Regrettably, yes, Hancock is definitely controlled opposition.
It's not that there's nothing to be learned from his work, but the whole idea is to get in front of where you are with the truth, then slowly veer you off. I mean, how is it possible Hancock does not seem to have heard of the mudflood or Tartaria? Oh, right, that what he was sent forth to keep you from looking at.
Also regrettably, the Electric Universe crew is also, ultimately, another disinfo op. The basic ideas are correct and they rightly upend many things, but remember, they have to get out in front of you with the truth to lead you anywhere.
In the case of EU, what they want you to believe is that all ancient mythology was just people seeing wonders in the sky and making up stories about them. Not correct.
Hope you get something out of it. You can also look for a few video presentations that are available, maybe about four or so. But he speaks in Italian and you have to read the subtitles. Well worth, though, because his info is dead on.
I'm sure whatever liberal creative writing hack put this together is very impressed with xerself, but sometimes I wish they'd just get it over with and go all the way:
"The SCIENCE is in: Thinking make wee-wee more small. Pretty girls no like small wee-wee."
Rogan--I think genuimely--shows the same confusion shared by many, many people, even conspiracy theorists: Yes, they admit their plans quite openly, and no, you're wrong if you talk about it, even using their own quotes.
Why would anyone think that what they said to us was supposed to make sense? They are not engaging in double-think, They are conditioning us to do so. And They will continue to dominate for as long as we fail to climb out of the hole and understand events from a higher level.
I was surprised to see this headline at mises.org, but this is a rare departure from rhetorical convention. When a question is used as the title of an article, the answer is virtually always "Yes".
In this case, it's, "No, increases in the supply of gold cannot lead to boom-bust cycles":
The increase in the supply of gold has nothing to do with business cycles, as an increase in the supply of gold is an increase of wealth. This wealth increase does not result in an exchange of nothing for something.
If you've got an open mind to the fringe stuff, the story gets very strange. This site has reported that Paul was arrested and is now in GTMO, and that the whole "hammer" story was concocted from nothing just to get everyone to believe, well, anything other than the truth:
False Flag Paul Pelosi (10/29/2022)
Personally, I believe that's the case. If you examine the evidence and narratives that come by, you can compare them to that thesis.
For example, an 82yo man gets bashed in the head by a hammer, undergoes surgery, and gets out of the hospital after 3 days? And for people obsessed with public image, they don't bother publishing a pic of the happy couple reunited? Seems more consistent with the Pelosi in Gitmo story, doesn't it?
As for Nancy and her ultimate fate, who the hell knows? What I keep in mind, though, is that there's a very deep, very dangerous game being played, and trying to get any evidence of what's really going on is like scratching dust off of concrete.
I believe that's in reference to Nancy saying she wants to be ambassador to Italy. That in itself struck me as a weird career move, but I think she suspects the "hammer" is coming for her too.
Italy will extradite to the US, but my speculation is that she may be seeking the protection of family ties back in the old country:
You have to give (((them))) credit for this subtle form of propaganda. The unstated premise of the statement throws you off from realizing that (((they))) already own the table.
Actually, you don't have to give (((them))) credit, but (((they))) may extend you credit if you behave, goy.
You have to wonder: if the NYT wrote that Jones now had to pay "infinity money", how many readers would finally recognize this all for fiction versus the ones that would say, "It's about time he pays before he destroys our democracy and our climate."
Here's where they finally put him down, and there are previous articles on the same site with the story leading up to it:
Gavin Newsom Hanged at GITMO (1/24/2022)
So if Gavin's been gone since then, all his media appearances must be fake, right? I was going to link you to this really gay tweet he put out with Justin Trudeau, but--surprise!--it's gone.
In an effort at randomness, I looked their names up on YT and one of the first links was from an event back in June:
California, Canada Create Climate Action Partnership
It's very well done, but I'll point you to a few things. First, at 0:15, look really closely at the line between the side of his face and the flag. It looks very unnatural, doesn't it? Also, if you get just the right frame when his mouth is open, you can see the side of his face when you should be able to see the flag through his mouth.
A little more obvious is at 1:23. Look at the seal on his podium. Seems more real than real life, doesn't it? The same goes for the podium. Compare Gavin's to Justin's. You can see from the design that they are identical, and why wouldn't they be. But see how very different they appear from each other? Gavin's was filmed in a studio with nice lighting, which is why it looks so much better.
If you take a look at the group shot starting at 0:45, notice that Gavin doesn't touch anyone, but they do stage that very awkward handoff. I'd say that was specifically added to convince us he was there. Look very sharply starting at 0:52. As the folder goes up, Gavin's eyes and head don't follow it. Nor does he ever make eye contact with anyone else, although that's a very natural thing to do and you can see the others doing it. Justin doesn't bother trying. He just looks at the folder, when he should look at Gavin to synchronize his actions.
If all that makes you think Gavin's really gone, take a look at the 1-on-1 interview starting at 1:42. It's flawless, and evidently that's how good DeepFake can be under very controlled circumstances. Frightening, really.
Well, just so it doesn't seem like a tease or a LARP or some such thing, from a meta perspective I've learned that you really can't tell anyone anything (most particularly something they already "know") but there is some possibility they can learn it for themselves. Then again, it's no more mysterious than the idea that you can't learn algebra if someone just hands you the answer key for all the assignments for the semester. With that idea in mind, here's the first place to look....
The big breakthrough for me came when I was looking at Isaiah 14:12, which is the one and only place we get the name "Lucifer". Freeman Fly had mentioned there was evidence that he was not the same entity as Satan, and I thought it was a good way to show it was all nonsense by proving this. Freeman never wrote it up so I was studying it for myself.
What struck me was the variety of English translations of "Lucifer, son of the morning star". I don't speak Hebrew, but thought maybe I should look at it myself to see where they were getting all this. That turns out to have been the key: not taking the word of the "authorities", but rather just reading what was there to puzzle out the meaning for myself.
It turns out that in that single phrase, there are two very strong links to the Anunnaki, one more obvious and one more subtte. Funny enough, I got the subtle one first and didn't get the obvious one for years. Why, you ask? Because I took the word of the "authorities" and didn't read what was there.
I believe that for anyone with an interest in Satan and his effect on this world, it's well worth the time to study this and figure out the puzzle personally. That is, you see what's written in the Bible long ago and use your own reasoning and research to understand it, and that has nothing at all to do with what some dude on the Internet said. I promise you it's not a wild goose chase, nor even a very long one.
But it's worth it because it's a huge paradigm change. If Lucifer is some alien from another planet, then you can pretty much dispense with all the talk of divine realms and cosmic destiny and metaphysical what-have-you. I'm personally very lazy and am glad to avoid having to wade through all that to consider myself "well-informed".
Anyway, let me know what you find!
CA Gov Gavin Newsom was arrested a year ago and later executed, so all the photos and video since then have been faked. It's the best I've ever seen but if you look closely you can see the evidence.
Here's last night's story about his re-election:
California Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom wins re-election, defeating Brian Dahle
Fox News can't get any new pictures of him on election night? Do you believe that? Turns out photos of Newsom's "victory speech" are almost impossible to find. Quite bizarre, eh? Here's one:
Newsom swipes at Republican leaders over migrant trips in victory speech
I've never even heard of that site before. And read the story: it doesn't mention where or when this speech was made or any other detail of a real event.
The pic is easy enough to fake. Is his family social distancing or something? No, just too much work to put them next to him. Why is there a shadow of his son on his son's left when the light is obviously coming from that side? Is that how light works?
I saw a couple other pics in the same set last night from this "event", but they've already been nuked from the net, having already served their purpose for people looking up election results to convince them that an election had taken place.
Hard to believe the new governor of a state with 45 million people in it has been dead for most of a year, but there you have it.
It turns out Lucifer is one of the Anunnaki.
It's quite a long story and it took a bit to work out the major parts of it but it all hung together in the end. When I look around at what others have to say on the subject, I can see that at best they have partial, distorted, and corrupted versions of the truth.
After I stumbled my way to this conclusion a few years ago I've accumulated a ton of evidence, so much that it really made me wonder how so many people who actually set out to study these things have missed it all for so long. But I just kept accumulating more evidence towards the same conclusions, and still do.
But why would I think I have the truth and not any of these others? Of course I've pondered that for years now. With 20/20 hindsight, I think the difference was that others carried into their studies some preexisting worldview on the subject, and forced what they found to fit into that. I fell into it trying to quickly prove to myself that Satan did not exist so I could ignore all discussion on it.
Research is always easier when you can just make stuff up, and I see people doing that all the time. You really need look no further than the comments here. Oh, and it's nearly impossible to get people out of that.
The true story is easily the most fascinating and important subject I know, from the dawn of mankind to the 2022 midterm elections. But I've found that the vast majority are interested in what they're interested in, and that's rarely the truth.
As dry as most of AZ, the Swamp is apparently very, very deep. After the 2020 Presidential Election, they had a very high-profile audit. Long story short, the audit itself was phony and part of the coverup.
Dave Hodges of the Common Sense Show, who was particularly interested because he lives in AZ, reported on the fraudit and very quickly a number of his associates were contacted suggesting what a bad idea it was to be connected with him.
We have to keep in mind that John McCain, our own modern day Benedict Arnold, kept getting "reelected" in Arizona.
Here's the original story: Recap: Newsom, Dahle trade barbs in California governor debate
I noticed this pic on the San Jose Mercury News site on election night in a story just after the polls closed, when AP had already called Newsom's big win with 0% of precincts reporting. By the time I got around to posting a few hours later they'd already removed the pic. This is the only other use of it I could find.
Just as a "boots on the ground" note of how phony this particular race was, I will confess that I didn't even know Newsom was up for reelection until I opened up my ballot this afternoon. There are no campaign signs for either of them and no one's talking about the race.
You can compare that to all the coverage of Newsom badmouthing DeSantis, and there was tons of coverage when Newsom was up for recall last summer. This one was a joke and apparently they got a "widow's son" no one's ever heard of to play along.
(If anyone has seen my previous posts regarding Newsom having been executed last January, I still believe that and this latest event fits right in. Why stage a campaign for a dead guy when he's already going to win? No one's even noticed he's dead, so why make more work?)
There's also the counterpart of "enforced collective guilt". If some liberal wants to feel guilty about what Nazis did, then that's their business, but that's not what's really going on.
First, let me say that I simply do not believe they actually feel any personal guilt, because subconsciously they know they aren't responsible. Aside from virtue-signalling, where do we ever see them taking personal responsibility? Is there even one of them that said something like, "During all this Ye furor, I found out that Adidas was founded by Nazis. I love their shoes, but no more Adidas for me at least until they admit that, and that they were hypocrites about Ye."
The real problem from these people, though, is that they subconsciously have declared the collective guilt of others, then use it consciously to justify enforcing their will against them. Hey, it's not immoral coercion, it's highly moral punishment of the guilty, right?
Voting may not be the solution, but if there's any possibility that the ballot box helps avoid or delay resort to the cartridge box, then I'm all for it.
The real game is, of course, in each individual consciousness, and there is a benefit to holding even rigged elections with all the ensuing controversy. Almost no one sees it.
That is, whenever discussion of some bad situation involving some politician comes up around normies, the easiest "awakening" points you're ever going score are simply to remark, "Yeah, it really makes you wonder if there's anything to all this rigged election talk, huh? Did anyone really vote for that jerk?"
I completely agree. It's brainless not to vote.
I'm stunned by how many people impress themselves with how clever they are to not "fall into the trap" by refusing to vote. What could they possibly think they're accomplishing? Are they just trying to impress the rest of us with their insight?
I suppose that if and when the day comes, we will be able to separate people into three groups. Those that participating in casting phony ballots can be lined up next to a ditch. Those that cast valid ballots not just exercised their rights, but helped keep the Republic alive. And those that declined to vote and suggested others do the same... well, what can be said of them?
I no longer wonder that "They" have got so far with so many people considering such thinking a "higher mentality".
I guess I'm still waiting for a Ukrainian to say, "Hey, I think I've been lied to. I don't believe the US and NATO are looking out for the welfare of the Ukraine and the Ukrainian people after all."
Doesn't seem that hard to figure out, so we have to look around and see that the people most affected must not even be trying to figure it out.
Yeah, I'm definitely a subscriber to the polar alignment/"purple dawn" hypothesis. I have my radar on for evidence of it as it comes by, but there's very little.
Wish I could find the link, but for me the last piece dropped into place recently. There's some sort of rare stellar structure that is basically huge blobs of gas strung out like pearls in a line. My guess is that it's rare because it's short-lived. It explains simultaneously the very weird polar alignment and also how most star systems are binary or trinary.
If Purple Dawn is correct, then it was within human memory, and for certain reasons I would put that no more than 50K years ago. That really upends a lot of what we've been told about, well, a lot.
But my point in all this is that "They" have really been pushed to tell us a lot of truth lately, and I take that as a very positive sign.