This lecture expands greatly on the history of one of the points made in the video:
Has Zionism Hijacked Judaism by Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro (YT 1'30" 2/23/2017)
You realize that the early Zionists actually despised religious Jews, as do many of the current ones. And Shapiro doesn't make the point himself, but if you follow the arc of where Zionism leads, Judaism will be completely annihilated.
As regards the "social media" battlespace, Hamas and Hezbollah are owning it with this kind of material: "Here we are slugging it out in our houses and streets that were blown to smithereens."
On the flip side, the Israelis are coming with, "Yeah, we bombed that hospital because there was some raghead commander there, and if you don't support that you're a fucking anti-Semite."
Thanks for the tip on the Syrian video.
The Bitchute video was so interesting. You first think they're laughing because they think it's funny, but the one guy says himself he had never gotten over it. They're just broken inside, no way back to being a normal human like all others. It makes me think two things.
One is reinforce yet again the idea that killing other people is a profoundly unnatural act, and it's a measure of just how deranged and demonic things have become that they can get anyone to participate in it.
The other is why Yahweh would have allowed the Flood to come. He just looked around at what people were doing to one another and said, "I'm just... uhhh... I'm just gonna go ahead and hit reset on this thing."
Another video came through today that amped the situation up a number of notches:
Exclusive: Video of Mass Execution of Gaza Civilians by US Backed IDF Mercenaries from Bangladesh (Warning!!!) (TID 11/7/2023)
It's really bad. Somehow it's even darker and more disturbing than the Ahli Hospital bombing. You hear about these things in history, but seeing video in 2023 is another level.
In my judgment, the Zios have gone beyond pushing the boundaries, or pleading a special case, or even "no one asks the winners questions". It's flat suicidal.
They make nuclear threats and in fact they've has already used nukes in Gaza. All it takes is a credible player to say it, someone who can back up words with deeds like Russia, Iran, or Turkey. Israel tells them to fuck off, then they say, "Uh, if you think it's just gonna end like that, you're wrong."
Aside from nations, the Arab world is on the edge and ready to explode. There are all kinds of militant groups they've armed over the years, and I don't think any countries are going to start shooting at their own proxies and auxiliaries to try to stop them. It's all a huge powder keg.
No sane Zio leader could possibly think they can just keep raising and get the whole rest of the world to fold. But then, who says they're sane? It's actually enough to make you wonder if, very deep under the surface, some 5D chess players over the course of years have pushed these maniacs right toward this suicide.
In this substantially undertitled article,
Apartheid Israeli minister’s threat to drop nuke on Gaza ‘raises questions’: Russia (TID 11/7/2023)
Russia raises the obvious question that's on no one's lips, namely,
“Question number one – it turns out that we are hearing official statements about the presence of nuclear weapons?” she was quoted as saying by state RIA news agency.
If so, Zakharova asked, then where are the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and international nuclear inspectors?
Indeed. And where are all those incredibly pompous scolds and lecturers on the "Rules-Based International Order" who are ceaselessly whining, moaning, and war-mongering about all the "bad" countries? Never noticed? Got nothing to say? But of course.
If Abbas was just a Zio stooge, then this seems an odd move that should be taken into account when determining the intent of this event:
Quick take: Abbas was not complete enough a stooge to go along with genocide and annexation. The Zios need him gone to keep the Palestinians off-balance and prevent any resistance from forming around him.
It looks more and more like this conflict is going to escalate rather than come down off the boil.
People are starting to feel that Hezbollah is cucking out, but I've been studying their attacks along the northern border. I'm no military expert, but these don't look like harassing attacks, or probing attacks, or attacking in force. Rather, it looks like they are "shaping the battlespace" by destroying the assets Israel would use to repel an invasion: sensors, outposts, comms and intel equipment.
Yesterday they advertised that they have Noor anti-ship missiles just so every-fucking-body knows, and anyone not wishing to receive such a gift better literally steer clear.
You know, as an add-on to the add-on, I've watched a lot of "gun guy" videos on YT and I've watched a lot of battlefield videos from the SMO. What I learned is that virtually nothing of what the "gun guys" consider vital is actually important at all.
They're always talking about chest rigs and plates, and trigger resets, and complaining that an AR-15's gas block isn't pinned. All manner of tacticool stuff like that, no end to it.
But in the SMO, I saw a GoPro video of a Russian coming up from behind on two Ukrainians in a foxhole. They didn't know the Russians had penetrated their lines, so when the Russian jumped in their hole, they said, "Our side, our side."
The Russian tried to grab one of their rifles--which incidentally was pointed directly at him--but the guy wouldn't let go. So the Russian shot both of them in the head. They died because they had no fucking idea what was actually going on.
I haven't yet seen a gun video on YT titled anything like, "How to figure out what the fuck is going on in a gunfight, and why it may save your life".
Yeah, you hit a few nails right on the head, at least as far as I've been able to figure out.
I think that the fundamental difference between the average normie and the average conspiracy theorist is that the normie takes the default mainstream as the "authority" and source of truth, and the conspiracist is handed a range of alternative authorities from which to choose. "They" flood the zone with disinfo agents and you may choose freely, because they're all wrong!
Also, the normies are comfortable because they're moving along with the herd. The conspiracists are comfortable because they're made to feel "smart" and "in the know". Well c'mon, neither of those is the path to digging out the truth. And of all the truths I've managed to dig out, zero of them made me feel more comfortable in any way.
Finally, interesting point about taking the opposite side: I postulate that may be the mechanism of why so many buy into Flat Earth. I think they dynamic is something like, "We've been lied to about everything. Now someone on YouTube tells me the damn Earth is actually flat. Well you're not going to fool me on this one any longer, NASA, no sir!"
What times we live in.
I'm learning how little it takes to "convince" someone of anything they are already predisposed to believe.
I was listening to today's "No Agenda Show" where they were covering the war. One of the many very poor points they made was, "In the protests over the weekend, there were a lot of preprinted signs. That indicates the whole thing is manufactured just to manipulate you. Be smart like us and don't buy into any of this."
The war has been going on for a month, which I would consider ample time to get signs printed. What I can see is that John and Adam are heavily invested in "being too smart to fall for tricks". Even more importantly, I can see they they are very heavily invested in not choosing a side, alienating part of the audience, and losing donations.
The path of least resistance and highest revenue is that "it's all fake" and "no one could possibly know what's really happening". This turned into a rant, bur I guess my point is that that viewpoint sells itself to many.
Frankly, though, it's so sickening and disappointing that I may have to stop listening to a show I've faithfully followed for it's entire 16 year run. I always wondered how it would end.
Finally, someone recognizes and calls these people out. As a meta-observation that I'm always trying to bring to people's minds, just running down the list on this single subject we can see that we are absolutely drowning in disinformation agents.
The very uncomfortable implication is this: if you're a big fan of someone as a source of "truth", there's a very good chance they're a disinformation agent. I learned a lot about how the average conspiracy theorist actually thinks by suggesting this to different people about "their guy".
This guy offered a huge list and he was swinging for the fences, so let me offer thoughts on what I consider a couple of strike-outs:
- Donald Trump (vaccine pusher)
Did he do certain things that facilitated it? Sure. Certain of those specifically involved the J+J vaxx, which is a longer story not mentioned so we recognize that we're already missing a deeper level..
But as far as "pusher", is that at all accurate? Well, he's said, "You should take the vaxx" a number of times, but then it's followed with, "but it's everyone's choice." In any case, you should ask yourself this: Do you really think there was anyone that was against it but took it because Trump said so? I sincerely doubt there was a single person. That is, he was saying it for an effect other than to encourage people to take it.
- Kary Mullis
The explanation was garbled and thus incorrect. Rather than explain why, let me briefly explain what Mullis did and said, which is virtually unknown anyway. Then one can compare that to what was written.
Mullis developed the PCR technique. In short, it's simply a copying machine, making many, many copies from a minute sample of DNA. Then you can do whatever the hell you want with the DNA after that.
What Mullis said was, "PCR is not a test, it's a copying machine. Don't say or do anything that regards it as a test in any way. To repeat: it's not a test."
But how many zillion times did we hear about the "PCR test"? It always struck my hears like hearing that a conviction in a trial was based on the testimony of an HP LaserJet. It just prints TPS report cover sheets and is not evidence of anything.
I mean, I hope these examples are not indicative of the overall quality. For example, I was glad to see James Corbett and Whitney Webb on it, who very few see through.
This is how you tell that these scumbag whore journalists are creatively bankrupt: they obviously should have worked in the insinuation that--hockey being "the white man's sport"--the many decades of exclusion and oppression would result in a volatile environment where violence was the inevitable outcome.
Also, could ice be any more white? (RIP Chandler Bing).
We should be sure to make the deeper inference from this: This guy and so many others were so scared of the shot they he would not even consent to be injected with saline, which would have been a completely impenetrable hoax.
I think of it like someone saying, "Okay, I'm going to point this gun at your forehead and pull the trigger, but it's just a blank so don't worry, bro!"
You'd say, "No, you're not going to do that."
I'd never heard about Iran expelling Afghans, and I haven't read up on the issue at all, but I think Afghanistan (and the whole Middle East) is trying to get back to some kind of normalcy and Afghanistan may be ready to accept them.
What makes me think this is the most illuminating article I've found on the current state of Afghanistan. It's not political--really just an extended travel blog--but you come to find out surprising things. For example, the most common complaint among the average Taliban ex-fighter? They don't like office jobs... lol
The West Lives On in the Taliban’s Afghanistan (2/23/3023)
For anyone tracking this "continuity of government" topic, you should be sure to add the Denver Federal Center to your notes:
The Denver Federal Center, in Lakewood, Colorado, is part of the General Services Administration and is home to about 6,200 employees of agencies of the federal government of the United States. The Center encompasses an area of about 670 acres (2.7 km2) and has 90 buildings with over 4,000,000 square feet (400,000 m2) of office, warehouse, lab and special use space. There are 28 different Federal agencies on-site, making it the largest concentration of Federal agencies outside of Washington, D.C.
Only six thousand employees in 4M sf on 670 acres? Sure, the Feds like to overdo it, but that is off the scale.
Now, that may be a little boring. There's nothing much really going on in Denver, right? Well IDK, but to add a little spice, make sure to check out the flag of Colorado from 1907-1911.
Didn't see that coming, amirite?
You know, I was making a joke based on how chaotic the situation is, but there really is a serious underlying issue which you describe. And it's a good news/bad news situation.
The good news is that "They" are pretty much out of ideas and initiatives. It seems as if They're basically just introducing chaos anywhere and everywhere They can to keep the world off-balance long enough to regain some kind of directed control.
The bad news is that it makes the fight harder in a way. If you were fighting a boxer, you would use boxing: every move has a countermove and every boxer has a level of predictability. But now it's like fighting a roid-raging mental patient in full chimp-out--all flailing arms and biting.
And I, too, feel very sad for all the people that are getting hurt along the way. It doesn't need to be this way, and it's not "human nature" or "God's plan" or anything like that. It's enough to make you want to start praying we can get through this as fast as possible, if you haven't already.
A take on this only for the most conspiratorial of thinkers (all others please pass by quietly):
What should first draw our attention is why anyone would consider Obama an expert on AI or anything else. Did you ever get the impression he even personally used a personal computer? Okay, so the story is BS. But why does the mainstream of mainstreams sell it to us?
There was some evidence a few years back that Obama was put to death. After some time where they filled in with stock pics and CGI, they apparently finished growing a clone, which is who we see running around now.
The point is, They can run this boogeyman around for years and all the standard-issue conspiracy theorists will chase right after, thinking they're really "in the know".
I mean, the guy's "wife" has a dick and that's fooled billions around the world for 16 years, so I don't think this theory is even very far "out there".
Just as an aside, a part of our "stolen history" appears to be that Christianity and Islam were once part of the same religion, perhaps something like Protestantism and Catholicism and Orthodoxy are now.
There are historical relics such as the coronation garb of Christian kings with verses from the Koran in Arabic embroidered on them, and the weapons of Islamic kings with Christian crosses on them. There's also quite a Christian background to Mohammad himself.
See the work of Sylvie Ivanowa.
Show this to liberal friends to see if their brains short-circuit. They won't know which brown people to love and which ones to hate, or which terror attacks were actually mostly peaceful terror for social justice and equity.
I'm certain the United States will help as soon as they can engineer a mechanism to rake off $98 of every $100 in "assistance".
Ah, the good old "lol", the go-to for creative bankrupt midwits and low-effort shills. The rest of the message contained no question--nor much grammar--and is a good measure of midwittery that you now highlight it yourself.
You should be flattered I wasted this much time on your ego. Alas, the ridicule is now at an end.
But as "the smartest person in the room" always needs to prove it by having the last word, let me now trigger (in the fashion of an NPC) the "smartest person in the room" so we can all hear those invaluable final thoughts the Internet can hardly do without....
you really must like Musk huh?
Oh, was this was your vital point which I did not address? Are you interested in dating him? I've never even met him, so go ahead.
And if you get upset with the sarcasm, ask a worthy question and you'll get a worthy answer. I don't care to spend time dealing with the egos who just cannot stand not being "the smartest person in the room". You can even learn to ignore things you don't like.
27 March 2020
I guess we must differ on our definition of "current events". You are reading all the way through my posts, not just stuck in your own mind wrapping your thoughts ever tighter together, right?
I may be asking way too much. My bad!
When the news hit, there were an extreme number of posts on r/conspiracy pushing the vaxx/"died suddenly" thesis. I mean, it was really striking.
Let's be honest, Perry didn't do much after "Friends", and given the average age on Reddit, what fraction of them actually watched the show? I did, and I thought, "That's too bad," for about 3 seconds.
So I suggest there was a social media push towards conspiracists--who would be the only ones to question his death--along the lines of: "Nothing to see here but the vaxx killing another celebrity. Move along, move along."
You have to admit "They" are upping their game a bit with this kind of thing.