TL;DR: Jarl Mohn is actually Johannes Mohn, the son of Reinhard Mohn. The late billionaire Reinhard was the head of Bertlesmann and that’s where Jarl really got his money. Bertlesmann was originally a publishing company, and Reinhard’s father specialized in—you got it—propaganda for the National Socialists. Jarl is the guy that ruined MTV, so maybe now that makes sense, too. Stick around to the end and you’ll find out that, yes, “They” do censor email.

Normally I stumble around so much when I’m researching that I simply can’t remember how I got to where I ended up. In this case, even though it was a decade ago, I remember a bit about the sequence so that’s how we’ll walk through it.

It began with the “No Agenda Show” podcast. Adam Curry, one of the original MTV VJs, was hired for the job by a man named Lee Masters. Adam had casually mentioned that Masters was a former DJ himself and went by his radio name. His less catchy real name was Jarl Mohn. Interesting inside baseball trivia, and it always stuck with me.

Years went by and I read hundreds of papers by high-level disinfo agent Miles Mathis. One of the themes that came out of that was how much you could learn just by paying attention to and researching names. Jarl had by that time moved on to CEO of NPR. Then I chanced across the factoid that Bertlesmann was run by a guy named Reinhard Mohn. Two Mohns running two giant media properties on two continents? What are the odds? Time to check it out.

First, though, let me accent the level of media control here. As mentioned, Jarl had turned a simple music video channel into a twisted social engineering outlet that has skewed the reality of a couple of generations by this point. NPR was no slouch, either. At the time I was researching, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity were all the talk of talk radio, each with a daily audience of about 20 million. Meanwhile, NPR’s “Fresh Air” and “All Things Considered” each had an audience of about 30 million. See how They keep things low-profile and you just somehow never notice?

As for Bertlesmann, there are no apples-to-apples comparisons but we can put it up against media behemoth Warner Bros. Discovery, which Forbes lists as the fourth largest worldwide. Warner has revenue of $41B and 35K employees, while Bertlesmann has revenue of 20B euros and 165K employees. In any case, a very heavy hitter on the public consciousness.

Obvious initial question: do they just admit Jarl is Reinhard’s son? No. But they do say he had a son named Johannes and two daughters. Suspicious “J”’s, eh? But okay, if we could just ascertain the whereabouts of Johannes, we could probably put the matter to rest. And this is where the hook was set.

You see, Reinhard died in 2009. Did Johannes come calling to collect his share of the billions? Nope. In fact, if you scour any of the media accounts of his passing, they never mention Johannes or the two girls. By that time, Reinhard had remarried and had another son, and that is the only family they ever talk about, still running Bertlesmann to this day. Also, good luck finding any record of Johannes dying or being taken away by UFOs or whatever. Johannes had simply evaporated into history.

Let’s check the other side, then. You know how Five-O always keys on “no visible means of support” when they’re trying to find organized criminals? Let’s see if Jarl has “visible means of billions”. The answer is no, he does not.

Read his wiki carefully and you won’t find where he “struck it rich”. They actually mention the place where I would say the transfer from father Reinhard to son Johannes to took place, Liberty Digital, but the link is broken. They don’t want you thinking about it, let alone researching it. The closest you’ll get is the hazy tale told in this article, where he kind of wanders in and comes out rich a couple of years later:

Jarl Mohn: The Art of Being Jarl (CSQ 9/25/2014)

Many reading this might have the idea that WW2 was managed by powers higher than the leadership of the Allies and the Axis, and that those powers still manage the world to this day. This revelation should coincide well with that view. To provide further evidence and cement all this together, we’ll look at where They are actively rewriting history. Get it while you can.

In an earlier version of Reinhard’s wiki, we find this passage, now expunged from the Book of Knowledge:

He ended up in Camp Concordia, a prisoner of war camp in Kansas. There, he learned English, as well as American business practices.

Did you know that POWs were trained in American business practices? I thought it was all standing around smoking and slave labor and digging tunnels. I claim here that Reinhard was an asset, being trained for his future role. Then we find this, even more telling:

Though his father had been a supporter of the SS, the company was able to obtain a publishing permit from the occupying British. Nearly half a century later, Austrian journalist Hersch Fischler determined that the company had, contrary to its official version of its wartime activities, worked closely with the Nazi regime from the 1930s through the war, and had probably employed Jewish slave labour at some of its plants. Reinhard Mohn however denied being involved in the company's operations during World War II.

So they gave a permit to a Nazi propaganda operation? Uh, who did they not give them to, then? Also, you see at the end where they’re already trying to massage Reinhard’s history. Reinhard was in the Luftwaffe then in a POW camp (wink!), so yes, of course he didn’t work in the print shop. Already trying to wash the stain off him, see?

Bonus time: I wrote up a short version of this and emailed it to Adam Curry, co-host of the “No Agenda Show” podcast. As I mentioned, Adam knew Lee Masters personally. Really, you could say that if it weren’t for good old Jarl, none of us would have ever heard of Adam. If not conclusive, it’s at least an intriguing theory and who knows what Adam would be able to add to it, right?

At that time, Adam was much more of a conspiracy theorist. Over the years, though, every time Adam brings up “conspiracy” John Dvorak basically sits on his back and Adam has largely given up. So what did the “Second Half of Show” version of Adam have to say about this?

Nothing. Never heard it mentioned on the show and never heard back via email. By that time, I had emailed back and forth with him on several occasions, so it wasn’t a comms problem. This was just a bit too hot let get through to a few hundred thousand people. On other occasions, I’ve even gotten replies from “Adam” that I’m sure are phony.

I suppose if anyone feels that they are not on enough watchlists, feel free to email any or all of this writeup to adam at curry dot com. I cannot be held responsible for any problems thereafter with your email service, which I experience to this very day (yes, literally today, which I think somehow upsets me and caused me to write this decade-old expose).

TL;DR: The Real Elite Families work together all the time to control history. Here, we’ll take a quick peek at the Coffins, the Motts, and the Parkers. Never heard of them? That’s how you know they’re the Real ones instead of the ones They present to us to “reeeee!” about in the daily headlines. The point of this tour is not so much to expose their activities, it’s so you notice that you never noticed these people and their antics.

Stick with this long post all the way through, though, and I’ll reward you with a connection to the Sandy Hook event. Yes, that damn Sandy Hook!

As a way of introduction, I’ll say that I finally realized why the movie Forrest Gump was so famous. Was it really just the feel-good hit of the summer of 94? Was it happenstance that it was directed by Robert Zemeckis, responsible for so much foreshadowing in Back to the Future? Was it pure chance it starred Top Hollywood Freakazoid Tom Hanks? I never thought about these questions before.

Now, though, I believe that the Elite could not help pointing us towards the way that They control events from just outside the spotlight. Forrest touches all kinds of events in history, but is never noticed doing so. It’s not like the movie depicts a historian or researcher discovering these hidden connections, so don’t kid yourself: the only reason any of us noticed is because they made a movie showing us just that. Get it?

We begin the actual the 3x3 back at my post about the strange association with the Elites and the name “evergreen”. In the section on Evergreen, Colorado, I mentioned that when I came across the name Diane Mott Davidson, there was much more to be said. Here we are, and that was our first square filling out the grid.

Our second is just north of Denver: the historical landmark known as the Morse Coffin House:

The lure of the west brought his [Tristram Coffin of Nantucket’s] eighth generation descendant, Morse H. Coffin, to Colorado with two friends to work among the support services to the burgeoning mining industry.

The Denver Public Library also hosts the Coffin Family Papers. We can guess this all probably means they controlled Colorado mining back in the day.

For our last square in Denver, did you know there’s an entire suburb of Denver named Parker, Colorado? I wouldn’t have known either, except that I met someone who had recently moved to Denver, and she clarified that it was technically Parker. The point is that you never know when and how you’ll come into contact with these little clues.

You can’t find out very much about the guys after whom it was named, other than their last names were Parker and they were brothers. And if you’re thinking, “Parker Brothers, haha, like the game company?” we’ll get there! But first, we head west thousands of miles….

You see, I noticed back on Diane’s page that she’d been born in Honolulu. Well, I knew from before that the Elite had stolen the entire Kingdom of Hawaii. Now, you didn’t think you’d read that in so many words on that wiki page, did you? Of course not! Everyone assumes rewriting history is all about making up lies, but that’s not the most effective way. They can write truths, but just leave out the good parts and all the connections.

In this case, read that page up and down and you’ll find only the tiniest possible hint of those pulling the levers. You’ll see a “Mr. Parker” mentioned in Footnote 75. See how it works? They have you looking through the wrong end of the telescope. I refer you instead to the pages for:

-Charles Coffin Harris: Hawaii’s Attorney General, Minister of Finance, Minister of Foreign Affairs, and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

-Samuel Parker (Hawaii politician): Hawaii’s Minister of Finance and Minister of Foreign Affairs

-John Mott-Smith: Hawaii’s Minister of Finance and Minister of the Interior (Tangent: did you know there’s a Mott-Smith Trophy for bridge? Can’t get away from these people.)

Read up on their influence and activities in Hawaii and you’ll understand more why the “overthrow” wiki doesn’t mention them. And remember, all these pages have to read with the thoughts in mind, “this is what they’ll admit to” and “this is what they want you to believe”.

Now we flip back to the other edge of the New World, back closer to Their origins in the upper-right hand corner of the good old USA. Specifically, we land in Seneca Falls, we where get a two-fer.

I hope everyone reading this knows well that Feminism is one of Their big “ops”. The Women’s Studies majors among us might have immediately thought of the birth of modern Feminism at the Seneca Falls Convention of 1848, and the name Elizabeth Cady Stanton perhaps came to mind. Good for you! (Much more to be said about Liz at a later date.)

But much less well-known, standing just outside the spotlight as I told you They do, is Lucretia Mott. She is a Mott by marriage, though, and was born Lucretia Coffin. Our two-fer! (She’s actually an incredible-fer, because you can tie her right in to things from the fake Manson murders to Benjamin Franklin, but again this is for another day.)

We fill out our grid with this topic: ouija boards. They have been covered innumerable times by conspiracists interested in the occult, who sometimes note how very strange it was that a mainstream game company used to sell them in the toy aisle of department stores. They never mentioned exactly how that anomaly came to be, did they? I’ll tell you, but you already guessed, didn’t you? They were produced by Parker Brothers. That no longer seems like trivia, does it?

It’s just an aside, but if you push a little further you find that the company was founded by George Swinnerton Parker. Know what his first game was, published when he was 16? Banking. You can’t make this up! I wonder if he ever planned sequels like Usury and Asset Stripping. Haha, that’s a joke! He and the crew were too busy actually doing those things.

So there’s our grid, and if you’re still here it’s time now for the bonus. It seems a stretch at face value, but if you’ve read all the other stuff, maybe it won’t seem so. It doesn’t seem like a stretch at all to me anymore. We go back to where we started….

Back on Diane’s page, they shoehorn in a reference to Robert B. Parker. I mean, it’s literally in the first motherscratching sentence of her wiki. Seems forced, right? Now, if you’re thinking that discovering another Parker was the bonus, that’s just the tip.

Here’s the full shaft: Robert B. Parker was born in Springfield, Massachusetts. If you head south-southeast for an hour, a straight shot down 91 then 84, you come to Newtown, Connecticut. Oh, you forgot about that other Robert—excuse me, “Robbie”—Parker, didn’t you? We all assumed he was just some hired douchebag actor and thought no more about it, but that doesn’t seem to be the explanation now, does it?

It’s just speculation, but I think They purposely put one of Their own--using his real name—to lie to all of us right to our stupid fucking faces. I would guess They really get off on that. That fuckwad Robbie sure seemed tickled about something, didn’t he?

TL;DR: This is another wandering tour that highlights a few leaves on the tree of one of the handful of Families that have run America since long before its inception. What brings up here today is this news item:

San Francisco Macy’s to close in devastating blow to downtown (SF Chronicle 2/27/2024)

Many will have seen this news and simply thought, “Another bump on the side of the hill down which progressives have kicked the once beautiful city of San Francisco,” or “The Doom Spiral!” or some similar thought. As always, “They” are content with you thinking whatever first comes to mind, but fear you ever looking deeper. That’s what we’ll do here.

You see, the connections to this event stretch all the way back to the mid-1600’s, when (we are told) whitey first showed up in North America to begin the program of bigotry and oppression that has lead us to Donald J. Trump (or whatever we’re supposed to believe).

If you are very old indeed, you may have heard the department store called by the original name “R.H. Macy & Co.”. That refers to the founder, Rowland Hussey Macy , originally of Nantucket. Any time you see that island mentioned, pay close attention. I did.

Wiki won’t tell you this on R.H. Macy’s page, but I will: one of the original group of Nantucket settlers in the mid-17th Century was Thomas Macy. Given the tiny population of that tiny island, I think we can say without genealogical research that R.H. is clearly one of his descendants. Is there anyone else? Sure, but we’ll start slow and build up.

As you were reading this post, did you think of beloved character actor and “Varsity Blues” briber William H. Macy? If so, and you just clicked that hotlink to check your guess to confirm that he’s descended from Thomas of Nantucket, you’ll be disappointed. But fear not, I will confirm it for you here, courtesy of EthniCelebs. You don’t think leaving that out of Wiki was on purpose, do you?

Everyone likes to talk about “the Joos” and—again—I will not disappoint. A few may have been aware that Otto Frank, fiction writer and father of the renowned diarist, tried to immigrate to the US before the war by writing for the help of an influential American friend. He knew that friend from his time decades previously working in—you got it—Macy’s Department Store in Jew York City. That friend was Nathan Straus Jr., son of the owner of Macy’s. Nathan married Helen Sachs, and that made his father-in-law the neurologist Bernard Sachs. If that immediately made you think, “Haha, Sachs as in Goldman–Sachs?”, click the link to see how correct you are.

I won’t go into it here, but it’s well worth looking up Nathan Jr’s son, R. Peter Straus. You’ll find direct links to: Edward Bernays, the Sulzbergers and the Jew York Times, USAID, VOA, and (tell me you saw this coming) Monica Lewinsky. You can’t make this stuff up. He married her mom while the scandal was ongoing. (And as you might now be guessing, The Monica Lewinsky Scandal was Faked (25-page PDF)).

However, you might at this point also be thinking, “We’re wandering off the track a bit, aren’t we?” Kinda, but the whole point is to illustrate that wandering off the track even slightly--but in the correct direction--leads you even deeper into the weeds because it’s a Very… Small… Club.

Back on the main line but two and a half centuries ago, we can take a look at this old clipping:

Nantucket Newspapers and My Parker Ancestors

Much more to be said about these Parkers at a later date (again, see how it works?), but for now you may note that Isaac Parker was involved in some sort of commercial venture with Peleg Macy, Jr. on Nantucket. Turns out Isaac was the son of Captain John Parker. He commanded the colonial militia at the Battle of Lexington on April 19, 1776. (Waco massacre and almost Hitler’s birthday, right? Coincidence? Think that battle might have been a false flag of sorts?)

Somehow I never knew his name before this, but as I reflect on that, I take it as suggesting that there’s not so much a formal Memory Hole that we could locate and destroy, but a subtle smearing and slow wiping away of history from consciousness. Effective, is it not?

Finally, another Macy along the chain was Josiah Macy Jr.: Nantucket, Standard Oil, Rockefellers, and setting up Albert Einstein’s handler. The drill gets boring after a while, doesn’t it? Well, I wanted to end with a bang and I’ll give it to you: his foundation set up what are known as the Macy conferences. Never heard of them? Of course not. Wiki doesn’t even link to them from Josiah’s page, the devious bastards!

You can chase down some documentation on them in this link I saved:

Cybernetics. The Macy Conferences 1946-53. Technocratic planning for the Internet and the Merger of Man/Machine. (r/conspiracy 1/13/2021)

I will tell you about their importance, though, something no one is talking about and and an insight I came to only very recently. We’ve all heard of Technocracy and we’ve all heard of Transhumanism, probably too much and most of it pointless. You can actually see the insight I had in the title of that post: it is cybernetics that is the fusion of technocracy and transhumanism and is the level beyond them both. Wiki feeds you a lot of nonsense and hand-waving on their cybernetics page, but I link only for completeness and not because you should study it.

Really, the only item of importance on the page is the etymology of the word itself, and it is revelatory. The word “cybernetics” comes from the Greek and means “helmsperson”. “They” mean to steer human society as one steers a ship, you see. To accomplish that, humans must become parts of that ship, to become machine-like, as reliable and predictable as any inanimate part. (I digress here to add that the word “robot” comes from a word meaning “slave”, so you should observe the concepts have always coalesced.) Indeed, if one observes the operation of a sailing vessel, the members of the crew behave as machines. There is no creativity, only execution.

So we got from a department store closing to The System of the World. Not bad, right?

Bonus for everyone that stuck it out this far: did you ever actually take conscious notice of the logo of Macy’s? Now that I alert you to it consciously, have you ever seen such a symbol used anywhere else? You can believe it indeed has broader (dare I say “occult”?) meaning, or is merely coincidence, or you may prefer to accept this preposterous story on it’s face:

Macy’s famous red star has Nantucket roots (Boston.com 9/23/2017)

ADVISORY: Another medium-long post with no thesis, just a collection of strangely interrelated facts. Keep this post in mind for when you encounter the name “evergreen” in your research, because there may be more to it than meets the eye. Or just enjoy the medium-long, strange trip.

What this all means, I do not know. Maybe something Occult, like “Evergreen” was the nickname of Satan’s college roommate. That’s a joke, but speaking of what “meets the eye”, the material we’re reviewing today is what I consider the true occult: doings of the Elites whose meanings are actually hidden from you.

We’ll proceed in order of what I think should be most obvious to most obscure, and just when you think I should have arranged them some other way for best dramatic effect, I’ll stick the landing. Watch and see! We begin with….

Hillary Clinton’s Secret Service Code Name

15 Secret Service code names for presidents, first ladies, and first children — and the stories behind them. I hope everyone already knew this one. But psych! That article never actually tells you the story behind Hellary’s name. Technically, only President’s pick their own, but I don’t believe that rule held for HRC, do you? Also note that she used the same name both in 2016 and all the way back in 1992.

(Fun addition: scroll up in the article to the two above Hillbeast. “Barbara Base here, the Bill Clinton has landed.” Something there? No, probably not.)

Evergreen Air

Evergreen International Aviation is an admitted CIA front. Back in 2010, a whistleblower came forward to IntelliHub and reported that, among other hijinks, they were involved in chemtrails:

Evergreen Air and a Secret Chemtrail Facility

I have to admit that at this point, those type of revelations seem almost pedestrian, don’t they? So let’s go to crass, juvenile graffiti on a grand scale with…

Operation DICKBALLS

That’s not an official name, if you were wondering, just my catchy tag for this bizarre, unexplained incident. But you see, one of the ways They divert your attention away from something significant is to make it seem boring. How about giving it a boring name like, say, the 2021 Suez Canal obstruction? Mission accomplished! But do you recall how extremely strange this whole affair was? Like this aspect, which is hard for me to believe Snopes admits:

Did Cargo Ship 'Draw' a Penis Before Getting Stuck in Suez Canal? (3/24/2021)

Do you recall getting a clear, reasonable explanation for this? Me neither. As to this other aspect, since Snopes officially denies it, I consider at least some variation of it officially confirmed:

Conspiracy Theorists Try to Connect Ever Given Ship, Hillary Clinton, and Child Trafficking (3/26/2021)

The connection to our theme? While the name of the ship is Ever Given, I am not a researcher ever given to “rounding up” and calling that a match. If you haven’t already clicked on one of the last two links, please do and take a look at a photo of the ship.

Yes, in letters 50 feet high or whatever. That’s the name of the shipping company that owns it, Evergreen Marine Corporation, part of the larger Evergreen Group.

Evergreen is titanic, and I can’t tell you how big because it’s privately held. We can get some idea about the Evergreen Marine component by comparing it to the slightly larger Hapag-Lloyd AG. Since they’re a public company, we can see that their 2022 revenue was over $36 billion with a net income of $18 billion. So… wow.

(Worth mentioning: China is currently undergoing a huge financial crisis, centered around the enormous property developer Evergrande Group, whose 2020 revenue was $78B. Is Xi cleaning out the PRC Swamp, and this “ever” is one of the swamp monsters? You decide.)

So was Operation DICKBALLS really just crass, juvenile graffiti on a grand scale? Maybe not:

Can we agree that the Ever Given dick/balls route looks exactly like the Denver International Airport roads from above? Denver airport is fucking weird and we all know who sponsored it. I’m just saying. (r/conspiracy 4/3/2021)

Hmm, DIA again? That really tees it up for me perfectly, because now I get to bring it all home and tell you about…

Evergreen, Colorado

I hope someone out there caught this name from my previous mentions of it, but even for you we’ll go deeper. Evergreen, Colorado is a tiny exurb just west of Denver. It was even tinier back in 1973, with a population of just a few thousand. That was when young John Hinckley Jr. moved there with his family.

Lacking any rationale, Dallas oilman and GHWB crony, John Hinckley Sr., had moved there with both his family and his company, Vanderbilt Energy Corporation. That’s bizarre. DJT and the Trump Organization decamping Manhattan and Mar-a-Lago for Truckee is more plausible. Is there easy access to a DUMB there or something? Who knows.

Junior was back with the family and living in Evergreen at the time of the (staged) Reagan assassination attempt, so that’s why I was even looking at this Nowheresville in the first place. On the wiki under “Notable residents”, I saw the name Diane Mott Davidson and I knew we were on to something. (I told you these clues would get more difficult to spot, and here we are.)

Now, keying on the name “Mott” opens a can of worms much bigger that you imagine. Since it really is about keeping real secrets when They wish, that’s why you probably can’t imagine WTH I’m even talking about. We’ll have to save it all for another post. As to Diane, it turns out that she studied political science at Wellesley and lived across the hall from her fellow poli-sci major…

Hillary Rodham

C’mon, that stuck the landing, right? I never see these things coming and I can’t imagine anyone else does, either. In any case, thanks for coming along for the ride!

ADVISORY: There will be no startling revelations or even a thesis in this post, just a long, strange chain of evidence that wraps around on itself in a surprising way. What it conjures, though, is the notion that far beneath the headlines and history books, it really is a Small Club, and you ain’t in it.

Understand first that very, very few people are actually trying to put together for themselves How the World Really Works. I would say the number of such people on conspiracies.win is less than 10. If you’re one of them, consider yourself an Elite (of the right kind, for once).

What we’re doing is putting together a giant jigsaw puzzle. Most of what counts as “conspiracy theory” these days is that someone pulls out a puzzle piece, waves it in your face, and you have a primarily emotional reaction. Even if that puzzle piece is legit, just trying to place that single piece correctly into the whole puzzle is nearly impossible. TPTB know these dynamics and that’s why disinfo is so effective.

What I’ve done here is put together a block of puzzle pieces, all with this strange center of “Lookout Mountain”. Exactly what it all means I certainly do not know, but the idea is this: if you can’t remember the details, just remember “Lookout Mountain”. If you later encounter that name in research, rather than skating over it your mind will catch and you’ll think, “Hang on—there may be some significance to that.” You can then refer back here.

Alternatively, you can just enjoy the sights along the way and be reminded once again, “Oh, yes, there is a Dark World that the Small Club lives in but which few outside of it ever notice.” In either case, let’s begin our sightseeing…

Once again, I bumbled into all this when--for a reason I have utterly forgotten--I was looking at the wiki of Mark David Chapman, the fake assassin in the fake murder of John Lennon. (If you were not aware it was fake, I told you already we’d wrap back around so please remain seated until the post comes to a complete stop.) I happened to notice that he had attended college in Lookout Mountain, Georgia. I was immediately hooked by an association which we will get to shortly, but first things first. That city in northwest Georgia near the Alabama line is at the foot of a striking ridgeline, very ominous and surely occult, known as…

Lookout Mountain, Georgia. It’s the first place everyone thinks of when they hear that name, but, well… it isn’t at all significant, at least not in any way I could detect. No red flags at all, but everyone is free to look for themselves. So we’ll go back to the association I had, the one I know leads somewhere…

Lookout Mountain Air Force Station. Ten demerits if you were not already familiar with this place. The site figures prominently in Miles Mathis’ landmark paper: The Tate Murders were a False Flag (95-page PDF). While it is quite a stunning work, keep in mind that Mathis is a disinfo agent. We might have an example of that disinfo at work in an insignificant line from the paper: “behind Sharon in both pictures is a large hill called Lookout Mountain”.

The thing is, I cannot confirm that’s what the hill--among countless others in the canyons north of LA--is or ever was named. We all know how the military is obsessed with naming things after people, so why not something like “William H. Blanchard Air Force Station”? The naming is particularly strange seeing that there is another Lookout Mountain about 40 miles east across the LA Basin, near Mt. Baldy. Were they running out of names? This all leads me to believe the AFS was so named not because of the ground on which it stood, but because “They” find this name significant in some way.

And keep this in your back pocket for now, but near Wonderland Ave where the old AFS was, there’s a Stanley Hills Drive off Lookout Mountain Ave just before you get to Laurel Canyon Blvd. (Any Dave McGowan fans here?) But for now, back to Chapman, where we learn more about that school in Lookout Mountain, GA, named…

Covenant College. Let’s see, a Christian School located at the Georgia-Alabama line, so of course you can guess it was founded in… Pasadena, California. While I expect everyone to know that Jack Parsons died in Pasadena in 1952 (or did he?), just before Covenant was founded there in 1955, what you might not have seen coming is that Pasadena is on a direct line between those two Lookout Mountains we were just talking about. Curious, no? More provocative is the founding president of Covenant College, Robert G. Rayburn. Okay fine, it’s not actually him that’s provocative, but more his brother…

Jim Rayburn. Jim was born in Iowa, but he ended his days in Colorado Springs, Colorado. They may as well call the place “DotMIL West”, and it’s an hour south of Denver. Also, Jim married a lady named Helen Maxine Stanley. Huh. But speaking of Denver, did you know that on the western edge of town you’ll find another (you guessed it)…

Lookout Mountain (Colorado). You know about Columbine and Aurora, but no one ever mentioned this place before, did they? So, what crazy Elite stuff goes on there? Hell if I know, but that’s how secrets work--they’re secret. But we can talk more about the suburb immediately to the south…

Morrison, Colorado. “Morrison”? As in Jim Morrison, lead singer of The Doors? (As in Rush Limbaugh?) As in Vice Admiral George Stephen Morrison, who gifted us with the Gulf of Tonkin Incident and the Vietnam War? I can’t tell you the answer--because I’m terrible at genealogy--but I can tell you the town was founded by another George Morrison. Common name to be sure, but still, right? You’ll also see that three of the most famous types of dinosaurs were discovered in the nearby Morrison Formation, so that may be of interest to proponents of “dinos never existed”. But the more prominent and interesting fellow from Morrison seems to be…

John Brisben Walker. “Walker” as in “George Herbert Walker Bush”? Maybe, but as I said I’m terrible at genealogy so I leave it as an exercise for the student. First quick note on this guy: in 1887, Walker donated 40 acres in Denver to the Jesuits, where they built what is now Regis University. Take that for what it’s worth.

Second not as quick note on this guy: he was an early owner of Cosmopolitan magazine. Weirdly, it started as a family magazine. Double-weirdly, the word “cosmopolitan” used to mean "belonging to all parts of the world, limited to no place or society [ie, no borders or national sovereignty]” or "composed of people of all nations, multi-ethnic". Haha, ring any bells? Today, the magazine is primarily about teen butt sex or something. But John’s story does not itself end with teen butt sex.

You see, I noticed something on Walker’s page in the “See also” section not mentioned elsewhere in the rest of the text. It turns out that for his Locomobile Company of America, he purchased a prototype from the brothers that founded the...

Stanley Motor Carriage Company. Yes, the "Stanley Steamer". Again with these people? And speaking of American industrialists named "Stanley", what might have popped into your head is...

Stanley Hand Tools. Good instinct, but there’s a bit of a longer story. The founding of that company traces back to Frederick Trent Stanley, but look on that page and you’ll see it traces back further to a broken link to his cousin, “Henry Stanley (industrialist)”. Who is he? IDK and--once more--this is how secrets are kept. You can decide whether and how he might be related to this man of the same name...

Henry Morton Stanley. Yes, this is the guy from, "Doctor Livingstone, I presume?". You know how the Elites all love to change and corrupt their own names? There’s a switchup with this guy, where they tell some fake-ass story about how he was born “John Rowland” and then changed it to “Henry Morton Stanley”. In this case, he switched to his real name, or rather never switched away. But do we have any reason to believe this guy might be one of “Them”, controlling world events from behind the scenes? Well, we do have this:

Henry Stanley, The Man Who Stole The Congo (HeadStuff 8/25/2018)

You can’t make this stuff up, can you? If you’re thinking that was the big reveal about the Stanleys, you’re wrong but we’ll finally close the loop when I tell you about the…

Murder of John Lennon. Phony, as you might have guessed at the rate things are going, but you can read up on all of Miles Mathis’ Proof that John Lennon Faked his Death (54-page PDF). Another landmark paper and well worth studying, including a lot of info on these Stanleys we've seen over and over. For example, if this whole time you’ve been thinking, “The only Stanley I know about is the Cup”, yep, same Stanleys.

Maybe you think this material is all old and dusty, but I tell you it’s still close at hand. Obama’s mother’s name is Stanley Ann Dunham. Really? No, of course not. As I just said, they like to corrupt their own names to fool us all (which They usually do). Her name was clearly Ann Stanley Dunham, her middle name reflecting her bloodline. That makes former President Osama yet another Stanley. Meanwhile, everyone points and shrieks about Gates and Schwab and Trump. See how real power is hidden?

As promised, I brought us all right back to Mark David Chapman, who may have shot any number of people, but not John Lennon. Oh, almost forgot to mention John’s mother’s name was Julia Stanley. Quite a trip, eh?

WARNING: Another long, rambling post to get it out of my system and on to the Internet so it can live in true obscurity.

Everyone needs the TL;DR to get hooked, so here it is: Foster is connected to “Them” (the ones whose names you are not familiar with), was involved in the Reagan assassination, is a psychopath, and is a no-talent artificial Hollyweird “star” handed down to us like all the rest of our popular culture.

I know I won’t be offending any Jodie Foster fans because she doesn’t have any. Odd, is it not, considering she’s one of America’s A-list movie stars with a career going strong into it’s sixth decade? That’s because she was packaged up and shoved in our faces without letup, as is so painfully obvious with today’s hottest celebs.

There’s a point to this writeup, and it’s not to bash Foster. Actually, it’s to note the opposite. You never thought much about her before--nor did I until very recently--and when you did it was only what “everybody knew” about her, particularly her incidence with the Reagan assassination attempt. But you see, when “They” don’t wish you to notice something, almost no one will (and I include myself in that group). Over “secrecy”, “failure to notice” is a much bigger part of how They keep secrets.

But I have found that when see a rock with the slightest intrigue to it and take the time to kick it over, I will almost always find things I did not notice before and that may have some importance. Kicking rocks over seems like too much effort for most people these days, but I’ll do the kicking and we can all take a look underneath the rock called “Jodie Foster”….

What caused me to look at any of this in the first place? Well, it was stumbling into this article, little-noted and long-forgotten:

HINCKLEY'S FATHER TELLS THE COURT, 'I AM THE CAUSE OF JOHN'S TRAGEDY' (New York Times 5/13/1982)

Their 26-year-old son stared stonily into space. But this afternoon, John W. Hinckley Jr. reacted strongly to the videotaped deposition of another defense witness, Jodie Foster, a film actress. And when her voice said coolly, ''I don't have any relationship with John Hinckley,'' he abruptly stood up from the defense table and walked out the back door of the courtroom, with three guards in his wake.

Hang on, did I read that right? He walked out of his own trial for attempted murder? Is that something we can all do but were simply ignorant of the option? No, of course not. The trial was phony.

If you watch the handful of mainstream interviews with Junior—extremely brief and without content, as you may imagine—you might observe, as I did, that he is a bit dim and emotionally underdeveloped, perhaps with a touch of the ‘tism. Very manipulable, in other words. (But not straight up retarded, and therefore unsuitable for FBI work.)

Which brings us to the outburst itself: what caused such an intense reaction in this otherwise “stony” and detached man? I propose that he heard something that he knew was a flat fucking lie and just couldn’t stand it. My basic thesis is that Senior worked with Foster to talk him into it under some pretense, and that Mommy went along with it all because Junior was a bit “slow”, and life in a mental hospital was not much different than any other state institution. All for the best, as always.

In that same article, another strange comment backs up the thesis about Dad’s involvement. You’d think he’d say something like, “I wish I’d handled John just a little differently so that all this didn’t happen,” right? Wrong:

The father of the man who shot President Reagan testified this morning, in a voice laden with emotion, ''I am the cause of John's tragedy'' and ''I wish to God that I could trade places with him right now.''

Well, well. As I would have it, the first part is the pure truth, is it not? Perhaps the second even expresses some regret after the fact. A sobbing Mommy was soon escorted from the courtroom, so maybe she just could not take the shit show either.

Foster herself is not just some ordinary person, but connected to “Them”, in case you had any doubts. Her Dad was just some deadbeat who bailed before she was even born, we are told. Well, her older brother is Buddy Foster, but his real name is Lucius Fisher Foster IV. Do you know any IV’s? I actually did meet a IV once, but let’s admit such bloodlines are pretty damn rare.

Their father was Air Force Lt Col Lucius Fisher Foster III. He was born in Denver and I don’t think that’s just trivia. Junior was living in Evergreen, a western exburb of Denver, at the time of the attempted assassination. (I’m planning a whole long boring post on the strange associations emanating from there, but that must wait for another time.)

The father of III is linked as Lucius Fisher Foster, also born in Denver. But that’s not right: the dates are right but he should be II. Well, we’re being fucked around genealogically, that’s why. This is how They snip those red strings. We also have not a whisper what he did in the military. Very suspicious, though, is the mere fact he was a Lieutenant Colonel. Having read through hundreds of Miles Mathis’s papers exposing psyops, it’s absolutely stunning how often that rank shows up in relatives of participants in said psyops. Miles suspected it was the highest rank that could be given to military spooks without drawing undue attention.

And did I say Jodie is a psychopath? The tables are turned, Lecter! And the apple apparently did not fall far from the tree. Take a look at the gems in this article:

Jodie Foster's father jailed over scam (ABC.au 12/9/2011)

"Despite your personal charm, you are dangerous," the judge said at the courthouse in Van Nuys, just north of Los Angeles, telling Foster that he was "continuing your business as we speak."

"He's either the liar of the century or he's delusional," she said. "Either way he's dangerous. It does not matter that he's 89 years old ... We all know what he's capable of."

Yikes! Sounds like a psychopath who just can’t stop predating even in his “golden years”. But does that mean Jodie is a psycho, too? Watch this video and see if you fail to notice what I failed to notice:

Jodie Foster press conference in April 1981 after Reagan was shot FULL INTERVIEW (4/12/1981)

I failed to notice any negative emotional affect. None. Just blank affect interspersed with smiles and light laughs. Keep in mind this is about two weeks after the incident where two people, Reagan and Brady, were gravely wounded. You’ll see more upset by telling someone in a departure lounge that their flight will be delayed by 30 minutes, particularly if they have a connection. (And is anyone reminded of the strange Apollo 11 press conference, just coming from a different angle?)

In brief, psychos don’t have normal emotional reactions. As a necessary tool of survival among other people, they carefully learn to act as if they’re experiencing emotions. Like an actor, if you will. Someone apparently forgot to tell Jodie how to act in this, her most crucial role.

Let’s finish up with Ms. Foster’s movie career. Did you know she was the prototype for the Disney child star? I did not realize that until I looked: Disney Fandom: Jodie Foster. Starting all the way back in 1972, she was in four Disney movies in five years. Looking at this list of Walt Disney Pictures films, none look suspicious until, half a year before Foster’s first film for them, we find Bedknobs and Broomsticks.

Did you know that the film was based on books titled The Magic Bedknob; or, How to Become a Witch in Ten Easy Lessons and Bonfires and Broomsticks. I read once that “bonfire” originally comes from “Baal fire”. Who knows, but it appears the Dark Artists arrived around 1971 and started churning them out. (Some might push it back to 1969 and say that The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes was actually about transhumanism, but I don’t feel the need to go that far. Plus, Kurt Russell is a conservative now. Plus, how dare you give Snake Plissken any side eye.)

Now don’t click the link yet, but Jodie’s breakout film as an adult was, of course, The Accused, a highly controversial movie about a gang rape. Is that what audiences demanded? No, not even on PornHub. Can you say “cultural degradation”? Okay, if I claim Foster is an Illuminati puppet, what symbology might you expect to see in the movie poster? Go ahead and click that link.

The real attention is based on Jodie’s role in the film, Taxi Driver, where she plays a 12-year-old prostitute. Can you say “cultural degradation”? We are told this was the origination of Hinckley’s obsession. When I finally got around to watching it decades after the fact--just to find out what all the fuss was about--I thought for the longest time I had the wrong movie. Cybill Shepard (who is stunning) plays the female lead, while Foster has a tiny part and doesn’t come in until very late. Continue to accept this “obsession” as a plot element of the assassination attempt, if you insist.

Quick addition: I almost forgot to mention her forgettable film, Panic Room. Can you say “strategy of tension”?

Finally, let’s back up and look at the 30,000’ view: how in the hell did Jodie Foster have such an outstanding career? What’s her most notable movie? The Silence of the Lambs, of course. Is it because of anything she did? Nope. What’s her most memorable line? “Well hello, Clarice”, or whichever Mandela version you choose. Whoops, it was Anthony Hopkins who said that! Now, who among your friends does the best Jodie Foster impression? Well… after half a century she’s really left no impression at all, has she?

There are various other lies and contradictions and suspicious behavior and phoniness, but if I haven’t driven the point deep into the ground by this time, I never will. In any case, for anyone that has stuck it out this far, I hope you enjoyed the ride and thanks for flying!

PS: I mentioned known disinfo agent Miles Mathis. I find that my writing style comes out unavoidably like his. I read over 3,000 pages of his work and that is going to have an effect, right? Anyway, I’ve been waiting for someone to accuse me of being some sort of MM spinoff project, now that the original has gotten so ridiculous. I now feel like I need to keep upping my game In order to be suspected of being a high-level CIA disinfo writing team. I’ll try!

PPS: I always wonder if counter-intelligence agents read my posts. (They should!) I like to fuck with their heads by writing stuff like the PS. And this PPS.

WARNING: This post ended up much longer than I expected. It will be long and boring to almost everyone, about an event from long ago that has little direct relevance to any current events. But if you have the slightest interest, you’ll read some things I have not ever seen noted anywhere else and I think you will find you “didn’t expect all this”. I sure didn’t. Also, I’ll end with a comment as to why it may have been a crucial failure for TPTB.

Why write all this? I have this strange compulsion to speak truths out into the Universe. Maybe that’s because I just like being contrary to TPTB, who control history by speaking lies into the Universe longer than anyone else can speak the truth. Yes, it’s a drop in the ocean of the fight against them, but the ocean is made of drops, is it not? If you’re still here, let’s begin….

For the vast majority of the population, the attempted assassination of President Reagan is not even a blip on the radar, even though it is well within living memory. The normies that are aware of it know the story as, “John Hinckley Jr. shoots Reagan to impress Jodie Foster”. Note that this is a reinforcement to the “lone nut with a gun” meme, not even twenty years after they gave us the first telling of that tale.

We were also introduced to the novel meme of “deranged stalker”, and “They” have gotten a lot of mileage from that, have They not? Take a look at this: Erotomania: Well-known cases. This “disorder” barely exists outside of Hinckley. But then again, Wiki says the DSM-5 says it’s real, so it’s real.

Alternatively, conspiracy theorists know the story as, “son of Bush crony tries to kill Reagan so Bush can become President”. Yes, that’s certainly true and that’s where the theorists stop. I’ve been satisfied with that explanation myself for many years, but I never really thought it through. Here’s the part in the story that separates conspiracy theorists from truth-seekers: when you kick over a rock, truth-seekers must be prepared to throw out what they thought before and take a look at new findings. Okay, last chance to turn back….

The mainstream takes pains to tell us that Hinckley shot Reagan with a Röhm RG-14, “known as a Saturday night special, a general category of cheap, low quality handguns”. JHJR did not bring much of a gun for this job, did he? Really, it’s about as low-rent as you can go and have a normal person even consider it a “gun” (unless that person is a Democrat, but then again I did say “normal”).

What can you do with that kind of firepower? It’s terrifying! Shooting six rounds of .22LR from a snubnose revolver in a chaotic situation, Hinckley confirmed two near fatalities and two complete incapacitations. Wow! He would kick Wick’s dick in, would he not? Super Soldier Hinckley, reporting for duty!

Wellllll… I do not believe it. Not in the slightest.

Everybody knows about Reagan and Hinckley, but go back and look at footage of the other two “victims”. They are face down on the sidewalk, completely motionless. No blood, of course, but not clutching at wounds or moaning or writhing or swearing profusely about being shot. Complete incapacitation through a mechanism no one seems to have ever wondered about.

Is 22 Long Rifle God’s own caliber? No. It can certainly be fatal in exactly the correct circumstances, but here’s something for comparison: a story about a guy who accidentally shot himself with a .25 ACP (something everyone would consider more powerful) and he did not realize it until he had some knee pain, went to the ER, and doctors dug out a bullet:

The Wound Report: Always Bring Enough Gun (TTAG 2/8/2024)

Okay then, what really happened on March 30, 1981 outside the Washington Hilton?

It’s a longer story I’ll have to post separately about, but (1) there’s more to the Hinckleys than you think, and (2) it looks like Jodie Foster is yet another Illuminati puppet and was directly involved. You’ll have to accept those provisionally until I get to it, but I speculate that Foster and Senior talked Junior into playing his part (literally)

At a guess, she may have told him he was going to be in a movie and it was all just a set. An “assistant director” handed him a gun with blanks then, at the right time, told him to walk to his mark and fire. That’s about all that was needed from him for the psyop, but it served as the crucial distraction for all the rest of the action.

Reagan was shot by a real assassin on a balcony overlooking the scene, and he came close but failed. All talk of this has been suppressed, but if you look around you can find that a mysterious figure--never identified, of course--was seen on the balcony by several witnesses. This was reported at the time by Judy Woodruff. She is now a prominent Establishment mouthpiece. Is it a stretch to imagine her whole career is down to falling silent about her “brush with history”?

The other two we’ve talked about: they just fell down on the sidewalk. Not hard to pull off. Interestingly, I watched three brief mainstream interviews with Junior after his release. Throughout his profuse apologies, Hinckley never mentioned them by name. Like, “Sorry about the other people, too.” Pretty heartfelt, given only 40 years to reflect on his actions. Only one of the three reporters ever states their names. Why? Those other two VicSims are to be removed from your consciousness, lest the light goes on in your head about those fakers like it did in mine.

Finally, James Brady. I don’t even care enough about any of this to look in to his story, but let me assume his gunshot injury was real. I’d speculate that, in all the confusion, someone just stepped up next to him and popped him in the head. Maybe it could have been anybody and it turned out to be Brady. Then they could have presented us with at least one real victim to focus on, taking our eyes off the late President.

Interestingly, a distraction shooter and a real one simply walking up and firing is exactly what conspiracists are supposed to believe happened at the RFK assassination. Double-interestingly, the RFK assassination was faked. Triple-interestingly, If you work through all the permutations of what you believe about this aspect with Brady and RFK, you’ll either agree with me, agree with the normies, or be a hypocrite. All pretty bad, right?

Anyway, in the Reagan event, instead of dying Brady just got his brain fucked up or whatever. Well, even better (for Them)! Look at the incredible mileage They got out of him towards gun control. Immeasurable. Instead of only a martyr to the cause of gun grabbing, how incredibly effective it is to have someone with a fucked up head who talks like a retard going around saying guns ‘r’ bad, m’kay?

It was so effective that we saw a repeat of all this with the fake Gabbie Giffords. Note that They did not get a fraction out of her of what They did with Brady. I think that’s because she wasn’t actually fucked up. People could detect that on a subconscious level and refused to buy in. That reflexively goes back to Brady to indicate he really was shot. In any case, They shuffled Gabbie’s dumb ass off the stage now.

If you made it this far, I promised I would give some sort of justification as to why you should think any of this is important. Here it is as a counter-factual: what if the plan had actually succeeded? Bush the Elder gets in four years earlier, and maybe the Reign of Magog then extends for an additional term. All of “Their” plans are much farther along. Specifically, Obama the “set up pitcher” does his job, and Hellary successfully comes in as the “closer”.

They say the bullet stopped less than an inch from Reagan’s heart.

NOTE: Obviously, you’re going to have to take my word for some stuff when we get to the Satan part, but by that time you may be more of a mind to do so. Alternatively, if you think that--rather than simply discovering that which is there to be discovered—I am creative enough to just invent all this out of unrelated bits and bobs, well… I appreciate the compliment! Let’s begin….

“Pharos”, the shitcoin in question, seems to have come along in August 2023, as you can see in their whitepaper (31-page PDF). IDK what such whitepapers are normally like, but this one reads like it came right out of ChatGPT. On very casual page-downing, I did notice a few items worth mentioning.

First, it is not searchable. It’s all just a giant image. Even old texts scanned by Google three decades ago are searchable. What’s the deal here? Weird, right?

Second, because of that, don’t bother searching for “plato” but just go to page 23. It says, “Plato considered the ideal polis….” You be the judge, but the reference seems really forced. Why is it really here? Well, the utopia of Plato’s Republic includes no rights and a caste system where almost everyone is a slave. Maybe that’s why the reference is here, huh?

Third, remember that famous cover from The Economist, 9-15 January 1988? It’s getting harder to find now, BTW. Take a look at that symbol in the center of the phoenix’s medallion. You’ll notice it repeated at the top of page 28 of the whitepaper. I can assure you it’s no accident.

Anyway, I posted about it this before here, but the handful that bother noticing that symbol and thinking about it will instantaneously conclude that it’s the Greek letter “phi”. Alright, so that’s either part of the name of the organization behind “Pharos”, or the first part of the name of that phoenix they are showing you, right? Wrong.

It’s a sly reference by “Them” to the null sign, which is visually identical. The null sign represents the “empty set”, that is, the set with nothing in it. Funny, right? They take pains to tell you it’s some Scandinavian symbol. Are you reassured? Not me. And Pharos is trading as we speak for $0.0005116.

Okay, on to what They are googlewashing out of existence: “Pharos coins”. Now that the cryptocurrency exists, see if you casually run into any of the following by searching that phrase. You never knew it existed before, and the objective is that you never will.

(Here’s the part where you have to start accepting certain things provisionally, but when you see how it all begins to fit together, maybe the bar will be lowered.)

Money was invented by Satan for purposes of control. You might even have thought so before, but I’ll fill in the details. To keep you from reaching the basic realizations, They do an incredible amount of hand-waving in mainstream sources but they admit this fact right in the History of money:

The first manufactured actual coins seem to have appeared separately in India, China, and the cities around the Aegean Sea 7th century BC.

Really? All these widely separated cultures just decided to invent coinage at the same time. Suuuuure, buddy, you bet. It turns out that Satan took over about 600 BC, so they’re just imprecise in their dating or smearing it to keep you from realizing this all took place virtually simultaneously.

The very first coins Satan created, which we will talk about in detail in a moment, were known as “Pharos coins”. You can see them discussed here, in Ancient Greek coinage. Oh wait, no you can’t! “Pharos” is not even mentioned. They erased those coins from existence! But you can see that numismatists still know they exist, are you can see from this coinnerd: “Finally a Pharos”.

(So now here again is a difficult part: it turns out that Satan was real and living on the Earth, and was known by various cultures by various names. He was Zeus to the Greeks, Amon Ra to the Egyptians, and Marduk to the Sumerians, among many other names. Also, let me note that “Marduk” comes originally from “young bull of the Sun”. And yes, I should write a book about who Satan really is and the real history of the Earth, but I’m very lazy. Assuming you accept all that provisionally….)

“Pharos coins” as referenced by that coinnerd, feature the “Lighthouse of Alexandria”. Without even getting in to the “light bringer” stuff, we can say that Alexandria was formerly known as Heliopolis, or the “City of the Sun”. See where we’re heading?

Now we move to a mint in a city named “Pharos” on an island in the eastern Adriatic. Somehow no scholar with edit access to wiki knows about this, but we can find out more about those “Pharos coins” here: Greek-Illyrian coinage of the central Adriatic region: an overview:

The dominant iconographical motif that appears on the coins of Pharos is the head of Zeus on the obverse, accompanied by a goat and, most often, a legend designating the city on the reverse. Some reverse types add a snake, which has prompted some researches to identify this Zeus as Zeus Melichios, a chthonic deity worshipped in the Hellenic world.

Okayyyyy, a whole lot to break down there! As to the goat symbology and snake symbology relating to Satan, well… I leave that as an exercise for the reader. The Zeus reference I told you about previously. And as to being a “chthonic deity”, he was actually one of the Anunnaki, an expedition from an advanced alien race.

What you may have missed is the other reference to “Melichios”. This is a corruption from the original Semitic word root mlk. You will see that root vowelized many ways, including (drum roll)… “Moloch”. It’s not a proper name but rather a title, and is typically translated as “king”. The thing is, at the time they were using these words, everybody knew exactly who the “king” was. Get me?

If you’ve made it this far with me, holy crap. And I’ll ask again, seriously, do you think I could just be making this all up?

ADVISORY: This is a long read. My aim is to knock over a lot of sandcastles, but my hope is that if I do, in the future you won’t waste a lot more time admiring those sandcastles.

First off… I lied, but I had to write an attention-grabbing headline. The real claims about Phil Schneider’s father, Oscar Schneider, are even longer and wackier than the headline. You can barely find two facts about him that are consistent with one another.

Everyone may decide for themselves but to me, Oscar was clearly a Simulant. “They” love to keep it in the family, so his son Phil was used as a disinfo agent. Then, because these Intelligence projects are always formed as cells of mutual support and promotion, every other person and project associated with him can be considered ghey and an op.

Okay, what do I mean by “Simulant”? It turns out history is full of them, acting as agents of TPTB. Their lives are a blend of elements that are authentic, hidden, made-up, and corrupted. Nothing is reliable. If you know someone who has deceived you about something simple like, say, when and where they were born, that’s already extremely unusual.

For virtually everyone who encounters his story, Phil Schneider is the “person of interest”. Who his father is doesn’t even cross their mind, let alone that he is anything other than just some dude named Mr. Schneider. In this case, that’s totally wrong. Let me give everyone some resources about dear old Dad:

Find a Grave | Capt Oscar Schneider

WikiTree | Otto Oscar Schneider (1906 - 1993)

The Mysterious Life and Death of Phil Schneider

Shocking Yet Forgotten Whistleblower Claims (1995): Phil Schneider and Los Alamos National Lab

THE UNITED NATIONS WAS RUN BY SEVEN-FOOT-TALL GREY ALIENS

Alright, when was Oscar born: 1/21/1906, 1/22/1906, “about 1905”, “c1906”, or “c1907”? Where was he born: San Francisco CA, Cisco CA (that’s actually a different city), or Germany? Was he a medical doctor with only 4 years of college completed, or a U-boat captain in the Kreigsmarine? If he was in pre-war Germany U-boating, how did he happen to meet a girl from rural Arkansas? Do you really want to see these questions coming up on your quiz?

Then we get to: when and how did Phil find out about his father’s background? In conversation before he died, or was it that he found a trove of his father’s papers after his passing? Why is this so hard to pin down?

Funny thing concerning Oscar’s heritage: both his parents were Jews (either both Russian, or Russian and Polish, they can’t agree), making Oscar a Jew by anyone’s standard. But then Bielek says that Oscar confessed to Phil he wasn’t a Jew born in America, but was actually born in Germany. Does Bielek not get that being German doesn’t imply he wasn’t a Jew? True Holohoax Revision: no Jews in Germany at all... lol

Now we get to the projects he was supposedly involved in: the Philadelphia Experiment and the atomic tests at Bikini Atoll, known as Operation Crossroads.

If you can believe this much, Oscar was a doctor involved in nuclear medicine and was to study the “participants” in the Philadelphia Experiment. The closest you can come to substantiation here is that Oscar was living in Philly as late as 1940 and the experiment took place in 1943. Weak, but there you have it.

As an aside, you’ll sometimes see an association of that experiment with the CIA’s Project RAINBOW. It was for stealthing the U-2, test flights didn’t start until 1957, and it was a failure. Just my judgement, but that sounds about right for the CIA trying to do something useful. I would throw out anyone’s work that makes the association.

The other association is even more undermining. Tale-tellers that want to rope Oscar into it clearly don’t know that The Bikini Atoll Nuclear Tests were Faked (11-page PDF). Yes, it’s by disinfo agent Miles Mathis but the data and analysis seem sound to me, and I have independently uncovered quite a damning connection to a deep swath of fakery going on during that period.

And here’s something fun I stumbled across from The National WW2 Museum:

Operation Crossroads: A Deadly Illusion (7/5/2021)

What?! The author explains that the “illusion” was that a nuclear war could be fought successfully. Read it for yourself because that explanation seems weak-ass and very forced.

Maybe by this time you’re thinking, “Jesus, what a storm of lies and bullshit.” That’s what I think, anyway, but let me finish by describing what I meant by the “Montauk Gang”. See, overlaying all this, Venn diagram-style, you’ll find other people referencing and promoting each other: Al Bielek, Preston Nichols, Peter Moon, Duncan Cameron, Stewart Swerdlow, Thomas Castello, etc. Notice, though, that none of the people involved ever seemed to have had any confusion or doubt about any of the things we just covered. Stark ignorance, or is everyone just playing a part?

So is there any truth in anything any of them are saying? Who knows, but the pattern you’ll see is that as these events recede in time, more information about them turns up. Seems odd, right? I’d say that’s simply the ghey operators piling on more for you to dig down through. Roswell is a perfect example of that phenomena, and no, there’s nothing at the bottom of that one.

You’ll see another one of these “intel circle jerks” that is active as we speak. You can start with George Knapp and Bob Lazar, and end with Leslie Kean, Ralph Blumenthal and David Grusch. Get out your pushpins and red string and you’ll be rewarded with a connected graph. I call it “Project MKDISCLOSURE”.

Marvel's "Winter Soldier" is Bucky Barnes, and we are told that he first appeared under that very cool (haha) name in May 2005. That was long, long after the original coining of the name for an event in 1971 called the Winter Soldier Investigation. The not-very-cool-at-all subject? American war crimes and atrocities in Vietnam, told first-person.

Surprisingly, there is indeed a writeup on the nexus between the two names:

Learn the History of the Term “Winter Soldier” and Why Ed Brubaker Used the Name in Captain America (The Mary Sue 3/21/2014)

The author is just a normie comic fanboy but, as you'll read, he was tipped off by podcaster Jesse Thorn, whose own father was a member of Vietnam Veterans Against the War, the sponsors of the WSI. (I used to listen to Jesse Thorn's Bullseye until a decade ago, when the progressivism that spilled over into the pop culture show became unbearable.)

The article comes off innocently enough and even includes an explanation of the name by the author of the comic himself, Ed Brubaker (who we will come back to). Believe it if you like, but his explanation is retcon bullshit.

The phrase "winter soldier" is a reversal of Thomas Paine's famous quote about the "summer soldier", and is meant to describe a true patriot, one who accepts as his duty the overthrow of tyranny. Well, Barnes is a traitor to America and a soldier for the quite tyrannical USSR. Not an apt name, is it? Then he has a whole paragraph of non-sequiturs about Vietnam, Russia and the American Revolution. Nice try.

I call it a googlewash because if you're searching for "winter soldier" and aren't already aware the WSI existed, you'll have a much harder time stumbling across either it or this:

Winter Soldier: Iraq & Afghanistan

Yes, I too didn't know that existed until I was searching all around for this writeup. See how good googlewashing works? You'll also likely never find this documentary made about the original WSI either:

MILESTONE FILMS: WINTER SOLDIER

Though the event was attended by press and television news crews, almost nothing was reported to the American public. Yet, this unprecedented forum marked a turning point in the anti-war movement. It was a pivotal moment in the lives of young vets from around the country who participated, including the young John Kerry.

Memory-holed then, googlewashed now. Did you catch the last bit? That's our first twist.

Yes, Deep State Elitist scumbag John Kerry participated! You might be thinking that the whole thing was limited hangout with Kerry a leader of it, but I don't think so in this case:

We could come back to this country; we could be quiet; we could hold our silence; we could not tell what went on in Vietnam, but we feel because of what threatens this country, the fact that the crimes threaten it, not reds, and not redcoats but the crimes which we are committing that threaten it, that we have to speak out.

Some plain truth there and--as we're seeing--all slated to be erased from history. Not consistent with an op, is it? And I say that even given the next twist.

Mark Lane was one of the organizers. He's very prominent as a JFK researcher and (IMHO) a primary disinfo agent on the issue. Big red flag, right? Well, after the assassination, Lane sent the Warren Omission a 10,000 word brief saying that (drum roll)... Oswald was innocent. Was any disinfo agent going to be stirring up the waters that soon and in that way? IMHO, no.

Which brings up my view on the great majority of the Elite scumsuckers, Uniparty dirtbags, squadrons of disinfo rats, etc: they are made, not born. Well, "They" like to use Their own relatives to be sure, but those agents are shaped over a long process of seduction and grooming. Those assets start out fighting the good fight, and "They" make sure that's what those assets believe all the way along, see?

Final twist, this one concerning the comics author, Ed Brubaker:

Brubaker, the child of a Navy intelligence officer, spent much of his childhood in Guantánamo Bay....

To paraphrase Dr. Evil, typical childhood, the details of which are quite inconsequential, eh?

But that's not all: it is not listed under his "Notable works", but Brubaker was on the writing staff of Westworld. It's much, much too long to get into, but I have posted about that show numerous times. It is, IMHO, far and away the show where the Those That Really Run This World and Know What Has Really Happened have tipped Their hand the most and in an unmistakable way.

Is Ed himself one of those people? I sincerely doubt it. I've always suspected that They just have a conduit to screenwriters and the like, passing messages like "show this visual" or "have somebody say these words". That would be Ed, in the case of Westworld.

And it works, of course. Think about it: what percentage of people reading the coverage of it have any doubt he's alive and governing? Whatever you pick, it rounds down to zero.

You can read a basic story here at Gateway Pundit:

Gov. Gavin Newsom Clashes with Target Employee Who Blames Him for California’s Surging Theft Crime — Questions Employee Why He Should Pay in a State of Rampant Shoplifting (VIDEO) (2/1/2024)

Let's analyze the event, shall we? But we should do it from the perspective of the ghey operators. For the benefits we desire, what does it take to create it and what are the downsides?

So the "evidence" we have to generate is a tweet of a Zoom call with "Gavin" on it telling an anecdote, all downrezzed to a potato-phone video. That does not sound like much of a challenge when put that way, does it?

Also, notice that Gavin gets to state his case for people that have never heard it, doesn't he? That's a plus.

Did you notice, though, that at the end he questions why he himself should pay? Do you think a career politician would carelessly say such a thing aloud, as if it was a point that happened to cross his mind? The writer went a step too far to make it sound "real".

Now let's talk about downsides: they had to admit that there's a shoplifting problem in California. Is that a big secret? Not really. So do you see that was the bait? If you look around, you'll see how hard everyone chomps down on it.

Okay, now let's talk about "dogs that didn't bark". Do you think someone could brazenly shoplift and the Governor of the state could argue with the cashier about it with someone taking a cell phone video? Without a dozen people taking cell phone videos? No, of course not.

Let's back up a step and ask: what are the chances that there's such a crime and the Governor is right there? Everybody I know shops at Target and every other kind of store in California, and as rampant as shoplifting is I've never heard a single one of them say it happened in front of them. Ever. No, I don't live in the hood but neither does (did) Gavin.

Let's back up another step: do you think the millionaire hereditary Elitist fuckwad Governor of California does his own shopping at Target? I decline to believe anyone who's made it as far as reading these words actually believes that. Don't even bother trying to claim it.

Anyway, to seal the deal, here's the paid shill post from r/conspiracy:

Theft is so common in California that it happened right in front of Gavin Newsom, and when the cashier (who didn't realize it was Newsom) said they can't stop shoplifters due to the California government, Newsom got mad at her and asked to see the manager.

Over a thousand upvotes in 16 hours with the achingly phony top comment alone having 691 upvotes. There are 174 comments with some being shills, but obviously the vast majority are genuine "conspiracy theorists" taking the opportunity to stomp down hard when bad news comes along about a guy they despise.

It all seems very lame in retrospect but, again, see how well it works?

First off, we should all be aware that this type of the technology has been floating around for at least six decades and who knows what they have now. The tech in question is described here:

RHIC – EDOM (Radio-Hypnotic Intra-Cerebral Control – Electronic Dissolution of Memory) (9/28/2016)

Now, make of these associations what you will, but you know how "They" just love to put Their little references into such acronyms, right? Does that one ring and bells? The first part is exactly the same as this:

Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider

The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) is the first and one of only two operating heavy-ion colliders.... Located at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL)... it is the only operating particle collider in the US.

I don't think it's related, but I'll mention that BNL is 20 miles from Montauk. I do think it's related that BNL hosts an experiment named PHENIX.

What's more intriguing is this: do you know where the only other operating heavy-ion collider is? Yep, you got it! It's the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) operating at CERN near the Swiss/French border (actually spanning it).

The second part is not quite as direct, but it's strange to see it come up. Edom was an ancient kingdom south of the Dead Sea, and apparently the Israelites were told to lay a Nakba on it and wipe it off the map or some such thing.

But that was in Biblical times, and here in the 21st Century researcher Adam Green has concluded that a notion has developed among certain modern Judaics that Christianity--particularly American Christians--are to be identified as the modern "Edom". And, you know, get the same kind of treatment.

Adam can go overboard with some things (IMHO) but if you have any interest in such topics you should hear him out. You're guaranteed to hear some things that others never seem to mention:

Rabbis Prophesize The Destruction Of America Christianity ( Edom) Know More News W Adam Green

In any case, the world is so strange that you can't kick over an ordinary-looking mind control rock without finding something weird underneath, can you?

It's intriguing how this aspect never gets mentioned, but @ShadowofEzra pointed out in this tweet a couple of days ago. By the Texas Constitution, while the Governor is out of state, Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick is in charge.

According to this press release, Abbott left the 19th and is returning on the 28th,

Not to start a discussion of either thesis, but it looks more and more like Abbott is a Deep State snake and Patrick is MAGA (to put it roughly). Did Patrick take steps as acting Governor that the Deep State took sharp exception to?

If you take a look at this timeline, it all began before Abbott left town. On the flip side, none of the mainstream coverage mentions either that Abbott is gone or quotes anything Patrick has to say. That is a red flag.

Final note: TIL that Abbott is in a wheelchair, and has been since he was 26. Am I the only person who didn't know this? I feel like I've been FDR-ed.

That's an unusual name, like a character in a work of fiction, isn't it? Like "Remington Steele" or something.

For the last two years of Obama's term (2015-2017), Ashton Carter was the Secretary of Defense and John Forbes Kerry was the Secretary of State.

It is just a coincidence, right?

The Zionists wish to continue their war, justify it, expand it, and bring in the West. Hostages are the emotional crux of that justification, and any and all of them may be imaginary at this point. Thus, I found this headline suspect:

Israel drops leaflets in Gaza asking Palestinians for help finding hostages (SCMP 1/21/2024)

If the Israelis want their hostages back, isn't it infinitely easier just to deal directly with Hamas? And Hamas must keep them safe, since a dead hostage is no hostage at all, correct? The story is nonsense and a psyop.

The full article is paywalled, but the psyop is confirmed by the subhead:

• ‘Do you want to return home?’ Displaced civilians seeking refuge in Rafah were urged to ‘make the call’ if they saw one of 33 captives held by Hamas

They simply cannot help themselves, can they? The overall thesis, that the war is all about Israeli aggression and nothing at all to do with hostages--real or fictitious--is confirmed by the second subhead:

• Israeli planes and tanks intensified their bombardment in Jabalia on the northern edge of Gaza, and in Khan Younis and Rafah in the south

You have to wonder is this all started with, "ChatGPT, make me a flyer asking for the whereabouts of 33 Jewy-looking hostages...."

ADVISORY: This is a very long post with no startling revelations. Skip it if you're looking to be entertained. (Although I find it quite entertaining, which is why I write it up.)

So what's the purpose? Really, I have something to get off my chest. It's about conspiracy theorists who are interested in the occult and like to listen to the occult doings of Jack Parsons and others like Crowley. More specifically, it's about the researchers and podcasters and posters who tell us about these things over and over. Even the mainstream covers Parsons.

If you're told about something over and over and over, can it possibly be considered "occult"? Seems crazy, like you're not really paying attention, just looking to be enthralled. Shouldn't we be looking deeper, and be suspect of the things we're told repeatedly? I think so. Instead of looking at the curtain of Jack Parsons, let's take peek behind it for once.

The thrust of this is that Parsons was what I term a Simulant. We live in a big simulation, but it's not a fancy computer program run by AIs or aliens. The bare fact that those notions are promoted should be enough to tell you they're not true.

Rather, this simulation is--among other properties--sprinkled about with open-air actors, especially up on the stage where we're all looking. But it's not as simple as being an actor, where everything about them is a lie. The Simulants are a mix of truth and falsity. I stress this because the idea seems quite hard for people to absorb.

One of the most common characteristics of these Simulants is that they have an altered name. I have yet to fully understand why. Most often it's not even a secret, it's just that for some reason we didn't have a "President Barry Soetoro" or "Mayor of NY Warren Wilhelm Jr." or "Candidate Nimarata Randhawa". It's bizarre, but it's a red flag for a Simulant. Jack Parsons has this red flag.

The wiki for Jack Parsons of course admits right up front that he was born Marvel Whiteside Parsons, with his father's first name and his mother's surname as his middle name.

Their son was his father's namesake, but was known in the household as Jack.

Okay, the family had to distinguish between the two, so the kid got a nickname of sorts. Plus, they don't want him getting his ass kicked every day in school, right? So "Jack" is out of nowhere, like calling someone "Chief" or "Ace" or something?

In this case "Jack" seems to be the common diminutive for "John", but the bizarre part is: where does the name John come from? This never gets mentioned.

The name John is actually the first word in his wiki, but I bet your eyes skipped right over it like mine did. Also, it's not his name as an infant when daddy was living at home. We're given this non-explanation:

Although she retained her ex-husband's surname, Ruth started calling her son John, but many friends throughout his life knew him as Jack.

That's odd, right? I might be willing to spackle right over this except for one thing: there is another John Parsons. And he was alive at the same time, and he attended Stanford like Jack did, and he ran NASA Ames (next door to Googleplex today), and he was also known as "Jack", and, well, he kinda looked like our Jack:

SP-4302 Adventures in Research: A History of Ames Research Center 1940-1965

Scroll down to his pic and compare to Jack's pic on his wiki. He's got the same double-chin and the same John Waters-esque mustache. No, not the same person or twin or clone. Is he a brother or cousin about which They do not care to disclose the connection? Odd.

Again, I'd be willing to write this off, except for the matter of Jack's first wife. We're told over and over about his relationship with Marjorie Cameron, but no one mentions Helen Northrup. I wonder why?

Is it because her name was actually Helen Northrop, and she was closely related to Jack Northrop, founder of Northrop Aviation? You would know that organization better as Northrop Grumman:

Northrop Grumman Corporation is an American multinational aerospace and defense technology company. With 95,000 employees and an annual revenue in excess of $30 billion, it is one of the world's largest weapons manufacturers and military technology providers. The firm ranks No. 101 on the 2022 Fortune 500 list of America's largest corporations.

Helen Northup was from Pasadena, which was where JPL was founded. Jack Northrop was from Santa Barbara and his company was founded in El Segundo, just across LA from Pasadena. And, as if I had to mention it, Northop-Grumman is now headquartered in West Falls Church, VA, a stone's throw from the Pentagram. All very cozy, right?

My point in all this, again, is that while the real Elites arrange the Military-Industrial Complex just under the surface, lots of people are fascinated with the study of these "occultists" but never scratch that surface. It also leads me to think 99.9% of all "occultism" is shiny made-up nonsense. See why it all strikes me as frustrating?

Well, I guess I got it off my chest!

As the rumor has it, he was killed in Ukrainian bunker struck by a Russian missile. There have been a number of such rumored strikes over time and it does not seem surprising, but how are we to decide? Well, this was posted on r/conspiracy today in the wake of the rumor:

Is Loyd Austin Dead ? (1/8/2024)

The top-voted comment, the one that will be read by almost everyone who opens the post, says:

The info you shared is all wrong. He was not in Ukraine when he got hospitalised. But in the US.

The problem? The inept Cognitive Warrior that created the post just put in a stock picture of Austin and forgot to include a link or any text. There's no mention of the rumor or anything else at all.

But the first fake commenter replies as if the rumor was there instead of, "WTF does this mean? Why do you think he's dead. It's just a pic of him." So there's your tip-off. Then the lame OP replies to that comment with:

I am sure it is just clickbait and that he will show up at a presser relatively soon. Just wanted to see what the conspiracy community says about this.

To get what we're seeing, we would have to believe that the OP then--for some bizarre and unknowable reason--went back to the original post and just deleted all the text. Technically possible, but I'd sooner buy in to the adventures of Bob Lazar.

Final observation: Did you note the spelling errors and funky grammar to make it all seem more legit? Nice touch, right?

EDIT: If you're looking for at least some account of the circumstances, this is the only one I know of (from what many consider a fictional news site), so FWIW:

Russian Claim: Austin Dead In Ukraine (RRN 1/7/2024)

Somehow I had never heard any of this mentioned about the Monsantos:

The Monsanto family is a historical Sephardic Jewish merchant and banking business who played a significant role in founding the Jewish community in Colonial Louisiana (then transferring between French and Spanish rule) in the 18th century.

The family arrived in Louisiana in the 1760s, and one of their members, Isaac Monsanto, was one of the wealthiest merchants in New Orleans. The family engaged in the Atlantic slave trade and owned African slaves at their plantations at Natchez, Mississippi... and Trianon, New Orleans. Not including their former estate in New Orleans, by the 1780s, the Monsantos kept 51 slaves for their personal use and sold other enslaved African people to Louisiana plantations.

The Monsanto we know and love was founded by John Francis Queeny. It was named after his wife, Olga Mendez Monsanto, so he was obviously just the front goy.

Now, I also mentioned that they were Dutch. That sounds incidental but I assure you it isn't. These Dutch were like a main circuit cable in Colonial America. And no one talks about them, which should clue you in on their importance.

Take one of these families, the Livingstons. BTW, they're also Jewish and that's an Americanized form of Lowenstein. I guarantee it's worth your time to go to that wiki page and see all the people and families they're connected to.

For example, you'll see the Schuyler family. You might miss the connection, but Alexander Hamilton married one of the Schuylers. When George Carlin mentioned the Big Club we ain't in, I don't even think he was aware these very tight, very Elite parts of it even existed.

Fun Fact #1: General Hoyt Sanford Vandenberg, Sr., of Vandenberg Space Force Base fame, was one of these Dutch. He ran the USAF, was CIA Director and (in my strong opinion) arranged the Roswell UFO hoax. Always take a second glance when someone Dutch comes up.

Fun Fact #2: Monsanto's first product was saccharin. For those that didn't live through all the controversy, skim through the wiki to see the furious hand-waving about how "everyone said it was real bad but it really wasn't so shut up about that!". IOW, they were "on brand" right out of the gate.

Intriguing Fact: The name "Monsanto" (which sounds like a type of plastic) actually means "Holy Mountain". All I can say is that it puts me in mind of Mount Hermon, where the 200 Fallen Angels came to Earth.

Well, wouldn't that just be "on brand" too?

I was triggered (haha) by a story all over the mainstream media today:

RUSSIA: Alexey Navalny, Putin’s Chief Opponent, Speaks Out After Prison Transfer – HE’S HELD IN A SOVIET GULAG (TGP 12/26/2023)

The point of this post is not to out Navalny as an Intelligence asset, which we will do only briefly, but to take a look at how thin the deception can be and still fool the consciousness of billions of people. Present company excepted, of course.

The zero-th item to note is that these types of analyses are very unpopular in conspiracy circles. That is, there are very few theorists left, where you have to at least string together a couple of facts with some analysis. They have been completely diluted (and I'm not disparaging) by people (God bless them) who are driven more by, "Yeah, that guy does suck! Upvote!" That's great and all, but if you're looking for more, read on.

Before we look at the general phenomenon, we'll only examine one conclusive detail to his phony story. You'll only be reading about it here, so note how easily an obvious contradiction flies by the rest of the world.

In the story linked above, you'll find a tweet dated the 26th from Navalny's blue-check account. Who cares what it says, because it's mere existence is directly contradicted here by Kira Yarmysh, Navalny's spokesperson:

Alexei Navalny ‘doing well’ after transfer to remote Arctic prison (The Independent 12/26/2023)

There's no way of reaching inmates, nor by mail nor by Internet, so it is practically impossible to contact someone directly.

I hope no troll is going to give us, "Ackshually, you can't email them, they can only tweet out." Although we'd all like to see that, it would still be pretty shameful.

The point is, one sheer lie serves one audience, and another sheer lie serves a different one. The two people making up these lies do not care whatsoever about coordinating them. Nor, as I have pointed out, do they need to.

As I referenced in the title, Navalny is a "Simulant". I don't know of any existing term for this type of "person". It's what I've come up with for the range of such people who go from absolutely authentic with a few phony aspects to outright "virtual persons" constructed from scratch.

Navalny seems to be a living, breathing human being. After that it gets very murky, which is what I'm trying to highlight. And what I'm really trying to highlight is how very thin it all is yet still yields successful, long-running psyop.

For example, this whole dumb, bullshit narrative about "disappearing" and "no one knew where he was for three weeks" until be was found "exiled to Sibera"? Did you know he was (supposedly) sent to the exact same place not quite three years ago?

What we know about the prison hospital where Alexei Navalny has been sent (Reuters 4/19/2021)

You can see the narrative at the time was that he was "recovering from Novichok poisoning (from Putin!)", and not "disappeared to Siberia". Yes, it's all just narrative, but everyone laps it right up.

But I want to stress how thin it all is, and always was. So this guy is supposed to be "Putin's opposition", right? I used Qwant to search on "putin navalny" and got--get this--27 hits. The nexus between the two is virtually non-existent.

Does Putin even know he exists, fake or real? It turns out the answer is probably not. The closest I can come is this video:

Putin says palace in Navalny report 'doesn't belong to me' | AFP (YouTube 1/25/2021)

If you watch the video, Putin never mentions Navalny. In fact, he says he never watched the video, only a summary made by his aides. My guess is that Putin is aware of the deception and chooses never to acknowledge it.

Finally, recall that Navalny is supposedly a politician seeking to challenge the highest-profile leader in the world, correct? He's got to get out there and kiss hands and shake babies, right? Apparently, no, he never does that.

Search for images with "navalny meets". It's him alone, in court, with his "family", and sometimes with some people floating around in the background. He never goes out and poses for photos with people he meets. Try the same search with something like "lauren boebert meets" and she's right there with all kinds of people. Maybe just a slut, huh?

Recall that "media" means "middle", and that's the shim that's created between people and reality. It may be razor-thin, but it's there and makes all the difference in the world.

The title unavoidably comes off like a slam against Tucker, but I do not mean it that way. I think he's more or less a normal person caught up in circumstances far beyond his control and is trying to do what's best in a murky situation.

First off, if anyone reading this does not or cannot believe that Julian Assange is either dead or--equivalently--in a black site he'll probably never come out of, then stop reading now because it will just make you upset and feel you need to argue about it for your own emotional stability.

The real Assange has been gone since October 2016, and everything after that has been DeepFakes and a modicum of simple hand-waving. Sounds primitive but it's fooled virtually everyone in the world. I suspect that Tucker might have had half an idea something was up and finally went to check it out.

Tucker Carlson Makes Surprise Visit to Julian Assange in Prison (TGP 11/2/2023)

Read that carefully. The only evidence really shown is Tucker and Assange's (fake) wife walking through a parking lot. All the rest I could have written up off the top of my head.

And that's it. No confirmation. No update. No "stay tuned for my upcoming interview". Nothing for nearly two months.

What was really going on? I think Tucker realized or had it confirmed there that Assange was dead. What to do? Well, let's see: a journalist was disappeared seven years ago and no one in the world realizes it. The most memorable factoid from that time was that Pam Anderson brought him a sandwich. Tucker himself is also a journalist, isn't he? Hey, how about a sandwich?

Anyway, it's not real clear that this is just something you go public with. Aside from the obvious, basically no normies and only a handful of conspiracists would even entertain the idea, let alone weigh the evidence. Is there a clear moral or ethical act? I don't think so.

So Tucker just punts, and that gives us today's article:

"It's Disgusting What They're Doing": Tucker Carlson Describes Visit With Julian Assange (ZH 12/23/2023)

If you deconstruct it, it's a few thin lies and the rest is a recap of "The Julian Assange Story" you could write up off his Wikipedia page. No video, no audio, no pictures. It didn't take Tucker two months to put the package together, it's the work of an afternoon.

Remember when they interviewed Manson in prison, several times? Tucker didn't even bother faking a selfie because that would be too deceitful. But let's look at the thin veneer put on for believability. For example, how did the guy look?

"Assange looks like press photographs of him, maybe older, pale, he hasn't been outside in 13 years..."

Oh, he did? Well, we've been told over and over about his physical and emotional decline over the years, and two years ago we were told this:

‘Looks very awful and ill’: Journalist tells RT he ‘couldn’t recognize’ Assange during High Court hearing on his extradition to US (RT 8/11/2021)

So that was a body double or just another outright lie. But if we assume it was him, maybe he's been working out, getting fit, and eating well at Belmarsh, right?

"The inmates are treated like animals."

Okay, enough of that. Well, what did "Julian" have to say, then?

"We talked about why he is in prison...."

The real Julian Assange was a smart, worldly, sensitive, passionate and articulate journalist, and after all that's gone on in the world since he's been "in prison", this is all he has to talk about with one of the world's highest profile journalists? We don't even know if he supports Trump or not!

Which brings up what finally occurred to me as the most significant continuing evidence Julian Assange is dead: Is he being held incommunicado? Is that even legal in any country? Everyone talks about extradition but no one mentions this?Doesn't he make and receive phone calls or letters? Is there a single person known to be in communication with him?

I guess even these guys gave up three years ago, after this tweet:

“This is not normal. @amnesty is almost always granted access to monitor court cases around the world. For our legal observer to find out this morning that he has not been granted even REMOTE access to the #Assange proceedings is an outrage.

He got married--or so we are told--but how is it his wife has no messages to pass on? No interview with Tucker about his situation or his persecution? Of course not. She's just a prop with limited dialogue.

A final reflection: If you've read this far, I hope you see that the point is not anything about Julian Assange, who, after all, was just one man in a world where thousands are outrageously slaughtered by various methodologies every single day.

Rather, think about how far the rest of the world is from this kind of information. You've joined me on the high vantage at the top of Everest. A commanding view, but very lonely, is it not?

And the analogy totally breaks down if you choose to tell anyone what you've seen from the top of that mountain: "Mount What? Doesn't exist. As a matter of fact, it cannot exist. That's science, dumbfuck."