was picked to be the chauffeur for Chief William H. Parker. Gates often remarked that he gained many administrative and professional insights from Parker during the hours they spent together each day.

Sometimes, it really seems like they write this stuff just for me, doesn’t it? In any case, Parker seems to be the arch scumbag. In the very first paragraph of his wiki, we read:

During his tenure, the LAPD was known for police brutality and racism; Parker himself was known for his "unambiguous racism".

Nice. But what does that kind of behavior get you in this world? Why, they named Parker Center after him, of course! That was the headquarters of the Los Angeles Police Department from 1955 until October 2009, specially renamed for him after his death in 1966.

Remember, what gets put in wiki should be interpreted as “what They will admit to” and “what They want you to believe”. How bad was he really, do you think? They pour on whitewash by the gallon throughout the rest of the page. For example, Parker was supposedly eliminating police corruption. I might describe it as eliminating rival criminal elements and consolidating power.

We’re not here to blackwash Parker, though, but I will repeat this one fascinating (you’ll see!) factoid from his wiki:

Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry, a former LAPD officer, wrote speeches for Parker. Roddenberry is said to have modeled the character Mr. Spock after Parker.

Spock… an emotionless psychopath? Half-alien? Ha, no, I doubt that claim is true. And I suspect they just coincidentally spotted Roddenberry as a creative young writer and handed him the gig. Funny, though, all those conspiracy theorists that love to blackwash Roddenberry as FBI or CIA or a Mason or a Jesuit or a crypto-Jew or whatever never seem have noticed this one fact that I might have considered important (but do not).

Spock is not the only popular cultural reference. Did you know what I was talking about in the title when I wrote, “To protect and serve”? How about describing the police as the “thin blue line”? Both of those come courtesy of Chief Parker. I’ll comment more about this when I close.

The bonus of this post comes here in the middle with a Mandela Effect. It is one that does not exist but I want to show you one of the techniques They use to manufacture them.

Did anyone out there click reply when they read the title of this post, ready to hit me with an ackshually? Of course not. I suspect 0 out of 100 people are aware that the motto of the LAPD is not “To protect and serve”, it’s ackshually “To Protect and to Serve”.

The thing is, when was the last time you stopped to read the side of a patrol vehicle from the LAPD? Never, right? You heard it wrong and you repeated it wrong. It’s ackshually a bit shorter and therefore catchier when said the incorrect way, and that’s why it sticks and spreads. A supposed Mandela Effect could be achieved by sending forth shills to propagate the message, “Guise, guise, new Mandela Effect! Guess what they’re now saying the police motto is and always was?” Mandela Effect unlocked. Same trick was used for the “mirror, mirror” Mandela Effect. Before the “Effect”, how many people alive now ackshually watched the 1937 movie and said, “Hang on, I need to hear the exact wording here.” Zero.

Want more proof? Check out this disambiguation page for “To protect and to serve”. Of the six other references, none of them get it right. Do you really think no one in the CIA ever noticed this phenomenon and thought to use it to fuck with our heads? C’mon, man!

But let’s get even more ackshually with some detail I was unaware of until I started this research. You see, I had always assumed the “Rampart Division”. was just some arbitrary organizational subdivision of the LAPD, like it was the one between the Anagram Division and the Hairpart Division, along with many others. Wrong!

There are only two Divisions, the other being the LAPD Metropolitan Division. Discussion of LAPD organizational structure is beyond the scope of this post, but on the surface it looks to me like both of these divisions were set up and maintained as bastions of bad apples, if you get the concept. Got a goody-two-shoes in Metro or Rampart? Shuffle him off before he makes trouble trying to fix trouble. For both of these Divisions, well, you can read as much as you would like about their troubles.

Sure, we started with a Parker, but do I think there are nefarious occultists at work beyond that? I’ll let you decide but I came across this: the Rampart Division, the one set up by Parker just before he died, became operational in 1966. That’s said to be the number of the Fallen Angels, whatever that means. And the Metro Division went active in---you got it—1933.

Just like Rampart’s “To Protect and to Serve”, Metro also has a motto. Can these be occultic? Again, you’ll have to be the judge as to whether these are messages “hidden from the eye”. Rampart seeks “To Protect and To Serve”, but do you note that they do not specify whom they are protecting and serving? Dark Occultists love that kind of joke, don’t they? The Metro Division’s motto is “Can Do, Will Do”. A very famous occultist’s very famous motto comes immediately to mind, does it not?

I hate to end in a boring way instead of with that tasty Mandela bit, but for purposes of scholarship we have to document Chief William’s genealogy. Otherwise, we’re gonna get “ackshually he’s just a guy named Parker”. We can short-circuit it, though. Start with the man himself:

Chief William Henry Parker III (1905-1966)

Under “Parents and Siblings”, you can just keep clicking on the father’s link. I’m assuming you can guess which one identifies as the non-birthing partner. You’ll eventually get to this guy:

John Parker (about 1585 – after 1630)

There’s a lot of haziness here because those tiny threads I mentioned before have been cut. As near as I can figure, this John Parker is a guy I refer to as “Mayflower John”. There’s a “John Parker, Master Mate” that was aboard the ship, about which nothing is known. I think he was on a sort of advance mission. Anyway, there are three other Parkers that were born starting right after the John Parker listed above stopped having children. A sort of secret second family? A lot of genealogy connects with those three. The only item recorded about their fathers is that one of them is said to be “John”. Intriguing, right?

Finally, I wanted to comment about those popular cultural references tied to Parker. You see, when I look around, I notice those type of references to the Hidden Elite everywhere, used by people all the time in their everyday lives. And not just catchphrases but historical figures and events, consumer brands, place names, families and organizations, etc. It’s like “Rowdy” Roddy Piper’s glasses in “They Live”.

That vision is important—maybe even crucial—to this kind of research. There are a couple of critical differences, though. For one, Piper could take off the glasses when he wanted and go back to the world everyone else saw. The other is that, even if it took an overly lengthy brawl with Keith David, Piper could put the glasses on someone else and they would immediately and unavoidably see exactly what he saw. I just wanted to point out that that is where the metaphor breaks down utterly. People just think you’re an angry retard or whatever, which is not depicted in “They Live”. Also, in movies you can freely chew bubble gum and kick ass. Not, generally, in real life.

If you’re wondering where the generational Satanism of the Parker family comes in, this is the link (and I do not think Jay knows what his family has been up to historically):

Jay Parker | Satanic Ritual Abuse, Entity Invocation, & The Power of Consciousness (The Higherside Chats 12/9/2017)

If you’re read this far, I really appreciate your interest. More to come soon that you never heard about the Black Dahlia….

TL;DR: The original psychodrama of the murders was staged as part of the larger “civil rights” color revolution. As always, They write history long after the fact with a film “based on a true story”. The given historical narrative is ludicrous when you take a close look (which no one does because they watched the movie, you see). The deal is sealed by the presence of a couple of familiar Elites in key positions.

I never intentionally go looking for these Elites and their psyops. I don’t consider myself smart enough or intuitive enough or whatever enough to detect Their presence by my brilliance and inerrancy alone. That’s probably a good thing for a researcher, because it always looks to me like way too many people rely on their brilliance and inerrancy alone to substantiate fact. Or to be more precise, that which they will never be persuaded is not “fact”.

So God knows what I was looking up at the time, but I somehow happened to notice that the 1988 movie Mississippi Burning was directed by a man named Alan Parker. Frankly, I was hoping he was just some dude named Parker, who was not of the Elite family of generational Satanists, and I could save myself all the mental turmoil and effort writing these things up. That was not to be.

Do I think Alan—pardon, Sir Alan—is himself a practicing Satanist? There’s no way of knowing and I would guess probably not. But the idea here is that he’s “in the family” and, as Michael Corleone warned, “You never go against the family.” That’s enough to keep it all in check, don’t you think?

So why should we think this Parker is one of these particular Parkers? You decide, but I will only present to you my thoughts on one paragraph from his wiki, in the section titled “1962–1975: Early work and breakthrough”:

His first job was office boy in the post room of Ogilvy & Mather an advertising agency in London.... One such agency was Collett Dickenson Pearce in London, where he first met the future producers David Puttnam and Alan Marshall, both of whom would later produce many of his films. Parker credited Puttnam with inspiring him and talking him into writing his first film script, Melody (1971).

Wow, all I need.

“Ogilvy & Mather” refers to the very prominent PR agency now known as Ogilvy, but it was actually founded in 1850 in London by a guy named Edmund Mather. In fact, the name didn’t change to Ogilvy until 114 years later. So who’s this Mather? He’s a ghost:

Who Was Mather? Meet the Lesser-Known Men Behind Famous Agency Names (Ad Age 4/29/2013)

That headline is a joke—they know nothing about him. But was he of some relation to Samuel Liddell MacGregor Mathers, born in London in 1850 and later to found the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn? Ties us right into Crowley and all that other manufactured “magick” nonsense, doesn’t it? Perhaps Edmund is of the family that had much earlier spawned Increase Mather, who was instrumental in staging the phony Salem witch trials. Stick that in your back pocket, because we’ll see those witch trials come up again.

How about Collett Dickenson Pearce? If we get into exhaustive detail and linking we’ll never get out, but let me just say that I see the name “Pearce” and think of the name “Percy” (Smithsonian Institution, Battles of Lexington and Concord, phony Gunpowder Plot), the name “Peirce” (overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom), and the name “Pierce” (President Franklin Pierce, Barbara Pierce Crowley Bush). Similarly with the name David Puttnam, we find the Americanized version Putnam showing up at the American Revolution, Jonestown, “The Exorcist”, and—you got it—the Salem witch trials.

Finally, when they wrote that paragraph I quoted about Sir Alan, I have to wonder if they intentionally saved the, um, tastiest bit for last. His first movie was 1971’s Melody. Specifically, take a look at the movie poster. An apple with a bite out of it over the crotch of a young boy? No hidden meanings there, right? In any case, I suppose it can be considered tasteful and understated by 2024 mass media messaging standards.

We’re all this way in and haven’t even talked about the supposed outrage underlying it all, the murders of Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner. In this case, there’s not a lot of specific evidence to cover. It’s more a case of carefully reading through the materials and asking yourself, “Do I really think this actually happened in the real world?”

To get to the crux of it, go straight to the section in the wiki titled “Murders”. If 19 hijackers—whoops!—19 homicidal racists in the Deep South of 60 years ago wanted to smoke three young troublemakers far away from home and get away it, do you really think that’s the best they could come up with? I find it hard to believe that if such a thing happened that they would not get away with it. I know we’re supposed to think Southerners are dumb, but the tale we’re told here is an insult to the intelligence of all of us.

A more subtle form of analysis which I have mentioned before is not looking at the evidence presented, but looking around the evidence. That is, if what we are told is true, then we can extrapolate that certain other things should be true, and yet other things would not be true. Then we go looking for that “para-evidence”.

In this case, we ask, “Are these murder victims even real people?” You’ll have to judge, but I think we’ve all been handed enough phony “personalities” to consider it a legitimate question. Try this: look up photos of the victims. There Is only a single photo for the black guy and two photos of each of the Jews. Oh, and Schwerner’s photos? If you ask me, they’re not the same person. Does all that seem like what we should find?

Maybe you’re thinking, “Well, these were just some rando nobodies, very young, never did anything, thousands of other faceless activists just like them in the Civil Rights Movement.” Okay, fair enough if you want to go that way, but then it contradicts other information we find. The mother of Andrew Goodman was Carolyn Goodman, a “prominent civil rights advocate”. Michael Schwerner was a childhood friend of Robert Reich, former US Secretary of Labor and current loudmouth progressive maniac. Okay, I’m a rando—supposedly like them—and I don’t even know anyone that knows anyone that has a wiki page, but these two guys are one degree of Kevin Bacon away? C’mon, man!

Let’s wind it up with the key guy that made this whole operation come together: Gene Hackman. Oh, I mean FBI agent John Proctor. That wiki page says almost nothing about him, so refer to this bio that says a little more than nothing:

Biography of John Proctor, FBI agent

He makes some… peculiar and ambiguous comments in there. One sentence in particular caught my attention, though:

Proctor played both bad cop and good cop effectively.

The thing is, as I would describe it, Proctor really was (at least here) neither a good cop nor a bad cop. He was not solving a crime nor accessory to a crime. He was coordinating a capstone event. Researchers therefore have the wrong framework, the wrong paradigm. As much as this case may have been studied over the decades, because of that erroneous paradigm they’ll never get from where they are to where we are, you see?

But his name, though, rings a bell, so hauntingly familiar. Where have I heard it before? Oh yes:

John Proctor (Salem witch trials)

And I always feel compelled to attempt to wrap things around to the beginning, in the style of a “Seinfeld” episode, so:

Alice Parker (Salem witch trials)

Mary Parker (Salem witch trials)

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, no one could possibly think I could make all this up, right?

TL;DR: The “true story” on which “The Exorcist” was based was itself a hoax run by the Elites. Why They did it is hazy, but we see a lot along the way.

As always, I never go looking for this stuff. I just stumble into it. In this case, I was in bed in the wee hours of the morning listening to a podcast that happened to come up in my podcast subscriptions, an interview promoting a new book:

Demonic Possession and The Unwelcomed – The Paranormal Podcast 839 (Jim Harold 7/2/2024)

THE UNWELCOMED: The Curious Case of Clara Fowler (Ron Felber 2024)

Just so everyone is clear, let me say that I am interested in the subject of demonic possession because I believe 100% that is exists. Now, owing to my research into the Anunnaki and various other subjects, I would describe it in very different terms than anyone else. When I hear analysis and discussion from other people, it always seems like partial and corrupted understandings. That’s not our subject, but no one should think I’m trying to “debunk” the all-too-real and all-too-destructive phenomenon.

Now this next item seems trivial but I think it’s important, although I do not know what it all means. Starting at 3:30 (coincidence) in the interview, Felber describes how he was personally handed a story as an 18-year-old all the way back in 1972 by William Peter Blatty, the author of the novel on which the movie is based. Blatty had uncovered it as part of his research for “The Exorcist”.

Felber tells us it was the story of Clara Fowler, a young woman from Radcliffe, just before the turn of the 20th Century. She “showed all the signs of demonic possession”, as he puts it, and was studied by a team from Harvard. Great! As stated, I’m very interested in the reality of demonic possession and here was a chance to learn something more about it from another angle.

A bit later, Felber mentions that one of the team was named Putnam. “Can’t be,” thought I, and literally got out of bed to put my mind at ease that this wasn’t the Elites at work in the shadows once again. It was.

But before that shoe drops, we should talk a bit about the movie. It has been forgotten, but The Exorcist, at the time it was released in 1973, was terribly traumatic to the population:

Some viewers suffered adverse physical reactions, fainting or vomiting to shocking scenes such as a realistic cerebral angiography. Many children were allowed to see it, leading to charges that the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) had accommodated the studio by giving the film an R rating instead of an X rating to ensure the troubled production its commercial success. Several cities attempted to ban it outright or prevent children from attending.

Okay, the Elites alchemically processing the people once again, right? Makes sense. The puzzling part is that it lent legitimacy to demonic possession and exorcism, did it not? Before that, the mainstream population--even Catholics—had about as much familiarity with those subjects as people (up until very recently) did with what Haitians got up to with cats and dogs. Unknown and outlandish, in other words.

The issue is this: demonic possession is tied closely to the Anunnaki, and this is one of the Big Secrets. Why would They care to draw any attention to it? If someone thinks I’ve lost it and I’m tying together pushpins with a 50-yard piece of red string, recall this: the opening scene of the movie is a priest at an archaeological dig recovering a demonic-looking stone talisman. Where are they? Mesopotamia, home base of the Anunnaki.

All that crazy stage being set, our story takes an immediate left turn. You see, contrary to what Felber says in the interview, the story of Clara Fowler has nothing to do with demonic possession. Then again, maybe it does, but I guarantee you it’s not in any way Felber or anyone else is going to tell you about. We’ll cover that at the end.

If you look up “Clara Norton Fowler”, you’ll find her under ”Christine ‘Sally’ Beauchamp”. That was the pseudonym under which she was studied. But now that we know her real name, guess what else we can find out about Clara?

Almost nothing, that’s what. Clara is an Intelligence legend. She has no existence outside of immediate reference of the study between 1898 and 1904. Here are a couple of sources on “Clara”:

MULTIPLE PERSONALITY: An exercise in deception (Ray Aldridge-Morris 1989, Google Books)

Feminists Theorize the Political (edited by Judith Butler and Jean W. Scott 1992, 507-page PDF)

Those sources conflict even on the few facts given. One says she was a Radcliffe student, the other that she went there after the study was over. One says she was 23 in 1898, the other that she was 39 in 1912. Does not compute. And it’s not just indicative that Clara was a fake person, these are supposed to be academic scholars. Full of bullshit, as usual.

Now for more bullshit: Christine/Clara’s wiki tells us she “later married one of Prince's assistants”. (Morton Prince was the Harvard doctor who led the study and later wrote it up.) Their footnote is to the “Multiple Personality” book, but guess what? That information is not in that book. In another strange twist, it does exist in the “Feminists” book.

Then who was Clara, really? Some Elite, would be my guess. She married into their circle, as they admit. To me, though, the persuasive evidence is that they really went over the top with her legend, giving us the typical cover for an Elite of “just a down-on-her-luck nobody from nowhere”:

THE DISINTEGRATION OF AN IDEAL: Morton Prince, Sigmund Freud, and the extraordinary case of “Christine Beauchamp” (Cabinet Magazine, Fall 2010)

… a young woman of motley Irish descent. Extremely nervous, with different parts of her body incessantly in motion, Fowler betrayed, Prince opined, “the general appearance of an hysteric.” Though it emerged that she was holding down a job as a stenographer while belatedly completing her high school education, and was well regarded by friends for her ideals and conscientiousness, Fowler’s private life was a shambles….

But then she winds up this study—not treatment—and walks into Radcliffe? No longer a head case barely holding down an entry-level gig? Lots of money and connections in the steno game? Okay.

If you’ve been perusing the links, you may have picked up on what I mentioned before: her case has nothing at all to do with demonic possession, but with something else entirely as wiki says:

This case was widely cited as the "prototypical case" of dissociative identity disorder, even into the 1970s.

The closest to demonry that you get is that Prince called one of the personalities “the Devil”. Don’t hang your hat on that, though, it was only because that alter was “regressive, child-like, and ill-tempered”. The others were “the Saint” and “the Woman”.

But then again, is there some strange, buried connection that we should discuss here?

Many will already be familiar with this, but Satanic Ritual Abuse bears a strong resemblance to MKULTRA-style trauma-based conditioning. Maybe just the outfits and ambience are different, eh? But one of the main features and benefits of trauma-based conditioning is that the mind gets so stressed that, to protect itself, it creates one or more alternate personalities to endure the suffering, artificially creating a condition we now call… dissociative identity disorder.

So there’s the connection, but remember, we drew that connection here. It was nothing any of Them showed us or even hinted at. Mere coincidence, synchromysticism, or some lower-level program at work? IDK. You decide.

Let me end with this horrible little Easter egg I found which wraps it all up: When I first searched for the mysterious Clara Norton Fowler, one of the first results I came up with was Harriet Putnam Fowler. The ages don’t match at all, nor any other details. I skipped past it. Very nearly.

You see, this Fowler was in the same tight circle of Hidden Elites. She was from Danvers, just outside Boston, and married a Putnam, one of the Boston Brahmins. You may have noted in the “Feminists” book that Clara’s husband was an assistant of James Jackson Putnam. Tight little clique, right?

That’s not the horrible part, it’s this: look at the sidebar on Harriet’s page. You’ll see “Spouse: R. C Parker”. OMG. He’s not mentioned in the main text, and you’ll never find out who he was from another source.

But I recognized the family, for sure. If you’ve followed my work, a lot of it lately has been on all the shenanigans the Parkers have gotten up to over the centuries, along with all these other Spook Families. The kicker, if you will, is that the Parkers are also generational Satanists:

Jay Parker | Satanic Ritual Abuse, Entity Invocation, & The Power of Consciousness (The Higherside Chats 12/9/2017)

Jay doesn’t make the connection (so far as I know), but I do. So when I see the name Parker come up in this “Exorcist” mess of… whatever it may be, I think, “Well, at least it makes some sense.”

TL;DR: We recap that the sinking of both the Titan and the Titanic before it were hoaxes. A reference was placed in the Titan narrative (which was itself a reference) to a real-life supervillain at the very birth of the British Empire. The US never “got corrupted” or “fell” or anything like that, since They were there from the start.

This is a long and unexpected journey which began innocently enough with an update to a run-of-the-mill global hoax:

Newly Released Images Show OceanGate Titan Wreckage Found 1,600 Feet from Titanic’s Bow (The Gateway Pundit 9/16/2024)

Take a quick look at the story and, even if we had no idea either sinking had been hoaxed, there’s already a big question that should draw our suspicion: why are they only releasing this video now? You see, I had assumed this was news because they had just found the wreckage on the seafloor. That was the new event, right? The new event is actually a US Coast Guard hearing on the sinking, and it was they who released the video. They don’t say why they were sitting on it for over a year. Personally, I think the hearing itself is fake and staged, but that’s not even worth getting into. The whole point of the exercise is, IMHO, primarily to periodically reinforce their fake history.

I fear at this point that to get a sensible context, we’ll have to make a long story long. We’ll begin at the Lost Empire of Tartaria. If you’re not up to speed on Tartary, this will make more sense soon.

The advanced Tartarian civilization left behind many remnants, mostly buildings but also ships. What became the Titanic was one of them. You can tell the Titanic “should not have existed” because it used full-thickness welding techniques for its hull construction, which were not developed until more than a decade after it was finished.

Going in chronological order, then, we have this pre-existing ship, and the Elites seem to have had in mind They might want to get rid of it someday, perhaps with a phony sinking. They were getting rid of many other Tartarian relics with their World’s Fairs and Great Fires at the time.

So in 1898, a stooge of Theirs writes a novel about such a sinking titled, “The Wreck of the Titan: Or, Futility”. If anyone was familiar with that controversial and puzzling book before, you can see we don’t need time travel or synchromysticism or conscious manifestation of the Universe or anything like that. We just need bullshit. So the real book Futility and the fictional ship Titan go into the little-known but well-documented historical record.

Along about 1912, They decide to go ahead with it and stage the “construction”. Then They orchestrate the whole iceberg collision business. You can read up on it in this classic paper:

The Titanic: the Fraud that Keeps on Giving (Miles Mathis 10/2/2018 39-page PDF)

“Miles” is a disinfo agent, to be sure, but he surfaces (haha) more than enough evidence that you can validate for yourself. He leaves out Tartaria, for example, and that John Jacob Astor IV was a fake person, and he adds in that every other person associated with the Titanic was secretly a Jew. But as I said, there’s more than enough reliable evidence made available.

Then in 2023, when they decided to stage this new sinking and reused the name Titan, I could not believe the audacity. But then They know no one will notice, and no one does (almost!). Finally we get to 2024 and this latest psychodrama….

You’ll find screencaps from the video in various articles, but for some reason they’re cropped. Huh. The “official” release would seem to be this:

Coast Guard Marine Board of Investigation releases remotely operated vehicle footage from the Titan submersible incident salvage (Defense Visual Information Distribution Service 9/17/2024) (<- seems like a CIA proprietary, but whatever)

A few notes about the video itself: They got the depth correct. I checked that first. But remember how I pointed out the screencaps were cropped? The HUD is where you can see it was taken 6/22/2023, only three days after the “sinking”.

Also, see how it’s labeled “Dive: 01”? They tell us elsewhere that the wreckage was 1,600’ from the bow of the Titanic, and at a depth of 3800m. Are we to think they hit this on the very first go at the bottom of the fricking ocean? You can read about the off-the-chain search for and location of the wreckage in these articles:

Here Are the Vessels Working to Find the Titan Sub (gCaptain 6/21/2023)

Titan Lost: Debris Field Consistent with ‘Catastrophic Implosion’ of Tourist Submersible (gCaptain 6/22/2023)

Well, I’m not going to assume that all those ships were not really involved. Let me explain it another way: they searched back and forth and all found nothing because there was nothing to find.

But then what about the Coast Guard and the ROV and the video? Like a magic trick, it’s not what you see, it’s what you don’t notice and what you never think about. We look up the magician’s sleeve in this paragraph from the second article:

The Coast Guard said earlier that the debris was located by an ROV from the Horizon Arctic, an Anchor Handling Tug Supply (AHTS) operated by Horizon Maritime, after its ROV reached the sea floor earlier Thursday. The company also operates OceanGate’s expedition support vessel Polar Prince, which launched the Titan sub on Sunday morning and later reported it missing after losing contact with the vessel.

It was all contained by Horizon Arctic, you see? So a phony dive to a phony wreck site, a phony implosion, phony submersible wreckage, a phony ROV video, etc, etc. And like other magic tricks, when you look it the right way it doesn’t seem that hard at all to pull off, does it? But you can fool the whole world.

Let’s get to the bonus. Not only was it all I ever meant to do, I stumbled into it completely by accident trying to score easy upvotes. See in that last paragraph how the Titan’s support vessel is named Polar Prince? I had the idea that reference might turn out to be a cartoon hero whose sleigh was pulled by 33 reindeer or some such. Conspiracists love to upvote that kinda thing.

Nope. Way deeper.

Before it became the privately-owned Polar Prince, that ship had been the Canadian Coast Guard ship CCGS Sir Humphrey Gilbert. Some development-league Elite bureaucratic Sir douche, right? Nope, and this is where we really step in it.

Sir Humphrey Gilbert was a real Elite, and you know he’s a real one because you’ve never heard of him. You can read up on how this guy was connected at the highest levels, and I’m sure they’re downplaying and soft-pedaling. And then they include this, which makes him sound worse than we’re supposed to think (Putin+MBS)*Jong-un is:

The heddes of all those (of who sort soever thei were) which were killed in the daie, should be cutte off from their bodies and brought to the place where he incamped at night, and should there bee laied on the ground by eche side of the waie ledying into his owne tente so that none could come into his tente for any cause but commonly he muste passe through a lane of heddes which he used ad terrorem... [It brought] greate terrour to the people when thei sawe the heddes of their dedde fathers, brothers, children, kindsfolke, and freinds...

The hell, right? Guess he was a guy who could get the job done. They describe it as:

He was outstanding for his initiative and originality….

Okay then. Actually, the last part of that sentence is also key:

He was outstanding for his initiative and originality, if not for his successes, but it was in his efforts at colonisation that he had the most influence.

See, people these days (thank you public school system) think that Americans were just a bunch of backwards farmers that were a tiny part of the mighty British Empire. Not so. The American colonies were the first overseas settlements of the British, and thus mark the very birth of the Empire.

You can read that he was key to the Roanoke Colony, which many would think of as the first American colonization effort, but his own son Raleigh Gilbert was second-in-command of the even earlier but failed Popham Colony. BTW, the sponsor of the colony, Judge John Popham, presided over the trial of the phony Gunpowder Plot. All really ties together after a while.

And speaking of tying it all together, the last sentence from Gilbert’s wiki is:

Certain contemporaries speculated that he was a pederast.

As the French say, “Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose.”

TL;DR: This is another in the series of posts on the centuries-long historical hijinks by the Parker Family of generational Satanists. In this installment, we find the Parkers were behind one of the most prominent incidents in UFO lore, the Pascagoula Abduction of 1973, and we’ll tie into two other famous UFO incidents. You might think of these as Golden Age of TV episodes of Project BLUEBEAM. Stick around to the end for the Crowley bonus. It’s not that he was involved, but by tracing the connections you learn more about the much bigger web.

If this is your first time reading about the Parkers, I’ve written up just a fraction of the material I’ve collected on them in posts about Vietnam’s Phoenix Program, Jim Jones and Jonestown, and the Parker’s connection to other Spook Families. There’s much more where that came from and this is meant to add to the pile. Also be sure to listen to Jay Parker’s THC interview on Satanic Ritual Abuse, which is the Parkers’ connection to generational Satanism.

First up, a quick note right off the wiki: The incident supposedly took place on 8/11/1973. In his voluminous work, Miles Mathis has pointed out the nauseating frequency with which these hoaxers use “aces and eights” numerology. Something to do with Jewish mysticism and the number 18. FWIW.

Second, we’re not really here to determine the validity of the incident by examining the facts and evidence of the incident itself. That’s already been done and the wiki tells us what we need to know:

Aviation journalist and UFO skeptic Philip J. Klass found "discrepancies" in Hickson's story, noted that Hickson refused to take a polygraph exam conducted by an experienced examiner, and concluded that the case was a hoax. Skeptical investigator Joe Nickell wrote that Hickson's behavior was "questionable" and that Hickson later altered or embellished his claims. Nickell speculated that Hickson may have fantasized the alien encounter during a hypnagogic "waking dream state", and suggested that Parker's corroboration of the tale was likely due to suggestibility because he initially told police he had "passed out at the beginning of the incident and failed to regain consciousness until it was over", a claim supported by Hickson during his To Tell the Truth appearance.

BTW, I know that Nickell I a POS that you want to punch in the voice every time you hear him, but it doesn’t mean he’s wrong about this. In any case, this is our jumping off point. You see, what’s novel here is exactly the nature of Calvin Parker’s involvement. Normally, you’d point to the Elite and screech that he was the hoaxer behind it all. That does not seem to be the case here.

You can see from that paragraph that Calvin had a very odd experience, and it’s just not the kind of lie you make up as part of a hoax. Also, Calvin is not a Satanist but professes a faith in Jesus. Watch an interview with him. As far I can tell, he’s totally sincere.

So what really happened to him? I don’t know. What I do think, though, is that he was picked out as a participant because he was a Parker and they wanted someone from the family, even if he wasn’t “in on it”. He may have already had some kind of conditioning. Who knows?

Again, I said we weren’t going to be looking at the evidence, but more “around” the evidence. These are the informative little splinters They shave off of history as They continuously rewrite the narrative to suit Their contemporary needs.

To find it, we have to go to the original case file of the aforementioned Philip Klass. I found it on a page flogging a new book about the incident from 2018 (what did I say about constantly rewriting?) titled: Pascagoula: The Closest Encounter - My Story. That leads to a page called Calvin Parker – Philip J. Klass File. That contains an embedded 183-page PDF which you cannot download. Fortunately, I extracted the link you really want if you really want the file (and we should probably be archiving these things, right?):

https://de173.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Philip_Klass_Pascagoula_File_Online-1.pdf

At this point you may be thinking, “Hey, Calvin is just some dude with a UFO story that just happens to be named Parker. Just a coincidence!” Maybe, but on page 111 of the file we find a newspaper clipping of an article titled “Federal government will not get involved” with the text:

Capt. Dennis Parker, who said he checked with higher authorities in the Pentagon, said the Air Force would only investigate if there was a threat to national security.

There’s the Parker that’s controlling the psyop right there! He shuts down the government end and you’ll read just after that paragraph that he shuts down the local sheriff too. That’s how it’s done, folks.

Okay, maybe you’re still thinking it’s just two coincidental Parkers, right? Scroll up a little to page 107. Inset in the article about Pascagoula is another titled “Engineer believes UFOs have landed”, where we read:

Stephen Putnam, who passed out name cards with U.F.O. Research printed on them, said he became friends with Betty and Barney Hill…. Putnam, who works with Sidmar Enterprises in Medway, Mass., said he also investigated another UFO sighting in Massachusetts that later became the famous Incident at Exeter.

A lot to unpack. Is that a lazy phony or the world’s most generic business card? Who was this guy, really? Go back to the link at the beginning about Jonestown and you’ll find the Putnams were closely connected. Jim’s mother was Lynetta Putnam. Those Putnams were a branch of the Boston Brahmin Putnams. Where is Medway? Just outside Boston.

How about those other two famous UFO incidents? “The Interrupted Journey” took place near Mount Pemigewasset, a couple hours north of Boston. Exeter, NH, is less than an hour north of Boston. Really popping off in the Boston area, wasn’t it?

This turned out a lot longer than I expected. There’s always a lot to explain because this material will be familiar to few or none. But if you’ve read this far, here is our bonus link to Aleister Crowley (and in the midst of all these fakers, IDK how anyone could possibly believe there was anything legit about him)….

Scroll back in the Klass file to page 111 that we looked at before. See that picture of two long-haired teens that saw a flying saucer? The one-paragraph story begins, “Frankie Pierce (left)….” Now what could I possibly make of this? Well, look how artificial the story seems. One paragraph placed in the corner is all they have to say? I contend it was phony and planted as one of Their little signals to each other.

You may remember there was a US President named Franklin Pierce. One of his direct descendants was named Marvin Pierce. He had a grandson, his namesake Marvin Bush. You may remember him as being on the board of directors for SECURACOM/Stratasec, who provided security for the World Trade Center. Marvin was on the board from 1993 (when the WTC was first bombed) to 2001 (when it was last bombed). Marvin is the more talented and less visible version of his brother George, who also happened to be a US President in 2001.

But more fun is that Marvin Pierce’s wife was Pauline Pierce (nee Robinson), and their daughter was Barbara Pierce, later to marry George HW Bush (another US President!). Some suspect, though, that Barbara’s real father was not Marvin, but (drum roll) Aleister Crowley.

Quick double bonus in case you thought that was a reach: In the Battle of Lexington and Concord, the colonial militia on Lexington Green was commanded by John Parker. The Brit in command of the Redcoats in the area was Hugh Percy. Long story, but the English Percys became American Pearces then Pierces.

Quicker triple bonus: Hugh Percy’s illegitimate half-brother was James Smithson, founder of the Smithsonian Institution, which defines institutional shadiness.

Out of breath? I am.