There's a theory floating around that takes the same observations described in the article and accounts for them in a different way. It's one of the most disturbing things I've ever heard and I've never researched it in depth because I don't really like thinking about it, but here it is....
The Anunnaki and their offspring, the Nephilim, were cannibalistic. That is, they ate humans, and humans are genetically part-Anunnaki and part-primate. So many of the old stories of human sacrifice may not have been for strictly ceremonial purposes, or even for consumption of loosh, but for consumption of human flesh.
At some point and in some circumstance of which I do not know, a compromise or substitute was developed. Through genetic engineering, wild hogs were crossed with humans to create domestic pigs. The Anunnaki or Nephilim could eat these freely without people getting upset at all the human sacrifice and cannibalism.
As crazy as this thesis sounds, it precisely addresses two very disparate items:
First, the paper suggest the cross was due to some fucking in the forest by wild pigs and primates. Does that seem even remotely plausible? Not to me. Interestingly, Robert Sepehr has mentioned some hybrid primates that are not much different from either parent species, but are socially rejected by both.
Second, did you ever wonder where the Jews' very strong taboo against pork came from? People wave their hands around about parasites and trichonosis or whatever, but others have been safely consuming pork for a very long time. I'm pretty sure that if there was a safe way to do it, hungry people would find it.
If any of this has put anyone off pork to any extent, I'm staring a club.
“It is time to end this war and stop being silent.”
He supposedly defected in October, six months ago. So he felt strongly enough to defect, but not strongly enough to tell the press? Who writes this nonsense?
Although I suppose a better question is, who believes this nonsense?
From what you just wrote, I can see you're just missing the element of the Anunnaki. Take my word for it if you care to, but a lot of things will crystallize for you once you include them. Frankly, they are the framework on which human history and society is based.
If you don't believe me about their importance, try this instead: whenever the subject of the Anunnaki comes up with one of these popular researchers, pay extremely close attention to how it is handled. They will almost all ridicule it and quickly divert back to their narrative. This is how They keep you away from it.
One exception I've found is Clif High, who has a special technique. When someone mentions the Anunnaki, he says, "Oh yes, very important. But you know what's much more important is the Nommo. Let me tell you about them...." Once you're attentive to it, it's quite transparent.
Well, study their teaching all you like, but I doubt you'll find anything of any value. What you want is what might be described as "actionable intel", but as far as I can tell virtually all of this occult "doctrine" is simply made up nonsense. For example, I think you could read everything ever published by Scientologists, and not a bit of it would ever lead you to uncover Operation Snow White.
Same goes for Masonry. I remember Cecil Rhodes, a guy who I take was hip to a lot of how things really worked, made some very disparaging comment about it, something that added up to, "What a load of bullshit." When I heard that it confirmed my feeling that there was nothing important to be discovered about their doctrine.
Really, it could be counted on one hand the number of important items I've come across from all these flavors of "secret societies". And none of them are things that you would find explicitly written in their documentation. You have to abstract a level to see that that how they're really going about their business.
With Masonry, for example, throw out everything they say about themselves and realize that each has sworn a secret oath. All nefarious associations aside, how could any of them be trusted to keep any public oath? That's all you need to know about how Masonry really works.
Another example would be how the real deep Zionists/Talmudists/Kabalists think that non-Jews don't really have souls, are like animals, and may be treated as such. Yeah, okay, they wrote that down in several ways in the Talmud but that was millennia ago. All of them are way more circumspect about saying such things now. But it's still how they act, isn't it?
I've long believed the Gnostics were an early disinfo-based social engineering project. As disinfo, they have to give you some truth, and in this case I am certain the truth given was that there are the three types of human consciousness that you describe.
I believe there is something to be learned from the Gnostics as to the characteristics of these types, but everything further I've ever come across from them seems like superstitious nonsense with no basis in fact. Maybe there's more to be learned from them, but it never looked promising to me.
At a guess, I think the main idea of the Gnostic project was to off-ramp people from the increasingly popular ideas that would eventually become Christianity.
Part of what I've noticed about people attracted to Gnosticism in the modern day is that a lot of them are stoner/hippie types that have been left with a bad taste in their mouths over something to do with Christianity. It seems they are attracted to it because they can be literally "in the know" without exercising discipline, and also feel gratification that the Church "really was wrong" and not them.
The Essenes (and there's evidence to indicate that Jesus was one of them) also wrote about these three types. They referred to them as "sleeping", "drowsy", and "awake". IIRC, the Essenes taught that that the awake should not try to awaken the sleeping, but they did have a responsibility for protecting and caring for them. The awake should also stand ready to welcome and guide the drowsy as they roused from their slumber.
It struck me that, yeah, that seemed like something Jesus would teach.
I believe it is as you say. I have no direct evidence, but circumstantially They have never shown 1% of the concern They would have had if crypto--as understood--posed any threat to Their death grip on power through control of money.
But They (specifically through the NSA) were the ones that first released it, right? Reasoning backwards, I believe They must have either known about a flaw or developed a backdoor significant enough to render all crypto harmless if need be (or confiscate or deactivate it at will or whatever).
Being aware of the exact nature of the flaw, They can simply monitor the space to see if anyone seems to be sniffing around at the flaw, or working on developing something that would close off their backdoor. If deemed serious enough, they are made to go away.
Since the plan is ultimately to control tens of trillions of dollars worth of global currency, virtually any amount of resources could be justified towards this project. And They certainly have no rules about "tragic accidents" that may or may not occur.
For years now, my working theory has been that all crypto is, ultimately and at the deepest level, originated and controlled by the Cabal. But as with any big, complex system, there was always the danger that a few smart and capable people could start to turn it around and empower the people, sealing off the backdoors and creating systems outside the control of the Cabal.
I suspect that what we are seeing now is the Cabal very quietly and judiciously removing the handful of real threats without raising any alarms.
I can't get over the fact that AJ is Bill Hicks, so that puts him in the category of what I call "Simulant". This type of person is not an Intelligence legend, which is entirely fabricated. Also, he's not just an ordinary person. Like, don't you get a little bit of a weird feeling when you find out the first name of someone you know isn't their real first name, but they go by their middle name for whatever reason?
The weird feeling is precisely because we trust one another implicitly, and real fakery or deception is so uncommon. So AJ can tell an authentic and convincing story about his youth because it probably happened almost exactly that way, but we have to keep in mind he's definitely not an ordinary person.
The trans agenda of the Establishment is alive and well. Witness them burying Hale's manifesto.
(Which in itself is strange. The event was fake, so didn't they write the manifesto themselves beforehand and arrange it's release? If somehow it really existed and is authentic, why not just declare it was a "diary with unimportant ramblings"? Makes me think these hoaxes are not as tightly controlled as we all assume them to be.)
As you say, though, the tide seems to be shifting. And also as you say, the NPCs get their programming from the media. But they also absorb other material on a subconscious basis from the environment, and the Establishment cannot (yet) shield NPCs from that completely.
I would say that there has been such an accumulation of negative associations with trannies and transsexualism and the trans agenda that it has finally begun to overbalance the scales in the minds of NPCs.
Of course, they would be unaware of this. None will say, "I was wrong and I've changed my mind." They won't say anything, really, other than just a vague, "I think it all may be going too far," or, "Well, it seems like some of these people have problems."
Same thing happened with all the rioting a couple of years ago. Notice how there aren't any NPCs saying "BLM 4eva!" No, they all got enough dirty looks and absorbed the message.
Make of this what you will, but I'd say the name is a reference to Pazuzu:
Pazuzu is a fictional character who is the main antagonist in The Exorcist horror novels and film series, created by William Peter Blatty. Blatty derived the character from Assyrian and Babylonian mythology, where the mythic Pazuzu was considered the king of the demons of the wind, and the son of the god Hanbi. In The Exorcist, Pazuzu appears as a demon who possesses Regan MacNeil.
We also find for the mentioned Hanbi that:
In Sumerian and Akkadian mythology (and Mesopotamian mythology in general) Hanbi or Hanpa (more commonly known in western text) was the god of evil, god of all evil forces and the father of Pazuzu and Humbaba.
An association between AOC and the child of the god of evil? Who saw that coming? Surely a coincidence!
For historical context, we can see that they are taking their "liberal democracies" all the way back to ancient times:
Lèse-majesté is an offence against the dignity of a ruling head of state (traditionally a monarch but now more often a president) or the state itself.... This behaviour was first classified as a criminal offence against the dignity of the Roman Republic of ancient Rome. In the Dominate, or Late Empire period, the emperors eliminated the republican trappings of their predecessors and began to equate the state with themselves.
Sorta reminds me of, "L'etat c'est moi!." Can't think who said that, though.
My guess is it's a Deep State debrief. They want to know everything he knows about China.
The difference is that China has gone from fake enemy of the West and real friend of the NWO to the leader of the multipolar world order, with no enmity to Western populations. Xi finally turned the tables at the 20th Politburo of the CCP at the end of last October.
Remember when they hauled off the guy that was sitting right next to Xi? That was a very public message to the Chinese Deep State. And as much as the Establishment loves to bash Xi as a brutal dictator, notice how they never mention that incident? The Deep State memory holes it's defeats as quickly as possible.
I think the really diabolical aspect is that all the normies that watched this said to themselves, "Oh totally. Ryland really IS a boy--I can just tell. Transgenderism FTW!"
I don't want to call it brilliant, so I'll say it's sickeningly effective.
Actually, I had been really intrigued by the material referenced in the movie "The Men Who Stare at Goats", and for a long time I meant to research it but never got around to it.
Then somewhere along the line I found out those two factoids: the one about Ronson and Jones, and also that Ronson wrote the book the movie was based on.
Being a good enough conspiracist to put two and two together, I said to myself, "Well, I really just saved myself a lot of research time on evaluating that material, didn't i?"
Haha, no, I never knew this! Again, what a strange parallel: remember that Alex Jones got his "big break" when he "snuck in" to Bohemian Grove?
Makes you wonder whether Fulford and AJ are secretly in some weird Cabal version of the Mickey Mouse Club together, except that Elites did stuff to your butthole when you were a kid?
Oh... well... I guess that goes for the regular Mickey Mouse Club too, doesn't it?
Fulford is, IMHO, a Cabal asset and disinfo agent. (And I'm quite surprised at some of the people who give credence to his "reports".)
Just at a guess, he was deemed by his masters to be deserving of punishment, and it comes in the form of this strange public humiliation. I find it a parallel to the similarly questionable Alex Jones "tranny porn" incident.
Public Service Announcement: FTN is ultimately, like so many alternative media outlets, disinfo.
A few years back I heard an episode where they exposed Alexander Hamilton. They came up with extremely deep research about all his connections to Jewry. Quite informative and quite damning.
But I happened to have read a paper about Hamilton by Miles Mathis, another disinfo agent. He detailed Hamilton's connections to the British aristocracy. (Did you know there was literally a member of the peerage named Alexander Hamilton alive at the same time as the American one?) FTN mentioned not a single bit of this. Do I think they could have simply overlooked it? No way.
So They give out info about the Jews to the Jew-haters, because they know they're foolish enough to think that's where it ends. That's how They keep those people from finding out anything more. The same goes for the flip side.
When smart and knowledgeable people who are "on your side" are saying all the things you want to hear, that's when you need to get your guard up. IOW, if you think you're already on to the game and playing it well, make sure it's not the one They set up for you.
I wholeheartedly recommend the work of Mark Passio to everyone.
Over the course of years, listening to many thousands of interviews and presentations, I've found that these "popular" researchers break down according to the "80-20 rule" (estimated values):
- 80% are straight up disinfo with material written in some Langley basement office
- 16% are honest but in error because they foolishly base their work on the 80% disinfo peddlers
- 3.2% are honest and have avoided the disinfo, but are in error because they make mistakes like we all do
- 0.64% are honest and accurate, but lack importance because they are incorrectly tied into the larger context
- 0.16% are honest, accurate, important, and insightful
Mark Passio falls into this last category.
Here's where I first read about the idea: Domestic Pig is hybrid of Human and Wild Boar genetics (6/5/2012)
I forgot to mention the third strange anomalous data point that plugs into this theory. Apparently human meat is known in certain circles as "long pig", because it smells just like pork while cooking. You can't even make this shit up.