Well, study their teaching all you like, but I doubt you'll find anything of any value. What you want is what might be described as "actionable intel", but as far as I can tell virtually all of this occult "doctrine" is simply made up nonsense. For example, I think you could read everything ever published by Scientologists, and not a bit of it would ever lead you to uncover Operation Snow White.
Same goes for Masonry. I remember Cecil Rhodes, a guy who I take was hip to a lot of how things really worked, made some very disparaging comment about it, something that added up to, "What a load of bullshit." When I heard that it confirmed my feeling that there was nothing important to be discovered about their doctrine.
Really, it could be counted on one hand the number of important items I've come across from all these flavors of "secret societies". And none of them are things that you would find explicitly written in their documentation. You have to abstract a level to see that that how they're really going about their business.
With Masonry, for example, throw out everything they say about themselves and realize that each has sworn a secret oath. All nefarious associations aside, how could any of them be trusted to keep any public oath? That's all you need to know about how Masonry really works.
Another example would be how the real deep Zionists/Talmudists/Kabalists think that non-Jews don't really have souls, are like animals, and may be treated as such. Yeah, okay, they wrote that down in several ways in the Talmud but that was millennia ago. All of them are way more circumspect about saying such things now. But it's still how they act, isn't it?
From what you just wrote, I can see you're just missing the element of the Anunnaki. Take my word for it if you care to, but a lot of things will crystallize for you once you include them. Frankly, they are the framework on which human history and society is based.
If you don't believe me about their importance, try this instead: whenever the subject of the Anunnaki comes up with one of these popular researchers, pay extremely close attention to how it is handled. They will almost all ridicule it and quickly divert back to their narrative. This is how They keep you away from it.
One exception I've found is Clif High, who has a special technique. When someone mentions the Anunnaki, he says, "Oh yes, very important. But you know what's much more important is the Nommo. Let me tell you about them...." Once you're attentive to it, it's quite transparent.
Well, study their teaching all you like, but I doubt you'll find anything of any value. What you want is what might be described as "actionable intel", but as far as I can tell virtually all of this occult "doctrine" is simply made up nonsense. For example, I think you could read everything ever published by Scientologists, and not a bit of it would ever lead you to uncover Operation Snow White.
Same goes for Masonry. I remember Cecil Rhodes, a guy who I take was hip to a lot of how things really worked, made some very disparaging comment about it, something that added up to, "What a load of bullshit." When I heard that it confirmed my feeling that there was nothing important to be discovered about their doctrine.
Really, it could be counted on one hand the number of important items I've come across from all these flavors of "secret societies". And none of them are things that you would find explicitly written in their documentation. You have to abstract a level to see that that how they're really going about their business.
With Masonry, for example, throw out everything they say about themselves and realize that each has sworn a secret oath. All nefarious associations aside, how could any of them be trusted to keep any public oath? That's all you need to know about how Masonry really works.
Another example would be how the real deep Zionists/Talmudists/Kabalists think that non-Jews don't really have souls, are like animals, and may be treated as such. Yeah, okay, they wrote that down in several ways in the Talmud but that was millennia ago. All of them are way more circumspect about saying such things now. But it's still how they act, isn't it?
From what you just wrote, I can see you're just missing the element of the Anunnaki. Take my word for it if you care to, but a lot of things will crystallize for you once you include them. Frankly, they are the framework on which human history and society is based.
If you don't believe me about their importance, try this instead: whenever the subject of the Anunnaki comes up with one of these popular researchers, pay extremely close attention to how it is handled. They will almost all ridicule it and quickly divert back to their narrative. This is how They keep you away from it.
One exception I've found is Clif High, who has a special technique. When someone mentions the Anunnaki, he says, "Oh yes, very important. But you know what's much more important is the Nommo. Let me tell you about them...." Once you're attentive to it, it's quite transparent.