I would disagree with Blockchain Robber Baron and others who hold the view that They are radicalizing people. That's an idiotic notion. People are so un-radicalized they have to invent Patriot Front, as lame and laughable a psyop as I've ever seen. Nor do they need a reason to move on anyone. They do what they feel they can get away with without taking losses, creating what reasons they find convenient as they go along.
And I guess Dissident Soaps was attempting some sort of sarcastic witticism? I can't really tell, but for those unfamiliar with his work, Solzhenitsyn said something far more valuable than Dissident Soaps:
And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.
See how these things are related? The Bolsheviki thought they could get away with it, so that's what they did. They were right. Solzhenitsyn is only pointing out that if they had thought they couldn't get away with it, they would not have done it.
BTW, who said anyone was getting out of the gulag?
Well, yes, thank you for the link and it's precisely what I thought, but on the other hand it's also precisely not my point.
That is, BeastMilk posts it without this information, so everyone automatically thinks it's "news" and just happened. That's exactly the same technique the mainstream often uses when they wish to mislead people. Others may feel differently, but I object when anyone does such things. The notion that the ends justify the means underlies the vast majority of what the Elite do. Perhaps some think They are correct about that.
Taken from another angle, this is from 5 years ago. My views on a great many things have evolved over the last 5 years. Personally, I would be deeply suspicious of anyone whose views have not changed over that same period. I see that, as a rule, people can barely deal with a static world, let alone a dynamic one, so I always wish to bring this concept in when appropriate.
I can't help but notice that BeachMilk neglected to provide the date and source of this video. That can't be on purpose, can it?
Maybe she was trying to tell us we have to step more carefully when people like BeachMilk around who, rather than trying to share information and document, are trying to promote a message. Isn't that our criticism of mainstream media?
And frankly, yes, given innumerable disinfo agents and hordes of gullible and easily manipulable people around, I might actually raise a similar alert. Okay, well, I guess I just did.
Very coincidentally, this story came through just yesterday:
Special Forces Raid Regime Warehouse Filled With Drug Shortage Meds Headed to Ukraine (RRN 5/13/2023)
... White Hats, however, believe they have a clear idea why ill Americans can’t find basic drugs like antibiotics: the administration is hoarding stockpiles of medications and sending them overseas to Ukraine.
(Yeah, I get it, all the super-geniuses like to bag on RRN. If anyone feels that way, you may save your insightful comments for r/conspiracy because I could not possibly care less.)
Too long a story to go into, but there's evidence indicating an erased history that Christianity and Islam were a single religion at one time.
Even in the accepted (but suppressed) historical record and religious doctrine, there are incredibly strong links and associations between the two. A few examples:
- Muslims are awaiting the return of Jesus.
- The Virgin Mary, mother of Jesus, is stated to be the most holy woman in the Quran. Two of it's books are named for her.
- Muhammad's first wife was from a family of Christians, and was thus likely Christian herself.
- Muhammad directed Muslims--very strongly and in no uncertain terms--exactly how to treat all Christians in the Ashtiname of Muhammad. It's worth reading the entirety of the short document, but here's a taste:
Thus they [Christians] will live favored and protected from everything which may offend them by the Callers to religion (Islam), wherever they may be and in any place they may dwell.
Rather than study such things, from skimming the comments I see that people would rather give themselves over to ignorance, fear and hatred, rather than to the study of such things as I have mentioned. Sad.
I'm surprised no one yet mentioned the historical dustup between the Khazars on one side, and the Rus and Persians on the other. Okay, I suppose I just did.
To go further (and I'm just at a point of rank speculation with this, being too lazy to have done any research), but I suspect even that contretemps runs deeper. There's an obvious association between Tartaria and Russia. There's a less well-known association between the Persians (ie, Iran) and the Aryans. That's where the name "Iran" itself comes from.
My speculation is that the word "tartarian" derives ultimately from "aryan". Say the two out loud. If correct, that points towards a deeper, obscured connection between Russia and Persia, and why they worked together against the Khazars.
It would also go a long way to explain why the entire (Khazarian) Establishment wets it's pants every time Russia and Iran get on the phone together. "It's happening again!"
Suppose we frame the question this way, "The US Empire puts major bases all through Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, but not no major bases in South America or Africa. Why is that?" (We're doing some rounding here because, yes, for example, the US has a big drone base in Africa but it sure ain't Incirlik.)
People could point to any number of reasons, but I would land on two. While they're interrelated, they're also quite distinct.
The first is that they're not contemplating a war where big bases in SA or Africa would be important. Big bases in Japan and arming up Taiwan with an eye towards China? Sure. Bases in Romania and turning all of Poland into an armed camp against Russia? You bet! Guns and planes and bombs all over the Middle East against everywhere else in the Middle East, particularly Iran? You know it!
There really aren't anything like the same sort of prospective campaigns in SA or Africa. There aren't really any significant opposing militaries. Venezuela and Cuba come to mind, but they're just across from Pensacola and Tampa. No problemo.
Which brings us to the second reason: the whole mindset is different. You can see from the original article that the entire underlying mindset is colonialism. Like, "Hey, ain't those Chinamen ever heard of the Monroe Doctrine? GTFO!"
Which brings us to what underlies the second reason: racial superiority. See how everything eventually is geared around, "All those greaseballs and darkies belong to us. We'll take their shit when we're good and goddamn ready. Oops, I mean, we'll take our shit." So the entire military approach involves taking our shit from these mud people who seem to have some objection to that.
(Sorry for the rough language, just trying to make a point. I'm certainly not in a warship off someone's coast with an eye towards taking anyone's stuff.)
Final note: it's not really even racial superiority, although "They" leverage any that is already existing. The people running the game will murder, rob and oppress white people just as enthusiastically as brown people (see Ukraine), but historically the more melanistic people ended up lower down on the totem pole, and therefore softer and higher priority targets.
in all seriousness, although suspicion of that is widespread (in certain circles), I really, really, really hope so.
When I look around and see how history is being annihilated just in our current time, I wonder how much was ever preserved when it's all so delicate to begin with. I try not to think about it too much so I don't weep and fall to despair.
The subject of the destruction and desecration of the record of human events is rarely talked about, but you know who mentioned years ago their alarm and regret that lies were being written down as history? Melania Trump. She's a quiet one but there's more going on with her than we know., huh?
You would have to say more about what you find odd about it.
I mean, the USG cares enough about the American population to hold guns to their heads to take their money in what they call "taxes", yet clearly care nothing at all about their civil liberties and Constitutional rights.
So if someone asked, "Don't you find the way the US government treats it's citizens a bit odd?" I think most of us would note a lack of clarity--if not a lack of insight--on the part of the questioner.
It strikes me that people read these articles, yet have no comprehension of what they're reading. Some examples:
China tightens stranglehold on Latin America and Caribbean
Shouldn't Latin America and Caribbean nations be the ones complaining? None of them rate a single quote. Apparently, the Globalist American Empire speaks for them.
As an aside, I wonder how liberals define colonialism? The imperial military speaking for brown people does not qualify, evidently.
Commanders in the Pentagon are worried ....
Hold on, we're already talking to the people with guns? Don't they just take orders from the people in suits any more? How about those, you know, diplomats? What do they have to say? The article never tells us. BTW, couldn't we save money by getting of the State Department?
'The PRC has expanded its ability to extract resources, establish port, manipulate governments through predatory investment practices....
No word in the article whether the US has ever contemplated doing such things. I mean, because what China is accused of doing is way out of bounds, right?
She has also criticized the fact many major players in the region, including Brazil, Panama and Chile, have spent years with no US ambassador in place.
Oh, okay, so there we have mention of diplomats. But no actual diplomats. Well again, who needs them when you have color revolutions and sanctions for "bad behavior", amirite?
'When countries see that we don’t have our senior diplomat there, it shows that we’re not serious,' [4-star General Laura Richardson] said.
Apparently, it takes four stars on your shoulder to realize this and point it out. Has she considered relating this insight to the State Department, as long as we still have it around? Or do they just get their foreign policy advice from a UK tabloid?
In a plot twist here at the end, I have reason to believe Gen. Richardson is one of the "good guys", doing what she can to bring attention to the precarious situation in USSOUTHCOM, even if it involves scare-mongering and blackwashing China to get some action. Interestingly, her wiki bio includes this:
Richardson was originally going to be recommended by then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, but they delayed until after the 2020 United States presidential election over concern that then-President Donald Trump might react negatively to the nomination of a woman to a top command.
Does anyone really believe that reason? I'd guess she was a Trump holdover they didn't manage to flush out of the Swamp.
Just a fun note on a related subject no one thinks about: why are Europe and Asia considered different continents? What numbskull would even suggest them to be separate continents... uh, you know, just welded together by a low mountain range 1,600 miles long?
A solution to this disregarded question is that, at one time, there was so much enmity between the Tartarians in what we now call Asia and whoever exactly was in what we now call Europe that they refused to even acknowledge they shared the same continent.
Even in relatively recent history, the borders in Eastern Europe have shifted all around. They still are, in fact. As is often the case, the game is given away to the observant right on Wikipedia itself, and this time it's on this map.
With the Urals accepted as the demarcation between Europe and Asia, we see a huge chunk of Russia in Europe but--again--who would have drawn this line and why? If you read the nonsense written in the Ural Mountains wiki, they dance all around it but include this gem:
Nevertheless, around that time in the early 16th century, Polish geographer, Maciej of Miechów, in his influential Tractatus de duabus Sarmatiis (1517) argued that there were no mountains in Eastern Europe at all, challenging the point of view of some authors of Classical antiquity, popular during the Renaissance.
They were arguing as late as the 16th Century whether the mountains even existed! We have already mentioned the Tartarians, but for those with very adventurous minds, the next sentence from the article is quite tantalizing:
... there are mountains behind the Pechora and identified them with the Riphean Mountains and Hyperboreans of ancient authors....
Through geography, have we tripped across an intersection between Tartary and Hyperborea? Sometimes I wish I could just find the Indiana Jones warehouse and read the history books about all this.
These blasts were nuclear weapons detonations. For anyone that believes they would "already know" if that were so, please stop reading now.
I refer persons who like to talk about nuclear stuff to two of my other comments and one post. In a long comment to a post from last night, I analyze these nuclear blasts:
Bidens tax dollars up in flames in Ukraine
I add some analysis regarding depleted uranium in a comment to this post today:
Fear Mongering: Radioactive Panic from Russian Missiles impact on munitions
In my post from 8 days ago, we found that the strike in Pavlohrad was also a nuclear strike:
I say "we found out", but readers should take the time to skim the comments on that one, particularly the pushback, to understand and evaluate the expertise and insight of the company we find ourselves among on this forum.
The two big blasts were nuclear detonations and I wrote up an analysis of them yesterday evening in a long comment on this post:
Bidens tax dollars up in flames in Ukraine
I would add this in regard to depleted uranium. There may have been DU shells stored there, and that may have been why Russia obliterated this facility. And for anyone that thinks they would never do that because it would poison the land, note that it's in western Ukraine which will likely be left to a rump Ukrainian state or to Poland.
Note that DU and gamma radiation actually furthers the argument that these were nuclear weapon events. First, note that "depleted" means that this is the fraction of uranium that does not undergo fission and becomes a waste product in purifying the isotope that does. Second, DU is used as gamma radiation shielding. It does not produce gamma radiation, it blocks it.
Apparently this is shadowbanned on r/conspiracy.
I opened the browser to new posts but didn't look at it. Just now, a couple of hours later, when I clicked on the tab I reflexively hit refresh, but as the page was loading I happened to see a post at the top with the same thumbnail titled, "Why is there not a single post about this explosion?"
It has now been vaporized. There's only one post on Reddit with "Khmelnytskyi:" in the title, and it's from several months ago.
If memory serves, some years back a rich Israeli offered Iranian Jews who wished to make aliyah something like $25,000 a piece to defray moving costs and get them out from the grip of the Iranian regime. He shut the program down after less than a year. Why? Not a single taker.
One might say, "Yes, of course, it was one giant fake and ghey psyop, and now there are 25,000 kike fifth columnists ready to take down Iran!" Maybe, but I have always shied away from the unfalsifiable. As far as critical thinking and mental discipline are concerned, it's like lifting weights with no plates attached.
As far as the Golan Heights are concerned, my interest in the areas runs deeper than any military utility. I believe that ultimately, it's real importance is that it's the location of Mt. Hermon.
You had two chances at it now: the name of the town where it took place was the very first word in the link provided. Given that, I'm not sure what value anyone would ascribe to the acuity of any analysis you will provide, but if I were you, I'd be embarrassed and just let it drop.
But then again, not everyone is me, right?
These are more nukes they keep secret by not telling us they're nukes, cemented by near universal ignorance:
Khmelnytskyi: Two NATO Tactical Nukes in Western Ukraine Storage Hit by Cheap ‘Iranian’ Drone…Radiation Alert Over Europe (The Intel Drop 5/13/2023)
In the video available in the link, you can get a rough size comparison to the buildings in the foreground and see that both of these detonations are titanic. They are much larger than Pavlohrad, and I would guesstimate the yield at 10kt.
Although these installations may have been ammo depots, these are not the "cooking off" of ammo depots which happen munition by munition, just like a pack of firecrackers tossed in a campfire.
Although these installations may have been fuel depots, these are not the burning of fuel depots, which are simply large, smoky fires. If you toss a road flare in a pool of gasoline, it doesn't explode since it is not under compression, it just burns furiously. After it settles down a bit, there's not actually much of a fire at the site since all the flammable material has been vaporized or blown clear.
A key feature of the aftermath is the glowing column. This is not made up of burning mortar shells launched on ballistic trajectories. Rather, it clearly comes down out of the fireball. This is vaporized material, heated to incandescence and carried aloft by the fierce updrafts. It remains incandescent even as it falls back out of the sky.
An earlier article on the same site seemed to blame the Pavlohrad nuke on a Ukrainian black market nuke stored there accidentally detonated by the explosion of a Russian cruise missile. This strike, though, going two for two, to my way of thinking casts tremendous doubt on that.
Geopolitically, I would say that Russia knows the end is near and wants it over with sooner rather than later. They lost four aircraft today, and the terrorism is getting more blatant. On the flip side, everyone is beginning to realize the AFU spring counteroffensive is having trouble getting off the ground because it does not exist. Western wunderwaffen seem to be having little to no effect.
So can Russia increase resistance among participating NATO officers when their colleagues just down the road from Lvov are vaporized and reported as "training accidents"? I would say probably yes.
And if anyone is wondering why NATO doesn't just call it out for what it is, well, then what would they do? Declare war? Already done. That would just legitimize strikes on NATO assets wherever they are, without the inconvenience of having to track them until they arrive in Ukraine.
The situation in Iran is clearly complicated. For some balance, one might wish to spend a few minutes watching this:
Ahmadinejad: "Jesus WILL return" (When did you ever hear Western leaders talk with this conviction) (12/25/2008)
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad delivers a startling message to the people of Britain in an "Alternative" Christmas message.
One may make of it what they will, but I for one certainly wish that any Western political leader would make comments as uplifting and heartfelt on this subject.
A subject totally silenced outside Western media is that Iranian Jews do not support the Zionist entity in Israel. Here's one example:
MP Underlines Jewish Community’s Support for Iranian Athletes Abstaining Competition against Israeli Opponents (Fars News 11/14/2021)
One might say, "Well, he's controlled opposition, obviously!" The second paragraph in the article is this quote:
“Today, abstention from rivalry against Zionist athletes is not limited to Iranian athletes, and athletes from other countries are not either willing to face the sports representatives of the child-killing regime,” Sameh Yah told FNA on Sunday.
"Child-killing regime"? Everyone will have to make their own judgement, but that seems over-the-top rhetoric for controlled opposition. Try to find any Western politician saying anything similar.
Off-topic: I've always wondered why no one builds an app where, if you enter a certain PIN, it puts up a phony "false bottom" screen with a goatse background while it vaporizes the contents and activates your dead hand switch.
"Yes officer, I know I should be more careful but the passcode is 1234."