Trump never gave his reasons, and he made some comment to one of the holdouts along the lines of, "Don't worry about it, he's going to be fine."
That's one of the subtle instances, and quite transitory, where the curtain isn't pulled back but you can plainly see that there's a curtain with something going on behind it.
As you read the comments from others, you can see that their focus is not on the curtain nor on collecting and analyzing evidence for what's going on behind it, but rather how this entire incident is clear evidence that they were right all along.
This is how you figure out how the human mind actually works, and the worth of the vast majority of their analysis.
As far as his personal wealth, this is a Western Intelligence legend. They can't even resist tipping their hand in their own writings. Take this story, for example:
An investigation on how Vladimir Putin profits from the vices of the Russians (2/28/2023)
In addition to the overblown artwork, we get this sentence right up front:
And thus begins an incredible story about money and vices.
Yes indeed, it's just a "story" and it is not credible. Take a look around for evidence of this wealth. Do you ever see it?
No, there's no trace of it. He wears ordinary dark suits and what looks like a Timex watch. The Presidential plane is the size of a 737. No photos of him in his mansions or on his yachts or with his collections of European sports cars and race horses. Nothing.
His office is clearly set up for work, not ceremony. I'm sure he's taken other days off in the last ten years, but I've only seen two days documented. Both were simple day trips into the woods with his friend, Defense Minister Shoigu. There was one other "working" day he spent working out and eating lunch with Medvedev.
As far as Putin "changing", he was switched out with a body double starting as early as 2010, and the last time I saw the real Putin was in 2013. Anyone that does not take this into account I feel cannot really be said to be paying attention.
Nicole became "her sister" Denise: THE O. J. SIMPSON TRIAL was Faked as were the murders (30-page PDF)
What you hit on is the biggest argument against him. I take the view that brute force and main strength is seldom the wisest strategy to take, especially when your enemy is immensely powerful, deeply entrenched, and knows no boundary to their methodologies.
As I see it, Putin has been preparing for this time for more than 25 years. He's been building the economy and enhancing the Russian military-industrial complex, all on a shoestring budget. And all the while, he scrupulously avoided antagonizing his Western "partners" and "colleagues". A wise strategy, in my book.
This idea was cemented for me when I came across some information about the sinking of the Kursk back in 2000, "anomalous" evidence as I have described.
Long story short, Putin deliberately let 23 survivors perish. Evil? Call it what you will, but the Kursk was sunk in an engagement with one US and one UK sub. Had the survivors told the tale, the Russian people would have demanded a fight. Putin knew they were unprepared for such a fight, and who knows how many would die. He made a tremendously difficult decision.
You can see that the picture I have built up is quite complex, and includes data seldom discussed, but at least it's consistent.
There is a little-known but absolutely crucial connection between that Jekyll Island meeting and the Canaanites (and thence to Satan). This is not quite the best presentation of it, but it's enough documentation to get any researcher started:
The Canaanite Altar Below Jekyll Island Hotel of Federal Reserve Infamy
Note that the altar is directly below the very room in which they met.
As far as Russia and Putin, I've studied them both for many years and have concluded that they are completely anti-NWO. In fact, I believe the Special Military Operation started a year ago will, in the fullness of time, come to mark the point where the tide was finally turned against them.
Now that's a helluva tall claim and I would never ask anyone to take my word for it, but I do have a suggestion: keep that thesis in mind as evidence comes before you and look for two different things.
One is concrete counter-evidence. By that I mean, when you think you've got something solid against the thesis, take the time to validate it. You'll very often find it ends up coming from unidentifiable sources. (And I'll tell you who it was: the CIA.)
The other is anomalous evidence, something that you have to fit into the picture yourself. Take this story, for example: RUSSIA REPORT: PUTIN
It was written back in 2014 and concerns an encounter in 1992. It's part of the picture I have built over time of Putin, and doesn't match any characterization given by either the mainstream or even conspiracy theorists.
Did some disinfo agent plant that to fool the handful of people like myself who might trip over it? I suppose it's possible, but if they did, They are so far ahead it doesn't matter what we do.
I hate to get overly optimistic, but it seems like "They" are coming unraveled and can't keep everyone on the same page. I collected these headlines just this morning:
Zelensky Says Ukraine’s Top Generals Want to Keep Fighting for Bakhmut
They're beyond the point of telling you a lie and have to tell you all the lies.
Everyone interested in similar such activism should be sure to look up the work of Neturei Karta.
The mere fact that their views and activities are virtually unknown should be demonstration enough that "They" (the real "They") will turn on Jews just as fast as anyone else if they aren't following the program.
Thanks for posting that comment. You know, I've never even bothered to study the subject of the Antichrist before. That may sound lax, but I'll tell you why.
For one matter, we should already be behaving morally, and the presence or absence of the Antichrist does not affect that duty.
For another, the world is already so full of dangerous Satanic deceivers that we should already be on our highest guard and practicing our utmost discernment. If that doesn't help you detect the Antichrist, well, you did your best and I don't think more could be required.
For yet a third, none of us are in control of the time and circumstance under which the Antichrist will come, so why worry about it? We're only responsible for those things under our control, which brings us back to the first two points.
But I'll let you know if I see anyone suspicious! ;)
Here's one of his that I thought was very worthwhile that I've never heard anywhere else and--just like Alex Jones--HE'S GOT THE DOCUMENTS!:
The True Meaning of ‘Shalom’ (submit Or Die!) – Know More News Live Feat. Adam Green
But his basic slant is that Da Joos are responsible for everything. Sure, they're responsible for plenty, but when they're not it obscures and even precludes analysys into who really is.
As far as the evangelicals and almost all other religious people, the more I've learned about the Bible, the more I've realized that the vast majority of their religious thinking comes from reading things in to the Bible, rather than reading out of it.
This is to say that they basically just make a lot of stuff up to suit what they already thought. That doesn't make it wrong, it just means it has little basis. Of course, that's not just religious people but the same goes for all people all the time.
In other words, in this instance I would say they just got carried about with something that they would like to be true, but has little evidentiary basis. Was he anointed? No, and no one has ever presented evidence to that effect.
Was he "chosen" by cloaked forces that have yet to publicly reveal themselves, but which evidence may indicate? Well, that is quite another subject entirely.
Final note: I really like Adam Green and think he has done some vital work. But on the flip side, he really seems to force a lot of evidence to fit his existing theories. I've never seen him say something like, "I came across this thing that proves I was wrong about what I said before." Frankly, I can't even imagine him doing that.
I would like to remind everyone again of the current US Ambassador to Poland: Mark Brzezinski.
Conspiracy theorists love to demonstrate their knowledge by showing that picture of his father looking at a machine gun with Osama bin Laden, We all lived through the conflagration set by that little spark.
One may now compare that machine gun to this display.
They were used as pretexts to destroy the physical remnants of the Tartarian world culture. There are no photos of their construction, the accounts of the construction are preposterous, and nothing like them has been built in the century and a quarter since then by our "advanced" civilization". That's because the builders are no longer around.
When I first came across that story a few years back, I took one look at the picture of it they included and thought, "For Christ;s sake, that's obviously petrified wood! It looks exactly like the petrified wood bookends I bought at that rock shop years ago. How could no one notice this for 40 years?"
In unrelated news, be sure to look up my eBay listing for genuine Moon rock bookends. Best price!
What I find interesting is that the normies are now so conditioned, it never enters their consciousness that there are two sides (or more) to the issue of Taiwan or any other issue.
I mean, if you asked them what China's views and intentions were, you'd just get a blank look or something along the lines of, "They're just a bunch of imperialist Commies (or NWO puppets) bent on destroying America!" Of course, this is nothing coming out of the mouth of any Chinese official.
The two sides they get are 1) "China is a huge threat to America", and 2) "What are you faggots waiting for--we got to get them zipperheads right now!" And they do not detect a problem with that.
One may compare and integrate that with this information:
The baseline answer is that all these polls are made up and we're just being psychologically manipulated.
Not to be harsh about making the point, but you've really got to read the material if you expect to understand what's going on in the world:
We further asked why the Deep State used a balloon when it could have used a satellite.
“They no longer have access to them,” he said but would not expound on his response.
Also, They have clearly lost control of Elon's satellite array, as demonstrated when he precluded it's use by Ukraine's military. They have also lost control of Elon.
Once again, everyone bought into a big deception: White Hats: Montana Balloon Was Deep State, not Chinese
People took photos of "something" shot down over Billings. That was the DS balloon. A few days later, the government announced they shot down the balloon over the Atlantic. They threw some junk in the water and had some dupes fish it back out.
I think your read of this "AfI" is correct, but I would fit it into the overall picture differently.
It's a BS intel front. Ronny is a Deep State asset to be sure, and this can be read fairly plainly (well, it's plain to the astute) in evidence in the public record. Obviously his use is to lead people away from Trump at any cost. So They dream up this little initiative and fill it with high-wattage conspiratorial fantasy.
This has multiple uses. On the one hand, it draws researchers away from the real evidence against DeSantis, and this is probably the most important function. Also, it can be easily discredited and deboonked at will by the promoters of DeSantis as conspiracists "taking their best shot". Finally, for the brainwashed liberals it's sold as, "Look at these horrible fascists turning on each other."
The proof of this is that it took me about five seconds to analyze this and think it up. Do you think They're incapable of that?