All false flags. Japan didn't get aircraft carriers near Pearl Harbor and surprise attack. I call bullshit. Historians make up excuses such as "radio silence" and Japan Navy being covert. Bullshit.
I also hear Boomers always talk about Pearl Harbor being real and this being "the good war." Bullshit.
USA took the wrong side in the war and should have stayed out of it. Now the Jewish Pride Fund markets LGBTQ to kids.
What needs to be understood is that the personalized realities in which the vast majority of people live are constructed by methods other than exposure to the truth. Take the plain fact of the truth of Pearl Harbor right from the mouth of the US military itself:
I'll save anyone looking for it some time and say you find it at the very end of the article. Know what it says right up front?
Note to conspiracy buffs: nothing here suggests that Roosevelt or anyone else knew that Pearl Harbor would be the target.
See the way it works for most people? They can be shown even shocking truths, but they are not given permission to draw their own conclusions from it, nor do they take for themselves such authority over their own consciousness.
If you are (temporary growth), the you are within (ongoing loss)...lack represents your choice to want more (suggested) than need offers (perceivable).
bot
Aka Robot (Latin robur, strength)...the strength of temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) implies resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
Ask yourself why you use the suggested term "bot" to dehumanize others? Why not express humanity within perceivable instead of trying to dehumanize others by suggestion?
free will
Suggested free will tempts one to ignore being "free will of choice". Consenting to suggested "free will" implies ignoring to both have a "choice" and having it "of" origin.
FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies within balance)...can you describe the foundation for your choice?
You will respond
I need to adapt to perceivable inspiration, while resisting the want/will to respond to suggested information. I write so much because I choose to draw from inspiration instead of reasoning against others about information.
You will respond with definitions
I dismantle suggested definitions, which in return helps me to resist the temptation of being a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one who willingly ignores perceivable sound for suggested words.
LACK FREE WILL AND FREE CHOICE
a) lacking implies being within an origin that offers, hence one being able to perceive abundance and lack, which further implies having free will of choice in-between abundance (growth) and lack (loss).
b) can you give me an example of having free will "without" free choice?
Everyone talks about 9-11 being false flag.
Pearl Harbor was too.
Same with Jan6
All false flags. Japan didn't get aircraft carriers near Pearl Harbor and surprise attack. I call bullshit. Historians make up excuses such as "radio silence" and Japan Navy being covert. Bullshit.
I also hear Boomers always talk about Pearl Harbor being real and this being "the good war." Bullshit.
USA took the wrong side in the war and should have stayed out of it. Now the Jewish Pride Fund markets LGBTQ to kids.
Here is a review of the book PEARL HARBOR AND FALSE FLAG USA https://www.bitchute.com/video/NtvRq0i2EAtY/
This is the AudioBook version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooxfUpFenxc
An excerpt from the book: https://www.scribd.com/document/145021957/Day-of-Deceit-Pearl-Harbor-2p#
What needs to be understood is that the personalized realities in which the vast majority of people live are constructed by methods other than exposure to the truth. Take the plain fact of the truth of Pearl Harbor right from the mouth of the US military itself:
Top Secret Report of Army Pearl Harbor Board (October 20, 1944)
Startling, eh? Case closed, right? You can find that very statement quoted in this extremely long and detailed article:
Did U.S. leaders know that war was coming?
I'll save anyone looking for it some time and say you find it at the very end of the article. Know what it says right up front?
See the way it works for most people? They can be shown even shocking truths, but they are not given permission to draw their own conclusions from it, nor do they take for themselves such authority over their own consciousness.
a) nature draws initiation (inception) and conclusion (death) for every expression (life) within...
b) DRAW, verb - "to cause to move forward"...self discernment allows one to comprehend being the effect, caused to move forwards.
a) EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal/inherent power"...that's work.
b) Inside work exists the way (process of dying) and the wanderer (living) aka ongoing loss and temporary growth in balance with each other.
c) sleight of hand: "Arbeit (energy) macht Frei (free will of choice)" aka work will set you free.
If you are a bot, then you lack free will.
You do not have will to break free of what you are programmed to do.
You will respond with definitions and semantics because you LACK FREE WILL AND FREE CHOICE.
You have now been blue-screened.
If you are (temporary growth), the you are within (ongoing loss)...lack represents your choice to want more (suggested) than need offers (perceivable).
Aka Robot (Latin robur, strength)...the strength of temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) implies resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
Ask yourself why you use the suggested term "bot" to dehumanize others? Why not express humanity within perceivable instead of trying to dehumanize others by suggestion?
Suggested free will tempts one to ignore being "free will of choice". Consenting to suggested "free will" implies ignoring to both have a "choice" and having it "of" origin.
FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies within balance)...can you describe the foundation for your choice?
I need to adapt to perceivable inspiration, while resisting the want/will to respond to suggested information. I write so much because I choose to draw from inspiration instead of reasoning against others about information.
I dismantle suggested definitions, which in return helps me to resist the temptation of being a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one who willingly ignores perceivable sound for suggested words.
a) lacking implies being within an origin that offers, hence one being able to perceive abundance and lack, which further implies having free will of choice in-between abundance (growth) and lack (loss).
b) can you give me an example of having free will "without" free choice?
You only get jew-screened on windows...and if you look through suggested windows, then you view the world "through the looking glass"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Through_the_Looking-Glass
Mouth to Ass or Ass to Mouth?
Most of the people I impale have shit coming out of both.. So it doesn't matter.
The Japanese Rising Sun Nationalists are false flags too.
World War II is a pro-wrestling fest with billions of innocents dead.
The goal is to subjugate all of Europe and east Asia into the NWO.
Millions of white people were tricked into killing millions of white people
FDR was a faggot communist. Communism comes from Jew synagogue of satan.