I put that together with this article from a couple of months ago:
IRGC commander advises Iraqi resistance against attacks on US bases: Report (8/17/2023)
My interpretation of that older story is that the IRGC was saying, "Hey, instead of some tit-for-tat bullshit, save it for the right time. We're all going to do it together and make sure it's effective and permanent."
So maybe this is the right time.
Flynn is controlled opposition, and so here he's used to discredit Q: a deep-cover asset used against an important target. His declaration is not "breaking news", as he said the same thing to Lin Wood in private communications that Wood revealed like a year or two ago (again, in an effort to get Wood back "on side"). TGP and everyone else seems to have forgotten this.
There's a load of interesting evidence against Flynn, but most people aren't at all interested in evidence these days. The point I would bring up against him is this: for a "patriot" that ran the DIA for two years, and ran intel for JSOC before that, when has Flynn revealed any secret, anything you would not otherwise have known had he not disclosed it? I can't think of a single thing.
For comparison, one can look at examples like Bill Binney and Thomas Drake. When you hear them talk, you think, "Holy shit, is that what was going on on the inside?"
Very coincidental you mention a sharpening of the visual sense.
Just this morning I was listening to a years old podcast where a few individuals were talking about experiences on psychedelic drugs, particularly DMT. One of them mentioned that in South America, as a hunting aid some tribes chew on a certain vine because it heightens visual acuity and acts as an appetite suppressant, and--get this--big cats in the area do it too.
Then as regards sports, the other funny thing I would mention is this: have you ever seen someone--maybe a hockey goalie--playing with uncanny reaction speed and precision, in an almost preternatural way, and then the commentators will say something like, "This guy's unconscious! He's playing completely out of his head!" I always found that a very strange phraseology, but I think they're saying more than they know.
As far as I can tell so far, it all traces back to states of mind as reflected in brain waves--alpha, theta, whatever. I've never sorted it out, and when you go looking, no researchers have either. All of which leads me to believe that, no, They really don't want anyone to sort it out.
The whole story of "QAnon Shaman" just took another strange and unexpected turn today that anyone with an interest in what really happened on J6 should be aware of.
From other analysis too long to go into, it's clear that Chansley was part of the dramatic presentation, even to the extent of appearing in photos that were obviously taken some time before that fateful day. But now we get him "exposing the op":
The expose is largely accurate, as far as I can say, and it's even beyond what this joker would know just because he happened to be there. If it's a limited hangout, it's hanging way out there. That should not be ruled out, because I don't think any of us would be surprised if there were yet darker secrets it is intended to divert from.
In any case, I don't think it's anything the real planners behind J6 would care to see released if They felt they were holding a strong hand.
It's funny you mentioned you took it nonchalantly, because that's exactly what I did too. Never made much of it and never mentioned it to anyone for years. Then by chance I happened to read a sci-fi novel called Blindsight. Skim that section because there's some pretty freaky stuff about consciousness.
One of the points that comes out in the book is that consciousness is way overrated. The crew in the novel figures out the aliens they go out to meet in deep space are not consciousness. With a lot of background material, the author illustrates the point that you don't have to be conscious to do any of the normal things, from drive a car to build and fly an interstellar spacecraft. We all just incorrectly assume you do.
That's when I thought back and went, "Aw shit, this guy is totally right. Reality just got a lot weirder."
while being 13 miles away from Yemen
I wonder what the reaction would be if a Russian guided missile cruiser was 13 miles away from Long Island, of a Chinese destroyer was 13 miles away from Long Beach?
Maybe a Coast Guard cutter would go out there and invite them over for cocktail hour on the poopdeck.
You know, there's a hallmark you see in virtually all Democrats and to a slightly lesser degree in RINOs: they recognize no limitation to their power, and exercise no self-control. The only limitation is that of a psychopath: "What can I get away with?"
In fact, I would say that it is precisely because of this quality that they chosen and placed into the Establishment.
IDK about Wood. It was from following him that I learned about Powell and Flynn. In fact, he gave so much detail it was impossible to retain any doubt about either of them. I would consider that a significant deviation from SOP for controlled opposition.
On the flip side, it seemed like they were trying to rope him back in to the corral with other assets who talked about how much they loved Jesus and other things he wanted to hear. Eventually I gave up because his feed was 99.9% Jesus and 0.1% intel.
To me, stories like this and so many similar ones are more signs of Their desperation. That is, They are flailing about for anything which will help them regain control of the social psyche.
In contrast, when They really did have such control, we got a single ridiculous narrative on continuous repeat. It was the classic "Big Lie" technique. Twenty-two years ago with 9/11, we got "19 A-rabs with boxcutters" a million times over.
Now, such as here with the increasingly obviously dire economic situation, browse through Establishment media and you'll get:
- it's not bad
- it's not getting worse
- it's the Republicans fault
- it's bad but here's why that's good
- it's Putin's fault
- it's great
If you have a shitty song and you're desperate for sales, what do you do? Keep making covers: country, rap, heavy metal, EDM, pop, Christian, soul, anything. Maybe some group somewhere is stupid enough to buy it and you can work from there.
Just today, Henry Makow ran an infographic with a lot of quotes from the Talmud regarding Jewish attitudes towards the goyim:
Oct 18 - Zionists are Barefaced Liars & Murderers
I always say that Americans are only the second most brainwashed people on the planet. Israeli Jews get all the usual political-social conditioning, but they also get exposed to all this toxicity, seeped into the ground like the world's biggest demonic SuperFund site.
The mere fact that such content was never exposed, condemned, and expurgated is enough demonstration that to some extent or another it indeed has been absorbed and accepted.
There are monsters in human form, and it's no wonder they can participate in activities the rest of find so revolting and completely alien.
Probably off-topic but may be of help:
I never bothered evaluating whether the events related in the "Book of Esther" took place or not (but why the hell would you admit to a treacherous genocide if one never took place?), but I did conclude it was almost certainly rewritten to some extent.
Specifically, "Esther" is yet another variant of the name "Ishtar", a deity of the Babylonian pantheon and known earlier to the Sumerians as "Inanna". Far less noticeably, we find that the name of her Jewish secret husband, Mordechai, is essentially a respelling of what we would write in the modern day as "Marduk-ite". Marduk is the name of another Sumerian and Babylonian deity. Importantly, he is, in fact, the tutelary deity of Babylon.
From other research, I had long concluded that Inanna had for some time been the consort of Marduk. When I encountered them together in "Esther", the choice was between wild coincidence, or that someone along the line knew what I knew and wrote it into the text.
Bonus: "Inanna" may be fairly translated from the Sumerian as "Queen of Heaven", and you can find her mentioned several times in the Bible.
It's funny that I never noticed how strong They had created support for the Palestinians on the Left. It should have been obvious as the counterbalance to the very strong "Israel4Eva" Christian Zionist crowd on the Right.
I say to myself, "Live and learn!", but I don't think that's what They are saying to Themselves right now. I suspect it's more along the lines of, "The fuck we gonna do now?!"
Skim through his wiki and see the other stuff he was at the center of, which upon further research you'll conclude was no accident.
Here's the biggest giveaway: after a literally historic fuckup at Roswell, he should have been sent to the Arctic Circle Narwhal Patrol or something, right? So is that what happened to him?
I think that is the correct read on this guy. Took about 20 seconds to find this giveaway:
I believed the most likely explanation would prove to be either an accident or possibly a terrorist incident covered-up for the sake of political expediency. For that reason, I chose to focus on why the plane went up rather than why it came down.
One of the fundamental disinformation techniques it to simply hand out bright, shiny conspiracy theories that lead you away from the place the truth could be revealed. There are a couple of prime examples that everyone can notice for themselves by their glaring omission from the work of prominent "conspiracy theorists".
One is the volume upon volume of JFK assassination research (most written by the CIA, of course) that will minutely examine and analyze everything except what happened in the limo during those few seconds it traveled down Elm Street.
The other is Roswell. They'll tell you all about dead fucking aliens, live fucking aliens, anti-gravity, interdimensionality, fiber optics and lasers, but listen very, very carefully how they steer away when mention comes--if it ever does--of the single man at the very center of the event. And if anyone does not know exactly who I'm talking about, well at least you understand how well it has worked.
As has been said before, everything old is new again. And in this case, it was said by Jacques Mallet du Pan regarding the French Revolution:
A l'exemple de Saturne, la révolution dévore ses enfants
"like Saturn, the Revolution devours its children" (<- haha, that's fitting too, eh?)
Reread my original comment. The point is subtle, and I find that subtlety gets by almost everyone (by definition, perhaps) even when they bother putting forth the effort to understand. Most people love too much thinking they already have the answer. That's because it makes them comfortable.
And that subtle point has greatly informed my view of the evolution to the current situation.
Standard Hollywood scriptwriting is that the "evil one" is the darker-skinned guy with facial hair. Got us with the reverse-o on this one!