There's just a ton of speculation out there about what the whole Noah story was about. I came across some writing that I feel is crucial to sorting out some of the issues which seems to almost be unknown:
Short as it is, it's full of what I think of as "anomalous evidence". That is, very strange statements are made that don't lend themselves to what most people like, which is a "storybook narrative" that can made to support their existing worldview. So when I find an interpretation of these very strange things that fits the very strange theories I have, I find it very convincing.
So as concerns Noah, he was said to be "perfect in his generations". Every researcher thinks that means he was of purely human genetics. But that fragment says his appearance was so odd his father believes he was sired by an angel! When the issue eventually makes it to Enoch, he says, "Don't worry about it, he's Lamech's son. A big flood is coming and Noah and his sons are going to survive it." Noah also lived almost a thousand years, so I would say there's no way he was a human like you and me.
Making it more odd is that the Flood doesn't come for 600 more years! Pretty delayed for a punishment. Other sources and even certain interpretations of Bible passages seem to indicate the Flood was caused by the close passage of Nibiru.
What makes sense to me is that the return of Nibiru could be predicted as far ahead as one would like, and perhaps it was known that this next one would be a close passage causing great destruction. As I put it together, Yahweh decided that--given the Nephilim genetics floating around causing a lot of evil and a lot of suffering--he'd just go ahead and let the whole place get reset. (Longer story, but Enoch had apparently been talking to Yahweh's half-brother, the scientist that engineered humans and who wanted to save some people.)
As to the issue of how certain I am about this, well, there's a limit to how certain you can be with fragmentary evidence. But I see over and over and over how the wildest aspects of the story I've put together lock into place with one another.
There's one such example in that fragment of the Book of Noah. Long story, but I had put together that Atlantis was an empire based in Antarctica before it shifted to it's current position, and further that it had been founded by Poseidon, who was actually Enki who I mentioned above.
When Methuselah seeks out Enoch, he finds him at "the ends of the earth". If you had to pick out where the ends of the Earth were, would you come up with anything other than the Arctic and Antarctic?
I mean, I'm decently creative, but I couldn't begin to come up with these interlocking associations if I tried. And I've found so many I refuse to think it's all coincidence.
There's another fascinating yet totally unsurprising connection here.
The Vandenberg Coalition is named for the late Senator Arthus H. Vandenberg of Michigan. His nephew was four-star General Hoyt S. Vandenberg. He was Chief of Staff of the Air Force and Vandenberg AFB is named in honor of him.
Less well-known is that he was the 2nd Director of the CIA, taking the job only six months after it was created. He left in May 1947, just before the Roswell Incident.
Roswell AAFB was commanded at that time by Colonel William H. Blanchard. Rather than being punished, Blanchard went on to a stellar career. He was eventually promoted to four-star general and served as Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force under (guess who?) Vandenberg.
Coincidence? I think not.
I was always of the opinion it was leaked by Alito himself. I would content the op (part of the larger Quiet War) was to gauge public opinion, defuse it as an election issue, and was a sort of predictive programming. They got like two days of outrage, 90% of which was driven by non-stop media, so they proceeded with the ruling.
In actuality, the Supreme Court is like the kind of small office many of us had worked in. Nine justice have seven of so clerks each, plus a small administrative staff. Maybe a hundred people, only a small fraction of which would have had access to prepublished opinions.
Just a guess, but I'd say if such an opinion really leaked, it would be instantly narrowed down to no more than three people, if they didn't know who it was right away. Not much of an investigation would ever be needed.
I think Ardis may be of a certain class of disinfo agents.
That is, if "They" can't convince you of their lies, then they'll take keeping you away from the truth. To that end, they find someone who is honest but incorrect and promote him in various (probably clandestine) ways. Some people will then buy into the error, but in any case the waters are further muddied and that's never a bad thing.
Someone who honest but in error will ultimately fall to someone with the correct information. (We also see that once attached to an idea, people have an extremely hard time letting go, and that's a lesson for all of us.) Pure disinfo agents either dodge around, devolve into sophistry, or go with the old standby: unhinged personal attacks.
They were definitely the creator race, huge pile of evidence for that along many lines. One item I learned about recently was that the phrase "in our image" in the Bible was translated from a Hebrew word with the deep etymology "cut out from". In modern English we would say "cut from the same cloth". That's pretty damn close to "genetic engineering", keeping in mind that the people writing these things down were fresh out of the Bronze Age.
As a quick aside on terminology, we would specify that the Anunnaki were those natives of Nibiru that traveled to Earth, and the Nibiruans were the race itself. In almost all cases, though, you'll find that "Anunnaki" is used both for the members of the expedition and for the race.
The Anunnaki of the expedition are one and the same as the "Watchers" of Enoch, but that word results from a mistranslation and people mistakenly think it has something to do with their function. The original Sumerian word was I.GI.GI, which can be and was translated as "watchers". But it can also be translated as the number 600, and I firmly believe this is what the Sumerians meant: that there were 600 members of the expedition.Many confirming pieces of evidence for that.
The Nephilim, meaning something like "The Fallen", were Anunnaki/human hybrids. It long puzzled me that the Bible included breeding between "angels" and humans. Bible scholars either ignore it or just wave their hands around and claim angels can do anything. But with the correct interpretation we see the possibility: we're already genetically part Anunnaki. It also explains the giantism, which you find for specific genetic reasons in another hybrid, the liger.
The first question is what I think we know least about, and we have to piece it together from tiny clues. I think "They" told us something about the situation in the book "Childhood's End" by Arthur C. Clarke. Spoiler: an alien master race comes to Earth but carefully conceals their appearance from humans because humans will find it too disturbing. Turns out they resemble the Devil.
So if I had to bet money, I think they resemble the Devil, although maybe more reptilian. And in a boomerang, my research has indicated without doubt that the Devil was one of the Anunnaki. You have to shovel away a huge pile of incorrect interpretation of the "authorities" to get to that, though, but I think you can see how it starts to fall into place.
The giveaway here is that it comes out of the Department of Energy. So they're in charge of nuclear accelerators, viruses and petroleum? Does this make sense to anyone?
My guess is that "They" have lost control of even the incredibly corrupt HHS.
Here's something sure to be the opposite of shocking for most people here:
Christian Zionism: Cyrus Scofield was Rothschild’s puppet (Veterans Today 10/17/2020)
Cyrus Scofield, a forger, felon and trained lawyer, had been hired by the Rothschilds to write this dispensational reinterpretation of biblical events and Christian doctrine.
As I noted in another comment, CA Gov Newsom has been dead over a year and no one seems to have noticed. It's been just a small number of DeepFakes since then, no body doubles to my knowledge. The DeepFakes are now very, very good, but my point is that no one is even looking, which is another problem altogether.
I'm sure most "conspiracy theorists" reading this right now are thinking, "Oh, how ridiculous! Why would I waste time on such obvious BS?" Yeah, that's what I'm talking about.
Point is, nothing is going to change. Welcome to the world we're all actually living in.
I certainly try to tread carefully.
As for UFOs, I fairly recently discovered that Roswell was most assuredly a government psyop--that is, a faked crash and a faked coverup. Then I thought, "Well, why bother with all that unless there was something they're trying to disguise?" To me, they've muddied the waters so completely it's hardly worth the time to sort through it.
The only aliens of which I'm aware are the Anunnaki, and there's an overwhelming amount of evidence for them. You'll notice that "They" handle this one of three ways: make sure you stay ignorant, dismiss and ridicule the subject, or (as with "Ancient Aliens" or Clif High) lead you right into a black hole of nonsense.
But I think that if the Anunnaki are tooling around the Earth in flying saucers there is so much garbage around the phenomenon we'd never be able to know. Then again, maybe that's the point.
He's dead. Not that they will announce that. A "Senator" is too important to give up for such a trivial reason.
UPDATE: Apparently others are figuring this out. And just FYI, I maintain that CA Gov Newsom has been dead over a year, even winning reselection, so don't expect anything to happen with Fetterman. The body double search for such a freak must be incredibly challenging.
Same here, actually. If I had to wager one way or the other, I would bet that there is not some folder somewhere in DC labeled "Project Blue Beam" that a government employee opens up and works from every day. Rather, the idea exists and the people that work on it know what they're working on and those that assist them believe they're working on something else.
If this sounds like some airy-fairy hand-waving to preserve a "debunked" theory, you can think of it like this: were there "cool kids" in your high school? There sure were in mine and I knew for certain I was not one of them. But the cool kids themselves knew who each other were.
Was there any physical evidence of this? No, of course not. They didn't maintain public membership rosters, or have ID cards, nor did they even have a formal name for their "organization". But they existed nonetheless, and one would need to carefully observe their behaviors, activities, habits, associations, etc., to detect them.
Which is exactly what we did, and that's how we know there were "cool kids" in high school.
A decent collection of relevant info: A Discussion of Project Blue Beam Theory (11/11/2021)
It may be obvious to many, but we should all pause to take note how we identify someone speaking the truth.
You can see he talks very plainly, straightforward and in simple terms. You also get the impression he's holding back somewhat and couching his speech to best effect for the listener, neither too technical nor too dumbed down. This is all because you're seeing a person trying best to communicate what is in their mind to the minds of other people.
These are simple things, but if you hold them up to what we are so used to hearing all day long, you'll note how uncommon it really is.
There's a framework that that I kind of see shaping up in the following way:
For decades, the propaganda theme was consistently, "blacks are oppressed and victims". Then we finally got, "blacks are overlooked and underrepresented, and must be elevated and celebrated". Now, as you say, very quickly there's an emerging theme of, "blacks are criminals and naturally violent". The only thing is, they're still running with the first two themes also.
This makes no sense. When programming, you have to hammer the theme constantly and consistently. And as best exemplified by all the censorship, counter-programming must be extinguished.
So what are we seeing? What I'm guessing is this: when the first thing you do doesn't work, you do a second thing. When that doesn't work, you do a third. When none of them work, you do all three. What's there to lose? Maybe something will finally break your way and you can get back on track.
So I believe what we're witnessing is that Their racial "divide and rule" scheme is breaking down.
There's an important lesson to be learned here, for me anyway.
For almost all my life, it was an unquestionable truth that the white liberal was the black man's best friend. Then I find out that, no, they've done a lot of things that ended up destructive to the black community. Then I find it it was all on purpose. Then I find out this has been known and spoken of publicly for at least 60 years by people like Malcolm X.
I spin around and think, "Well Jesus, what the hell else have I missed?" And I come to realize virtually everyone lives in some level of a fake reality that is unquestionably and entirely real to them.
You end up looking around at people and thinking, "I wonder what color the sky is in their world?"
Philosophical thought: I think that if you built a chronovisor and all you ever got to see was a single page of a high school history textbook from 50 or 100 years from now summarizing "COVID", that would tell you all you needed to know about how things are going to turn out for us.
I wish I had some visibility into the mindset of the "average" German. Do they really not get that peace and good times were ahead working with the Russians?
Now that may have been a little subtle since it had been developing over a number of years, but how could they possibly miss their big "ally", the United States of Freedom, committing industrial terrorism and wrecking their economy?
It's hard for me to believe, but sometimes I suspect that the entire nation is so cucked by extreme levels of WW2 guilt that they actually think, "Oh vell, ve got it comink!"
I got the "Atlantis in Antarctica" theory from the work of Rand and Rose Flem-Ath. It works into the Richat Structure thesis in that Atlantis was a worldwide empire based in Antarctica with one of the outposts being in Mali. I've often wondered if Corsetti is a sort of limited hangout specifically to divert from Antarctica. I've never once heard him mention it, and here he is popping up on Rogan, a controlled outlet.
Part of this whole theory concerns the sudden shift of the Antarctic that hardly anyone talks about. Take a look at the Piri Reis map. Everyone talks about how the coast is shown ice-free, which indicates a warmer climate there, but even more startling is that it is shown connected to South America!
Now look at that same area on a globe. Notice that the Andes is all bent to the east, and there's another corresponding mountain range in Antarctica also bent to the east. Now look more carefully and you'll see a chain of islands wrapping around and connecting them. I suggest this was a single mountain range, bent all out shape during the shift. Who knows what other havoc took place during this time.
As for long lives, it seems as if it has something to do with Anunnaki genetics in humans. They live, I believe, for perhaps 500k years. If you look at the Sumerian King List, you'll see three distinct lengths of reign: first tens of thousands of years, then thousands, then hundreds. I would suggest these correspond to full Anunnaki, part-Anunnaki, then mostly human genetics.
So thinking about Noah, there's that very anomalous incident where his sons saw him naked. No one wants to see their Dad's dingle, sure, but what's the big deal? I'm guessing here that there was something about his physical appearance that made him obviously not a normal human. What that was would be pure guesswork.
Very, very, very long story short, it turns out the Bible is basically about some of the dealings of the Anunnaki with humans. Actually, it's only a small part of a much larger picture. You can approach it as Mauro Biglino does by just reading what's in the text and realizing it's been terribly mistranslated, and a very different story emerges with a correct translation.
IDK how much Biglino really knows about the whole story, although I can see he treads very carefully when brushing up against people's religious convictions. As for myself, I just want the truth.
So it turns out, in brief, that in the Old Testament, these are the fundamental mistranslations (English = original Hebrew = actual identity):
Plus, it turns out that Satan is the Anunnaki named Marduk, nephew of Enlil.
The Creator of the Universe is named only once, in Genesis 1:1, which was of course mistranslated. The proper translation is, "The Father of the Beginnings created the Elohim, the heavens and the Earth".
Finally, it's much harder to discern working in the New Testament, but clearly Jesus (and probably other messiahs in history) was sent to aid humanity by one of the Anunnaki, either Enlil of Enki.
It's all a story that the word "fascinating" does not begin to do justice to, and it makes me sad that people are missing out on it. But let's be honest: very few really want to hear it.