What needs to be understood is that the personalized realities in which the vast majority of people live are constructed by methods other than exposure to the truth. Take the plain fact of the truth of Pearl Harbor right from the mouth of the US military itself:
Top Secret Report of Army Pearl Harbor Board (October 20, 1944)
Up to the morning of December 7, 1941, everything that the Japanese were planning to do was known to the United States….
Startling, eh? Case closed, right? You can find that very statement quoted in this extremely long and detailed article:
Did U.S. leaders know that war was coming?
I'll save anyone looking for it some time and say you find it at the very end of the article. Know what it says right up front?
Note to conspiracy buffs: nothing here suggests that Roosevelt or anyone else knew that Pearl Harbor would be the target.
See the way it works for most people? They can be shown even shocking truths, but they are not given permission to draw their own conclusions from it, nor do they take for themselves such authority over their own consciousness.
Personally, I'm working under the scenario that the guy was executed about a year ago:
GITMO Double-Header Execution: Anthony Fauci & Loretta Lynch (RRN 4/25/2022)
They roll out a video of him once in a while and virtually everyone is not only convinced he's still alive, it's absurd to think he's not. None of the halfwits that believe they're smart enough to have seen through the "QAnon deception" even begin to question this illusion.
So "They" can run this out as long as is convenient to their purposes, saying anything about the guy they please. All eyes are on the drama as they look for retribution/validation. A grand open-air kabuki, brought to you by DeepFake.
I hate to give Them ideas, but they could even end it in due time with an assassination (AR-15 and a MAGA hat, of course). The violent liberals love blood-letting, after all.
"They" are losing their grip, and fear that the components of power that slip from their control will be turned against them.
Similarly, you will see that when it comes to 2A, they have a special emphasis in disarming veterans. One aspect, soft-pedaled so far, is the line that "veterans are inherently emotionally unstable and prone to self-harm and violence against others." Watch for the volume on thus to increase.
For historical context, research "dekulakization" by the Bolsheviks. They moved quickly to destroy the strongest potential source of resistance and resource base. Of course, we see this already with all Trump supporters being denounced as "far-right domestic violent extremists", "hooite supremacists" or just "nazis".
I've never spent much time researching this incident because I never saw the point, but I have a suspicion this particular revelation is a limited hangout. Actually, more than that, it's just outright fabrication. The proof will come in this way: not one single person will be punished for any actions associated with this event, or even be brought before a court or tribunal.
As a contemporary comparison, we're two years out from J6 and everyone is flipping their lids just because the video finally got released. But here, this guy is testifying to an obvious, overt, heinous, homicidal act and no one ever tried to stop him. Does not wash, and look how hard people bite down on it.
So what's the truth of that bombing? I'd say it was a last-ditch effort by the HarrisBiden Administration (or whoever really runs it) for an excuse for the US to stay in Afghanistan in violation of the agreement with the Taliban. "Oh noes, we can't leave when muh terrorists are killing all these peoples. Wouldn't be right!"
The attack never made sense from any other perspective. The Taliban wanted the US out and they were in the process of leaving. What everyone has been conditioned to forget is that even a terrorist is supposed to be trying to accomplish something.
The dismaying thought for me is that so many people are at heart simply bigots. They will accept as reasonable and rational the explanation that whatever enemy is pointed out to them is simply barbarous and acts insensibly with random violence. And yes, "They" take full advantage of this bigotry.
Another sign of deep desperation. This may be the thinnest, most absurd pretext for protest I have ever seen: the people are taking to the streets and using violence to ensure they will have no way of knowing what foreigners may be tampering in the internal affairs of their country.
Uhhhh, couldn't they just ignore it? I doubt 2% of Americans have even heard of FARA. Fawcett, maybe, but not the other one.
For the preservation of Finnish sovereignty and In the best interest of the people of Finland, the Finnish Defence Forces should apprehend and subject to a military tribunal for treason any government officials suggesting that Finland join NATO. I'm certain they would be fully capable of that.
Not gonna happen, but we can dream!
I can't talk about any specifics, but the Globalist American Empire is struggling for survival and is therefore pulling out all the stops. Russia is going to drop the hammer on Ukraine any day now, and when they do the remaining UAF are going to die, surrender, or go to Kyiv looking for people to hang.
So the short-term goal is war and more war, and hope that this will give them enough slack to solve their problems. The easiest path for this is to widen the existing conflict into an open NATO-Russia War.
That Finland is not a member of NATO is at this point a mere formality, as adherence to laws, customary normal procedure and even reason will not be held as obstacles. Sanna Marin is a body double that will ram through and sign off on anything They wish. Finland them becomes another battering ram to use against Russia.
We found out over the last year on conflict that Ukraine's huge forces, trained to NATO standards and by every report competent and courageous, have been systematically annihilated by Russia. Further, we found that the rest of NATO, supposedly on the doorstep of the Red Menace, is a toothless paper tiger and is now drained of what little armaments they had.
We find out from wiki that Finland has 24K active troops. For comparison, when Russia raised 300k additional troops, they got 70-80k volunteers. All are now trained and deployed. They have also regularly rotated troops through the front, so God only knows how many battle-hardened soldiers they now have, ready to close with and destroy the enemy.
Which brings us to Ahiberg's comments. The FDF could not sell out a Major League Baseball stadium. If the GAE somehow gets Finland into play militarily, it will not be for long.
I think your read of this "AfI" is correct, but I would fit it into the overall picture differently.
It's a BS intel front. Ronny is a Deep State asset to be sure, and this can be read fairly plainly (well, it's plain to the astute) in evidence in the public record. Obviously his use is to lead people away from Trump at any cost. So They dream up this little initiative and fill it with high-wattage conspiratorial fantasy.
This has multiple uses. On the one hand, it draws researchers away from the real evidence against DeSantis, and this is probably the most important function. Also, it can be easily discredited and deboonked at will by the promoters of DeSantis as conspiracists "taking their best shot". Finally, for the brainwashed liberals it's sold as, "Look at these horrible fascists turning on each other."
The proof of this is that it took me about five seconds to analyze this and think it up. Do you think They're incapable of that?
Trump never gave his reasons, and he made some comment to one of the holdouts along the lines of, "Don't worry about it, he's going to be fine."
That's one of the subtle instances, and quite transitory, where the curtain isn't pulled back but you can plainly see that there's a curtain with something going on behind it.
As you read the comments from others, you can see that their focus is not on the curtain nor on collecting and analyzing evidence for what's going on behind it, but rather how this entire incident is clear evidence that they were right all along.
This is how you figure out how the human mind actually works, and the worth of the vast majority of their analysis.
As far as his personal wealth, this is a Western Intelligence legend. They can't even resist tipping their hand in their own writings. Take this story, for example:
An investigation on how Vladimir Putin profits from the vices of the Russians (2/28/2023)
In addition to the overblown artwork, we get this sentence right up front:
And thus begins an incredible story about money and vices.
Yes indeed, it's just a "story" and it is not credible. Take a look around for evidence of this wealth. Do you ever see it?
No, there's no trace of it. He wears ordinary dark suits and what looks like a Timex watch. The Presidential plane is the size of a 737. No photos of him in his mansions or on his yachts or with his collections of European sports cars and race horses. Nothing.
His office is clearly set up for work, not ceremony. I'm sure he's taken other days off in the last ten years, but I've only seen two days documented. Both were simple day trips into the woods with his friend, Defense Minister Shoigu. There was one other "working" day he spent working out and eating lunch with Medvedev.
As far as Putin "changing", he was switched out with a body double starting as early as 2010, and the last time I saw the real Putin was in 2013. Anyone that does not take this into account I feel cannot really be said to be paying attention.
Nicole became "her sister" Denise: THE O. J. SIMPSON TRIAL was Faked as were the murders (30-page PDF)
What you hit on is the biggest argument against him. I take the view that brute force and main strength is seldom the wisest strategy to take, especially when your enemy is immensely powerful, deeply entrenched, and knows no boundary to their methodologies.
As I see it, Putin has been preparing for this time for more than 25 years. He's been building the economy and enhancing the Russian military-industrial complex, all on a shoestring budget. And all the while, he scrupulously avoided antagonizing his Western "partners" and "colleagues". A wise strategy, in my book.
This idea was cemented for me when I came across some information about the sinking of the Kursk back in 2000, "anomalous" evidence as I have described.
Long story short, Putin deliberately let 23 survivors perish. Evil? Call it what you will, but the Kursk was sunk in an engagement with one US and one UK sub. Had the survivors told the tale, the Russian people would have demanded a fight. Putin knew they were unprepared for such a fight, and who knows how many would die. He made a tremendously difficult decision.
You can see that the picture I have built up is quite complex, and includes data seldom discussed, but at least it's consistent.
There is a little-known but absolutely crucial connection between that Jekyll Island meeting and the Canaanites (and thence to Satan). This is not quite the best presentation of it, but it's enough documentation to get any researcher started:
The Canaanite Altar Below Jekyll Island Hotel of Federal Reserve Infamy
Note that the altar is directly below the very room in which they met.
As far as Russia and Putin, I've studied them both for many years and have concluded that they are completely anti-NWO. In fact, I believe the Special Military Operation started a year ago will, in the fullness of time, come to mark the point where the tide was finally turned against them.
Now that's a helluva tall claim and I would never ask anyone to take my word for it, but I do have a suggestion: keep that thesis in mind as evidence comes before you and look for two different things.
One is concrete counter-evidence. By that I mean, when you think you've got something solid against the thesis, take the time to validate it. You'll very often find it ends up coming from unidentifiable sources. (And I'll tell you who it was: the CIA.)
The other is anomalous evidence, something that you have to fit into the picture yourself. Take this story, for example: RUSSIA REPORT: PUTIN
It was written back in 2014 and concerns an encounter in 1992. It's part of the picture I have built over time of Putin, and doesn't match any characterization given by either the mainstream or even conspiracy theorists.
Did some disinfo agent plant that to fool the handful of people like myself who might trip over it? I suppose it's possible, but if they did, They are so far ahead it doesn't matter what we do.
I hate to get overly optimistic, but it seems like "They" are coming unraveled and can't keep everyone on the same page. I collected these headlines just this morning:
Zelensky Says Ukraine’s Top Generals Want to Keep Fighting for Bakhmut
They're beyond the point of telling you a lie and have to tell you all the lies.
Everyone interested in similar such activism should be sure to look up the work of Neturei Karta.
The mere fact that their views and activities are virtually unknown should be demonstration enough that "They" (the real "They") will turn on Jews just as fast as anyone else if they aren't following the program.
Thanks for posting that comment. You know, I've never even bothered to study the subject of the Antichrist before. That may sound lax, but I'll tell you why.
For one matter, we should already be behaving morally, and the presence or absence of the Antichrist does not affect that duty.
For another, the world is already so full of dangerous Satanic deceivers that we should already be on our highest guard and practicing our utmost discernment. If that doesn't help you detect the Antichrist, well, you did your best and I don't think more could be required.
For yet a third, none of us are in control of the time and circumstance under which the Antichrist will come, so why worry about it? We're only responsible for those things under our control, which brings us back to the first two points.
But I'll let you know if I see anyone suspicious! ;)
Here's one of his that I thought was very worthwhile that I've never heard anywhere else and--just like Alex Jones--HE'S GOT THE DOCUMENTS!:
The True Meaning of ‘Shalom’ (submit Or Die!) – Know More News Live Feat. Adam Green
But his basic slant is that Da Joos are responsible for everything. Sure, they're responsible for plenty, but when they're not it obscures and even precludes analysys into who really is.
As far as the evangelicals and almost all other religious people, the more I've learned about the Bible, the more I've realized that the vast majority of their religious thinking comes from reading things in to the Bible, rather than reading out of it.
This is to say that they basically just make a lot of stuff up to suit what they already thought. That doesn't make it wrong, it just means it has little basis. Of course, that's not just religious people but the same goes for all people all the time.
In other words, in this instance I would say they just got carried about with something that they would like to be true, but has little evidentiary basis. Was he anointed? No, and no one has ever presented evidence to that effect.
Was he "chosen" by cloaked forces that have yet to publicly reveal themselves, but which evidence may indicate? Well, that is quite another subject entirely.
Final note: I really like Adam Green and think he has done some vital work. But on the flip side, he really seems to force a lot of evidence to fit his existing theories. I've never seen him say something like, "I came across this thing that proves I was wrong about what I said before." Frankly, I can't even imagine him doing that.
I would like to remind everyone again of the current US Ambassador to Poland: Mark Brzezinski.
Conspiracy theorists love to demonstrate their knowledge by showing that picture of his father looking at a machine gun with Osama bin Laden, We all lived through the conflagration set by that little spark.
One may now compare that machine gun to this display.
For comparison, one may look at this NOAA rainfall data for various watersheds along the West Coast: Monthly Precipitation Summary Water Year 2023
There are a couple of notable items. One is that many of them have lower than normal rainfall.
The other item, which you can't see, I think is more important. When I checked this a couple of months ago, it had little or no missing data. The same pattern was present, though, with some higher than normal levels, but a great many with lower than normal.
What's the explanation? I discard that they're so incompetent that they can't keep track of rainfall. I would guess that with the "atmospheric river" and "bomb cyclone" and "end of the world" narratives being forwarded, anyone consulting the actual data would find it contradicted. So don't change the narrative, get rid of the "inconvenient truth".